The Bible

 

synty 30

Study

   

1 Koska Rakel näki, ettei hän synnyttänyt Jakobille, kadehti hän sisartansa, ja sanoi Jakobille: anna minun lapsia, eli minä kuolen.

2 Jakob vihastui kovin Rakelin päälle, ja sanoi: olenko minä Jumalan siassa, joka on sinulta kieltänyt kohdun hedelmän?

3 Ja hän sanoi: tässä on minun piikani Bilha, makaa hänen kanssansa; että hän synnyttäis minun helmaani, ja saisin sittenkin hänestä lapsia.

4 Niin hän antoi hänelle piikansa Bilhan emännäksi: ja Jakob makasi hänen kanssansa.

5 Niin Bilha tuli raskaaksi ja synnytti Jakobille pojan.

6 Ja Rakel sanoi: Jumala ratkasi minun asiani, ja kuuli myös minun ääneni, ja antoi minulle pojan; sentähden kutsui hän hänen nimensä Dan.

7 Ja taas Bilha Rakelin piika tuli raskaaksi, ja synnytti Jakobille toisen pojan.

8 Niin sanoi Rakel: minä olen jalosti kilvoitellut minun sisareni kanssa, ja olen myös voittanut: ja hän kutsui hänen nimensä Naphtali.

9 Koska Lea näki, että hän lakkasi synnyttämästä; otti hän piikansa Silpan, ja antoi sen Jakobille emännäksi.

10 Niin synnytti Silpa, Lean piika, Jakobille pojan.

11 Ja Lea sanoi: joukko tulee: ja kutsui hänen nimensä Gad.

12 Ja Silpa, Lean piika, synnytti Jakobille toisen pojan.

13 Ja Lea sanoi: autuasta minua, sillä tyttäret sanovat minua autuaaksi: ja hän kutsui hänen nimensä Asser.

14 Ja Ruben meni ulos nisun elonaikana, ja löysi dudaimia vainioilta, ja toi ne Lealle äidillensä. Niin sanoi Rakel Lealle: anna minulle poikas dudaimista.

15 Hän vastasi häntä: vähäkö sinun siinä on, ettäs olet minulta miehen vienyt, mutta tahdot myös ottaa poikani dudaimit? Ja Rakel sanoi: sentähden maatkaan hän tänä yönä sinun kanssas poikas dudaimien tähden.

16 Koska Jakob ehtoona kedolta palasi, meni Lea häntä vastaan, ja sanoi: minun kanssani pitää sinun makaaman: sillä minä olen sinun kallisti ostanut poikani dudaimilla. Ja hän makasi sen yön hänen kanssansa.

17 Ja Jumala kuuli Lean, ja hän tuli raskaaksi, ja synnytti Jakobille viidennen pojan.

18 Ja Lea sanoi: Jumala on maksanut sen minulle, että minä annoin piikani miehelleni: ja kutsui hänen nimensä Isaskar.

19 Ja Lea taas tuli raskaaksi, ja synnytti Jakobille kuudennen pojan.

20 Ja Lea sanoi: Jumala on minun hyvästi lahjoittanut, nyt taas asuu minun mieheni minun tykönäni: sillä minä olen synnyttänyt hänelle kuusi poikaa. Ja kutsui hänen nimensä Sebulon.

21 Sitte synnytti hän tyttären, ja kutsui hänen nimensä Dina.

22 Mutta Jumala muisti myös Rakelin, ja Jumala kuuli hänen, ja saatti hedelmälliseksi.

23 Niin hän tuli raskaaksi ja synnytti pojan, ja sanoi: Jumala on ottanut pois minun häväistykseni.

24 Ja kutsui hänen nimensä Joseph, sanoen: Herra lisätköön minulle vielä toisen pojan.

25 Ja tapahtui, koska Rakel oli synnyttänyt Josephin; sanoi Jakob Labanille: päästä minua menemään kotiani ja maalleni.

26 Anna minulle minun emäntäni ja lapseni, joiden tähden minä olen sinua palvellut, että minä menisin pois: sillä sinä tiedät minun palvelukseni, kuin minä olen sinua palvellut.

27 Ja Laban sanoi hänelle: anna minun löytää armo sinun edessäs, minä ymmärrän, että Herra on siunannut minun sinun tähtes.

28 Ja sanoi (vielä): määrää siis sinun palkkas minulle, ja minä annan.

29 Mutta hän sanoi hänelle: sinä tiedät, kuinka minä olen palvellut sinua: ja kuinka paljo sinun karjaas on minun haltuuni annettu.

30 Sinulla oli vähä ennenkuin minä tulin, mutta nyt se on paljoksi kasvanut, ja Herra on siunannut sinun, minun jalkajuonteni kautta. Koska minä siis oman huoneeni parasta katson?

31 Ja (Laban) sanoi: mitästä minä sinulle annan? Ja Jakob sanoi: ei sinun pidä mitään antaman minulle. Mutta jos sinä tämän minulle teet, niin minä vielä tästälähin kaitsen ja varjelen sinun laumaas:

32 Minä käyn tänäpänä kaiken sinun laumas lävitse, eroittaen sieltä kaikki pilkulliset ja kirjavat lampaat, ja kaikki hallavat karitsain seassa, ja kirjavat ja pilkulliset vuohten seassa, (mitä sitte kirjavaksi ja pilkulliseksi tulee) se olkoon minun palkkani.

33 Niin minun vanhurskauteni on todistava tästedes minusta, koska se siihen tulee, että minun pitää palkkani sinun nähtes saaman: niin että kaikki, jotka ei ole pilkulliset taikka kirjavat vohlista, eikä hallavat karitsoista, se olkoon varkaus minun tykönäni.

34 Niin sanoi Laban: katso, joska se olis sanas jälkeen.

35 Ja sinä päivänä eroitti hän pilkulliset ja kirjavat kauriit ja kaikki pilkulliset ja kirjavat vuohet, kaikki joissa jotakin valkeutta oli, ja kaikki hallavat karitsat: ja antoi ne lastensa haltuun.

36 Ja asetti kolmen päiväkunnan matkan, itsensä ja Jakobin vaiheelle: ja Jakob kaitsi niitä, jotka Labanin laumasta jäivät.

37 Mutta Jakob otti viherjäisiä haapaisia sauvoja, mandelpuisia ja plataneapuisia; ja kuori niihin valkiat juonteet, valkian paikan paljastamisella, joka sauvain päällä oli.

38 Ja pani ne sauvat, jotka hän kuorinut oli, laumain eteen, vesiruuhiin, ja juoma-astioihin, lauman eteen, joihin he tulivat juomaan, että he juomalle tultuansa siittäisivät.

39 Ja niin laumat siittivät niiden sauvain päällä, ja kantoivat pilkullisia, juonteisia ja kirjavia.

40 Niin Jakob eroitti karitsat, ja asetti lauman kasvot, siinä valkiassa laumassa, niitä pilkullisia ja hallavia päin: ja teki itsellensä eri lauman, ja ei laskenut niitä Labanin lauman sekaan.

41 Ja koska se varhain kantava lauma oli sikoillansa, pani Jakob sauvat laumain silmäin eteen ruuhiin: että he siittäisivät sauvain päällä.

42 Mutta koska ne hiljain juoksivat, niin ei hän pannut niitä sisälle. Niin tulivat äpöiset Labanille ja varhain kannetut Jakobille.

43 Siitä tuli mies sangen äveriääksi, niin että hänellä oli paljo lampaita ja piikoja ja palvelioita, ja kameleja ja aaseja.

   


SWORD version by Tero Favorin (tero at favorin dot com)

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #3957

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

3957. 'And she called his name Issachar' means the essential nature of it. This is clear from the meaning of 'calling the name' as the essential nature, as above in 3923, 3935. For he was given the name Issachar from the word 'reward', a name which therefore embodies the things stated above concerning 'reward', and at the same time the things meant by the rest of the words uttered by Leah. Since 'Issachar' means reward, and 'reward' in the external sense is mutual love and in the internal sense the joining together of good and truth, let it be said that very few nowadays in the Christian world know that 'reward' has such a meaning. And the reason why they do not know is that they do not know what mutual love is, still less that good has to be joined to truth if the heavenly marriage is to exist in a person. I have been allowed in the next life to talk about this to very many who were from the Christian world, including the more learned. But what is surprising, scarcely any one of those I talked to knew anything about it, even though they could have come to know much about those matters for themselves if only they had been willing to use their reason. But because they were not concerned about life after death, only about life in the world, they were not interested in such matters. The things they could have known for themselves if only, as has been stated, they had been willing to use their reason were the following:

[2] a When a person is stripped of the body he has a far more enlightened power of understanding than when he is living in the body, the reason being that when he is in the body worldly and bodily interests occupy his thoughts and bring obscurity there. But once he has been stripped of the body those worldly and bodily interests do not get in the way, but through the removal of his mind from sensory experiences of external things he is like those whose thought is more interior. From this consideration they could have known that in the state after death a person is far more clear-sighted and enlightened than in the state before death, and that when a person dies he passes from shade into that which, in comparison with it, is light, because he passes from the things which belong to the world to those which belong to heaven, and from those which belong to the body to those which belong to the spirit. But what is amazing, although people have the ability to understand these things they still think the contrary. That is to say, they think it is in the state of life within the body that a person enjoys clear-sightedness, as compared with the state of life after being stripped of the body, which to them is a state of obscurity.

[3] b They are able to know, if only they use their reason, that the life which a person acquires to himself in the world follows him when he dies, that is, his life is the same after death. For they are able to know that nobody can cast aside the life he has acquired to himself since earliest childhood except by death itself, and that that life cannot be transformed in a moment into any other life, let alone into a contrary life. For example: Someone who has acquired to himself a life of deceit and finds the delight of his life in that deceit cannot cast aside the life of deceit but goes on with that life after death. Or to take another example, people who are governed by self-love and consequently by forms of hatred and revenge against those who are not subservient, or by other similar traits, continue to be governed by these after the life of the body, for they are the things which they love and which constitute the delights of their life and so their very life itself. Such traits cannot therefore be taken away from them unless everything making up their life is wiped out at the same time. And the same applies to all other kinds of life that people have acquired.

[4] c A person is able to know for himself that when he passes into the next life he leaves many things behind him. He knows - since they have no place there - that he leaves behind, for example, anxious cares over food, clothing, accommodation, and the acquisition of money and wealth, as well as anxious cares about his promotion to positions of importance - matters to which a person gives so much thought during the life of the body. Indeed he knows that other things which do not belong to the earthly kingdom take the place of these.

[5] d From this he is able to know that anyone who in the world has thought about nothing else than worldly things such as these, so much so that they have taken a complete hold on him, and who has acquired a delight of life in those things alone, is not suited to be among those who delight to think of heavenly matters, that is, of things of heaven.

[6] e From this in turn he is able to know that if the external things of the body and of the world are taken away from those people, the individual is in that case such as he has been inwardly, that is to say, he thinks and wills as he did previously. If the thoughts within had at that time been deceits, schemings, aspirations after positions of importance, gain, and reputation on account of these; if hatred and revenge and similar passions have been present within, he goes on thinking such things, and so thinking the things of hell, though to achieve those ends he has concealed his thoughts from other people and to outward appearance has seemed honourable and produced in others the conviction that he was not turning such thoughts over in his mind. Knowledge that such outward appearance or presence at being honourable is removed in the next life may also be had from the fact that outward things are cast aside along with the body and have no further use. From this anyone can decide for himself that a person's real character will then be visible to the angels.

[7] f A person is also able to know that heaven, or the Lord by means of heaven, is constantly at work, flowing in with good and truth. But if there is not within a person's interior man that lives after death of the body some solid surface or some plane so to speak to receive good and truth, these cannot be received at all when they flow in. Therefore while a person is living in the world he ought to be anxious to obtain such an interior plane within himself. But he cannot obtain this unless he thinks of good towards his neighbour, desires for him that which is good, and consequently does this for him, and so acquires to himself the delight of life in such actions. This plane is acquired by means of charity towards the neighbour, that is, by mutual love; and it is what is called conscience. Into this plane good and truth from the Lord are able to flow in and be received there. But where charity does not exist, and so conscience does not exist, good and truth flowing in pass through and are converted into evil and falsity.

[8] g A person is able to know for himself that love to God and love towards the neighbour are what make a person a human being, different from animals, and that those things constitute heavenly life or heaven itself and their opposites hellish life or hell itself. But these things are not known by a person because, for one thing, he has no wish to know them since he is leading a life to the contrary; for another, he does not believe in the existence of life after death; and for yet another, ideas about faith but none about charity have taken hold of him, and therefore he believes, as many teach, that if there is a life after death he can be saved by faith, no matter what kind of life he has led, and that he can be saved if faith is received by him only in his last hour when he is dying.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.