The Bible

 

Sáng thế 27

Study

   

1 Bởi Y-sác đã già, mắt làng chẳng thấy được nữa, bèn gọi Ê-sau, con trưởng nam, mà rằng: Hỡi con! Ê-sau thưa rằng: Có con đây.

2 Người bèn nói rằng: Nầy, cha đã già rồi, chẳng biết ngày nào phải chết;

3 vậy bây giờ, cha xin con hãy lấy khí giới, ống tên và cung con, ra đồng săn thịt rừng cho cha,

4 dọn một món ngon tùy theo cha sở thích; rồi dâng lên cho cha ăn, đặng linh hồn cha chúc phước cho con trước khi chết.

5 Vả, đương khi Y-sác nói cùng Ê-sau con trai mình, thì ê-be-ca có nghe. Ê-sau bèn ra đồng săn thịt rừng đặng đem về cho cha.

6 ê-be-ca nói cùng Gia-cốp, con trai mình, rằng: Nầy, mẹ có nghe cha nói cùng Ê-sau, anh con, và dặn rằng:

7 Hãy đem thịt rừng về cho cha, dọn một món ngon cha ăn; đặng trước khi qua đời, cha sẽ chúc phước cho con trước mặt Ðức Giê-hô-va.

8 Vậy, con ơi! bây giờ, hãy nghe mẹ và làm theo lời mẹ biểu:

9 Hãy ra ngoài bầy, bắt hai con tốt, rồi mẹ sẽ dọn cho cha con một món ngon, tùy theo người sở thích;

10 con sẽ đem cho cha ăn, đặng người chúc phước con trước khi qua đời.

11 Gia-cốp thưa lại cùng mẹ rằng: Thưa mẹ, Ê-sau, anh con, có lông, còn con lại không.

12 Có lẽ cha sẽ rờ mình chăng, coi con như kẻ phỉnh gạt, thì con chắc lấy cho mình sự rủa sả, chớ chẳng phải sự chúc phước đâu.

13 Mẹ đáp rằng: Con ơi! xin sự rủa sả đó để cho mẹ chịu; hãy cứ nghe lời mẹ, ra bắt hai dê con.

14 Vậy, Gia-cốp đi bắt hai dê con, đem lại cho mẹ, làm món ngon, tùy theo cha sở thích.

15 Ðoạn ê-be-ca lấy quần áo tốt nhứt của Ê-sau, con trưởng nam, sẵn để trong nhà, mà mặc vào cho Gia-cốp, con út mình;

16 rồi người lấy da con bao hai tay và cổ, vì tay và cổ Gia-cốp không có lông.

17 ê-be-ca bèn để món ngon và bánh của mình đã dọn vào tay con út mình.

18 Gia-cốp bưng đến cha mình và nói rằng: Thưa cha! Y-sác đáp: Có cha đây; con là đứa nào đó?

19 Gia-cốp thưa: Tôi là Ê-sau, con trưởng nam của cha; con đã làm theo lời cha dặn biểu; xin cha dậy, ngồi ăn lấy thịt săn của con, đặng linh hồn cha sẽ chúc phước cho con.

20 Y-sác hỏi rằng: Sao con đi săn được mau thế? Thưa rằng: Ấy nhờ Giê-hô-va Ðức Chúa Trời của cha xui tôi gặp mau vậy.

21 Y-sác nói cùng Gia-cốp rằng: Hỡi con! hãy lại gần đặng cha rờ thử xem có phải là Ê-sau, con của cha chăng?

22 Gia-cốp bèn lại gần Y-sác; người rờ và nói rằng: Tiếng nói thì của Gia-cốp, còn hai tay lại của Ê-sau.

23 Người chẳng nhận biết đặng vì hai tay cũng có lông như của anh, là Ê-sau. Vậy Y-sác chúc phước cho.

24 Người lại hỏi rằng: Ấy con thật là Ê-sau, con trai ta, phải chăng? Gia-cốp thưa: Phải, con đây.

25 Y-sác bèn nói: Hãy dọn cho cha ăn lấy thịt săn của con, đặng linh hồn cha chúc phước cho con. Gia-cốp dọn cho người ăn, cũng có đem rượu cho người uống nữa.

26 ồi Y-sác cha người nói rằng: Hỡi con! hãy lại gần và hôn cha.

27 Gia-cốp bèn lại gần và hôn người. Y-sác đánh mùi thơm của áo con, liền chúc phước cho, và nói rằng: Nầy, mùi hương của con ta Khác nào mùi hương của cánh đồng mà Ðức Giê-hô-va đã ban phước cho.

28 Cầu xin Ðức Chúa Trời cho con sương móc trên trời xuống, Ðược màu mỡ của đất, và dư dật lúa mì cùng rượu.

29 Muôn dân phải phục con, Các nước phải quì lạy trước mặt con! Hãy được quyền chủ các anh em, Các con trai của mẹ con phải quì lạy trước mặt con! Ai rủa sả con sẽ bị rủa sả lại, Ai cầu phước cho con, sẽ được ban phước lại!

30 Vừa khi Y-sác chúc phước cho Gia-cốp xuống, và vừa khi Gia-cốp lùi ra khỏi nơi cha mình, thì Ê-sau, anh người, đi săn trở về.

31 Người cũng dọn một món ngon, dâng lên cho cha và thưa rằng: Xin dậy, ngồi ăn thịt săn của con trai cha, đặng linh hồn cha chúc phước cho con.

32 Y-sác, cha người, hỏi: Con là đứa nào? Thưa rằng: Tôi là Ê-sau, con trưởng nam của cha.

33 Y-sác lấy làm cảm động qua đỗi mà nói rằng: Vậy, còn đứa nào đã săn thịt rừng, và đã dâng lên cho cha đó? Trước khi con về, cha đã ăn hết rồi, và chúc phước cho nó; nó lại sẽ được ban phước vậy.

34 Vừa nghe dứt lời cha, thì Ê-sau la lên một tiếng rất lớn, và rất thảm thiết mà thưa cùng cha rằng: Cha ơi! xin hãy chúc phước cho con luôn nữa!

35 Nhưng Y-sác lại đáp: Em con đã dùng mưu kế đến cướp sự chúc phước của con rồi.

36 Ê-sau liền nói rằng: Có phải vì người ta gọi nó là Gia-cốp mà đó hai lần chiếm lấy vị tôi rồi chăng? Nó đã chiếm quyền trưởng nam tôi, và lại bây giờ còn chiếm sự phước lành của tôi nữa. Tiếp rằng: Cha chẳng có dành sự chúc phước chi cho tôi sao?

37 Y-sác đáp rằng: Nầy, cho đã lập nó lên làm chủ con, và đã cho các anh em làm tôi nó; và đã dự bị lúa mì và rượu cho nó. Vậy, cha sẽ làm chi cho con đây?

38 Ê-sau thưa rằng: Cha ơi! cha chỉ có sự chúc phước đó thôi sao? Hãy chúc phước cho con với, cha! ồi Ê-sau cất tiếng lên khóc.

39 Y-sác cha người, đáp rằng: Nầy, nơi con ở sẽ thiếu màu mỡ của đất, Cùng sương-móc trên trời sa xuống.

40 Con sẽ nhờ gươm mới được sống. Và làm tôi tớ cho em con. Song khi con lưu lạc rày đó mai đây, Sẽ bẻ cái ách của em trên cổ con vậy.

41 Ê-sau trở lòng ghét Gia-cốp vì cớ cha mình chúc phước cho người, bèn nói thầm trong lòng rằng: Ngày tang của cha đã hầu gần; vậy, ta sẽ giết Gia-cốp, em ta, đi.

42 Họ đem lời Ê-sau, con lớn, thuật lại cùng ê-be-ca, thì người sai gọi Gia-cốp, con út mình, mà nói rằng: Nầy, Ê-sau, anh con, toan giết con để báo thù.

43 Vậy, bây giờ, hỡi con, hãy nghe lời mẹ, đứng dậy, chạy trốn qua nhà La-ban, cậu con, tại Cha-ran,

44 và hãy ở cùng người ít lâu, cho đến lúc nào cơn giận của anh con qua hết.

45 Khi cơn giận anh con bỏ qua rồi, và nó quên việc con đã gây nên với nó, thì mẹ sẽ biểu con về. Có lẽ đâu mẹ phải chịu mất cả hai đứa trong một ngày ư?

46 ê-be-ca nói cùng Y-sác rằng: Tôi đã chán, không muốn sống nữa, vì cớ mấy con gái họ Hếch. Nếu Gia-cốp cưới một trong mấy con gái họ Hếch mà làm vợ, tức một người con gái trong xứ như các dân đó; thôi, tôi còn sống mà chi?

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3519

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3519. And take me from thence two good kids of the she-goats. That this signifies the truths of this good, is evident from the signification of “kids of the she-goats,” as being the truths of good, concerning which in what follows. The reason there were two, is that as in the rational, so in the natural, there are things which are of the will and things which are of the understanding. The things in the natural that have relation to the will are delights, and those which have relation to the understanding are memory-knowledges, and in order to be something these two must be conjoined together.

[2] That “kids of the she-goats” signify the truths of good, may be seen from those passages of the Word where “kids” and “she-goats” are mentioned. Be it known that in the genuine sense all the tame and useful beasts mentioned in the Word signify the celestial things of good and the spiritual things of truth (see n. 45, 46, 142, 143, 246, 714, 715, 2180, 2781, 3218); and because there are various kinds of celestial things or goods, and consequently various kinds of spiritual things or truths, one kind is signified by one beast, and another by another; thus one kind is signified by a “lamb,” another by a “kid,” another by a “sheep,” by a “she-goat,” a “ram,” a “he-goat,” a “bullock,” an “ox;” another also by a “horse” and by a “camel;” another likewise by birds; and also another by the beasts of the sea, as by “whales” and “fishes.” There are more genera of celestial and spiritual things than can be enumerated, consequently of goods and truths, although when the celestial or good is mentioned, and also the spiritual or truth, it appears as if it were not manifold, but only one. But how manifold they both are, or how innumerable their genera are, may be seen from what has been said concerning heaven (n. 3241), namely, that it is distinguished into innumerable societies, and this according to the genera of celestial and spiritual things, or of the goods of love and thence of the truths of faith; and moreover every single genus of good, and every single genus of truth, has innumerable species into which the societies of each genus are distinguished, and every species in like manner.

[3] The most universal genera of good and truth are what were represented by the animals that were offered in the burnt-offerings and sacrifices; and because the genera are most distinct from one another it was expressly enjoined that such and no other should be offered-in some cases, for instance, male and female lambs, also male and female kids; in some cases rams and sheep, and also he-goats; but in others, calves, bullocks, and oxen; also pigeons and turtle-doves (n. 922, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3218). What was signified by “kids” and “she-goats” may be seen both from the sacrifices in which they were offered, and also from other passages in the Word; whence it is evident that male and female “lambs” signified the innocence of the internal or rational man, and that “kids” and “she-goats” signified the innocence of the external or natural man, thus the truth and good thereof.

[4] That the truth and good of the innocence of the external or natural man is signified by “kids” and “she-goats” is evident from the following passages in the Word.

In Isaiah:

The wolf shall abide with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf, and the young lion, and the sheep 1 together; and a little child shall lead them (Isaiah 11:6); where the Lord’s kingdom is treated of, and a state of no fear from evil, or of no dread on account of hell, because one of presence with the Lord. The “lamb” and the “kid” denote those who are in innocence, and because these are the safest of all, they are mentioned first.

[5] When all the firstborn of Egypt were smitten, it was commanded that they should slay perfect and male young of the flock, of lambs or of kids, and should put some of the blood on the door-posts and on the lintel of the houses, and thus there should not be a plague on them from the destroyer (Exodus 12:5, 7, 13). The “firstborn of Egypt” denotes the good of love and charity extinct (n. 3325); “lambs” and “kids” are states of innocence; and those who are in these states are safe from evil, for all in heaven are protected by the Lord through states of innocence; and this protection was represented by the slaying of a lamb or kid, and by the blood upon the door-posts and lintel of the houses.

[6] When Jehovah appeared to anyone through an angel, a kid of the goats was sacrificed, lest the man should die-as when he appeared to Gideon (Judges 6:19), and to Manoah (13:15-16, 19). The reason was that Jehovah or the Lord cannot appear to anyone, not even to an angel, unless he to whom He appears is in a state of innocence; and therefore as soon as the Lord is present with anyone he is let into a state of innocence; for the Lord enters through innocence, even with the angels in heaven. On this account no one can come into heaven unless he has somewhat of innocence, according to the words of the Lord in Matthew 18:3; Mark 10:15; Luke 18:17. That men believed they should die when Jehovah appeared, unless they offered such a burnt-offering may be seen in Judges 13:22-23.

[7] Inasmuch as genuine conjugial love is innocence (see n. 2736), it was customary in the representative church to enter in unto a wife by a present of a kid of the she-goats; as we read of Samson (Judges 15:1); likewise of Judah when he went in unto Tamar (Genesis 38:17, 20, 23). That a “kid” and a “she-goat” signified innocence, is also evident from the sacrifices of guilt, which they were to offer when anyone had sinned through error (Leviticus 1:10; 4:28; 5:6); sin through error is a sin of ignorance in which is innocence. The same is evident from the following Divine command in Moses:

The first of the first-fruits of thy ground thou shalt bring into the house of Jehovah thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in its mother’s milk (Exodus 23:19; 34:26); where by the “first-fruits of the ground, which they were to bring into the house of Jehovah,” is signified the state of innocence which is in infancy; and by “not seething a kid in its mother’s milk,” that they should not destroy the innocence of infancy. Because these things are signified, in both passages the one command follows the other without a break; and yet in the literal sense they appear to be altogether different; but in the internal sense they cohere together.

[8] Because as before said “kids” and “she-goats” signified innocence, it was also commanded that the curtain of the tent over the tabernacle should be made of the wool of she-goats (Exodus 25:4; 26:7; 35:5-6, 23, 26; 36:14), for a sign that all the holy things therein represented derived their essence from innocence. By the “wool of she-goats” is signified the ultimate or outermost of the innocence that is in ignorance, such as exists with the Gentiles; and who in the internal sense are the “curtains” of the tabernacle. From all this it is evident what and of what quality are the truths of good that are signified by the “two good kids of the she-goats” concerning which Rebekah his mother spoke unto Jacob her son, namely, that they are those of innocence or of infancy, being in fact those which Esau was to bring to his father Isaac; concerning which above (n. 3501, 3508); and which indeed were not these truths of good, but at first appeared as if they were; and it is for this reason that by means of these Jacob simulated Esau.

Footnotes:

1. The Hebrew for “sheep” (ovis) here is meri, which in the A. V. is rendered “fatling” three times, “fat cattle” twice, “fat beast” once, “fed beast” once. By Swedenborg it is rendered saginatum seven times, pinguis once, pingue pecus once, and ovis once. In the passage before us he has rendered it saginatum in n. 10132; True Christian Religion789; Apocalypse Explained514, 780, 781; pingue pecus in n. 430 and ovis here in n. 3519 of the same work. The commentators usually understand by it a fattened calf; some rabbis a wild ox (buffalo or bubalus); none have “sheep.”

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #680

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

680. That goods and truths are the genuine foods of man must be evident to everyone, for he who is destitute of them has no life, but is dead. When a man is spiritually dead the foods with which his soul is fed are delights from evils and pleasantnesses from falsities-which are foods of death-and are also those which come from bodily, worldly, and natural things, which also have nothing of life in them. Moreover, such a man does not know what spiritual and celestial food is, insomuch that whenever “food” or “bread” is mentioned in the Word he supposes the food of the body to be meant; as in the Lord’s prayer, the words “Give us our daily bread” he supposes to mean only sustenance for the body; and those who extend their ideas further say it includes also other necessaries of the body, such as clothing, property, and the like. They even sharply deny that any other food is meant; when yet they see plainly that the words preceding and following involve only celestial and spiritual things, and that the Lord’s kingdom is spoken of; and besides, they might know that the Word of the Lord is celestial and spiritual.

[2] From this and other similar examples it must be sufficiently evident how corporeal is man at the present day; and that, like the Jews, he is disposed to take everything that is said in the Word in the most gross and material sense. The Lord Himself clearly teaches what is meant in His Word by “food” and “bread.” Concerning “food” He thus speaks in John:

Jesus said, Labor not for the meat [or food] which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth unto eternal life, which the Son of man shall give unto you (John 6:27).

And concerning “bread” He says, in the same chapter:

Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead. This is the Bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof and not die. I am the living Bread which came down from heaven; if any man eat of this Bread he shall live eternally (John 6:49-51, 58).

But at the present day there are men like those who heard these words and said: “This is a hard saying; who can hear it?” and who “went back and walked no more with Him” (John 6:60, 66), to whom the Lord said: “The words that I speak unto you they are spirit and they are life” (John 6:63).

[3] And so with respect to “water” which signifies the spiritual things of faith, and concerning which the Lord thus speaks in John:

Jesus said, Everyone that drinketh of this water shall thirst again; but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall become in him a fountain of water springing up unto eternal life (John 4:13-14).

But at the present day there are those who are like the woman with whom the Lord spoke at the well, and who answered, “Lord, give me this water, that I thirst not, neither come hither to draw” (John 4:15).

[4] That in the Word “food” means no other than spiritual and celestial food, which is faith in the Lord, and love, is evident from many passages in the Word, as in Jeremiah:

The enemy hath spread out his hand upon all the desirable things of Jerusalem; for she hath seen that the nations are entered into her sanctuary, concerning whom Thou didst command that they should not enter into Thy congregation. All the people groan, they seek bread; they have given their desirable things for food to refresh the soul (Lamentations 1:10-11).

No other than spiritual bread and food are here meant, for the subject is the sanctuary. Again:

I have cried out for my lovers, they have deceived me; my priests and mine elders in the city expired, for they sought food for themselves, to refresh their soul (Lamentations 1:19),

with the same meaning.

In David:

These wait all upon Thee, that Thou mayest give them their food in its season; Thou givest them, they gather; Thou openest thine hand, they are satisfied with good (Psalms 104:27-28).

Here likewise spiritual and celestial food is meant.

[5] In Isaiah:

Ho, everyone that thirsteth, come ye to the waters; and he that hath no silver; come ye, buy and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without silver, and without price (Isaiah 55:1),

where “wine” and “milk” denote spiritual and celestial drink. Again:

A virgin shall conceive and bear a Son, and thou shalt call His name Immanuel; butter and honey shall He eat, that He may know to refuse the evil and choose the good; and it shall come to pass that for the abundance of milk that they shall give they shall eat butter; for butter and honey shall everyone eat that is left in the midst of the land (Isaiah 7:1, 4-15, 22).

Here to “eat honey and butter” is to appropriate what is celestial-spiritual; “they that are left” denote remains, concerning whom also in Malachi:

Bring ye all the tithes into the treasure house, that there may be food in My house (Malachi 3:10).

“Tithes” denote remains. (Concerning the signification of “food” see above, n. 56-58, 276.)

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.