The Bible

 

Johannes 1

Study

1 Im Anfang war das Wort, und das Wort war bei Gott, und das Wort war Gott.

2 Dieses (O. Er) war im Anfang bei Gott.

3 Alles ward durch dasselbe, (O. ihn) und ohne dasselbe (O. ihn) ward auch nicht eines, das geworden ist.

4 In ihm war Leben, und das Leben war das Licht der Menschen.

5 Und das Licht scheint in der Finsternis, und die Finsternis hat es nicht erfaßt.

6 Da war ein Mensch, von Gott gesandt, sein Name Johannes.

7 Dieser kam zum Zeugnis, auf daß er zeugte von dem Lichte, damit alle durch ihn glaubten.

8 Er war nicht das Licht, sondern auf daß er zeugte von dem Lichte.

9 Das war das wahrhaftige Licht, welches, in die Welt kommend, jeden Menschen erleuchtet. (d. h. sein Licht auf jeden Menschen scheinen läßt. And. üb.: welches jeden in die Welt kommenden Menschen erleuchtet)

10 Er war in der Welt, und die Welt ward durch ihn, und die Welt kannte ihn nicht.

11 Er kam in das Seinige, und die Seinigen (Eig. in das Eigene, und die Eigenen) nahmen ihn nicht an;

12 so viele ihn aber aufnahmen, denen gab er das echt, Kinder Gottes zu werden, denen, die an seinen Namen glauben,

13 welche nicht aus Geblüt, noch aus dem Willen des Fleisches, noch aus dem Willen des Mannes, sondern aus Gott geboren sind.

14 Und das Wort ward Fleisch und wohnte (Eig. zeltete) unter uns (und wir haben seine Herrlichkeit angeschaut, eine Herrlichkeit als eines Eingeborenen vom Vater), voller Gnade und Wahrheit;

15 (Johannes zeugt von ihm und rief und sprach: Dieser war es, von dem ich sagte: Der nach mir Kommende ist mir vor, (W. vor geworden; so auch v 30) denn er war vor mir) (O. eher als ich)

16 denn aus seiner Fülle haben wir alle empfangen, und zwar Gnade um Gnade.

17 Denn das Gesetz wurde durch Moses gegeben; die Gnade und die Wahrheit ist durch Jesum Christum geworden.

18 Niemand hat Gott jemals gesehen; der eingeborene Sohn, der in des Vaters Schoß ist, der hat ihn kundgemacht.

19 Und dies ist das Zeugnis des Johannes, als die Juden aus Jerusalem Priester und Leviten sandten, damit sie ihn fragen sollten: Wer bist du?

20 Und er bekannte und leugnete nicht, und er bekannte: Ich bin nicht der Christus.

21 Und sie fragten ihn: Was denn? Bist du Elias? Und er sagt: Ich bin’s nicht. Bist du der Prophet? Und er antwortete: Nein.

22 Sie sprachen nun zu ihm: Wer bist du? auf daß wir Antwort geben denen, die uns gesandt haben; was sagst du von dir selbst?

23 Er sprach: Ich bin die "Stimme eines ufenden in der Wüste: Machet gerade den Weg des Herrn", (S. die Anm. zu Mat. 1,20) wie Jesaias, der Prophet, gesagt hat. (Jes. 40,3)

24 Und sie waren abgesandt von (W. aus (aus der Mitte der)) den Pharisäern.

25 Und sie fragten ihn und sprachen zu ihm: Was taufst du denn, wenn du nicht der Christus bist, noch Elias, noch der Prophet?

26 Johannes antwortete ihnen und sprach: Ich taufe mit (W. in) Wasser; mitten unter euch steht, den ihr nicht kennet,

27 der nach mir Kommende, dessen ich nicht würdig bin, ihm den iemen seiner Sandale zu lösen.

28 Dies geschah zu Bethanien, jenseit des Jordan, wo Johannes taufte.

29 Des folgenden Tages sieht er Jesum zu sich kommen und spricht: Siehe, das Lamm Gottes, welches die Sünde der Welt wegnimmt.

30 Dieser ist es, von dem ich sagte: Nach mir kommt ein Mann, der mir vor ist, denn er war vor mir. (O. eher als ich)

31 Und ich kannte ihn nicht; aber auf daß er Israel offenbar werden möchte, deswegen bin ich gekommen, mit (W. in) Wasser taufend.

32 Und Johannes zeugte und sprach: Ich schaute den Geist wie eine Taube aus dem Himmel herniederfahren, und er blieb auf ihm.

33 Und ich kannte ihn nicht; aber der mich gesandt hat, mit (W. in) Wasser zu taufen, der sprach zu mir: Auf welchen du sehen wirst den Geist herniederfahren und Auf ihm bleiben, dieser ist es, der mit (W. in) Heiligem Geiste tauft.

34 Und ich habe gesehen und habe bezeugt, daß dieser der Sohn Gottes ist.

35 Des folgenden Tages stand wiederum Johannes und zwei von seinen Jüngern,

36 und hinblickend auf Jesum, der da wandelte, spricht er: Siehe, das Lamm Gottes!

37 Und es hörten ihn die zwei Jünger reden und folgten Jesu nach.

38 Jesus aber wandte sich um und sah sie nachfolgen und spricht zu ihnen: Was suchet ihr? Sie aber sagten zu ihm: abbi (was verdolmetscht heißt: Lehrer), wo hältst du dich auf?

39 Er spricht zu ihnen: Kommet und sehet! (Nach and. Les.: und ihr werdet sehen) Sie kamen nun und sahen, wo er sich aufhielt, und blieben jenen Tag bei ihm. Es war um die zehnte Stunde.

40 Andreas, der Bruder des Simon Petrus, war einer von den zweien, die es von Johannes gehört hatten und ihm nachgefolgt waren.

41 Dieser findet zuerst seinen eigenen Bruder Simon und spricht zu ihm: Wir haben den Messias gefunden (was verdolmetscht ist: Christus). (O. Gesalbter)

42 Und er führte ihn zu Jesu. Jesus blickte ihn an und sprach: Du bist Simon, der Sohn Jonas’; du wirst Kephas heißen (was verdolmetscht wird: Stein). (Griech.: Petros (Petrus))

43 Des folgenden Tages wollte er aufbrechen nach Galiläa, und er findet Philippus; und Jesus spricht zu ihm: Folge mir nach.

44 Philippus aber war von Bethsaida, aus der Stadt des Andreas und Petrus.

45 Philippus findet den Nathanael und spricht zu ihm: Wir haben den gefunden, von welchem Moses in dem Gesetz geschrieben und die Propheten, Jesum, den Sohn des Joseph, den von Nazareth.

46 Und Nathanael sprach zu ihm: Kann aus Nazareth etwas Gutes kommen? (Eig. sein) Philippus spricht zu ihm: Komm und sieh!

47 Jesus sah den Nathanael zu sich kommen und spricht von ihm: Siehe, wahrhaftig ein Israelit, in welchem kein Trug ist.

48 Nathanael spricht zu ihm: Woher kennst du mich? Jesus antwortete und sprach zu ihm: Ehe Philippus dich rief, als du unter dem Feigenbaum warst, sah ich dich.

49 Nathanael antwortete und sprach zu ihm : abbi, du bist der Sohn Gottes, du bist der König Israels.

50 Jesus antwortete und sprach zu ihm: Weil ich dir sagte: Ich sah dich unter dem Feigenbaum, glaubst du? du wirst Größeres als dieses sehen.

51 Und er spricht zu ihm: Wahrlich, Wahrlich, ich sage euch: Von nun an werdet ihr den Himmel geöffnet sehen und die Engel Gottes auf- und niedersteigen auf den Sohn des Menschen.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #5323

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

5323. 'And they cried out before him, Abrek!' means acknowledgement coming through faith, and homage. This is clear from the meaning of 'crying out' as acknowledgement coming through faith, dealt with below, and from the meaning of 'Abrek!' as homage, because Abrek in the original language means 'bend your knees', and the bending of knees is homage. For every inward impulse of a person's will, thus of his love and affection, and consequently of his life, has corresponding outward actions and gestures. Those actions and gestures flow from the actual correspondence of exterior things with interior ones. Holy fear that leads to humility, and from this to homage, has corresponding actions or gestures, which are bending the knees, falling forward on the knees, and also prostration of the body flat on the ground. If in that state homage is a product of genuine humility, and if humility is the product of genuine holy fear, there is an absence of spirits, which leads to a falling downwards of the joints at the border or intermediate area where the spiritual is joined to the natural, and so where the knees are. For the parts below the knee correspond to natural things, while the parts above the knee correspond to spiritual ones. These are the reasons why bending the knees is a sign representative of homage. Among celestial people this action comes quite spontaneously, but in the case of spiritual people it is a deliberate act of their will.

[2] In former times people bent their knees before kings when they rode by in a chariot. They bent them because kings represented the Lord's Divine Truth, while 'a chariot' meant His Word. This customary act of homage came into being when people knew what was represented by it, at which time kings did not think that such homage was paid to themselves but to their kingly authority, which was distinct from yet invested in their own persons. That authority invested in them was the law, and because this law had its origin in Divine Truth, it was the law invested in the person of the king, inasmuch as he was the guardian of the law, to which homage had to be paid. Thus a king did not attribute any royal authority to himself other than guardianship of the law. Insofar as he relinquished that guardianship he relinquished his royal authority; for he knew that homage arising from any other source than the law, that is, any other homage than that paid to the law itself, was idolatry. By royal authority is meant Divine Truth - see 1672, 1728, 2015, 2069, 3009, 3670, 4581, 4966, 5044, 5068 - and therefore that authority is the law, which essentially is truth reigning in that kingdom, in accordance with which its inhabitants conduct their lives. From all this it may be seen that 'Abrek!' or 'bend your knees' means homage.

[3] Since 'a cry' is in a similar way an action which corresponds to a living confession or an acknowledgement that is a product of faith, crying out was also the custom followed by the ancients when an outward sign of such confession or acknowledgement needed to be made. The expression 'crying out' is therefore used in various places in the Word when confession and acknowledgement that are the product of faith are referred to, as in the description involving John the Baptist in John,

He bore witness to Jesus and he cried out, saying, This was He of whom I spoke, He who, though coming after me, was before me, for He was before me. I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord. John 1:15, 23.

In the same gospel,

They took branches of palm trees, and went to meet Jesus, and cried, Hosanna! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord, the King of Israel! John 12:13.

In Luke,

Jesus said to the Pharisees that if [the disciples] kept silent, the stones would cry out. Luke 19:40.

Because 'crying out' meant an acknowledgement that was the product of faith and consequently acceptance rising out of the acknowledgement, one therefore reads several times of the Lord's crying out, as in John 7:28, 37; 12:44-45. Also in Isaiah,

Jehovah will go forth as a Mighty Man, as a Man of Wars He will arouse zeal; He will shout aloud, and also will cry out. Isaiah 42:13.

In the contrary sense 'crying out' means lack of acknowledgement and so aversion, see 5016, 5018, 5027. This usage has reference to falsity, 2240.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #4581

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4581. 'And he poured out a drink-offering onto it' means the Divine Good of Truth. This is clear from the meaning of 'a drink-offering' as the Divine Good of Truth, dealt with below. But first one must say what the good of truth is. The good of truth is that which elsewhere has been called the good of faith, which is love towards the neighbour, or charity. There are two universal kinds of good, the first being that which is called the good of faith, the second that which is referred to as the good of love. The good of faith is the kind of good meant by 'a drink-offering', and the good of love the kind meant by 'oil'. The good of love exists with those whom the Lord brings to what is good by an internal way, while the good of faith exists with those He brings to it by an external way. The good of love exists with members of the celestial Church, and likewise with angels of the inmost or third heaven, but the good of faith with members of the spiritual Church, and likewise with angels of the middle or second heaven. Consequently the first kind of good is called celestial good, whereas the second kind is called spiritual good. The difference between the two is, on the one hand, willing what is good out of a will for good and, on the other, willing what is good out of an understanding of it. The second kind of good therefore - spiritual good or the good of faith, which is the good of truth - is meant by 'a drink-offering'; but the first - celestial good or the good of love - is meant in the internal sense by 'oil'.

[2] Nobody, it is true, can see that such things as these were meant by 'oil' and 'a drink-offering' unless he does so from the internal sense. Yet anyone may see that things of a holy nature were represented by them, for unless those holy things were represented by them what else would pouring out a drink-offering or pouring oil onto a stone pillar be but some ridiculous and idolatrous action? It is like the coronation of a king. What else would the ceremonies performed on that occasion be if they did not mean and imply things of a holy nature - placing the crown on his head; anointing him with oil from a horn, on his forehead and on his wrists; placing a sceptre in his hand, as well as a sword and keys; investing him with a purple robe, and then seating him on a silver throne; and after that, his riding in his regalia on a horse, and later still his being served at table by men of distinction, besides many other ceremonies? Unless these represented things of a holy nature and were themselves holy by virtue of their correspondence with the things of heaven and consequently of the Church, they would be no more than the kind of games that young children play, though on a grander scale, or else like plays that are performed on the stage.

[3] But all those ceremonies trace their origin back to most ancient times when ceremonies were holy by virtue of their representation of things that were holy and of their correspondence with holy things in heaven and consequently in the Church. Even today they are considered holy, though not because people know their spiritual representation and correspondence but through the interpretation so to speak they put on symbols in common use. If however people did know what the crown, oil, horn, sceptre, sword, keys, purple robe, silver throne, riding on a white horse, and eating while men of distinction act as the servers, all represented and to what holy thing each corresponded, they would conceive of those things in an even holier way. But they do not know, and surprisingly do not wish to know; indeed that lack of knowledge is so great that the representatives and the meaningful signs included within such ceremonies and within every part of the Word have been obliterated from people's minds at the present day.

[4] The fact that 'a drink-offering' means the good of truth, or spiritual good, may be seen from the sacrifices in which drink-offerings were used. When sacrifices were offered they were made either from the herd or from the flock, and they were representative of internal worship of the Lord, 922, 923, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3519. To these the minchah and the drink-offering were added. The minchah, which consisted of fine flour mixed with oil, meant celestial good, or what amounted to the same, the good of love - 'the oil' meaning love to the Lord and 'the fine flour' charity towards the neighbour. But the drink-offering, which consisted of wine, meant spiritual good, or what amounted to the same, the good of faith. Both these therefore, the minchah and the drink-offering, have the same meaning as the bread and wine in the Holy Supper.

[5] The addition of a minchah and a drink-offering to a burnt offering or to a sacrifice is clear in Moses,

You shall offer two lambs in their first year, each day continually. One lamb you shall offer in the morning, and the second you shall offer between the evenings; and a tenth of fine flour mixed with beaten oil, a quarter of a hin, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, for the first lamb; and so also for the second lamb. Exodus 29:38-41.

In the same author,

You shall offer on the day when you wave the sheaf of the firstfruits of the harvest a lamb without blemish in its first year as a burnt offering to Jehovah, its minchah being two tenths of fine flour mixed with oil, and its drink-offering wine, a quarter of a hin. Leviticus 23:12-13, 18.

In the same author,

On the day when the days of Naziriteship are completed he is to offer his gift to Jehovah, sacrifices and also a basket of unleavened [loaves] of fine flour, cakes mingled with oil, and unleavened wafers anointed with oil, together with their minchah and their drink-offerings. Numbers 6:13-17.

In the same author,

Upon the burnt offering they shall offer a minchah of a tenth [of an ephah] of fine flour mixed with a quarter of a hin of oil, and wine as the drink-offering, a quarter of a hin - in one way upon the burnt offering of a ram, and in another upon that of a bull. Numbers 15:3-11.

In the same author,

With the continual burnt offering you shall offer a drink-offering, a quarter of a hin for a lamb; in the holy place pour out a drink-offering of wine to Jehovah. Numbers 28:6-7.

Further references to minchahs and drink-offerings in the different kinds of sacrifices are continued in Numbers 28:7-end; 29:1-end.

[6] The meaning that 'minchah and drink-offering' had may be seen in addition from the considerations that love and faith constitute the whole of worship, and that in the Holy Supper 'the bread' - described in the quotations above as fine flour mixed with oil - and 'the wine' mean love and faith, and so the whole of worship, dealt with in 1798, 2165, 2177, 2187, 2343, 2359, 3464, 3735, 3813, 4211, 4217.

[7] But when people fell away from the genuine representative kind of worship of the Lord and turned to other gods and poured out drink-offerings to these, 'drink-offerings' came to mean things that were the reverse of charity and faith, namely the evils and falsities that go with the love of the world; as in Isaiah,

You inflamed yourselves among the gods under every green tree. You have also poured out a drink-offering to them, you have brought a minchah. Isaiah 57:5-6.

'Inflaming oneself among the gods' stands for cravings for falsity - 'gods' meaning falsities, 4402 (end), 4544. 'Under every green tree' stands for the trust in all falsities which leads to those cravings, 2722, 4552. 'Pouring out a drink-offering to them' and 'bringing a minchah' stand for the worship of those falsities. In the same prophet,

You who forsake Jehovah, who forget My holy mountain, who set a table for Gad, and fill a drink-offering for Meni. Isaiah 65:11.

In Jeremiah,

The sons gather pieces of wood, and the fathers kindle fire, and the women knead dough to make cakes for the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink-offerings to other gods. Jeremiah 7:18.

[8] In the same prophet,

We will surely do every word that has gone out of our mouth, to burn incense to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink-offerings to her, as we did, we and our fathers, and our princes in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem. Jeremiah 44:17-19.

'The queen of heaven' stands for all falsities, for 'the hosts of heaven' in the genuine sense means truths, and in the contrary sense falsities, and so in the same way do 'king' and 'queen'. 'Queen' accordingly stands for all [falsities] and 'pouring out drink-offerings to her' means worshipping them.

[9] In the same prophet,

The Chaldeans will burn the city, and the houses upon whose roofs they have burned incense to Baal and poured out drink-offerings to other gods. Jeremiah 32:29.

'The Chaldeans' stands for people whose worship involves falsity. 'Burning the city' stands for destroying and laying waste those whose doctrines teach falsity. Upon the roofs of the houses burning incense to Baal' stands for the worship of what is evil, 'pouring out drink-offerings to other gods' for the worship of what is false.

[10] In Hosea,

They will not dwell in Jehovah's land, but Ephraim will return to Egypt, and in Assyria they will eat what is unclean. They will not pour libations of wine to Jehovah. Hosea 9:3-4.

'Not dwelling in Jehovah's land' stands for not abiding in the good of love. 'Ephraim will return to Egypt' stands for the Church when its understanding will come to be no more than factual and sensory knowledge. 'In Assyria they will eat what is unclean' stands for impure and profane desires that are the product of reasoning. 'They will not pour libations of wine to Jehovah' stands for no worship based on truth.

[11] In Moses,

It will be said, Where are their gods, the rock in which they trusted, who ate the fat of the sacrifices, [who] drank the wine of their drink-offering? Let them rise up and help them! Deuteronomy 32:37-38.

'Gods' stands for falsities, as above. 'Who ate the fat of the sacrifices' stands for their destruction of the good belonging to worship, '[who] drank the wine of their drink-offering' for their destruction of the truth belonging to it. A reference to 'drink-offerings of blood' also occurs in David,

They will multiply their pains; they have hastened to another, lest I pour out their drink-offerings of blood, and take up their names upon My lips. Psalms 16:4.

By these 'drink-offerings' are meant profanations of truth, for in this case 'blood' means violence done to charity, 374, 1005, and profanation, 1003.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.