From Swedenborg's Works

 

Secrets of Heaven #4

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4. The Word's literal meaning alone, when it monopolizes our thinking, can never provide a view of the inner contents. Take for example this first chapter of Genesis. The literal meaning by itself offers no clue that it is speaking of anything but the world's creation, the Garden of Eden (paradise), and Adam, the first human ever created. 1 Who supposes anything else?

The wisdom hidden in these details (and never before revealed) will be clear enough from what follows. The inner sense of the first chapter of Genesis deals in general with the process that creates us anew — that is to say, with regeneration — and in particular with the very earliest church; 2 and it does so in such a way that not even the smallest syllable fails to represent, symbolize, and incorporate this meaning. 3

Footnotes:

1. The creation story is one area in which Secrets of Heaven differs radically from most earlier allegorical interpretations of Scripture (see note 1 in §606). The latter assume that the opening of Genesis does indeed attempt to explain the creation of the world and humankind (see, for example, Philo 1993, 3-5; Matt 2004, 107 and following). Swedenborg, by contrast, asserts that this passage is not dealing with actual cosmogenesis, but with the spiritual life of an individual human being. [RS]

2. Swedenborg uses the term ecclesia, or "church," in a number of ways. Here, as often, it does not denote a group of Christians but instead refers to one of five major phases Swedenborg assigns to the world's religious history. In general Swedenborg calls the first phase the earliest church, the second the ancient church, the third the Jewish church (up to the time of Christ), the fourth the Christian church, and the fifth a new church. In the early volumes of the present work, though, he often adds another, called the Hebrew church, between the ancient and Jewish churches. [LHC]

3. "Represent" (Latin repraesentare) and "symbolize" (significare) are heavily used terms in Swedenborg's theology. The two have related but distinguishable meanings. Both indicate the presence of an inner meaning in an object, person, name, or action, but symbolism directs our attention to the meaning itself (especially as communicated by words), whereas representation generally directs our attention to the living enactment of that meaning (especially by persons). One result, as described in §§665 and 1361, is that a person who represents something good does not actually have to be good; an evil monarch, to use Swedenborg's own example, can represent the Lord's power. In §920, in the first volume of the first edition, Swedenborg makes clear that these distinctions parallel certain of the divisions in the world's religious history he calls churches (see note 2 in §4). Members of the earliest church, he says, had the ability to perceive the inner meaning without effort; their perceptiveness was replaced in the ancient church by the codified knowledge of symbolism. In §1361:3, also in the first volume, he adds that when the church with an intuitive gift for symbolism came to an end, representation took the place of symbolism. However, by the third volume (that is, starting at §2760), Swedenborg becomes fairly consistent in assigning representative meaning to the individuals who appear in a story and symbolic meaning to everything else. A typical example occurs in §3131, which expounds a phrase in Genesis 24:29, "And Laban ran to the man outside at the spring." Swedenborg describes this as symbolizing the predisposition that goodness has toward truth; running symbolizes predisposition, and a man symbolizes truth, as does a spring, but Laban represents a desire for what is good. These distinctions apply only where Swedenborg is using the word symbolize in a technical sense. Often he uses it much more broadly. For more on these distinctions in inner meaning in relation to various modes of biblical discursion, see §66. For a very brief overview of the history of biblical interpretation as it relates to Swedenborg's views, see Smoley 2005, 27, and the references given there. [LHC, GHO]

  
/ 10837  
  

Many thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation and its New Century Edition team.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Secrets of Heaven #665

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

665. The meaning of setting up a pact as the fact that they would be reborn can be seen clearly from this: No pact can mediate between the Lord and humanity except that of being united by love and faith. So a pact symbolizes union. This kind of union is the heavenly marriage, which is the truest compact. The heavenly marriage, or union, can exist only in those who are reborn, and accordingly a pact in the broadest sense symbolizes rebirth itself. The Lord enters into a compact with us when he regenerates us, and for this reason the ancients saw a pact as representing nothing but regeneration.

The literal meaning gives no clue that the covenant made with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob and so often renewed with their descendants had to do with any others than those actual people. But they were people incapable of rebirth, since they equated worship with outward observances alone. They also saw holiness in external elements without considering any connection to internal values. So the pacts struck with them could do no more than represent regeneration.

None of their rituals did more than this. Neither did Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob themselves, who represented different aspects of love and faith. These men were like the priests and high priests, who were able to represent a heavenly and very holy priesthood no matter what their character was — even those who were criminal. When people serve to represent something, no thought is given to their personality, only to the quality represented. By the same token, all the monarchs of Israel and Judah — even the worst ones — represented the Lord's royal power. In fact the pharaoh who raised Joseph up over the land of Egypt also represented that power.

This consideration and many others (to be mentioned later, by the Lord's divine mercy) show that the numerous covenants with the children of Jacob were nothing more than rituals that held a representative meaning. 1

Footnotes:

1. For passages that may be the fulfillment of Swedenborg's promise of further discussion of the "other considerations" indicating that covenants with the children of Jacob were representative, see §1864 (which says that the covenants represent the Lord's union with Jehovah the Father) and §§2039-2042, 6804:11 (which say that circumcision, as an affirmation of a covenant, represents purification). See also §2842, where covenants sworn by God are described as accommodation to those who do not accept divine truth without such an external representation. [LSW]

  
/ 10837  
  

Many thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation and its New Century Edition team.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Secrets of Heaven #2039

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

2039. That every male be circumcised symbolizes purity. This can be seen from the representation and so the symbolism of circumcision on an inner level. Circumcision, or cutting off the foreskin, symbolized nothing else than removing and banishing the things that block and defile heavenly love. These impediments and pollutants are the evils we crave (especially those that our love for ourselves craves) and the distortions they give rise to. The reason for this symbolism is that the genitals of both sexes represent heavenly love.

There are three categories of love that make up the heavenly aspects of the Lord's kingdom: marriage love, love for children, and fellowship (mutual love). Marriage love is the highest love of all, because it includes the most useful possible goal: propagation of the human race and so of the Lord's kingdom, for which it provides the breeding ground. Love for children is next, because it develops out of marriage love. Then comes fellowship, or mutual love. Anything that cloaks, hampers, or contaminates these three types of love is symbolized by the foreskin, and that is why its removal, or circumcision, came to have a representative meaning. The more the evils we crave are removed, along with the distortions they lead to, the more pure we grow and the more manifest heavenly love becomes in us.

Sections 760, 1307, 1308, 1321, 1594, 2045, 2057 describe and illustrate how utterly opposed to heavenly love and how unclean self-love is.

These considerations make it quite clear that circumcision on an inner level symbolizes purity.

[2] The status of circumcision as a mere sign of the pact (or of union) is clear from the fact that circumcision of the foreskin is completely worthless without circumcision of the heart. Circumcision of the heart–purification from those unclean passions–is what it symbolizes. The following passages in the Word make this very clear. In Moses:

Jehovah God will circumcise your heart and the heart of your seed, [to cause you] to love Jehovah your God with all your heart and with all your soul, so that you will live. (Deuteronomy 30:6)

These words prove that circumcising the heart means being purified of vile passions so that we can love Jehovah God, or the Lord, with all our heart and with all our soul.

[3] In Jeremiah:

Till untilled ground for yourselves, and do not sow among thorns. Circumcise yourselves to Jehovah and remove the foreskin of your heart, man of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem! (Jeremiah 4:3, 4)

Again, circumcising themselves to Jehovah and removing the foreskins of their heart actually means removing the kinds of things that block heavenly love. This passage too proves that circumcising the heart is what circumcising the foreskin means inwardly. In Moses:

You shall circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and your neck you shall no longer harden. [Jehovah] is passing judgment in favor of the orphan and widow and loves the immigrant, to give the immigrant bread and clothing. (Deuteronomy 10:16, 18)

Here too it is quite plain that circumcising the foreskin of the heart is being purified from the evil of unclean passions and from the false thinking they lead to. Heavenly deeds of love are depicted as acts of charity–passing judgment in favor of the orphan and widow, and loving immigrants, to give them bread and clothing.

[4] In Jeremiah:

Watch! The days are coming when I will inflict punishment on everyone circumcised in the foreskin"on Egypt and on Judah and on Edom and on the children of Ammon and on Moab and on all who have trimmed the corners [of their hair and beard] and live in the wilderness, because all the nations are foreskinned, and the whole house of Israel is foreskinned at heart. (Jeremiah 9:25, 26)

This passage as well makes it plain that circumcision is a symbol of purification. The people are said to have their foreskins circumcised but are still called "foreskinned nations," Judah among them, and Israel is described as being foreskinned at heart. In Moses:

. . . or then their foreskinned heart will be brought low. (Leviticus 26:41)

This is similar.

[5] A foreskin and being foreskinned symbolizes something unclean, as can be seen in Isaiah:

Wake up! Wake up! Put on your strength, Zion! Put on your finest clothes, Jerusalem, you holy city, because the foreskinned and unclean will not come into you any longer. (Isaiah 52:1)

Zion means a heavenly religion, and Jerusalem, a spiritual one, which the foreskinned–that is, anything unclean–will not enter.

[6] A very clear indication that circumcision is simply a sign of the pact, or a mark of union, is the fact that trees also had to be "circumcised" of their fruit, which had a similar representation. This is what Moses says about it:

When you come into the land and plant any food tree, you shall foreskin its foreskin, its fruit. For three years it shall be foreskinned to you–it shall not be eaten–and in the fourth year all its fruit shall be consecrated to the praises of Jehovah. (Leviticus 19:23, 24)

Fruit likewise represents and symbolizes charity, as many passages in the Word can confirm, so its foreskin symbolizes uncleanness that hinders and contaminates charity.

[7] Amazing to say, when angels in heaven think about purification from earthly uncleanness, then almost immediately something like circumcision is represented in the world of spirits. Angelic thoughts, you see, turn into representations in the world of spirits.

Some of the representative practices in the Jewish religion originated in the world of spirits, but others did not.

There were some in the world of spirits who saw this instant representation of circumcision; they had been trying to gain admittance to heaven. This representation occurred and then they were let in. This explains why Joshua was commanded to circumcise the people as they were about to cross the Jordan and enter the land of Canaan. Their entry into that land represented exactly that–the admittance of the faithful into heaven,

[8] which is why a second circumcision was commanded, as recorded in Joshua:

Jehovah said to Joshua, "Make yourself swords of flint; circumcise the children of Israel a second time." And Joshua made himself swords of flint and circumcised the children of Israel at the Hill of Foreskins. And Jehovah said to Joshua, "Today I have rolled the taunt of Egypt away from you." And he called the name of the place Gilgal [a rolling]. (Joshua 5:2, 3, 9)

Swords of flint symbolize the truth they needed to absorb in order to discipline and drive away foul passions. Without a knowledge of truth, there can never be any purification. Stone, or flint, symbolizes truth, as shown before (§§643, 1298). A sword relates to true ideas that punish evil, as the Word reveals.

  
/ 10837  
  

Many thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation and its New Century Edition team.