The Bible

 

创世记 22

Study

   

1 这些事以要试验亚伯拉罕,就呼叫他亚伯拉罕!他:我在这里。

2 :你带着你的儿子,就是你独生的儿子,你所以撒,往摩利亚去,在我所要指示你的上,把他献为燔祭。

3 亚伯拉罕起来,备上,带着两个仆人和他儿子以撒,也劈好了燔祭的柴,就起身往所指示他的地方去了。

4 到了第三日,亚伯拉罕举目远远的见那地方

5 亚伯拉罕对他的仆人:你们和在此等候,我与童子往那里去拜一拜,就回到你们这里来。

6 亚伯拉罕把燔祭的柴放在他儿子以撒身上,自己里拿着与刀;於是人同行。

7 以撒对他父亲亚伯拉罕父亲哪!亚伯拉罕:我儿,我在这里。以撒:请看,与柴都有了,但燔祭的羊羔在那里呢?

8 亚伯拉罕:我儿,必自己预备作燔祭的羊羔。於是人同行。

9 他们到了所指示的地方亚伯拉罕在那里筑,把柴摆好,捆绑他的儿子以撒,放在的柴上。

10 亚伯拉罕就伸拿刀,要杀他的儿子

11 耶和华的使者从呼叫亚伯拉罕亚伯拉罕!他:我在这里。

12 天使:你不可在这童子身上下。一点不可害他!现在我知道你是敬畏的了;因为你没有将你的儿子,就是你独生的儿子,留下不给我。

13 亚伯拉罕举目观,不料,有一只公,两角扣在稠密的小树中,亚伯拉罕就取了那只公来,献为燔祭,代替他的儿子

14 亚伯拉罕给那地方起名耶和华以勒(意思就是耶和华必预备的意思),直到今日人还:在耶和华的上必有预备。

15 耶和华的使者第二次从呼叫亚伯拉罕说:

16 耶和华:你既行了这事,不留下你的儿子,就是你独生的儿子,我便指着自己起誓

17 论福,我必赐大福给你;论子孙,我必叫你的子孙多起来,如同上的边的沙。你子孙必得着仇敌的城

18 并且上万国都必因你的後裔得福,因为你听从了我的话。

19 於是亚伯拉罕回到他仆人那里,他们一同起身往别是巴去,亚伯拉罕在别是巴。

20 这事以,有人告诉亚伯拉罕说:密迦给你兄弟拿鹤生了几个儿子

21 长子是乌斯,他的兄弟是布斯和亚兰的父亲基母利,

22 并基薛、哈琐、必达、益拉、彼土利(彼土利生利百加)。

23 个人都是密迦给亚伯拉罕的兄弟拿鹤生的。

24 拿鹤的妾名叫流玛,生了提八、迦含、他辖,和玛迦。

   

From Swedenborg's Works

 

Arcana Coelestia #2982

Study this Passage

  
/ 10837  
  

2982. 'In the land of Canaan' means which was a united whole in the Lord's kingdom. This is clear from the representation of 'the land of Canaan' as the Lord's kingdom, dealt with in 1413, 1437, 1585, 1607. With the Lord's Churches the position is that in ancient times many existed simultaneously. These differed from one another, as Churches do today, on matters of doctrine, but they still made one in that they acknowledged love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour as the chief and most essential thing. And so to them matters of doctrine existed not so much to guide their thought as to direct their lives. And when in every single respect love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour, that is, the good of life, is the essential thing, then no matter how many Churches there are they all make one, and each is a united whole in the Lord's kingdom. The same is also true of heaven. Although there are countless communities there, and each one is distinct and separate from the rest, they nevertheless all constitute one heaven because every one is moved by love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour.

[2] But the situation is altogether different in the case of Churches which say that faith is the essential thing of the Church, for they imagine that if they know this and think it, they are saved irrespective of whatever kind of life they lead. When this is the situation many Churches existing simultaneously do not make one Church; they are not even Churches. The good of faith is what makes the Church, that is, the life of love and charity in accordance with matters of faith make it. It is for the sake of life that matters of doctrine exist. This anyone may know, for why does any doctrine exist if not for some end in view? And what else is that end but life, that is, that a person may become as such doctrine teaches? Those Churches do indeed speak of saving faith as being trust, but that trust cannot possibly exist except within the good of life. Without the latter there is no receptivity, and when there is no receptivity there is no trust, except on occasions when the mind or body is sick and the desires that belong to self-love and love of the world are dormant. But with those who are leading an evil life, when this crisis is over or takes a different turn, that spurious trust disappears altogether; for trust can exist even with those who are evil. But if a person wishes to know what kind of trust he has, let him examine his affections and ends in view, and also the kind of life his actions reveal.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.