Koncept „církve“ ve spisech je složitý a krásně organický, spojený s učením o povaze Pána a výsledné přirozenosti lidstva.

Spisy říkají, že Pán je ve své podstatě - svou skutečnou podstatou - dokonalá, nekonečná láska, láska, která poháněla stvoření, která je konečným zdrojem reality a která neustále udržuje realitu. Tato láska je vyjádřena ve formě jako dokonalá, nekonečná moudrost, která dala formě stvoření a dává formě realitě.

Hluboké věci! Můžete o tom číst více jinde, ale záleží na tom, že celé stvoření, od nejmenších prvků po celý vesmír, odráží stejnou strukturu. Je přítomen v přírodě samotné, poháněn žárem (láskou) a světlem (moudrostí) slunce. Je přítomna v základních formách života, s rostlinami (které jsou zakořeněné; které se málo mění; které jsou necítitelné; které jsou poháněny světlem) představují prvky moudrosti a zvířat (teplo, pocit, mobilní, neustále se měnící, poháněné teplem) ) představující formy lásky. Je přítomen v téměř univerzálním rozdělení na mužské (moudrost) a ženské (láska) aspekty rostlin a zvířat.

Tato struktura je také v každém z nás. V běžném jazyce bychom jim mohli říkat naše srdce a naše mysli - to, co chceme a co si myslíme. Spisy o nich běžně mluví jako o dobrém (láska; to, co chceme v našich srdcích) a pravdě (moudrost; co víme v našich myslích) nebo jako vůle (srdce) a porozumění (mysl). Tyto prvky nás nejen definují, ale jsou také klíčem k našim duchovním osudům. Můžeme je použít k přijetí Pánovy lásky, vstoupit do dobra života a nakonec jít do nebe. Můžeme je také použít k odmítnutí Pánovy lásky a klusu do pekla.

A jsou tu další vrstvy. Spisy říkají, že všechny lidské společnosti jsou v lidské formě, s funkcemi analogickými lidskému tělu. To platí od malých skupin, jako jsou rodiny, velké společnosti, až po celé národy a v konečném důsledku i celá lidská rasa v tomto světě a celá nebe v příštím.

Mezi nejdůležitější lidské společnosti patří samozřejmě církve. Protože pojem „církev“ je však založen na lidské podobě, mohou mít církve, jak je uvedeno v spisech, mnoho podob. Na jednom konci stupnice je každý, kdo má skutečné představy o správném a špatném a žije podle nich, sám církví. Na druhém konci stupnice všichni ti, kdo věří v lásku k sousedovi - a jednají z této víry - společně tvoří jeden kostel.

Mezi těmito dvěma extrémy leží mnoho dalších odrůd, ale většina odkazů na „církev“ ve Spisech znamená komunitu těch, kteří mají Slovo, zná Pána a dodržují Jeho přikázání. Tito lidé mají přístup k nejlepší možné pravdě a nejhlubší možné pochopení o povaze Pána a toho, co od nás chce.

Takový kostel hraje zásadní roli: Pán skrze ni vytváří myšlenky o tom, že jsou dobré v myslích lidí a touze být dobří do vnitřních výklenků jejich srdcí, přičemž sahá daleko za samotnou církev a dotýká se každého na světě. Ve skutečnosti se ve spisech uvádí, že v podstatě existuje manželství mezi Pánem a církví, s církví v roli nevěsty a manželky, vytvářející skutečné myšlenky a dobré touhy, jak manželka vyrábí děti.

Aby tuto funkci ochránil, Pán se postaral o to, aby v celé historii (a hodně pravěku) vždy existoval kostel, který tuto roli plnil.

Prvním z nich byl nejstarší kostel, zastoupený Adamem; bylo to inspirováno láskou k Pánu. Druhým byla starověká církev, zastoupená Noemem; bylo to inspirováno láskou k bližnímu a poznání Pána. Třetí byla Izraelská církev, která neměla vnitřní lásku k dobrým, ale dochovaným myšlenkám Pána. Čtvrtá byla primitivní křesťanská církev, která měla nové, přímější porozumění založené na Pánově učení. Pátý, podle Písem, má být založen na hlubším porozumění nabízeném Písmy a jejich vysvětlením Bible.

Mohlo by se říci mnohem více, ale zdůrazníme jen jeden další bod:

My jako jednotlivci jsme, kdo jsme založeni na tom, co milujeme, ne na tom, co víme. Půjdeme do nebe nebo do pekla na základě toho, co milujeme, ne podle toho, co víme. Poznání, myšlení a hledání pravdy jsou důležité věci, ale jejich účelem je utvářet, vést a sloužit našim láskám; láska je nakonec důležitá. Spisy jasně a opakovaně jasně ukazují, že to samé platí pro církve: Konečně jsou založeny na lásce, ne na znalostech, na jejich odhodlání sloužit sousedovi, nikoli na jejich vnějších uctívání. A pokud církve sdílejí společný účel sloužit sousedovi, jsou v podstatě jedním z nich, přičemž doktrinální variace mají malý význam.

(Референци: Zjevená Apokalypsa 533; Nebeská tajemství 407, 768, 1799 [3-4], 2048, 2853 [2-3], 2910, 2982, 3310, 3773, 3963 [2], 4292, 4672, 4723, 5826 [2-3], 6637, 6648, 8152, 9256 [4-5], 9276 [2]; Manželská láska 116; Nebe a Peklo 57; Slovo 8; Nauka Nového Jeruzaléma o Písmu svatém 99, 104)

116. THE MARRIAGE OF THE LORD AND THE CHURCH AND CORRESPONDENCE TO IT

This chapter also takes up the marriage of the Lord and the church and correspondence to it, because without a knowledge and understanding of the subject, scarcely anyone can see that conjugial love in its origin is sacred, spiritual and heavenly, and that it comes from the Lord. Some in the church indeed say that marriage has a relationship to the marriage of the Lord with the church, but they do not know what the nature of that relationship is.

In order to make this relationship perceptible to some sight of the understanding, therefore, we must discuss in detail that sacred marriage which exists with and in those people who form the Lord's church. They, too, and not others, possess truly conjugial love.

To explain this secret, however, we must divide our treatment into sections under the following headings:

1. In the Word, the Lord is called a Bridegroom and Husband, and the church a bride and wife; and the conjunction of the Lord with the church and the reciprocal conjunction of the church with the Lord is called a marriage.

2. The Lord is also called Father, and the church, mother.

3. The offspring from the Lord as Husband and Father and from the church as wife and mother are all spiritual offspring, and this is what is meant in the spiritual sense of the Word by sons and daughters, brothers and sisters, sons-in-law and daughters-in-law, and by other terms which have to do with descending generations.

4. The spiritual offspring that are born from the marriage of the Lord with the church are truths, from which come understanding, perception and all thought; and also qualities of goodness, from which come love, charity and all affection.

5. From the marriage of good and truth that emanates and flows in from the Lord, a person acquires truth, to which the Lord joins good, and in this way the church is formed in the person by the Lord.

6. A husband does not represent the Lord and his wife the church, because both husbands and wives together form the church.

7. Therefore neither in the marriages of angels in heaven nor in the marriages of people on earth does the husband correspond to the Lord and the wife to the church.

8. Rather, the correspondence rests with conjugial love, insemination, procreation, love for little children, and other things of a similar sort that occur in marriage and result from it.

9. The Word is the means of conjunction, because it is from the Lord and thus is the Lord.

10. The church comes from the Lord and it exists in people who go to Him and live according to His commandments.

11. Conjugial love depends on the state of the church in a person, because it depends on the state of his wisdom.

12. So, then, because the church comes from the Lord, conjugial love comes from Him as well.

Now follows the development of these points.

4292. In the internal historical sense 'he said, Your name will no longer be called Jacob, but Israel' means that they could not as [the descendants of] Jacob play the representative part, except by virtue of the new nature that was imparted to them. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'Jacob' in the Word as his descendants, dealt with above in 4281, and from the meaning of 'name' as the essential nature, dealt with immediately above in 4291. The new nature itself is meant by 'Israel' in the internal sense, for 'Israel' is the celestial-spiritual man and consequently the internal man, 4286. And since 'Israel' means the celestial-spiritual man, and so the internal man, 'Israel' also means the internal spiritual Church. For whether you use the expression spiritual man or spiritual Church, it amounts to the same thing because any spiritual person in particular is the Church, even as many are in general. If the individual person in particular were not the Church, no Church in general could exist. The expression Church is used in everyday language to describe a congregation in general; but each member of the congregation must be a Church if that greater Church is to exist. Every general whole incorporates parts that are like that whole.

[2] The implications of this particular matter - the inability of [the descendants on Jacob to play the representative part, except by virtue of the new nature imparted to them, meant by 'Israel' - are as follows: It was specifically Jacob's descendants who were to represent the Church but not specifically Isaac's since Isaac's descended not only through Jacob but also through Esau. Still less was it specifically Abraham's, for Abraham's descended not only through Jacob but also through Esau, and likewise through Ishmael, as well as through his sons by his second wife Keturah, who were Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak, Shuah, and the sons of these, see Genesis 25:1-4. Now because Jacob's descendants insisted that they should be representative, as shown just above in 4290, they could not represent as Jacob, or as Isaac, or as Abraham. The reason why they could not do so as Jacob was that 'Jacob' represented the external aspect of the Church, but not the internal. And they could not do so as Isaac at the same time or as Abraham at the same time for the reason advanced immediately above.

[3] So that they could represent the Church therefore, a new name had inevitably to be given to Jacob, and through that name a new nature, which new nature was to be a sign of the internal spiritual man, or what amounts to the same, of the internal spiritual Church. That new nature is meant by 'Israel'. Every Church of the Lord is internal and external, as has been shown several times already, the internal Church being that which is represented, the external that which represents. The internal Church is also either spiritual or else celestial, the internal spiritual Church being represented by 'Israel', but the internal celestial Church at a later time by 'Judah'. Therefore a division also took place, and the Israelites became a kingdom on their own and the Jews another on their own. But these matters will in the Lord's Divine mercy be discussed later on. From this it is evident that 'Jacob', that is, Jacob's descendants, could not represent the Church as Jacob, for that would have been to represent solely the external aspect of the Church. They had to do so as Israel as well because 'Israel' is the internal aspect.

[4] It has been shown in various places already that it is the internal which is represented and the external which represents, as may also be seen in the human being. A person's speech represents his thought, and a person's action represents his will. Speech and action are the external aspects of the person, thought and will the internal. In addition the various looks seen on a person's face represent both, that is to say, both his thought and his will. It is well known to everyone that the looks on a person's face are representative, for the looks on the faces of people who are sincere enable their interior states to be seen. In short, every part of the body represents some facet of a person's inclination (animus) and mind (mens).

[5] It is similar with the external aspects of the Church, for these are like the body, while its internal aspects are like the soul. There were, for example, the altars and the sacrifices on them, which, as is well known, were external things. There was likewise the bread of the presence, also the lampstand with its lamps, as well as the fire that was kept burning all the time. Anyone can recognize that these external things represented internal ones, as likewise did everything else of a ritual nature. The fact that these external things could not represent anything external, only what was internal, becomes clear from the considerations introduced already. So 'Jacob' could not represent as Jacob, because 'Jacob' means the external aspect of the Church, but he could do so as Israel because 'Israel' means its internal aspect. This is what is meant by a new nature being imparted to enable the descendants of Jacob to play the representative part.