The Bible

 

創世記 28

Study

   

1 イサクはヤコブを呼んで、これを祝福し、命じて言った、「あなたはカナンにめとってはならない。

2 立ってパダンアラムへ行き、あなたのの父ベトエルのに行って、そこであなたのラバンのにめとりなさい。

3 全能の神が、あなたを祝福し、多くの子を得させ、かつふえさせて、多くの国民とし、

4 またアブラハムの祝福をあなたと子孫とに与えて、アブラハムに授けられたあなたの寄留の地を継がせてくださるように」。

5 こうしてイサクはヤコブを送り出した。ヤコブはパダンアラムに向かい、アラムびとベトエルので、ヤコブとエサウとのリベカのラバンのもとへ行った。

6 さてエサウは、イサクがヤコブを祝福して、パダンアラムにつかわし、そこからをめとらせようとしたこと、彼を祝福し、命じて「あなたはカナンにめとってはならない」と言ったこと、

7 そしてヤコブが父の言葉に従って、パダンアラムへ行ったことを知ったとき、

8 彼はカナンが父イサクの心にかなわないのを見た

9 そこでエサウはイシマエルの所に行き、すでにあるたちのほかにアブラハムのイシマエルの娘で、ネバヨテの妹マハラテをにめとった。

10 さてヤコブはベエルシバを立って、ハランへ向かったが、

11 一つの所に着いた時、日が暮れたので、そこに一夜を過ごし、その所のを取ってまくらとし、そこに伏して寝た。

12 時に彼はをみた。一つのはしごが地の上に立っていて、その頂は天に達し、神の使たちがそれを上り下りしているのを見た。

13 そしては彼のそばに立って言われた、「わたしはあなたの父アブラハムの、イサクのである。あなたが伏している地を、あなたと子孫とに与えよう。

14 あなたの子孫は地のちりのように多くなって、西、東、にひろがり、地の諸族はあなたと子孫とによって祝福をうけるであろう。

15 わたしはあなたと共にいて、あなたがどこへ行くにもあなたを守り、あなたをこの地に連れ帰るであろう。わたしは決してあなたを捨てず、あなたに語った事を行うであろう」。

16 ヤコブは眠りからさめて言った、「まことにがこの所におられるのに、わたしは知らなかった」。

17 そして彼は恐れて言った、「これはなんという恐るべき所だろう。これは神のである。これは天のだ」。

18 ヤコブははやく起きて、まくらとしていたを取り、それを立てて柱とし、その頂にを注いで、

19 その所の名をベテルと名づけた。そのの名は初めはルズといった。

20 ヤコブは誓いを立てて言った、「がわたしと共にいまし、わたしの行くこの道でわたしを守り、食べるパンと着る着物を賜い、

21 安らかに父のに帰らせてくださるなら、をわたしのといたしましょう。

22 またわたしが柱に立てたこの神のといたしましょう。そしてあなたがくださるすべての物の十分の一を、わたしは必ずあなたにささげます」。

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3498

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3498. 'I do not know the day of my death' means the life within the natural. This is clear from the meaning of 'day' as state, dealt with in 23, 487, 488, 493, 893, 2788, and from the meaning of 'death' as rising again or awakening into life, dealt with in 3326. 'The day of death' accordingly means a state of awakening to life, or what amounts to the same, it means life - the life within the natural, it is evident, being meant in particular here, because that life is the subject here. What is implied in all this does not become clear unless one knows about the life of the rational, and the life of the natural, or what amounts to the same, about the life of the internal man and the life of the external man. The life of the rational or internal man is distinct and separate from that of the natural or external man, so distinct indeed that the life of the rational or internal man may exist quite independently of the life of the natural or external man; but the life of the natural or external man cannot exist apart from that of the rational or internal man. For the external man lives from the internal man, so much so that if the life of the internal man ceased to be, the life of the external man would instantly be no more. Exterior things are accordingly dependent on interior in the way that things which are posterior exist from those that are prior, or as an effect exists from its efficient cause. For if the efficient cause ceased to be, the effect would instantly be no more. The same is also so with the life of the external man in relation to the life of the internal man.

[2] This may be seen even more clearly in the human being, for while a person is in the world, that is, while he lives in the body, his rational is distinct and separate from the natural, so much so that he can be raised above the level of external sensory perceptions which belong to the body, and even to a certain extent above the level of inner sensory perceptions which belong to his natural man, and to be aware on the level of his rational, and so of spiritual thought. This is even more evident from the fact that when a person dies he leaves behind him altogether the external sensory perceptions that belong to the body, retaining at the same time the life of his interior man. Indeed he brings with him even the facts that exist in the external or natural memory, though he does not have the use of them, see 2475-2477, 2479-2483, 2485, 2486. From this it is evident that the rational or internal man is distinct and separate from the external man. But while a person is living in the body his rational does not seem to be distinct and separate from the natural, the reason being that he is living in the world or the natural order. That being so the life of the rational manifests itself within the natural, so much so that the rational does not seem to have any life at all if the natural does not at the same time have any. The amount of life that the rational seems to have in this case depends on how far the natural corresponds to it - see above in 3493. From this it may be seen that there is a corresponding life in the natural, which life is meant by the words which Isaac addressed to Esau, 'I do not know the day of my death'. For 'Isaac' represents the rational, and 'Esau' the natural, in both cases as regards good.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3326

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3326. 'Esau said, Behold, I am going to die' means that [the good of the natural] would after that rise again. This is clear from the representation of 'Esau' as the good of the natural, dealt with in 3302, 3322, and from the meaning of 'dying' as the final phase of a state when something ceases to exist, dealt with in 2908, 2912, 2917, 2923. And since the end of the previous state is the beginning of the next, 'going to die', like 'being buried', here means rising again after that. For 'being buried' means rising again, see 2916, 2917, 3256. His rising again after that implies that good will come to have priority and dominion over truth, after truth in the short term has apparently had priority, dealt with above.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.