The Bible

 

Genesis 30

Study

   

1 achelė matydama, kad ji nevaisinga, pavydėjo savo seseriai Lėjai ir tarė Jokūbui: “Duok man vaikų, kitaip aš mirsiu!”

2 Jokūbas, supykęs ant achelės, tarė: “Ar aš Dievas, kuris tau vaikų neduoda?”

3 Tada ji tarė: “Štai mano tarnaitė Bilha. Įeik pas ją, kad ji pagimdytų ant mano kelių ir aš galėčiau turėti vaikų iš jos”.

4 Ji davė jam už žmoną savo tarnaitę Bilhą, ir Jokūbas įėjo pas ją.

5 Bilha pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui sūnų.

6 Tada achelė tarė: “Dievas teisingai nusprendė dėl manęs, išklausydamas mano balsą ir davė man sūnų”. Todėl ji pavadino jį Danu.

7 achelės tarnaitė Bilha pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui antrą sūnų.

8 Tada achelė tarė: “Didžiose grumtynėse grūmiausi su savo seserimi ir nugalėjau”. Ir ji pavadino jį Neftaliu.

9 Lėja matydama, kad nebegali daugiau gimdyti, davė Jokūbui savo tarnaitę Zilpą už žmoną.

10 Zilpa, Lijos tarnaitė, pagimdė Jokūbui sūnų.

11 Tada Lėja tarė: “Laimingai!” Ir ji pavadino jį Gadu.

12 Vėliau Zilpa pagimdė Jokūbui antrą sūnų.

13 Tada Lėja tarė: “Aš laimingoji! Nes moterys vadins mane palaiminta”. Ir ji pavadino jį Ašeru.

14 Kviečių pjūties metu ubenas išėjęs rado mandragorų ir juos parnešė savo motinai Lėjai. Tada achelė tarė Lėjai: “Duok man savo sūnaus mandragorų”.

15 Bet ji atsakė: “Ar negana tau, kad turi mano vyrą, ar nori atimti ir mano sūnaus mandragorus?” achelė tarė: “Tegul jis šią naktį praleidžia su tavimi už tavo sūnaus mandragorus!”

16 Jokūbui pareinant vakare iš lauko, Lėja išėjo jo pasitikti ir tarė: “Tu eisi pas mane, nes aš tave pasamdžiau už mano sūnaus mandragorus”. Taip jis praleido su ja tą naktį.

17 Dievas išklausė Lėją; ji pagimdė Jokūbui penktąjį sūnų.

18 Tada Lėja tarė: “Dievas man atlygino, nes aš daviau savo tarnaitę savo vyrui”. Ji pavadino jį Isacharu.

19 Lėja vėl pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui šeštąjį sūnų.

20 Tada Lėja tarė: “Dievas apdovanojo mane gera dovana; dabar mano vyras gyvens su manimi, nes aš jam pagimdžiau šešis sūnus”. Ir ji praminė jį Zabulonu.

21 Po to ji pagimdė dukterį ir ją pavadino Dina.

22 Dievas atsiminė achelę, išklausė ją ir padarė vaisingą.

23 Ji pagimdė sūnų ir tarė: “Dievas pašalino mano gėdą”.

24 Ji pavadino jį Juozapu, sakydama: “Viešpats duos man dar kitą sūnų!”

25 achelei pagimdžius Juozapą, Jokūbas tarė Labanui: “Paleisk mane, grįšiu į tėvynę, į savo šalį!

26 Duok man mano žmonas ir mano vaikus, už kuriuos tau tarnavau, ir leisk man eiti. Tu juk žinai, kaip aš tau tarnavau!”

27 Labanas jam tarė: “O kad aš rasčiau malonę tavo akyse! Aš patyriau, kad Viešpats laimino mane dėl tavęs.

28 Nustatyk tu pats sau užmokestį, ir aš tau jį duosiu!”

29 Jokūbas atsakė: “Tu pats žinai, kaip tau tarnavau ir kokia tapo tavo banda mano priežiūroje.

30 Tu mažai turėjai prieš man atvykstant, bet dabar tai smarkiai padaugėjo, nes Viešpats tave laimino, kai aš atėjau. O dabar ar ne laikas man pasirūpinti savo namais?”

31 Labanas tarė: “Ką turiu tau duoti?” Jokūbas atsakė: “Nieko man neduok! Jei sutiksi su mano reikalavimu, aš vėl ganysiu ir saugosiu tavo kaimenę:

32 šiandien pereisiu visas avių bandas, išskirdamas iš jų kiekvieną dėmėtą bei lopiniuotą avį ir kiekvieną juodą avį, ir visas lopiniuotas bei dėmėtas ožkas. Tai bus mano atlyginimas.

33 Mano sąžiningumas kalbės už mane, kai ateis laikas man atsiimti užmokestį tavo akivaizdoje. Visa, kas nebus dėmėta bei lopiniuota tarp ožkų ir avių, tebūna kaip mano pavogta!”

34 Labanas atsakė: “Sutinku. Tebūna kaip sakai!”

35 Ir jis atskyrė tą dieną ožkas ir avis, ožius ir avinus­lopiniuotus ir dėmėtus; visus vienos spalvos gyvulius atidavė savo sūnums.

36 Labanas nustatė, kad tarp jo ir Jokūbo būtų trijų dienų atstumas. Jokūbas ganė likusią Labano kaimenę.

37 Jokūbas, paėmęs žalias drebulių, migdolų ir liepų lazdeles, išlupinėjo jose dryžius, kad tose vietose, kur buvo žievė, būtų balta.

38 Jis tas išpjaustytas lazdeles sudėjo į lovius, į kuriuos pilamas vanduo, prie kurių bandos ateidavo gerti, ir atėję gerti imdavo poruotis.

39 Ir avys poruodavosi, žiūrėdamos į lazdeles; ir jos vesdavo dryžuotus, dėmėtus ir lopiniuotus ėriukus.

40 Jokūbas perskyrė savo bandą. Jis sudėjo lazdeles taip, kad jo avys ir Labano avys matytų jas. Jis laikė savo bandas atskirai ir nesuleisdavo jų su Labano bandomis.

41 Kai poravosi stipresnieji gyvuliai, Jokūbas įdėdavo lazdeles į lovius taip, kad gyvuliai matytų jas ir poruotųsi.

42 Silpnesniems gyvuliams poruojantis, jis neįdėdavo tų lazdelių. Taigi silpnesnieji teko Labanui, o stipresnieji Jokūbui.

43 Taip šis žmogus nepaprastai pralobo. Jis turėjo daug tarnų ir tarnaičių, galvijų, avių, kupranugarių ir asilų.

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #4031

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4031. 'And before [the eyes of those of] the flock which came together later he did not put [the rods] in' means things that are compulsory. This is clear from the meaning of 'coming together later'. 'Coming together first' means, as shown above in 4029, that which is spontaneous or free; and from this, as well as from the sequence of thought in the internal sense, it is evident that 'coming together later' means that which is compulsory or non-free. It is also evident from the consideration that the expression 'coming on heat' is not used here as it is of those which came together first. For 'coming on heat' means affection, in this case an intense desire. Anything that does not begin from affection is not spontaneous or free, for everything spontaneous or free is in keeping with one's affection or love, 2870. This consideration is also evident from the derivation of the expression in the original language as a lack, for if the intense desire is lacking, all sense of freedom is at an end, in which case that which a pervert does is referred to as non-freedom and at length that which is compulsory.

[2] It may be seen from the paragraphs quoted above in 4029 that every joining together of truth and good, and therefore all reformation and regeneration, is effected in freedom, that is, is the outcome of what is spontaneous. Consequently no joining together of truth and good, thus no regeneration, is possible in the absence of freedom, that is, through compulsion. What freedom is, and the origin of it, see 2870-2893, where Human Freedom is the subject. Anyone who is unaware of the fact that no joining of truth and good, that is, no making of these one's own, and so no regeneration, is possible except in a person's freedom, ends up - if he reasons about the Lord's Providence, about human salvation, and about the eternal damnation of many - with utterly dim misconceptions and then with serious errors. For he imagines that if the Lord is willing, He is able to save anyone, and to do so by all manner of means beyond number - by miracles, by the dead coming back again, by direct revelations, by angels withholding people from evils, and driving them to good by the plain use of force, and by many states into which a person is introduced and becomes repentant, and by many other means.

[3] But he does not know that all of these means involve compulsion and that nobody can be reformed through them. For anything that compels a person does not impart any affection to him; or if it is of such a nature that it does impart an affection, it binds itself to an affection for evil. Indeed it seems to instill, and does in fact instill, some holiness, but even so, when the state is altered he goes back to his previous affections, which are evils and falsities. In that case that holiness links itself to the evils and falsities and is turned into profanity, such as leads him into the worst hell of all. For that person first of all acknowledges and believes, and also has an affection for what is holy; but after that he denies it, indeed he loathes it. For profaners are those who at one point acknowledge with the heart and after that deny, not those who have not acknowledged with the heart, see 301-303, 571, 582, 593, 1001, 1008, 1010, 1059, 1327, 1328, 2051, 2426, 3398, 3399, 3402, 3898. For this reason evident miracles do not take place at the present day, only miracles which are not evident or plain to see and which are of such a nature that they do not enforce any holiness or take away a person's freedom from him. This is why the dead do not come back again and why no one is withheld from evil by direct revelations, or by angels, and led to good by the plain use of force.

[4] It is man's freedom into which the Lord operates, and by means of which He turns him in a different direction. For all freedom involves that which is present in his love or affection, and so in his will, 3158. If he does not receive good and truth in freedom it cannot be made or become his own, since that which is for him compulsory is not his own but belongs to whoever compels it. For he is not acting of himself even though the action is done by him. It does sometimes seem as though a person is drawn under compulsion towards good, as in temptations and spiritual conflicts. But within these experiences he is in greater freedom than when he is outside them, see 1937, 1947, 2881. It also seems as though a person is acting under compulsion when he compels himself to do good; but self-compulsion is one thing, being compelled is another. Self-compulsion with anyone is a product of the freedom within him, but being compelled is a product of non-freedom. This shows what dim misconceptions and then what errors people end up with who reason about the Lord's Providence, about human salvation, and about the eternal damnation of many, yet who are unaware of the fact that it is freedom through which the Lord operates and by no means through compulsion. For compulsion in things of a holy nature if not freely accepted is dangerous.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #1327

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

1327. 'Jehovah confounded the lip of the whole earth' means the state of this Ancient Church, that internal worship started to perish. This is clear from the fact that the phrase used is 'the lip of the whole earth' and not, as previously in verse 7, the lip of those who started to build a city and a tower. 'The face of the whole earth' means the state of the Church since 'the earth' is the Church, as shown already in 662, 1066. The story of the Churches after the Flood is as follows: There were three Churches which receive specific mention in the Word - the first Ancient Church which took its name from Noah, the second Ancient Church which took its name from Eber, and the third Ancient Church which took its name from Jacob, and subsequently from Judah and Israel.

[2] As regards the first Ancient Church, that called Noah, this was the parent so to speak of those that followed, and as is usually the case with Churches in their earliest phases, it was more untarnished and innocent, as is also clear from verse 1 of this chapter which says that it had one lip, that is, one doctrine. That is to say, everyone regarded charity as the essential. But in the course of time, as usually happens to Churches, that Church also started to decline, chiefly because many people started to divert worship to themselves so as to set themselves above others, as is clear from verse 4 above - 'they said, Let us build ourselves a city and a tower, and its head in heaven, and let us make a name for ourselves'. In the Church such people were inevitably like some fermenting agent, or like firebrands that start a fire. When the danger of profaning what is holy was consequently near at hand, referred to in 571, 582, the state of this Church was, in the Lord's Providence, altered. That is to say, its internal worship perished but its external worship remained, which here is meant by the statement that 'Jehovah confounded the lip of the whole earth'. From this it is also clear that the kind of worship called Babel was not prevalent in the first Ancient Church but in those that followed when people started to be worshipped in place of gods, especially after they had died. This was the origin of so many pagan deities.

[3] The reason internal worship was allowed to perish and external remain was to prevent what is holy being profaned. The profanation of what is holy carries eternal condemnation with it. Nobody is able to profane what is holy unless he possesses cognitions of faith and also acknowledges them. Anyone who does not possess them cannot acknowledge them, still less profane them. It is internal things which may be profaned, for it is in internal things, not external, that holiness resides. The situation is similar with someone who does evil but does not have evil in mind. The evil he does cannot be attributed to him any more than to someone who does not deliberately intend evil, or to anyone devoid of rationality. Thus anyone who does not believe in the existence of a life after death, but who nevertheless has external worship, cannot profane the things that belong to eternal life because he does not believe that they exist. The situation is different with those who do know and acknowledge them.

[4] This too is why a person is allowed rather to live engrossed in lusts and pleasures, and so to isolate himself from internal things, than to enter into a knowledge and acknowledgement of internal things and so profane them. The Jews of today therefore are allowed to immerse themselves in avarice so that in this way they may be removed from an acknowledgement of internal things, for they are the kind of people who, if they acknowledged them, would inevitably profane them. Nothing does more to isolate a person from internal things than avarice, for this is the lowest of all earthly desires. The same applies to many inside the Church, and to gentiles outside, though gentiles, least of all people, are able to profane anything. This then is the reason for the statement here that 'Jehovah confounded the lip of the whole earth', and the reason why these words mean that the state of the Church was altered, that is to say, its worship became external, having no internal worship within it.

[5] The same situation was represented and meant by the Babylonish captivity into which the Israelites, and later on the Jews, were carried away. This is spoken of in Jeremiah as follows,

And there will be a nation and a kingdom that will not serve the king of Babel, and who will not put its neck in the yoke of the king of Babel. With the sword and famine and pestilence I will visit this people, until I have consumed it by his hand. Jeremiah 27:8 and following verses.

'Serving the king of Babel and putting its neck in his yoke' is being utterly deprived of the knowledge and acknowledgement of the good and the truth of faith, and so of internal worship.

[6] The point is clearer still in the same prophet,

Thus said Jehovah to all the people in this city, your brethren who did not go out with you into captivity, thus said Jehovah Zebaoth, Behold, I am sending on them the sword, famine, and pestilence, and I will make them like rotten figs. Jeremiah 29:16-17.

'Remaining in the city and not going out to the king of Babel' represented and meant people who possessed the cognitions of internal things, that is, of the truths of faith, and who profaned them - people on whom, it is said, He was sending 'the sword, famine, and pestilence', which are forms of punishment for profanation, and whom He was making 'like rotten figs'.

[7] That 'Babel' means people who deprive others of all knowledge and acknowledgement of truth was also represented and meant by the following words in the same prophet,

I will give all Judah into the hand of the king of Babel, and he will carry them off to Babel, and will smite them with the sword. And I will give over all the wealth of this city, and all its labour, and all its precious things; and I will give all the treasures of the kings of Judah into the hand of their enemies, and they will plunder them and seize them. Jeremiah 20:4-5.

Here 'all its wealth, all its lab our, all its precious things, all the treasures of the kings of Judah' means in the internal sense cognitions of faith.

[8] In the same prophet,

With the families of the north I will bring the king of Babel against this land and against its inhabitants, and against all those nations round about, and I will utterly destroy them and make them into a ruin, a hissing, and everlasting wastes. And this whole land will be a waste. Jeremiah 25:9, 11.

Here 'Babel' is used to describe the vastation of the interior things of faith, that is, of internal worship. Indeed, as shown already, anyone whose worship is worship of self possesses no truth of faith. He destroys and lays waste, and leads off into captivity, everything that is true. This is why Babel is also called 'a destroying mountain' in Jeremiah 51:25.

For more concerning Babel, see what has been stated already in 1182.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.