Bibla

 

Sáng thế 41

Studimi

   

1 Cách hai năm sau, Pha-ra-ôn nằm chiêm bao thấy mình đứng bên bờ sông.

2 Nầy đâu dưới sông đi lên bảy con mập và tốt, ăn cỏ trong bung.

3 ồi nầy, bảy con khác, xấu dạng, gầy guộc, ở dưới sông đi theo lên sau, đến đứng gần các con trước trên bờ sông.

4 Bảy con xấu dạng, gầy guộc nuốt Bảy con mập tốt. Pha-ra-ôn bèn thức giấc.

5 Vua nằm ngủ lại, chiêm bao lần thứ nhì, thấy bảy gié lúa chắc, tốt tươi, mọc chung trên một cộng rạ.

6 Kế đó, bảy gié lúa khác lép và bị gió đông thổi háp, mọc theo bảy gié lúa kia.

7 Bảy gié lúa lép nuốt Bảy gié lúa chắc. Pha-ra-ôn bèn thức giấc; và nầy, thành ra một điềm chiêm bao.

8 Sáng mai, tâm thần người bất định, truyền đòi các pháp-sư và các tay bác sĩ xứ Ê-díp-tô đến, thuật lại điềm chiêm bao mình cho họ nghe; nhưng chẳng có ai bàn được điềm chiêm bao đó cho vua hết.

9 Quan tửu chánh bèn tâu cùng Pha-ra-ôn rằng: Bây giờ, tôi nhớ đến lỗi của tôi.

10 Ngày trước, bệ hạ nổi giận cùng quần thần, có cầm ngục quan thượng thiện và tôi nơi dinh quan thị vệ.

11 Trong lúc đó, cùng một đêm kia, chúng tôi có thấy điềm chiêm bao, chiêm bao mỗi người đều có ý nghĩa riêng rõ ràng.

12 Tại đó, cùng chung ngục, có một người Hê-bơ-rơ, còn trẻ, kẻ gia-đinh của quan thị vệ; chúng tôi thuật lại cho chàng nghe điềm chiêm bao của mình; chàng bàn rõ ra cho ai mỗi chiêm bao nấy.

13 ồi ra, công việc xảy đến y như lời chàng bàn: bệ hạ phục chức tôi lại, và xử treo quan kia.

14 Pha-ra-ôn bèn sai đi đòi Giô-sép; họ lập tức tha người ra khỏi ngục, cạo mặt mày cho, biểu thay đổi áo xống, rồi vào chầu Pha-ra-ôn.

15 Pha-ra-ôn phán cùng Giô-sép rằng: Trẫm có thấy một điềm chiêm bao mà chẳng ai bàn ra. Vậy, trẫm nghe rằng khi người ta thuật điềm chiêm bao lại cho, thì ngươi bàn được.

16 Giô-sép tâu rằng: Ðó chẳng phải tôi, nhưng ấy là Ðức Chúa Trời đem sự bình an đáp cho bệ hạ vậy.

17 Pha-ra-ôn phán rằng: Nầy, trong điềm chiêm bao trẫm đương đứng bên bờ sông.

18 Nầy đâu bảy con mập và tốt dưới sông đi lên, đến ăn cỏ trong bưng.

19 ồi bảy con khác xấu dạng gầy guộc đi theo lên sau; thật trẫm chẳng thấy trong xứ Ê-díp-tô nầy có xấu dạng như vậy bao giờ.

20 Bảy con xấu dạng gầy guộc đó nuốt Bảy con mập tốt trước kia,

21 nuốt vào bụng, mà dường như không có nuốt, vì các con bò đó vẫn xấu dạng như xưa.

22 Trẫm bèn thức giấc; rồi lại thấy điềm chiêm bao khác, là bảy gié lúa chắc tốt tươi mọc chung trên một cộng rạ.

23 Kế đó, bảy gié lúa khác, khô, lép, bị gió đông thổi háp, mọc theo bảy gié lúa kia;

24 bảy gié lúa lép đó lại nuốt bảy gié lúa chắc. Trẫm đã thuật điềm chiêm bao nầy cho các pháp-sư, nhưng không ai giải nghĩa ra được.

25 Giô-sép tâu cùng Pha-ra-ôn rằng: Hai điềm chiêm bao của bệ hạ thấy đó đồng một nghĩa mà thôi; Ðức Chúa Trời mách cho bệ hạ biết trước những việc Ngài sẽ làm.

26 Bảy con mập tốt đó, tức là Bảy năm; Bảy gié lúa chắc đó cũng là Bảy năm. Ấy chỉ đồng một điềm chiêm bao vậy.

27 Bảy con xấu dạng gầy guộc lên theo sau Bảy con kia, tức là Bảy năm; và Bảy gié lúa lép bị gió đông thổi háp đó, tức là Bảy năm đói kém.

28 Ấy là điều tôi đã tâu cùng bệ hạ rồi: Ðức Chúa Trời có cho bệ hạ thấy những việc Ngài sẽ làm.

29 Nầy, trong khắp xứ Ê-díp-tô sẽ có bảy năm được mùa dư dật.

30 Nhưng bảy năm đó lại liền tiếp bảy năm đói kém; dân bổn xứ đều sẽ quên sự dư dật đó, và ách đói kém sẽ làm cho toàn xứ hao mòn.

31 Và vì sự đói kém liên tiếp nầy lớn quá, nên thiên hạ chẳng còn thấy chi về sự dư dật đó nữa.

32 Nếu điềm chiêm bao đến hai lần cho bệ hạ, ấy bởi Ðức Chúa Trời đã quyết định điều đó rồi, và Ngài mau mau lo làm cho thành vậy.

33 Bây giờ bệ hạ khá chọn một người thông minh trí-huệ, lập người lên làm đầu trong xứ Ê-díp-tô,

34 cùng lập các ủy viên trong xứ, để góp một phần năm của số thâu vào trong bảy năm được mùa dư dật đó.

35 Họ hãy thâu góp hết thảy mùa màng trong bảy năm được mùa dư dật sẽ đến sau nầy, cùng thâu thập lúa mì sẵn dành cho Pha-ra-ôn, dùng làm lương để dành trong các thành, và họ hãy giữ gìn lấy.

36 Các lương thực nầy phải để dành cho bảy năm đói kém sẽ đến trong xứ Ê-díp-tô, hầu cho xứ nầy khỏi bị diệt bởi sự đói kém đó.

37 Các lời nầy đẹp ý Pha-ra-ôn và quần thần.

38 Pha-ra-ôn phán cùng quần thần rằng: Chúng ta há dễ tìm một người như người nầy, có thần minh của Ðức Chúa Trời được sao?

39 Pha-ra-ôn phán cùng Giô-sép rằng: Vì Ðức Chúa Trời xui cho ngươi biết mọi việc nầy, thì chẳng còn ai được thông minh trí-huệ như ngươi nữa.

40 Vậy, ngươi sẽ lên cai trị nhà trẫm; hết thảy dân sự của trẫm đều sẽ vâng lời ngươi. Trẫm lớn hơn ngươi chỉ vì ngự ngôi vua mà thôi.

41 Pha-ra-ôn lại phán cùng Giô-sép rằng: Hãy xem! trẫm lập ngươi cầm quyền trên cả xứ Ê-díp-tô.

42 Vua liền cổi chiếc nhẫn trong tay mình, đeo vào tay Giô-sép, truyền mặc áo vải gai mịn, và đeo vòng vàng vào cổ người;

43 rồi, truyền cho lên ngồi sau xe vua, có người đi trước hô rằng: Hãy quì xuống! Ấy, Giô-sép được lập lên cầm quyền cả xứ Ê-díp-tô là vậy.

44 Pha-ra-ôn phán cùng Giô-sép: Ta là Pha-ra-ôn, nhưng nếu chẳng có ngươi, thì trong cả xứ Ê-díp-tô không có ai giơ tay đưa chơn lên được.

45 Pha-ra-ôn đặt tên Giô-sép là Xa-phơ-nát-Pha-nê-ách, đưa nàng Ách-nát, con gái Phô-ti-phê-ra, thầy cả thành Ôn, cho người làm vợ. Người thường tuần hành trong xứ Ê-díp-tô.

46 Vả, khi Giô-sép ra mắt Pha-ra-ôn, vua Ê-díp-tô, thì người đã ba mươi tuổi. Vậy, người từ tạ Pha-ra-ôn mà đi tuần khắp xứ Ê-díp-tô.

47 Trong bảy năm được mùa dư dật, đất sanh sản ra đầy dẫy.

48 Giô-sép bèn thâu góp hết thảy lương thực của bảy năm đó trong xứ Ê-díp-tô, và chứa lương thực nầy khắp các thành; trong mỗi thành, đều dành chứa hoa lợi của các ruộng ở chung quanh thành đó.

49 Vậy, Giô-sép thâu góp lúa mì rất nhiều, như cát nơi bờ biển, cho đến đỗi người ta đếm không được, vì đầy dẫy vô số.

50 Trước khi đến năm đói kém, thì Ách-nát, con gái Phô-ti-phê-ra, thầy cả thành Ôn, sanh cho Giô-sép hai con trai.

51 Giô-sép đặt tên đứa đầu lòng là Ma-na-se, vì nói rằng: Ðức Chúa Trời đã làm cho ta quên điều cực nhọc, và cả nhà cha ta.

52 Người đặt tên đứa thứ nhì là Ép-ra-im, vì nói rằng: Ðức Chúa Trời làm cho ta được hưng vượng trong xứ mà ta bị khốn khổ.

53 Bảy năm được mùa dư dật trong xứ Ê-díp-tô bèn qua,

54 thì bảy năm đói kém khởi đến, y như lời Giô-sép đã bàn trước. Khắp các xứ khác cũng đều bị đói, nhưng trong cả xứ Ê-díp-tô lại có bánh.

55 Ðoạn, cả xứ Ê-díp-tô đều bị đói, dân chúng đến kêu cầu Pha-ra-ôn xin lương. Pha-ra-ôn phán cùng bổn dân rằng: Hãy đi đến Giô-sép, rồi làm theo lời người sẽ chỉ bảo cho.

56 Khi khắp xứ bị đói kém, thì Giô-sép mở mọi kho lúa mà bán cho dân Ê-díp-tô.

57 Xứ càng đói nhiều nữa; vả, vì khắp thế gian đều bị đói quá, nên đâu đâu cũng đổ đến Ê-díp-tô mùa lúa nơi Giô-sép bán.

   

Nga veprat e Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #5351

Studioni këtë pasazh

  
/ 10837  
  

5351. 'And Joseph called the name of the firstborn Manasseh' means a new area of will within the natural, and the essential nature of it. This is clear from the representation of 'Manasseh' in the Word as spiritual good within the natural, and so a new area of will there, dealt with below. This name also implies the essential nature of that good or new area of will. The fact that the name implies the essential nature of this may be recognized from the names given to other people. An explanation of the essential nature accompanies each name, like that given for Manasseh in the following words, For God has made me forget all my labour and all my father's house. These words describe the essential nature of what is meant by 'Manasseh'. What is more, when the phrase 'he called the name' is used, the meaning is that the actual name too contains that essential nature, since 'name' and 'calling the name' mean the essential nature, 144, 145, 1754, 1896, 2009, 2724, 3006, 3421.

[2] The reason why the firstborn who was given the name Manasseh means spiritual good within the natural, or a new area of will there, is that good is in actual fact the firstborn in the Church. That is, with someone who is in the process of becoming a Church, truth is not the firstborn, though it appears to be so, see 352, 367, 2435, 3325, 3494, 4925, 4926, 4928, 4930. The same may also be recognized from the consideration that a person's will takes precedence over his understanding; for the desires in a person's will are the primary constituents of his life, while the ideas in his understanding are secondary to them; and he acts in accordance with the desires of his will. What goes forth from the will is called good in the case of those who through regeneration have received from the Lord a new will; but it is called evil in the case of those who have had no wish to receive such. What goes forth from the understanding however is called truth in the case of the regenerate but falsity in the case of the unregenerate. But because no knowledge of a person's will is possible except through his understanding - for the understanding is the outward form that the will possesses or the outward form taken by the will which enables it to be known - people therefore imagine that truth which goes forth from the understanding is the firstborn. But this is nothing else than the appearance, for the reason that has been stated.

[3] This explains the controversy that existed in former times over whether the truth which is the essence of faith was the firstborn of the Church or whether good which is the essence of charity was such. Those who based their conclusions on the appearance said that truth was the firstborn, whereas those who did not base theirs on the appearance acknowledged that good was. This also explains why at the present day people make faith the primary and absolutely essential constituent of the Church, but charity the secondary and non-essential element. But by supposing that faith alone is what saves a person they have sunk into far deeper error than the ancients. (In the Church faith is used to mean all the truth of doctrine, while charity is used to mean all the good of life.) They do, it is true, call charity and the works of charity the fruits of faith. Yet does anyone believe that those fruits make any contribution to salvation when the belief exists that someone can be saved by faith in the final hour of his life, no matter what kind of life he led before then? More than this, does anyone believe that those fruits contribute in any way to salvation when people use doctrine to set faith apart from works that are the product of charity, saying that faith alone saves without good works, or that works which are matters of life contribute nothing to salvation? Dear, dear! What kind of faith is that, and what kind of Church is it when people cherish faith that is dead and reject faith that is living? For faith without charity is like a body without a soul. But a body without a soul is removed from sight and put away because it stinks, as everyone knows; and in the next life faith without charity is just like this. All who possessed faith so-called which was devoid of charity are in hell; but all who had charity are in heaven. For everyone's life remains with him, whereas doctrine does so only insofar as it draws on that life.

[4] It is less easy to show from other places in the Word that 'Manasseh' means a new area of will within the natural - or what amounts to the same, spiritual good there - than it is to show that 'Ephraim' means a new area of understanding within the natural, or spiritual truth there. Even so, inferences can be drawn regarding the meaning of 'Manasseh' from what is said about 'Ephraim', because in the Word when two are mentioned together in the way these are, one means good, the other truth. Therefore Manasseh's meaning - spiritual good within the natural, which is the essence of the new will there - will be seen in what follows shortly where Ephraim is the subject.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Nga veprat e Swedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #3325

Studioni këtë pasazh

  
/ 10837  
  

3325. 'Sell me - as if today - your birthright' means that in the short term the doctrine of truth was apparently prior. This is clear from the meaning of 'selling' as claiming for oneself; from the meaning of 'as if today' as in the short term (for in the internal sense of the Word 'today' means that which is perpetual and eternal, 2838. But to avoid its meaning perpetual and eternal the expression 'as if today' is used, the expression as if indicating that it was so apparently); and from the meaning of 'birthright' as the fact that it - that is to say, the doctrine of truth, which Jacob represents, 3305 - is prior.

[2] By the expressions prior and priority of place, describing the birthright, are meant not only first in time but also first in degree; that is to say, it is a question of which one is to have dominion, good or truth? For until it has been joined to good truth is always prior; or what amounts to the same, until they have been regenerated, people governed by truth believe that truth is prior to and higher than good. That is how it appears at that time; but once truth with them has been joined to good, that is, once they have been regenerated, they see and perceive that truth is posterior and lower than good, and with them good has dominion over truth. This is what is meant by that which Isaac his father told Esau,

Behold, of the fatness of the earth will be your dwelling, and of the dew of heaven from above. And by your sword you will live, and you will serve your brother; and it will be, when you have dominion, that you will break his yoke from above your neck Genesis 27:39-40.

[3] But because within the Church those who are not being regenerated outnumber those who are, and those who are not base their judgements on what is the appearance, it has therefore been disputed, even from ancient times, whether priority of place belongs to truth or to good. With those who have not been regenerated and also with those who are not completely regenerate the opinion prevails that truth is prior, for they have not yet acquired a perception of good; and as long as anybody is without a perception of good he is in the dark or ignorant regarding these matters. But because those who have been regenerated are governed by good itself, they are able to discern from resulting intelligence and wisdom what good is, and that good comes from the Lord and flows in by way of the internal man into the external, doing so constantly without the person being aware of it. They are able to perceive that it joins itself to the truths of doctrine that are in the memory, and that as a consequence good in itself is prior even though it has not appeared so beforehand. This then is why the dispute arose about which one was prior and higher than the other, a dispute which was represented by Esau and Jacob, as well as by Perez and Zerah, Judah's sons by Tamar, Genesis 38:28-30, and also after that by Joseph's sons, Ephraim and Manasseh, Genesis 48:13-14, 17-20. The dispute arises because the spiritual Church is such that it has to be led to good by means of truth, and while being led to good it does not have the perception of good except insofar as this, quantitatively and qualitatively, lies concealed within the affection for truth. At that time it is indistinguishable from the delight of self-love and of love of the world which exists at the same time within that affection and is believed to be good.

[4] Good however is the firstborn, that is, good flowing from love to the Lord and from love towards the neighbour, for no other good is good except that which flows from these. This becomes clear from the fact that life is present within good but not within truth except the life received from good, and from the fact that good flows into truths and gives them life, as may be seen clearly from what has been stated and shown already in 3324 about good and truth. For this reason all in whom love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour are present are called 'the firstborn'. They were also represented in the Jewish Church by firstborn creatures - that is, when these are understood in the relative sense; for the Lord is the Firstborn, and those people are likenesses and images of Him.

[5] The Lord as regards His Divine Human is the Firstborn. This is clear in David,

He will cry to Me, You are My Father, My God, and the Rock of My Salvation; I will also make Him the Firstborn, supreme over the kings of the earth. My mercy I will keep for Him for ever, and My covenant will stand firm for Him, and I will establish His seed for ever, and His throne as the days of the heavens. Psalms 89:26-29.

This refers to the Lord. And in John,

From Jesus Christ the faithful witness, the Firstborn from mortal men, and Prince of the kings of the earth. Revelation 1:5.

And to fulfil those things that had been written regarding Him and that represented Him He was also the Firstborn Son, Luke 2:7, 22-23.

[6] The Lord also calls 'the firstborn' those in whom love to Him and charity towards the neighbour are present because they are likenesses and images of Him This is clear in John,

The hundred and forty-four thousand purchased from the earth - these are the ones who were not defiled with women, for they are virgins; these are the ones who follow the Lamb wherever He goes; these have been purchased from men as firstfruits (the firstborn) to God and the Lamb, and in their mouth no lie was found, for they are spotless before God's throne. Revelation 14:3-5.

'A hundred and forty-four', or twelve times twelve, stands for those who have the faith that is grounded in charity, 3272, 'thousands' for countless numbers or for them all, 2575, 'virgins' for the good that flows from love to the Lord and from charity towards the neighbour, 2362, 3081, and so for those with whom innocence is present, which is also the meaning of 'following the Lamb' since the Lord by virtue of His innocence is called 'the Lamb'. This is why they are called the firstfruits or the firstborn.

[7] From these quotations it is evident that the Lord as regards the Divine Human was represented in the Jewish Church by firstborn beings, as also are those with whom love to Him is present, for they abide in the Lord. But the firstborn beings mentioned in the Word have a dual representation. They represent the Lord as regards Divine celestial love and as regards Divine spiritual love. The Lord's Divine celestial love is specific to the celestial Church, or to those belonging to that Church, who are called celestial on account of their love to the Lord. The Lord's Divine spiritual love is specific to the spiritual Church, or to those belonging to that Church, who are referred to as spiritual on account of their love to the neighbour. The Lord's Divine love goes out to all, but because people receive it variously - the celestial person in one way, the spiritual in another - it is said to be specific.

[8] Concerning the firstborn beings which represented the Lord as regards Divine celestial love, and also the people who belonged specifically to the celestial Church, the following is said in Moses,

The firstborn of your sons you shall give to Me. You shall do the same with your oxen and your flock. Seven days it shall be with its mother; on the eighth you shall give it to Me. And you shall be men who are sanctified to Me. Exodus 22:29-31.

The reason why it was to stay seven days with its mother was that the seventh day meant the celestial man, 84-87, and that seven consequently means that which is holy, 395, 433, 716, 881. The reason why on the eighth day they were to be given to Jehovah was that the eighth day meant the continuation from a new beginning, that is to say, the continuation of love, 2044. In the same author,

The firstborn among beasts, which is given as the firstborn to Jehovah, no man shall consecrate it; whether an ox or of the herd, it is Jehovah's. Leviticus 27:26, 27.

In the same author,

The firstfruits of all that is in the land, which they bring to Jehovah, shall be yours (Aaron's); every clean person in your house shall eat them. All that opens the womb among all flesh which they offer to Jehovah, man and beast, shall be yours. Nevertheless you shall redeem the firstborn of man, and the firstborn of unclean beasts you shall redeem. The firstborn of an ox, or the firstborn of a sheep, or the firstborn of a goat you shall not redeem; they are holy. Their blood you shall sprinkle over the altar and burn their fat as a fire-offering for an odour of rest to Jehovah. Numbers 18:13, 15-18.

In the same author,

Every firstborn male that is born among your herds and among your flocks you shall sanctify to Jehovah your God; you shall do no work by means of the firstborn of your oxen, and you shall not shear the firstborn of your flock. And if there is a blemish in it, lameness or blindness, any ill blemish whatever, you shall not sacrifice it to Jehovah your God. Deuteronomy 15:19-22.

[9] Because 'the firstborn [among beasts]' represented the Lord and those who are the Lord's by virtue of love to Him, the tribe of Levi was therefore taken instead of all the firstborn, the reason for this being that Levi represented the Lord as regards His love. Also, Levi means love, for Levi is a name that means to cling to and to be joined together - and 'to cling to' and 'to be joined together' in the internal sense is love. This will in the Lord's Divine mercy be dealt with later on, at Genesis 29:34. Regarding the Levites the following is said in Moses,

Jehovah spoke to Moses. saying, Behold, I Myself will take the Levites from the midst of the children of Israel, instead of every firstborn, that which opens the womb, from the children of Israel; and the Levites will be Mine. For every firstborn is Mine; on the day I struck every firstborn in the land of Egypt I sanctified every firstborn for Myself in Israel; from man even to beast they shall be Mine. Numbers 3:11-13.

In the same author,

Jehovah said to Moses, Number every firstborn male from the children of Israel, a month old and over, and take the number of their names. And take the Levites for Me - I am Jehovah - instead of every firstborn among the children of Israel, and the beast of the Levites instead of every firstborn among the beasts of the children of Israel. Numbers 3:40-41, and following verses.

Also Numbers 8:14, 16-18. And the Levites were given to Aaron, Numbers 8:19, because Aaron represented the Lord as regards the priesthood, that is, as regards Divine love; for the priesthood represented the Lord's Divine love, see 1728, 2015 (end).

[10] Concerning the firstborn creatures however which represented the Lord as regards Divine spiritual love, and also the people who belonged specifically to the spiritual Church, the following is said in Jeremiah,

With weeping they will come, and with supplications I will lead them, I will bring them to springs of water in a straight path on which they will not stumble; and I will be a Father to Israel, and Ephraim will be My firstborn. Jeremiah 31:9.

This refers to a new spiritual Church. 'Israel' stands for spiritual good, 'Ephraim' for spiritual truth, who is called 'the firstborn' because the subject is a Church that is to be established in which the understanding - which is the holder of truth - is apparently the firstborn. Indeed Ephraim took Reuben's place and became the firstborn, Genesis 48:5, 20; 1 Chronicles 5:1. He did so because Joseph, whose sons were Ephraim and Manasseh, represented the Lord as regards Divine spiritual love. But fundamentally Israel, that is, spiritual good, is the firstborn. This is clear in Moses,

Jehovah said to Moses, You shall say to Pharaoh, Thus said Jehovah, My firstborn son is Israel, and I say to you, Send My son so that he may serve Me, and you have refused to send him; behold, I kill your son, the firstborn. Exodus 4:22-23.

Here 'Israel' in the highest sense is the Lord as regards Divine spiritual love, and in the relative sense those in whom spiritual love, that is, charity towards the neighbour, is present.

[11] In the case of the spiritual Church, in the beginning or when it is about to be established, it is the doctrine of truth that is the firstborn with the external Church and the truth taught by doctrine the firstborn with the internal Church - or what amounts to the same, the doctrine of faith is the firstborn with the external Church and faith itself with the internal Church. But once it has been set up, or is a reality among its members, it is the good flowing from charity that is the firstborn with the external Church and charity itself with the internal Church. When however the Church does not allow itself to be established, as happens when it is no longer possible for the member of the Church to be regenerated, it gradually retreats from charity and turns aside to faith. Furthermore it no longer concerns itself with life but with doctrine; and when that happens it casts itself into shadows and sinks into falsities and evils. In so doing it ceases to be a Church and brings about its own annihilation. This was represented by Cain, in that he slew Abel his brother - Cain meaning faith separated from charity, and Abel the charity which he annihilated, see 340, 342, 357, 362, and following paragraphs. Later on it was represented by Ham - and Canaan his son - in that he mocked Noah his father, 1062, 1063, 1076, 1140, 1141, 1162, 1179. After that it was represented by Reuben, Jacob's firstborn, in that he defiled his father's bed, Genesis 35:22, and at length by Pharaoh and the Egyptians, in that these afflicted the children of Israel. It is clear from the Word that all these were accursed, as the following shows:

Cain

Jehovah said, What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood is crying out to Me from the ground. And now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood from your hand. Genesis 4:10-11.

Ham and Canaan

Ham, the father of Canaan, saw his father's nakedness and pointed it out to his two brothers. And Noah awoke from his wine. He said, Cursed be Canaan, a slave of slaves will he be to his brothers. Genesis 9:22, 24-25.

Reuben

Reuben, my firstborn, you are my strength, and the beginning of my power, excelling in eminence, and excelling in might. Unstable as water, may you not excel, for you went up to your father's bed; then you defiled it. He went up to my couch. Genesis 49:3-4.

This was why he was deprived of the birthright, 1 Chronicles 5:1. The same was represented by Pharaoh and the Egyptians, and therefore their firstborn sons and firstborn creatures were slain. This is clear from their representation as facts, 1164, 1165, 1186, for whenever anyone enters into the arcana of faith along the path of factual knowledge, he no longer believes anything, apart from that which he is able to grasp through sensory evidence and factual knowledge. In that case things which belong to the doctrine of faith, and above all those which are matters of charity, he perverts and annihilates.

[12] These are the considerations which are represented in the internal sense by the slaying of the firstborn sons and firstborn creatures of Egypt, referred to in Moses as follows,

I will pass through the land of Egypt during that night, and will strike all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from man even to beast; and on all the gods of Egypt I will execute judgement; I am Jehovah. And the blood will be a sign on your houses where you are; and when I see the blood I will pass by over you, and the plague will not be on you for a destroyer when I strike the land of Egypt. Exodus 12:12-13.

'The firstborn of Egypt' is doctrinal teaching regarding faith and regarding charity, which is perverted, as has been stated, by means of facts. 'The gods of Egypt' on whom judgement would be executed are falsities. No plague would be brought by the destroyer where there was blood on houses means in the highest sense the place where the Lord as regards Divine spiritual love resides, and in the relative sense where spiritual love, that is, charity towards the neighbour, resides, see 1001.

[13] Further reference to Pharaoh and the Egyptians is made in the same book as follows,

Moses said, Thus said Jehovah, As at midnight I will go out into the midst of Egypt, and all the firstborn in the land of Egypt will die, and Pharaoh's firstborn who was to sit on his throne, even to the firstborn of the servant-girl who is behind the mill, and all the firstborn of the beasts. But on all the children of Israel not a dog will move its tongue, from man even to beast. Exodus 11:4-7.

And after that,

It happened at midnight, that Jehovah struck all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from Pharaoh's firstborn who was to sit on his throne even to the firstborn of the prisoner who was in the dungeon, 1 and all the firstborn of the beasts. Exodus 12:29.

The reason why it took place at midnight was that 'night' means the final state of the Church when there is no faith any longer because there is no charity any longer, 221, 709, 1712, 2353. In David,

He struck all the firstborn in Egypt, the beginning of powers in the tents of Ham. Psalms 78:51.

In the same author,

Then Israel came to Egypt, and Jacob became a sojourner in the land of Ham. God struck all the firstborn in their land, the beginning of all their powers. Psalms 105:23, 36.

'The tents of Ham' is the name given to the worship of the Egyptians, which is based on false assumptions that result from truth separated from good, or what amounts to the same, from faith separated from charity - 'tents' meaning worship, see 414, 1102, 1566, 2145, 2152, 3312, and 'Ham' faith separated from charity, 1062, 1063, 1076, 1140, 1141, 1162, 1179.

[14] This confirms yet again that 'the slaying of the firstborn of Egypt' had no other meaning. Now because all the firstborn of Egypt had been slain, and yet so that the firstborn might represent the Lord as regards Divine spiritual love and at the same time represent those who are governed by that love, [the Israelites] were commanded to sanctify all the firstborn the instant they were leaving. These matters are stated in Moses as follows,

Jehovah spoke to Moses, saying, Sanctify to Me all the firstborn, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel; with man and with beast let them be Mine. You shall make over to Jehovah all that opens the womb, and every firstling of a beast, that are yours; the males shall be Jehovah's. And every firstling of an ass you shall redeem in the herd. If you do not redeem it, you shall break its neck. And all the firstborn of man among your sons you shall redeem. And it shall be - when your son asks you in time to come, saying, What is this? - that you shall say to him, By a strong hand Jehovah led us out of Egypt, from the home of slaves. And so it was, that Pharaoh hardened himself against sending us away, and Jehovah slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, from the firstborn of man even to the firstborn of the beasts. Therefore I sacrifice to Jehovah all that open the womb, the males, and all the firstborn of my sons I redeem. Exodus 13:1-2, 12-15; 34:19-20; Numbers 33:3-4.

From all these quotations one may now see what is meant in the spiritual sense by the birthright.

Fusnotat:

1. literally, in the house of the pit

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.