The Bible

 

創世記 30

Study

   

1 拉結見自己不給雅各生子,就嫉妒他姊姊,對雅各:你給我孩子,不然我就死了

2 雅各向拉結生氣,:叫你不生育的是,我豈能代替他作主呢?

3 拉結:有我的使女辟拉在這裡,你可以與他同房,使他生子在我膝下,我便因他也得孩子(原文作被建立)。

4 拉結就把他的使女辟拉丈夫為妾;雅各便與他同房,

5 辟拉就懷孕,給雅各生了一個兒子

6 拉結伸了我的冤,也了我的聲音,賜我一個兒子,因此他起名但(就是伸冤的意思)。

7 拉結的使女辟拉又懷孕,給雅各生了第二個兒子

8 拉結:我與我姊姊大大相爭,並且得勝,於是給他起名拿弗他利(就是相爭的意思)。

9 利亞見自己停了生育,就把使女悉帕雅各為妾。

10 利亞的使女悉帕給雅各生了一個兒子

11 利亞:萬幸!於是給他起名迦得(就是萬幸的意思)。

12 利亞的使女悉帕又給雅各生了第二個兒子

13 利亞:我有福阿,眾女子都要稱我是有福的,於是給他起名亞設(就是有福的意思)。

14 割麥子的時候,流便往田裡去,尋見風茄,拿來母親利亞。拉結對利亞:請你把你兒子的風茄我些。

15 利亞:你奪了我的丈夫還算小事麼?你又要奪我兒子的風茄麼?拉結:為你兒子的風茄,今夜他可以與你同寢。

16 到了晚上雅各從田裡回,利亞出迎接他,:你要與我同寢,因為我實在用我兒子的風茄把你雇下了。那一夜,雅各就與他同寢。

17 應允了利亞,他就懷孕,給雅各生了第五個兒子

18 利亞了我價值,因為我把使女了我丈夫,於是他起名以薩迦(就是價值的意思)。

19 利亞又懷孕,給雅各生了第六兒子

20 利亞賜我厚賞;我丈夫必與我同住,因我給他生了個兒子,於是給他起名西布倫(就是同住的意思)。

21 來又生了一個女兒,給他起名底拿。

22 顧念拉結,應允了他,使他能生育。

23 拉結懷孕生子,除去了我的羞恥,

24 就給他起名約瑟(就是增添的意思),意思:願耶和華再增添我一個兒子

25 拉結生約瑟之後,雅各拉班:請打發我走,叫我回到我本鄉本土去。

26 請你把我服事你所得的妻子和兒女我,讓我走;我怎樣服事你,你都知道

27 拉班對他:我若在你眼前蒙恩,請你仍與我同住,因為我已算定,耶和華賜福與我是為你的緣故;

28 :請你定你的工價,我就你。

29 雅各對他:我怎樣服事你,你的牲畜在我手裡怎樣,是你知道的。

30 我未來之先,你所有的很少,現今卻發大眾多,耶和華隨我的步賜福與你。如今,我甚麼時候才為自己興家立業呢?

31 拉班:我當你甚麼呢?雅各:甚麼你也不必我,只有一件事,你若應承,我便仍舊牧放你的羊群

32 今天我要走遍你的羊群,把綿中凡有點的、有的,和黑色的,並山羊中凡有的、有點的,都挑出來;將來這一等的就算我的工價。

33 以後你查看我的工價,凡在我手裡的山羊不是有點有的,綿羊不是黑色的,那就算是我的;這樣便可證出我的公

34 拉班:好阿!我情願照著你的行。

35 當日,拉班把有紋的、有的公山羊,有點的、有的、有雜白紋的母山羊,並黑色的綿羊,都挑出來,交在他兒子們的下,

36 又使自己和雅各相離的路程。雅各就牧養拉班

37 雅各拿楊樹、杏樹、楓樹的嫩枝,將皮剝成白紋,使枝子露出白的來,

38 將剝了皮的枝子,對著羊群,插在飲溝裡和裡,的時候,牝牡配合。

39 對著枝子配合,就生下有紋的、有點的、有的來。

40 雅各羔分出來,使拉班的與這有紋和黑色的相對,把自己的另放一處,不叫他和拉班的混雜。

41 羊群肥壯配合的時候,雅各就把枝子插在水溝裡,使對著枝子配合。

42 只是到瘦弱配合的時候就不插枝子。這樣,瘦弱的就歸拉班,肥壯的就歸雅各

43 於是雅各極其發大,得了許多羊群、僕婢、駱駝,和

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #4171

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

4171. The torn I brought not unto thee. That this signifies that evil not by his fault was with that good, is evident from the signification of “torn,” as being death inflicted by another, and thus evil not by his fault. Evils with man have many origins. The first origin is from inheritance by continual derivations from grandparents and great-grandparents into the father, and from the father, in whom the evils are thus accumulated, to one’s self. The second origin is from what is actual, that is, what a man acquires to himself by a life of evil. This evil he in part receives by inheritance, as from an ocean of evils, and carries into act; and in part adds thereto many things of himself. From this comes the own which man acquires for himself. But this actual evil, which man makes his own, has also various origins-in general two: one, that he receives evil from others through no fault of his own; and the other, that he receives it of his own accord, thus through his own fault. That which a man receives from others without any fault of his own, is what is signified in the Word by “what is torn;” but that which he receives of his own accord, thus through his own fault, is signified in the Word by a “carcass.”

[2] Hence it was that, as in the Ancient Church, so also in the Jewish, it was forbidden to eat that which had died of itself, or a carcass, and also that which had been torn; concerning which we read in Moses:

Every soul that eateth a carcass and that which is torn, whether he be homeborn or a stranger, he shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even; then shall he be clean. And if he wash them not, nor bathe his flesh, he shall bear his iniquity (Leviticus 17:15-16).

A carcass and that which is torn he shall not eat, to defile himself therewith: I am Jehovah (Leviticus 22:8);

“that which is torn” denotes the evil which is from falsity that is injected by the evil, who are the wild beasts in the forest which tear; for in the Word the infernals are compared to wild beasts. In the same:

Men of holiness shall ye be unto Me; therefore ye shall not eat any flesh that is torn in the field, ye shall cast it to the dogs (Exodus 22:30).

In Ezekiel:

The prophet says to Jehovah, my soul hath not been defiled; and a carcass and that which is torn have I not eaten from my youth up, neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth (Ezekiel 4:14).

The priests shall not eat of any carcass or that which is torn, of fowl or of beast (Ezekiel 44:31);

speaking of the Lord’s kingdom, that the new earth is there.

[3] From these passages it may be seen what is meant in the internal sense by “that which is torn;” but to make this still more manifest, let us take an example. If a man who is leading a life of good, or who does well to another from willing well, suffers himself to be persuaded by another who is in evil that the life of good effects nothing toward salvation, for the reason that all are born in sins; and because no one can will good of himself, and therefore cannot do it; and that on this account a means of salvation has been provided which is called faith; and therefore that a man can be saved by faith without a life of good, and this even though he should receive faith in death’s last hour-if such a person who has lived in a life of good suffers himself to be so persuaded, and then becomes careless in regard to life, and even treats it with contempt, he is said to be “torn”; for “torn” is predicated of good into which falsity is insinuated, and thereby the good becomes no longer living.

[4] Take also as an example the conjugial, which in the beginning some one regards as heavenly, but afterwards one of the married partners or both of them suffer themselves to be persuaded that it is only for the sake of order in the world, and for the education and individual care of children, and for the sake of inheritance; and further that the bond of marriage is nothing but a matter of compact, which may be dissolved or relaxed by either party, provided that it is done by consent; the result being that after he has received this persuasion the individual has no heavenly idea of marriage; and supposing that lasciviousness is the consequence, there then comes into existence that which is called “torn”; and so in all other cases.

[5] That it is the evil who tear, and this by reasonings from external things, into which internal things cannot be insinuated on account of the evil of life, may be seen from the following passages.

In Jeremiah:

A lion out of the forest hath slain the great ones, a wolf of the deserts hath laid them waste, a leopard watcheth over their cities, everyone that goeth out from thence is torn, because their transgressions are multiplied, their backslidings are increased (Jeremiah 5:5-6).

And in Amos:

Edom did pursue his brother with the sword, and destroyed his compassions, and his anger did tear perpetually, and he keeps his fury continually (Amos 1:11).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.