Die Bibel

 

Genesis 23

Lernen

   

1 En het leven van Sara was honderd zeven en twintig jaren; dit waren de jaren des levens van Sara.

2 En Sara stierf te Kiriath-Arba, dat is Hebron, in het land Kanaan; en Abraham kwam om Sara te beklagen, en haar te bewenen.

3 Daarna stond Abraham op van het aangezicht van zijner dode, en hij sprak tot de zonen Heths, zeggende:

4 Ik ben een vreemdeling en inwoner bij u; geef mij een erfbegrafenis bij u, opdat ik mijn dode van voor mijn aangezicht begrave.

5 En de zonen Heths antwoordden Abraham, zeggende tot hem:

6 Hoor ons, mijn heer! gij zijt een vorst Gods in het midden van ons; begraaf uw dode in de keure onzer graven; niemand van ons zal zijn graf voor u weren, dat gij uw dode niet zoudt begraven.

7 Toen stond Abraham op, en boog zich neder voor het volk des lands, voor de zonen Heths;

8 En hij sprak met hen, zeggende: Is het met uw wil, dat ik mijn dode begrave van voor mijn aangezicht; zo hoort mij, en spreekt voor mij bij Efron, den zoon van Zohar,

9 Dat hij mij geve de spelonk van Machpela, die hij heeft, die in het einde van zijn akker is, dat hij dezelve mij om het volle geld geve, tot een erfbegrafenis in het midden van u.

10 Efron nu zat in het midden van de zonen Heths; en Efron de Hethiet antwoordde Abraham, voor de oren van de zonen Heths, van al degenen, die ter poorte zijner stad ingingen, zeggende:

11 Neen, mijn heer! hoor mij; den akker geef ik u; ook de spelonk, die daarin is, die geef ik u; voor de ogen van de zonen mijns volks geef ik u die; begraaf uw dode.

12 Toen boog zich Abraham neder voor het aangezicht van het volk des lands;

13 En hij sprak tot Efron, voor de oren van het volk des lands, zeggende: Trouwens, zijt gij het? lieve, hoor mij; ik zal het geld des akkers geven; neem het van mij, zo zal ik mijn dode aldaar begraven.

14 En Efron antwoordde Abraham, zeggende tot hem:

15 Mijn heer! hoor mij; een land van vierhonderd sikkelen zilvers, wat is dat tussen mij en tussen u? begraaf slechts uw dode.

16 En Abraham luisterde naar Efron; en Abraham woog Efron het geld, waarvan hij gesproken had voor de oren van de zonen Heths, vierhonderd sikkelen zilvers, onder den koopman gangbaar.

17 Alzo werd de akker van Efron, die in Machpela was, dat tegenover Mamre lag, de akker en de spelonk, die daarin was, en al het geboomte, dat op den akker stond, dat rondom in zijn ganse landpale was gevestigd,

18 Aan Abraham tot een bezitting, voor de ogen van de zonen Heths, bij allen, die tot zijn stadspoort ingingen.

19 En daarna begroef Abraham zijn huisvrouw Sara in de spelonk des akkers van Machpela, tegenover Mamre, hetwelk is Hebron, in het land Kanaan.

20 Alzo werd die akker, en de spelonk die daarin was, aan Abraham gevestigd tot een erfbegrafenis van de zonen Heths.

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #2943

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

2943. Of all that went in at the gate of his city, saying. That this signifies as to the doctrinal things through which there is faith, is evident from the signification of “gate,” as being entrance, thus that which introduces (in like manner as “door,” see n. 2145, 2152, 2356, 2385); and from the signification of “city,” as being the truth of faith (see n. 402, 2268, 2449, 2451, 2712). Cities in the Ancient Church were not like the cities of later times and of the present day, that is, assemblages and gatherings of people; but they were the dwelling together of separate families. The family of one parent constituted a city, as for instance the city of Nahor (to which Abraham’s servant came when he was to betroth Rebekah to Isaac, Genesis 24:10) was Nahor’s family which was there; and Shalem, the city of Shechem (to which Jacob came when he journeyed from Paddan-aram, Genesis 33:18; 34 (Genesis 34:2) (Genesis 34:4) (Genesis 34:6) (Genesis 34:8) (Genesis 34:11) (Genesis 34:13) (Genesis 34:18) (Genesis 34:20) (Genesis 34:24) (Genesis 34:26)) was the family of Hamor and Shechem, which was there; and so with the other cities of that time.

[2] And as they had learned from the most ancient people that nations and families represented the heavenly societies, and thus the things of love and charity (n. 655, 1159), so when a “city” is mentioned instead of a family, and “people” instead of nation, truth is signified which is of faith. Hence also the “city of God” and the “holy city,” in the genuine sense signify faith in the Lord; and as a walled town or city signified faith, the “gate” of the city signified doctrinal things, because these introduce to faith. This in the representative Jewish Church was also signified by the judges and the elders sitting in the gate of the city and judging there; as is plain from the historical parts of the Word; and also in Zechariah:

These are the words that ye shall do: Speak ye every man the truth with his companion, judge truth and the judgment of peace in your gates (Zech. 8:16).

Also in Amos:

Hate the evil and love the good, and establish judgment in the gate (Amos 5:15).

(That a “gate” also signifies the way of access to the rational mind, and that this mind is compared to a city, may be seen above, n. 2851)

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #2385

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

2385. And they labored to find the door. That this signifies so that they could not see any truth that would lead to good, is evident from the signification of a “door,” as being introduction and access, and as being truth itself, because this introduces to good (see above, n. 2356). But here by the “door” are signified the knowledges that introduce to truth; for the “door” (as said above, n. 2356) was at the front of the house, for it is said that Lot “went out to the door, and shut the door behind him” (verse 6): hence to “labor to find the door,” denotes not to see any truth that would lead to good.

[2] Such do those become, especially in the last times, who by ratiocination hatch doctrinal things, and believe nothing unless they first apprehend it; for in this case the life of evil continually inflows into their rational, and a kind of fallacious light pours in from the fire of the affections of evil, and causes them to see falsities as truths; as are wont to do those who see phantoms in nocturnal light. These same things are then confirmed in many ways, and become matters of doctrine, such as are the doctrinal tenets of those who say that the life (which is of the affection) is of no efficacy, but only the faith (which is of the thought).

[3] That every principle whatever, even if falsity itself, when once taken up, can be confirmed by innumerable things, and be presented in the outward form as if it were truth itself, may be known to everyone. Hence come heresies; from which, when once confirmed, the man never recedes. Yet from a false principle nothing but falsities can flow; and even if truths are interlarded among them, they became truths falsified when used to confirm a false principle, because they are contaminated by its essence.

[4] Very different is the case when truth itself is received as a principle, and this is confirmed, as for example that love to the Lord and charity toward the neighbor are that on which hangs all the Law, and of which all the Prophets speak, and that they are therefore the essentials of all doctrine and worship; for in this case the mind would be illuminated by innumerable things in the Word, that otherwise lie hidden in the obscurity of a false principle. Nay, in such a case heresies would be dissipated, and one church would arise out of many, no matter how greatly the doctrinal and ritual matters that flowed from or led to it might differ.

[5] Such was the ancient Church, which extended through many kingdoms, namely, Assyria, Mesopotamia, Syria, Ethiopia, Arabia, Libya, Egypt, Philistia as far as Tyre and Sidon, and through the land of Canaan on both sides the Jordan. Among these the doctrinal and ritual matters differed, but still the church was one, because to them charity was the essential thing. Then was there the Lord’s kingdom on earth as in the heavens, for such is heaven (see n. 684, 690). If it were so now, all would be governed by the Lord as one man; for they would be as the members and organs of one body, which, although not of similar form, nor of similar function, yet all have relation to one heart, on which depend all and each in their several forms, that are everywhere varied. Then would each person say, in whatever doctrine and in whatever outward worship he might be, This is my brother, I see that he worships the Lord, and is a good man.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.