The Bible

 

Genesis 35

Study

   

2 Iṇṇa Yaqub y aytedan-net əd win dər-əs əddewnen: «Əgərat-in aṣṣanaman win ɣur-wan əllanen, zəzdəgat, təsəṃṃəttəyam isəlsa!

3 Ad-nəfəl edagg a, ad-nakku Bet-El dad z-əkrəsa edagg ən təkutay i Məššina wa di-isannaflayan assaɣa wa ad əmaɣatara, iṣṣan daɣ-i edag oṣe.»

4 Təzzar əkfan Yaqub aṣṣanaman win əlan kul, əd təzabaten ən təməzzugen kul id əṃosnat addabaratan. Iṇbal-tan Yaqub daw ašək igan eṣəm ela illan dagma n əɣrəm ən Šəkem.

5 Dəffər a wen əṣṣəntan əšikəl. Ixrab Məššina kəl ɣərman win tan ɣalayɣalaynen a di da fəlas wər ilkem awedan i maddan-əs ən Yaqub.

6 Yaqub əd win dər iddew kul oṣan-in Luz igan eṣəm tolas Bet-El, ihan akal ən Kanan.

7 Əddi ikras edagg ən təkutay, ig-as eṣəm El-Betel (almaɣna-nnet Məššina ən Betel) id dada a das-d-inafalal Məššina as iḍḍəggag y amaqqar-net.

8 Aba Dəbora taklit ən Raqqiyyetu, tətawaṇbal daw ašək illan daw betel, igan eṣəm elon as har harwa eṣəm-net Elon wa n Tala.

9 Inafalal-du Məššina tolas i Yaqub ɣur tawaɣlay-nnet Mesofotami, iga fall-as albaraka,

10 iṇṇ-as: «Eṣəm-nak Yaqub mišan dəffər azala ad-tagaɣ eṣəm Israyel.» A di da fəl-as itawagga eṣəm Israyel.

11 Təzzar iṇṇ-as Məššina: «Nak Məššina di maqqaran zəddig. A fall-ak aga albaraka fəl ad ifələyləy əzzurriya-nnak. Əzzurriya-nnak di a daɣ-as tətəwəggu tamattay madeɣ tidawat ən təmattiwen. Agin mənokalan daɣ-as.

12 «Akal wa əkfeɣ Ibrahim d Isxaq, a-dak-akfa kay da, akfaq-qu y əzzurriya-nnak dəffər-ək.»

13 Təzzar ig̣mad Məššina edag wa daɣ iššewal i Yaqub.

14 Issəɣta Yaqub daɣ adag wa sər-əs iššewal Məššina təhunt təzzar inɣal fall-as esmad iṃosan takutay, issəlal-tat widi, təqqal təṃətirt ən Məššina.

15 Təzzar iga adagg-en wa sər-əs iššewal Məššina eṣəm Bet-El (almaɣna-nnet Ehan ən Məššina).

16 Yaqub əd tələqqawen-net əg̣madan Bet-El. Daɣ tarrayt n əɣrəm n Efrata, daq-qu əggugan, təggaz Raxil šin ig̣uz n əṃzur, das-wər-nələmmid.

17 Alwaq wa daɣ fall-as təṣṣas talɣa təṇṇ-as təṇtut ta n tənakbalt: «Dawat, barar iyyan tolas!»

18 Mišan s iga di da təlla ɣur-əs taṃattant, aṃaran dad zama təgraw tu daɣ amazay wa, təg-as eṣəm Benoni (almaɣna ag talawayt-in) mišan abba-nnet ig-as eṣəm Benyamin (almaɣna ag əɣil).

19 Aba Raxil. Tətawaṇbal daɣ tarrayt n Efrata, s əmərədda aɣrəm di itawagg-as eṣəm Betlehem.

20 Issəɣta Yaqub təhunt təqqal təṃətirt fəl tasaṣkawt-net.Təṃətirt-en təmmunn fəl tasaṣkawt ən Raxil har azalada.

21 Dəffər awen iggəlat, ikras ahaket dənnəg Migdal-Eder.

22 As iɣsar Israyel daɣ aṃadal wa, itinəməṇsu Ruben əd Bilha, tawahayt n abba-nnet. Isla Israyel a di wər t-ogem. Ila Yaqub ṃaraw bararan d əššin.

23 Ila əd Leyya: Ruben, aɣafadday, dəffər-əs Šimehon, Lefi, Yuda, Issakar əd Zəbulun

24 Ila əd Raxil: Yusəf əd Benyamin.

25 Ila əd Bilha, taklit ən Raxil: Dan əd Naftali.

26 Ila əd Zilfa, taklit ən Leyya: Gad d Aššer. Əntanay da da maddanəs ən Yaqub win das-d-əhunen daɣ Mesofotami.

27 Oṣ-in Yaqub aɣaywan n abba-nnet Isxaq daɣ Mamre, daɣ Kiryat-Arba, iṃos əmərədda Xebron, dad iga Ibrahim d Isxaq təməɣsurt ən magaran.

28 Iga Isxaq təməddurt ən ṭameday n awatay d əṭṭamat təṃərwen,

29 təzzar aba-tu. Dəffər təɣrəst zagret ilkam i win əglanen. Əṇbalan-tu bararan-net fəl əššin-essan Esaw əd Yaqub.

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #4563

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4563. And Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died. That this signifies that hereditary evil was expelled, is evident from the signification of “dying,” as being the end, or that a thing ceases to be such (see n. 494, 3253, 3259, 3276), here therefore expelled, because the subject treated of is hereditary evil; and from the representation of Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, as being hereditary evil. In nourishing and suckling an infant a nurse properly signifies the insinuation of innocence by means of what is celestial spiritual, for milk denotes the celestial spiritual (n. 2184), and the infant she suckles denotes innocence (n. 430, 1616, 2126, 2305, 2306) But here by “Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse,” is signified that which was received from the mother and nourished from infancy. That this was the hereditary evil from the mother against which the Lord fought, may be seen from what has been shown regarding this hereditary (n. 1414, 1444, 1573), and from His expelling it, so that at last He was not the son of Mary (see n. 2159, 2574, 2649, 3036).

[2] It is known that man derives evil from both his parents, and that this evil is called hereditary evil. He is therefore born into it, but still it does not manifest itself until the man becomes an adult and acts from his understanding and the derivative will, and meanwhile it lies hidden, especially during infancy. And as of the Lord’s mercy no one is blamed for what is hereditary, but for what is actual (n. 966, 2308), and what is hereditary cannot become actual until the man acts from his own understanding and his own will, therefore infants are led by the Lord by means of infants and angels from Him, and hence they appear in a state of innocence while hereditary evil still lurks in everything they do (n. 2300, 2307, 2308). This hereditary evil yields them nourishment, or is as a nurse, until the time when they judge for themselves (n. 4063); and then if they are being regenerated they are brought by the Lord into a state of new infancy, and at last into heavenly wisdom; thus into genuine infancy, that is, into innocence; for genuine infancy or innocence dwells in wisdom (n. 2305, 3183). The difference is, that the innocence of infancy is without, and hereditary evil within; whereas the innocence of wisdom is within, and evil both actual and hereditary is without. From these and other things that have been already stated, it is evident that hereditary evil acts as a nurse from the earliest infancy to the age of new infancy; and hence it is that by a “nurse” is signified hereditary evil, and also that by a “nurse” is signified the insinuation of innocence by means of the celestial spiritual.

[3] As in the internal sense of this chapter the disposition and arrangement of truths by good in the Lord’s natural is treated of (n. 4536), and the consequent progression to interior things, therefore hereditary evil is also treated of, in that it was expelled. This is the reason why mention is made in this verse of Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, that she died and was buried under an oak, which is not a thing of sufficient moment to interrupt the series unless it involved such things.

[4] The very mystery that is specifically signified by “Rebekah’s nurse” cannot as yet be disclosed, for before this is done it is necessary to know the nature of the influx of the rational into the natural, namely, that it is from the good of the rational immediately into the good of the natural, and from the good of the rational mediately, through the truth there into the good of natural truth. “Rebekah” is the truth of the rational (n. 3012, 3013, 3077); and “Isaac” is the good of the rational (n. 3012, 3194, 3210); “Esau” is the good of the natural by immediate influx from the good of the rational, or “Isaac;” and “Jacob” is the good or good of truth of the natural by mediate influx through the truth of the rational, or “Rebekah.” (In regard to this influx, mediate and immediate, see above, n. 3314, 3573.) This must be known before it is possible to have any specific knowledge of the mystery why by “Rebekah’s nurse” is here signified and described hereditary evil; for it is from this that the nature of this evil can be seen.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.