The Bible

 

Genesis 30

Study

   

1 achelė matydama, kad ji nevaisinga, pavydėjo savo seseriai Lėjai ir tarė Jokūbui: “Duok man vaikų, kitaip aš mirsiu!”

2 Jokūbas, supykęs ant achelės, tarė: “Ar aš Dievas, kuris tau vaikų neduoda?”

3 Tada ji tarė: “Štai mano tarnaitė Bilha. Įeik pas ją, kad ji pagimdytų ant mano kelių ir aš galėčiau turėti vaikų iš jos”.

4 Ji davė jam už žmoną savo tarnaitę Bilhą, ir Jokūbas įėjo pas ją.

5 Bilha pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui sūnų.

6 Tada achelė tarė: “Dievas teisingai nusprendė dėl manęs, išklausydamas mano balsą ir davė man sūnų”. Todėl ji pavadino jį Danu.

7 achelės tarnaitė Bilha pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui antrą sūnų.

8 Tada achelė tarė: “Didžiose grumtynėse grūmiausi su savo seserimi ir nugalėjau”. Ir ji pavadino jį Neftaliu.

9 Lėja matydama, kad nebegali daugiau gimdyti, davė Jokūbui savo tarnaitę Zilpą už žmoną.

10 Zilpa, Lijos tarnaitė, pagimdė Jokūbui sūnų.

11 Tada Lėja tarė: “Laimingai!” Ir ji pavadino jį Gadu.

12 Vėliau Zilpa pagimdė Jokūbui antrą sūnų.

13 Tada Lėja tarė: “Aš laimingoji! Nes moterys vadins mane palaiminta”. Ir ji pavadino jį Ašeru.

14 Kviečių pjūties metu ubenas išėjęs rado mandragorų ir juos parnešė savo motinai Lėjai. Tada achelė tarė Lėjai: “Duok man savo sūnaus mandragorų”.

15 Bet ji atsakė: “Ar negana tau, kad turi mano vyrą, ar nori atimti ir mano sūnaus mandragorus?” achelė tarė: “Tegul jis šią naktį praleidžia su tavimi už tavo sūnaus mandragorus!”

16 Jokūbui pareinant vakare iš lauko, Lėja išėjo jo pasitikti ir tarė: “Tu eisi pas mane, nes aš tave pasamdžiau už mano sūnaus mandragorus”. Taip jis praleido su ja tą naktį.

17 Dievas išklausė Lėją; ji pagimdė Jokūbui penktąjį sūnų.

18 Tada Lėja tarė: “Dievas man atlygino, nes aš daviau savo tarnaitę savo vyrui”. Ji pavadino jį Isacharu.

19 Lėja vėl pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui šeštąjį sūnų.

20 Tada Lėja tarė: “Dievas apdovanojo mane gera dovana; dabar mano vyras gyvens su manimi, nes aš jam pagimdžiau šešis sūnus”. Ir ji praminė jį Zabulonu.

21 Po to ji pagimdė dukterį ir ją pavadino Dina.

22 Dievas atsiminė achelę, išklausė ją ir padarė vaisingą.

23 Ji pagimdė sūnų ir tarė: “Dievas pašalino mano gėdą”.

24 Ji pavadino jį Juozapu, sakydama: “Viešpats duos man dar kitą sūnų!”

25 achelei pagimdžius Juozapą, Jokūbas tarė Labanui: “Paleisk mane, grįšiu į tėvynę, į savo šalį!

26 Duok man mano žmonas ir mano vaikus, už kuriuos tau tarnavau, ir leisk man eiti. Tu juk žinai, kaip aš tau tarnavau!”

27 Labanas jam tarė: “O kad aš rasčiau malonę tavo akyse! Aš patyriau, kad Viešpats laimino mane dėl tavęs.

28 Nustatyk tu pats sau užmokestį, ir aš tau jį duosiu!”

29 Jokūbas atsakė: “Tu pats žinai, kaip tau tarnavau ir kokia tapo tavo banda mano priežiūroje.

30 Tu mažai turėjai prieš man atvykstant, bet dabar tai smarkiai padaugėjo, nes Viešpats tave laimino, kai aš atėjau. O dabar ar ne laikas man pasirūpinti savo namais?”

31 Labanas tarė: “Ką turiu tau duoti?” Jokūbas atsakė: “Nieko man neduok! Jei sutiksi su mano reikalavimu, aš vėl ganysiu ir saugosiu tavo kaimenę:

32 šiandien pereisiu visas avių bandas, išskirdamas iš jų kiekvieną dėmėtą bei lopiniuotą avį ir kiekvieną juodą avį, ir visas lopiniuotas bei dėmėtas ožkas. Tai bus mano atlyginimas.

33 Mano sąžiningumas kalbės už mane, kai ateis laikas man atsiimti užmokestį tavo akivaizdoje. Visa, kas nebus dėmėta bei lopiniuota tarp ožkų ir avių, tebūna kaip mano pavogta!”

34 Labanas atsakė: “Sutinku. Tebūna kaip sakai!”

35 Ir jis atskyrė tą dieną ožkas ir avis, ožius ir avinus­lopiniuotus ir dėmėtus; visus vienos spalvos gyvulius atidavė savo sūnums.

36 Labanas nustatė, kad tarp jo ir Jokūbo būtų trijų dienų atstumas. Jokūbas ganė likusią Labano kaimenę.

37 Jokūbas, paėmęs žalias drebulių, migdolų ir liepų lazdeles, išlupinėjo jose dryžius, kad tose vietose, kur buvo žievė, būtų balta.

38 Jis tas išpjaustytas lazdeles sudėjo į lovius, į kuriuos pilamas vanduo, prie kurių bandos ateidavo gerti, ir atėję gerti imdavo poruotis.

39 Ir avys poruodavosi, žiūrėdamos į lazdeles; ir jos vesdavo dryžuotus, dėmėtus ir lopiniuotus ėriukus.

40 Jokūbas perskyrė savo bandą. Jis sudėjo lazdeles taip, kad jo avys ir Labano avys matytų jas. Jis laikė savo bandas atskirai ir nesuleisdavo jų su Labano bandomis.

41 Kai poravosi stipresnieji gyvuliai, Jokūbas įdėdavo lazdeles į lovius taip, kad gyvuliai matytų jas ir poruotųsi.

42 Silpnesniems gyvuliams poruojantis, jis neįdėdavo tų lazdelių. Taigi silpnesnieji teko Labanui, o stipresnieji Jokūbui.

43 Taip šis žmogus nepaprastai pralobo. Jis turėjo daug tarnų ir tarnaičių, galvijų, avių, kupranugarių ir asilų.

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3974

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3974. 'Give me my womenfolk' means that the affections for truth belonged to that natural, 'and my children' means as did the truths born from those affections. This is clear from the meaning of 'womenfolk' or 'wives' as affections for truth - his wife 'Leah' meaning the affection for external truth, and 'Rachel' the affection for internal truth, both dealt with often above; and from the meaning of 'children' as truths born from those affections. For 'sons' means truths, 489, 491, 533, 1147, 2623, 3373, and the children born of the womenfolk truths that spring from those affections.

It was a regulation among the Ancients that women given to slaves belonged to the master with whom they served, and so did the children born from them, as may be seen in Moses,

If you buy a Hebrew slave he shall serve for six years; and in the seventh he shall go out free, for nothing. If his master has given him a wife and she has borne him sons or daughters, the wife and her children shall belong to her master, and he shall go out by himself. 1 Exodus 21:2, 4.

It was because this was also a regulation in the Ancient Church and was therefore well known to Laban that he laid claim to Jacob's wives and children, as is evident in the next chapter,

Laban said to Jacob, The daughters are my daughters, and the sons are my sons, and the flock is my flock, and all that you see belongs to me. Genesis 31:43.

And because Jacob knows this he says to Laban, 'Give me my womenfolk and my children'. But this regulation as stated in Moses in the verses quoted above represented the right of the internal or rational man to the goods and truths of the external or natural man which the latter has obtained for itself. For a slave represented the truth of the natural man as that truth exists at first before genuine truths are instilled. The truth which is present at first is not truth but the outward appearance of it. Nevertheless it serves as the means by which genuine truths and goods are introduced, as has been shown already. For this reason once goods and truths have been instilled through that truth present at first, that is, through the service it renders, it is dispensed with, but the genuine truths obtained in that way are retained. It was for the sake of this representation that this law about slaves was laid down.

[2] But as for Jacob, he was not a slave who had been purchased, but a man from a more distinguished family than Laban. He himself - that is to say, Jacob - purchased Laban's daughters, and so also the children by them, through the service he rendered; for they were his instead of wages. Consequently Laban's assumptions concerning them were not correct. Furthermore 'a Hebrew slave' means the truth which serves to introduce genuine goods and truths, and his wife the affection for natural good. But Jacob's position was different from that of a slave. He represented the good of natural truth, and his wives the affections for truth. Nor does Laban have the same representation as the master in the law that has been quoted relating to a Hebrew slave. That is to say, he does not represent the rational, but a parallel good, 3612, 3665, 3778, which is such that it is not genuine good but the outward appearance of the genuine, serving to introduce truths, 3665, 3690, which were accordingly 'Jacob's'.

[3] These details which have been presented are indeed such as fall within the mental grasp of none but a very few, for most people do not know what the truth and good of the natural are, and that these are different from the truth and good of the rational. Still less do they know that goods and truths which are not genuine but only so to external appearance serve to introduce genuine truths and goods, especially at the outset of regeneration. All the same, as these details are contained in the internal sense of these words, and also in the internal sense of those that follow concerning Laban's flock from which Jacob obtained a flock for himself, they ought not to be passed over in silence. There will perhaps be some who grasp them. Any who have a strong desire to know such things, that is, who are stirred by an affection for spiritual good and truth, receive enlightenment in such matters.

Footnotes:

1. literally, with his own body

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3665

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3665. 'To the home of Bethuel your mother's father, and take for yourself from there a wife from the daughters of Laban your mother's brother' means a parallel external good, and the truth which sprang from this good and was to be joined [to the good of the natural]. This is clear from the representation of 'Bethuel' as good existing with those who make up a first group of gentiles, dealt with in 2865; from the representation of 'Laban' as the affection for good in the natural man, that is, the affection for external good, strictly speaking a parallel good that springs from a common stock, dealt with in 3129, 3130, 3160, 3612; and from the meaning of 'taking a wife from his daughters' as being brought into association with or joined to affections for truth from that source. For 'taking a wife', as is self-evident, means being joined to, and 'daughters' means affections, see 568, 2362, 3024. From this it is clear what those words mean, namely that the good of the natural represented here by 'Jacob' was to be joined to truths which came from a parallel external good.

[2] The implications of this are that when a person is being regenerated the Lord leads him first of all as an infant, then as a child, after that as a young person, and at length as an adult. The truths which he learns as a small child are totally external and bodily, for he is not yet capable of grasping more interior things. Those truths are no more than cognitions of such things as inmostly contain Divine things within them. For there are some cognitions of things which do not inmostly contain anything Divine and there are other cognitions which do. Cognitions that do contain the Divine inmostly are such that they can receive interior truths into themselves, increasingly so, one after another in their proper order, whereas cognitions that do not contain the Divine are such that they do not so receive them but spurn them. For the cognitions of external and bodily good and truth are like the soil which, depending on its own particular nature, receives into itself one kind of seed but not another, and is productive of one variety of seed but is destructive of another. Cognitions which inmostly contain the Divine receive spiritual and celestial truth and good into themselves, for it is by virtue of the Divine within, bringing order to them, that makes them what they are. But cognitions that do not contain the Divine receive only falsity and evil, such being their nature. Those cognitions of external and bodily truth which do receive spiritual and celestial truth and good are meant here by 'the daughters of Laban from the home of Bethuel', while those that do not receive them are meant by 'the daughters of Canaan'.

[3] The cognitions which people learn from infancy onwards into childhood are like very general vessels, which exist to be filled with goods. And as they are filled a person is enlightened. If the vessels are such that they can contain genuine goods within them, the person is in that case enlightened, step by step and increasingly so from the Divine that is within them. But if they are such that they cannot contain genuine goods within them he is not in that case enlightened. He may indeed give the appearance of being enlightened, but this comes about from the illusory light that goes with falsity and evil. Indeed those cognitions place him all the more in obscurity as regards good and truth.

[4] Such cognitions are manifold, so manifold that one can hardly count even the genera of them, let alone identify their species. For they derive in their multiplicity from the Divine and then pass by way of the rational into the natural. That is to say, certain of them flow in directly by way of the good of the rational, and from there into the good of the natural, and also into the truth that goes with that good, and again from there into the external or bodily natural, where also they depart into various channels; but others flow in indirectly by way of the truth of the rational into the truth of the natural, and also into the good that goes with this truth, and again from there into the external or bodily natural, see 3573, 3616. All this is like nations, families, and houses, in which there are blood relatives and relatives by marriage; that is to say, there are those in the direct line of descent from the chief ancestor and there are those belonging to an increasingly indirect or parallel line. In the heavens these things are quite distinct and separate, for all the communities there are distinguished according to genera and species of good and truth, and so according to how near they are in relation to one another, 685, 2508, 2524, 2556, 2739, 3612. The most ancient people, being celestial, also represented those communities by their dwelling as distinct and separate nations, families, and houses, 470, 471, 483, 1159, 1246. This was also the reason why members of the representative Church were commanded to contract marriages within the families which made up their own nation; for by so doing they could represent heaven and the interconnection of its communities as regards good and truth. That representation is exemplified here by Jacob's going to the home of Bethuel his mother's father and his taking a wife for himself from there from the daughters of Laban his mother's brother.

[5] As regards cognitions themselves of external or bodily truth which come from a parallel good and, as has been stated, contain the Divine and so are able to receive genuine truths within them, they are like cognitions present with small children who at a later time undergo regeneration. They are in general such as those that are found in the historical narratives of the Word, for example, in what is said there about Paradise, about the first human being in Paradise, about the tree of life in the middle of it, and about the tree of knowledge where the deceiving serpent was. These are cognitions which contain the Divine and which receive spiritual and celestial goods and truths into themselves because they represent and mean these. Such cognitions also constitute all the other descriptions in historical narratives of the Word, for example, those in the Word concerning the Tabernacle, concerning the Temple, and concerning the construction of these; likewise what is said about Aaron's vestments and those of his sons; also about the feasts of tabernacles, of first fruits, and of unleavened bread, and about other matters of a similar nature. When these and similar details are known and thought about by a small child, the thoughts of the angels residing with him at that time are concerned with the Divine things which they represent and mean. And because the angels are stirred by an affection for these things, that affection is communicated. This produces the joy and delight that the child gets out of them, and it prepares his mind for the reception of genuine truths and goods. These and very many others are the cognitions of external and bodily truth that come from a parallel good.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.