The Bible

 

Daniel 1

Study

1 επι-P βασιλευς-N3V-GSM *ιωακιμ-N---GSM ο- A--GSF *ιουδαια-N1A-GSF ετος-N3E-GSN τριτος-A1--GSN παραγιγνομαι-VB--AMPNSM *ναβουχοδονοσορ-N---NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM *βαβυλων-N3W-GSF εις-P *ιερουσαλημ-N---ASF πολιορκεω-V2I-IAI3S αυτος- D--ASF

2 και-C παραδιδωμι-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--ASF κυριος-N2--NSM εις-P χειρ-N3--APF αυτος- D--GSM και-C *ιωακιμ-N---ASM ο- A--ASM βασιλευς-N3V-ASM ο- A--GSF *ιουδαια-N1A-GSF και-C μερος-N3E-ASN τις- I--ASN ο- A--GPN ιερος-A1A-GPN σκευος-N3E-GPN ο- A--GSM κυριος-N2--GSM και-C αποφερω-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--APN εις-P *βαβυλων-N3W-ASF και-C αποερειδομαι-VAI-AMI3S αυτος- D--APN εν-P ο- A--DSN ειδωλιον-N2N-DSN αυτος- D--GSM

3 και-C ειπον-VBI-AAI3S ο- A--NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM *αβιεσδρι-N---DSM ο- A--DSM εαυτου- D--GSM αρχιευνουχος-N2--DSM αγω-VB--AAN αυτος- D--DSM εκ-P ο- A--GPM υιος-N2--GPM ο- A--GPM μεγισταν-N3--GPM ο- A--GSM *ισραηλ-N---GSM και-C εκ-P ο- A--GSN βασιλικος-A1--GSN γενος-N3E-GSN και-C εκ-P ο- A--GPM επιλεκτος-A1B-GPM

4 νεανισκος-N2--APM αμωμος-A1B-APM και-C ευειδης-A3H-APM και-C επιστημων-A3N-APM εν-P πας-A1S-DSF σοφια-N1A-DSF και-C γραμματικος-A1--APM και-C συνετος-A1--APM και-C σοφος-A1--APM και-C ισχυω-V1--PAPAPM ωστε-C ειμι-V9--PAN εν-P ο- A--DSM οικος-N2--DSM ο- A--GSM βασιλευς-N3V-GSM και-C διδασκω-VA--AAN αυτος- D--APM γραμμα-N3M-APN και-C διαλεκτος-N2--ASF *χαλδαικος-A1--ASF

5 και-C διδωμι-V8--PMN αυτος- D--DPM εκθεσις-N3I-ASF εκ-P ο- A--GSM οικος-N2--GSM ο- A--GSM βασιλευς-N3V-GSM κατα-P εκαστος-A1--ASF ημερα-N1A-ASF και-C απο-P ο- A--GSF βασιλικος-A1--GSF τραπεζα-N1S-GSF και-C απο-P ο- A--GSM οινος-N2--GSM ος- --GSM πινω-V1--PAI3S ο- A--NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM και-C εκπαιδευω-VA--AAN αυτος- D--APM ετος-N3E-APN τρεις-A3--APN και-C εκ-P ουτος- D--GPM ιστημι-VA--AAN εμπροσθεν-P ο- A--GSM βασιλευς-N3V-GSM

6 και-C ειμι-V9I-IAI3P εκ-P ο- A--GSN γενος-N3E-GSN ο- A--GPM υιος-N2--GPM *ισραηλ-N---GSM ο- A--GPM απο-P ο- A--GSF *ιουδαια-N1A-GSF *δανιηλ-N---NSM *ανανιας-N1T-NSM *μισαηλ-N---NSM *αζαριας-N1T-NSM

7 και-C επιτιθημι-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--DPM ο- A--NSM αρχιευνουχος-N2--NSM ονομα-N3M-APN ο- A--DSM μεν-X *δανιηλ-N---DSM *βαλτασαρ-N---ASM ο- A--DSM δε-X *ανανιας-N1T-DSM *σεδραχ-N---ASM και-C ο- A--DSM *μισαηλ-N---DSM *μισαχ-N---ASM και-C ο- A--DSM *αζαριας-N1T-DSM *αβδεναγω-N---ASM

8 και-C ενθυμεομαι-VCI-API3S *δανιηλ-N---NSM εν-P ο- A--DSF καρδια-N1A-DSF οπως-C μη-D αλισγεω-VC--APS3S εν-P ο- A--DSN δειπνον-N2N-DSN ο- A--GSM βασιλευς-N3V-GSM και-C εν-P ος- --DSM πινω-V1--PAI3S οινος-N2--DSM και-C αξιοω-VAI-AAI3S ο- A--ASM αρχιευνουχος-N2--ASM ινα-C μη-D συνμολυνομαι-VA--APS3S

9 και-C διδωμι-VAI-AAI3S κυριος-N2--NSM ο- A--DSM *δανιηλ-N---DSM τιμη-N1--ASF και-C χαρις-N3--ASF εναντιον-P ο- A--GSM αρχιευνουχος-N2--GSM

10 και-C ειπον-VBI-AAI3S ο- A--NSM αρχιευνουχος-N2--NSM ο- A--DSM *δανιηλ-N---DSM αγωνιαω-V3--PAI1S ο- A--ASM κυριος-N2--ASM εγω- P--GS ο- A--ASM βασιλευς-N3V-ASM ο- A--ASM εκτασσω-VA--AAPASM ο- A--ASF βρωσις-N3I-ASF συ- P--GP και-C ο- A--ASF ποσις-N3I-ASF συ- P--GP ινα-C μη-D οραω-VB--AAS3S ο- A--APN προσωπον-N2N-APN συ- P--GP διατρεπω-VP--XMPAPN και-C ασθενης-A3H-APN παρα-P ο- A--APM συντρεφω-V1--PMPAPM συ- P--DP νεανιας-N1T-APM ο- A--GPM αλλογενης-A3H-GPM και-C κινδυνευω-VF--FAI1S ο- A--DSM ιδιος-A1A-DSM τραχηλος-N2--DSM

11 και-C ειπον-VBI-AAI3S *δανιηλ-N---NSM *αβιεσδρι-N---DSM ο- A--DSM αναδεικνυω-VC--APPDSM αρχιευνουχος-N2--DSM επι-P ο- A--ASM *δανιηλ-N---ASM *ανανιας-N1T-ASM *μισαηλ-N---ASM *αζαριας-N1T-ASM

12 πειραζω-VA--AAD2S δη-X ο- A--APM παις-N3D-APM συ- P--GS επι-P ημερα-N1A-APF δεκα-M και-C διδωμι-VC--APD3S εγω- P--DP απο-P ο- A--GPN οσπριον-N2N-GPN ο- A--GSF γη-N1--GSF ωστε-C καπτω-V1--PAN και-C υδροποτεω-V2--PAN

13 και-C εαν-C φαινω-VD--APS3S ο- A--NSF οψις-N3I-NSF εγω- P--GP διατρεπω-VP--XMPNSF παρα-P ο- A--APM αλλος- D--APM νεανισκος-N2--APM ο- A--APM εσθιω-V1--PAPAPM απο-P ο- A--GSN βασιλικος-A1--GSN δειπνον-N2N-GSN καθως-D εαν-C θελω-V1--PAS2S ουτως-D χραω-VA--AAN ο- A--DPM παις-N3D-DPM συ- P--GS

14 και-C χραω-VAI-AMI3S αυτος- D--DPM ο- A--ASM τροπος-N2--ASM ουτος- D--ASM και-C πειραζω-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--APM ημερα-N1A-APF δεκα-M

15 μετα-P δε-X ο- A--APF δεκα-M ημερα-N1A-APF φαινω-VDI-API3S ο- A--NSF οψις-N3I-NSF αυτος- D--GPM καλος-A1--NSF και-C ο- A--NSF εξις-N3I-NSF ο- A--GSN σωμα-N3M-GSN κρεισσων-A3C-NSF ο- A--GPM αλλος- D--GPM νεανισκος-N2--GPM ο- A--GPM εσθιω-V1--PAPGPM ο- A--ASN βασιλικος-A1--ASN δειπνον-N2N-ASN

16 και-C ειμι-V9I-IAI3S *αβιεσδρι-N---NSM ανααιρεω-V2--PMPNSM ο- A--ASN δειπνον-N2N-ASN αυτος- D--GPM και-C ο- A--ASM οινος-N2--ASM αυτος- D--GPM και-C αντιδιδωμι-V8I-IAI3S αυτος- D--DPM απο-P ο- A--GPN οσπριον-N2N-GPN

17 και-C ο- A--DPM νεανισκος-N2--DPM διδωμι-VAI-AAI3S ο- A--NSM κυριος-N2--NSM επιστημη-N1--ASF και-C συνεσις-N3I-ASF και-C φρονησις-N3I-ASF εν-P πας-A1S-DSF γραμματικος-A1--DSF τεχνη-N1--DSF και-C ο- A--DSM *δανιηλ-N---DSM διδωμι-VAI-AAI3S συνεσις-N3I-ASF εν-P πας-A3--DSN ρημα-N3M-DSN και-C οραμα-N3M-DSN και-C ενυπνιον-N2N-DPN και-C εν-P πας-A1S-DSF σοφια-N1A-DSF

18 μετα-P δε-X ο- A--APF ημερα-N1A-APF ουτος- D--APF επιτασσω-VAI-AAI3S ο- A--NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM ειςαγω-VB--AAN αυτος- D--APM και-C ειςαγω-VQI-API3P απο-P ο- A--GSM αρχιευνουχος-N2--GSM προς-P ο- A--ASM βασιλευς-N3V-ASM *ναβουχοδονοσορ-N---ASM

19 και-C ομιλεω-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--DPM ο- A--NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM και-C ου-D ευρισκω-VC--API3S εν-P ο- A--DPM σοφος-A1--DPM ομοιος-A1A-NSM ο- A--DSM *δανιηλ-N---DSM και-C *ανανιας-N1T-DSM και-C *μισαηλ-N---DSM και-C *αζαριας-N1T-DSM και-C ειμι-V9I-IAI3P παρα-P ο- A--DSM βασιλευς-N3V-DSM

20 και-C εν-P πας-A3--DSM λογος-N2--DSM και-C συνεσις-N3I-DSF και-C παιδεια-N1A-DSF οσος-A1--APN ζητεω-VAI-AAI3S παρα-P αυτος- D--GPM ο- A--NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM καταλαμβανω-VBI-AAI3S αυτος- D--APM σοφος-A1--APMC δεκαπλασιως-D υπερ-P ο- A--APM σοφιστης-N1M-APM και-C ο- A--APM φιλοσοφος-N2--APM ο- A--APM εν-P πας-A1S-DSF ο- A--DSF βασιλεια-N1A-DSF αυτος- D--GSM και-C δοξαζω-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--APM ο- A--NSM βασιλευς-N3V-NSM και-C καταιστημι-VHI-AAI3S αυτος- D--APM αρχων-N3--APM και-C αναδεικνυω-VAI-AAI3S αυτος- D--APM σοφος-A1--APM παρα-P πας-A3--APM ο- A--APM αυτος- D--GSM εν-P πραγμα-N3M-DPN εν-P πας-A1S-DSF ο- A--DSF γη-N1--DSF αυτος- D--GSM και-C εν-P ο- A--DSF βασιλεια-N1A-DSF αυτος- D--GSM

21 και-C ειμι-V9I-IAI3S *δανιηλ-N---NSM εως-P ο- A--GSN πρωτος-A1--GSNS ετος-N3E-GSN ο- A--GSF βασιλεια-N1A-GSF *κυρος-N2--GSM βασιλευς-N3V-GSM *περσης-N1M-GPM

Commentary

 

Daniel Refuses the King's Food

By Andy Dibb

In the book of Daniel, there are lots of memorable stories in the literal text, and there are memorable spiritual stories going on in the internal sense, too.

The first chapter is centered on a story in Daniel's life - a sort of anecdote - in which he and his friends, now captives in Babylon, refuse the food that is being offered to them from the King's table.

Before that anecdote begins, though, there's some background: the Kingdom of Judah has been conquered by the Babylonian Empire. Many Judeans have been taken captive, and brought to Babylon.

The chapter begins with the phrase "in the third year." Even a cursory study of the Word shows that many sequences begin by setting a time in which the action takes place. Time in the Word always indicates a spiritual state (AC 4901). When the Word mentions blocks of time, days, weeks, months, years, they indicate states people pass through. Each term indicates a different state. To differentiate further between them, numbers are often attached to define the state. In the phrase, "in the third year," the number "three" contains the idea of fullness, an end, and a new beginning, and contains within it the added dimensions of a judgment on the past.

So the story begins with the end of one state, and the beginning of the next. The finishing state, represented by the king of Judah, Jehoiakim, gives way to a second state: Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon. The story of Jehoiakim, during whose reign Daniel was captured, describes the final throes of a deteriorating spiritual condition.

In the third year of his reign, Jehoiakim stopped paying tribute to Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar did not immediately invade Judah, preferring to give other conquered states, Syria, Moab, and Ammon, the task of harassing Jehoiakim with the intention of reducing him to submission. When this did not work, he attacked, forcibly reducing the city to submission. During Jehoiakim's revolt, Nebuchadnezzar took hostages to Babylon, including Daniel.

'Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, represented the Babylonian falsification of the Word, and destruction of all truth therein (AR 47:4 ).

At the end of the first verse, Nebuchadnezzar comes to Jerusalem and besieges it. This contains two elements: the first is Jerusalem; the second is his treatment of the city. Jerusalem was the center of worship in Judah, although by the time of Jehoiakim, the temple was desecrated. Secondly, in ancient times, the siege of a city did not necessarily mean its destruction, and at the time Daniel was taken captive, the city was not destroyed. But a siege was a long and disastrous event, weakening the fiber of the city. The siege perfectly illustrates the situation of spiritual things of the church with a person, represented by Jerusalem, when they are weakened by false thoughts and selfishness, depicted first by Jehoiakim and then by Nebuchadnezzar. Selfishness, attracted by a love of falsity, given a free hand by a lack of interest in the Word, besieges the mind until the bonds of consciousness are relaxed and selfishness wins.

This sets the natural and spiritual environments in which the story takes place. The historical Daniel lived in Babylon; he worked for kings, administering their kingdom. Spiritual meanings transcend this external, though they correspond perfectly to the details of the literal story.

Nebuchadnezzar's transfer of the vessels from the house of God to the house of his own god underscores and illustrates the meaning of the "third year" in the first verse. "The third year" signals the end of one stage and the start of the next. The desecration of the temple dramatically demonstrates this, for the temple, which should have been the center of Judah's worship, should have been protected at all costs. In reality, the temple was already desecrated by the sins of Jehoiakim, which were so bad they tipped the scales of Divine justice against Judah. With Nebuchadnezzar besieging the city, and the relinquishing of these vessels, the state of Judah's integrity came to an end — her most holy vessels were carried into captivity, and an entirely new chapter of Judah's history began.

This second verse refocuses the emphasis from the action of Nebuchadnezzar to the Lord: while the first verse states that Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem, the second shows the hand of the Lord in this. The clear indication is that Nebuchadnezzar did not conquer Judah from his own power, but "the Lord gave Jehoiakim, king of Judah, into his hand."

In Hebrew, the word for "Lord" is "Adonai," the Latin is "Dominus." While the Writings have no entry for the word "Adonai," the term "Dominus" is frequently used. The name "Lord" describes the Divine good — the Lord's love operating in peoples' lives (AC 2921). The book, Divine Love and Wisdom, poetically describes the quality of this love as "consisting in this, that its own should be another's; to feel the joy of another as joy in oneself, that is loving" (DLW 47). The Word shows the Lord's love in many places: from love, He took on the human form and saved the human race; from love, He brought both heaven and hell into order; and from love, He revealed Himself by means of the Word. Love is the very being of the Lord; it is the root and source of each of His actions through the ages. The words "the Lord gave Jehoiakim, king of Judah, into his hands," shows that this was from the Lord's love.

The Lord did not deliver Jehoiakim into Nebuchadnezzar's hand as punishment, but to illustrate how He brings goodness from an evil situation. If He did not do this on a daily basis, the whole foundation of human our regeneration would be undermined. Once Jehoiakim, representing the lusts for falsity, is submerged by the love of self, which is Nebuchadnezzar, people's spiritual lives would be over unless the Lord had a way of arresting the slide into hell and spiritually rehabilitating us.

The vessels held captive in the temple of the Babylonian god is a depiction of people, as they grow older, turning away from the things they learned in youth, and embracing things that appeal to their selfish will; they forget the spiritual things they learned as children. Selfishness destroys the taste for the truth, and with that destruction, people gradually lose the power to resist the allure of selfishness. This is what happened when Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem: the selfishness inherent in every person finally overruns the concepts of the truth already weakened by a lack of will to think and act according to the truth — represented by Jehoiakim. Selfishness carries off the vessels of the temple; it subverts the things that should introduce people to worshiping the Lord for another cause: the service of self.

After setting the scene in the first two verses of the book, we come to the central character of the story: Daniel himself. His introduction into the story fills the major segment of the first chapter. Verses three to five are transitional swinging away from Nebuchadnezzar the warrior king, to Daniel, the hero of the rest of the book. At this point, the focus is still on Nebuchadnezzar as an administrator. His power over Daniel appears in these verses, and indicates the power of the falsities (Nebuchadnezzar) arising from selfishness (king of Babylon), over the human conscience and commitment to truth, represented by Daniel. At this point in the story, Daniel is a helpless young man at the mercy of the king.

In the spiritual text, Daniel is the presence of the Lord within people, even in their pre-regenerative state when truth is captured and dominated by selfishness and twisted thinking. The Lord is central to the entire theme, both literally and spiritually: the Divine Love is ceaselessly in human lives, continually striving to turn people away from selfishness towards good. It is a great teaching of the Heavenly Doctrines that the Lord never breaks a people's state, but rather bends them within the bounds of human freedom and response. Historically, He placed Daniel in Babylon to show how He keeps the human conscience alive to judge actions, point out errors, and finally to lead people into His kingdom.

Enter Ashpenaz. The position "master of the eunuchs" makes Ashpenaz a high ranking court official. He is entrusted with the important task of training Jewish captives for future use in the Babylonian empire. In this capacity, he represents a common human situation: some people have the ability to appear to be good, nice, kind, and honest, while bent on fulfilling some hidden, and often selfish, agenda. But the Lord uses these visible qualities of good to lead people into true goodness. In many cases, regeneration is more of a change in a people's motives than a change in actions.

Only certain boys were suitable for the kind of training Nebuchadnezzar had in mind: the young men could have no blemish, they must be good looking, gifted in all wisdom, possessing knowledge, and quick to understand. Each of these criteria describes aspects of the truths the Lord cultivates in people in order to combat selfishness.

These boys were fed from the royal table. The concepts of "eating" and "drinking" in the Word describe the absorption of goodness and truth into people's lives. When people eat food and drink wine, these become a part of them, assimilated into the body. A similar thing happens with goodness and truth on the spiritual level. The process of learning or experiencing something good or true is very similar to the way people eat food and drink: the meal enters the stomach where it is digested and becomes a part of the person's spiritual life.

Babylon, a symbol of extreme selfishness, is diametrically opposite to the Lord Himself. Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, who represents the falsification of the Word from that selfishness, is the opposite of the Lord's truth given in the Word. The food he offered the boys would, on a spiritual level, undermine everything they stood for. Only innocence, defined as a willingness to follow the Lord by living according to His truth, can lead people from the clutches of selfishness; yet it is the very nature of selfishness to undermine that innocence and pervert truths. This is what is described by Nebuchadnezzar's apparently kind act of giving the boys food from his own table. This becomes clear in his motives: "three years of training for them, so that at the end of that time they might serve the king." This three-year period was to produce servants. The subversion of truth is never a quick process – people go through years of torment from hell before they totally surrender to it. Yet if they have no innocence, if the food of thought has always centered on selfishness and falsity, the time will come when the person's resistance breaks down completely, and that person will serve our spiritual Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon.

So Daniel appealed to Ashpenaz for permission to avoid eating the king's delicacies. In the literal sense, this took courage. Ashpenaz had a great deal of authority and Daniel was a mere captive. This courage is needed for spiritual change. When external actions are in the grip of false thoughts and rationalizations from selfishness, altruism is easily quelled. It takes courage to change motivation and to act from truth rather than falsity, especially when this change of motivation requires very little external behavioral change. Yet it must be done, and so Daniel made the request.

Every effort to come into order is blessed by the Lord. Daniel worked up the courage to ask, and God brought Him into favor and good will. The name for the Lord used here, "God," shows the presence of the Divine truth. This makes sense because Daniel represents truth affecting people's natural lives. This is from the Divine truth presented in the Word. Without Divine truth, people have no understanding of truth, and remain in falsity and selfishness forever.

When Daniel made his request, Ashpenaz was afraid that Daniel would not prosper as the other boys, and he, Ashpenaz, would be blamed. This is the essential nature of merely external good: when behavior is good without any sort of spiritual rudder to guide it, people find themselves led as easily by falsity as by truth. People guided by nonspiritual natural good allow themselves to be easily persuaded by evil, for evil spirits are in their element or their life's delight when they can get into another's desires; once they have entered, they allure that person into every kind of evil (AC 5032:3).

Ashpenaz faced a situation: one of his promising boys was rejecting the king's food and might soon look worse than the other boys. This means that truth, which challenges selfishness, begins to lose its appeal. Yet the challenge must be borne out to its conclusion. If people give in so quickly to selfish desires, their spiritual life would be over quickly. The solution is to look for another alternative, another place where the truth can gain a toehold in our minds.

Daniel appeals to the "steward." There are times when external behavior, good as it may seem, is too closely related to selfish will to respond to an appeal from truth. Sometimes the route of truth through the minds needs to begin at the outer, and often subordinate, elements of our lives – the steward.

To some degree, all people go through this process: before regeneration, we are motivated by selfishness, yet learn truth, and eventually learn to think from truth and develop an affection for it. This is how the Lord develops a toehold in the selfish nature of the unregenerate person. Eventually, adopting the affirmative principle and allowing truth to influence our actions, we find ourselves changing for the better: the stranglehold of selfishness on every facet of our lives begins to slip, and the slow process of liberation begins. But this truth is still in its early stages. In the first states of regeneration, the deeper levels of our mind are still under the control of selfishness and the falsities from it. Nebuchadnezzar is still on his throne, king of the most powerful empire in the world.

Daniel's experiment had been successful, and the final verses of this first chapter extol the wisdom of the four young men. Truth developed and cultivated in our lives appeals to our inner sense of selfishness – a selfish person can take pride in intelligence and wisdom. It is a wonderful thing to be thought good and wise. These are virtues a person can use for selfish ends.

But, as future chapters will show, the beginnings of a conscience spells the end of a life of selfishness. It may take a long time, just as Daniel lived and labored in Babylon for many years, but ultimately the conscience will be victorious, and selfishness banished.

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #5008

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

5008. 'And he left his garment in her hand' means that this outermost truth was removed. This is clear from the meaning of 'leaving in her hand' as leaving to its power and control, for 'the hand' means power or power and control, 878, 3091, 3387, 3563, 4931-4937, a removal being meant here since it is said that 'she took hold of his garment'; and from the meaning of 'a garment' as outermost truth, dealt with above in 5006. No one can begin to understand what is meant by a wish on the part of unspiritual natural truth to join itself to spiritual natural truth, or by the latter being filled with aversion to such a joining together and therefore leaving the outermost truth behind, that is, allowing this to be removed, except with the help of examples to shed light on the matter. But first, see what unspiritual natural truth is, and what spiritual natural truth is, in 4988, 4992; also the fact that the two are associated with each other so far as outermost things are concerned but that they are in no way joined to each other [4989].

[2] But, as has been said, examples will help to shed light on this matter. Take this one first. Within the Church there exists the unspiritual natural truth which says that good should be done to the poor, widows and orphans, and that doing good to these is the charity which is commanded in the Word. But unspiritual truth, or rather, people guided by unspiritual truth, understand the poor, widows and orphans to be those who are literally called such, whereas spiritual natural truth, or rather, people guided by this kind of truth - while giving their firm assent to this unspiritual natural truth - place such an understanding of the expression 'poor, widows and orphans' in the last or outermost position. For in their hearts they say that not all people calling themselves the poor are in fact such, and also that some of those who are poor lead very wicked lives, fearing neither God nor men, and ready to plunge into every unmentionable deed but for the fear that holds them back. They also say in their hearts that in the Word the expression 'the poor' is used to mean those who are such spiritually, that is to say, those who know and in their hearts confess that nothing good or true at all that originates in themselves resides with them and that everything that is there has been freely given them. The expressions 'widows' and 'orphans' are considered by them in a similar way, the difference being that each involves some different state. From this example it may be seen that to people guided by spiritual natural truth doing good to the poor, widows and orphans who are literally called such is an outermost truth, and that this outermost truth is like a garment covering the things within. One may also see that this outermost truth fits in with the truth as understood by those guided by unspiritual natural truth; and that even so the two are not joined together but have merely an association with each other.

[3] Take the example of doing good to the neighbour. Those guided by spiritual natural truth consider every individual person to be their neighbour, yet each one to be such in a different manner and degree. In their hearts they say that those governed by good are pre-eminently the neighbour to whom good should be done. They also say that those governed by evil are likewise the neighbour, but that good is done to these if they suffer the punishments prescribed by laws, because those punishments serve to correct them, as well as to prevent evil being done to the good by them and the bad examples they set. Those within the Church who are guided by unspiritual natural truth likewise call every individual person the neighbour; but they do not take into consideration the degree or manner in which each one is a neighbour. Therefore if motivated by natural goodness they do good indiscriminately, to everyone who moves them to pity, most of all to the evil rather than the good because the evil in their malice know how to arouse feelings of pity. From this example too one may see that this outermost truth brings together those guided by unspiritual natural truth and those guided by spiritual natural truth, and yet the two are still not joined together but have merely an association with each other, since one has a different idea and different perception from the other of the neighbour and of charity towards him.

[4] Take a further example. Those guided by spiritual natural truth say in general that the poor and the wretched are to inherit the kingdom of heaven. But for them this is an outermost truth since they gather up within this the belief that 'the poor' and 'the wretched' are those who are spiritually such, and that these are the ones meant in the Word, to whom the heavenly kingdom will belong. But those within the Church who are guided by unspiritual natural truth say that no others can inherit the kingdom of heaven but those who in the world have been reduced to poverty, live in wretched circumstances, and suffer greater affliction than everyone else. They also call riches, important positions, and worldly joys just so many distractions or means that divert a person from heaven. This example also shows what an outermost truth is and the nature of the harmony between the two kinds of natural truth; it shows that they are not joined together, but have merely an association with each other.

[5] Take this example too. Those guided by spiritual natural truth consider it an outermost truth that those objects which in the Word are called holy really were holy, such as the ark and mercy seat, the lampstand, the incense, the leaves, and so on, as well as the altar; also the temple; and Aaron's vestments too, which are called vestments of holiness - in particular the ephod together with the breastplate where the urim and thummim were. Yet the idea they have so far as this outermost truth is concerned is that those objects were not in themselves holy, nor had they had any holiness instilled into them, but that they were holy in a representative sense, that is to say, they represented the spiritual and celestial realities of the Lord's kingdom, and in the highest sense the Lord Himself. People guided by unspiritual natural truth however also call those objects holy, but holy in themselves because holiness has been instilled into them. From this one may see that the two kinds of truth meet but do not become joined to each other; for as the spiritual man's conception of that outermost truth is different from that of the merely natural man, a different form is taken by each.

[6] Take yet another example. To the spiritual man it is an outermost truth that all Divine truths can be substantiated from the literal sense of the Word, and also by means of the rational or intellectual concepts known to the enlightened. That same outermost or general truth is also accepted by the natural man, but he has the simple belief that everything is true which can be substantiated from the Word, above all that which he himself has substantiated from it. The spiritual man and the natural man meet each other therefore in their common acceptance of the idea that every Divine truth can be substantiated; yet one sees this general truth in a different way from the other. The merely natural man believes that whatever he himself has substantiated for himself, or else has heard others substantiate, is a Divine truth. He does not realize that falsity can be substantiated just as easily as truth, and that, once substantiated, falsity has all the appearance of truth; indeed it appears to be more true than the truth itself, because the illusions of the senses enter in and present it in the light of the world separated from the light of heaven.

[7] This too shows what outermost spiritual truth seems like to the natural man - like a garment. It also shows that when this garment is removed nothing at all is left to draw the two together, as a consequence of which the spiritual man no longer has anything with which to protect himself from the natural man, which considerations are meant by Joseph's leaving his garment behind, fleeing, and going out of doors. For the merely natural man does not acknowledge interior truths, and therefore when exterior ones are taken away or removed a severance instantly takes place. What is more, all the ideas introduced by the spiritual man to substantiate outermost truth are called falsities by the natural man since he has no ability to see whether the idea substantiated by the spiritual man is really true. It is not possible to see by natural light what belongs to spiritual light, for to do so is contrary to order. But seeing by spiritual light what belongs to natural light is in keeping with order.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.