1820. Dat de woorden ‘waarbij zal ik weten, dat ik het erfelijk bezitten zal’ een verzoeking betekenen tegen de liefde van de Heer, die zekerheid wilde hebben, kan uit de twijfel blijken die in de woorden zelf ligt. Wie in verzoeking is, is in twijfel over het einddoel; het einddoel is de liefde waartegen de boze geesten en de boze genieën strijden en zo het einddoel in twijfel stellen, en wel des te meer in twijfel, naarmate hij het meer liefheeft. Wanneer hij niet vanwege het einddoel dat hij liefheeft, in twijfel, ja zelfs in vertwijfeling gesteld werd, zou het geen verzoeking zijn. De zekerheid over de afloop gaat aan de overwinning vooraf, en behoort tot de overwinning. Daar weinigen weten, hoe het met verzoekingen is gesteld, mag het hier in het kort uiteengezet worden. Boze geesten vechten nooit tegen iets anders dan tegen de dingen die de mens liefheeft en zij vechten des te feller, naarmate hij vuriger liefheeft. Het zijn de boze genieën die tegen de dingen vechten die tot de neiging tot het goede behoren, en de boze geesten tegen de dingen, die tot de neiging tot het ware behoren. Zodra zij ook maar het minste bemerken wat de mens liefheeft, of als het ware de reuk ervan krijgen van iets dat hem aangenaam en dierbaar is, vallen zij er terstond op aan en trachten het te vernietigen en dus zo de hele mens, daar zijn leven bestaat in zijn liefden. Zo verschaft hun niets een groter vermaak dan de mens te vernietigen en zij laten daarvan niet af, ook al zou het tot in eeuwigheid duren, wanneer zij niet door de Heer werden teruggeworpen. Zij die boosaardig en sluw zijn, dringen in de liefde zelf binnen door ze te vleien, en komen op deze wijze de mens binnen, en kort nadat zij zo zijn binnengedrongen, trachten zij de liefden te vernietigen en zo de mens te doden en wel op duizenderlei manieren, die onbegrijpelijk zijn; en zij vechten niet op een wijze, dat zij tegen de goedheden en waarheden redeneren - dergelijke worstelingen zijn van geen betekenis, want al werden zij duizendmaal overwonnen, dan zouden zij toch op hun stuk blijven staan, daar redeneringen tegen goedheden en waarheden nooit kunnen uitblijven - maar zij verdraaien de goedheden en waarheden en doen de mens met een zeker vuur van begeerte en van overreding ontvlammen, zodat hij niet beter weet of hij bevindt zichzelf in een dergelijke begeerte en in een dergelijke overreding. Tevens steken zij in die goedheden en waarheden een vuur aan met een lust, die zij uit een lust van andere oorsprong bij de mens halen, en zo vergiftigen en bestoken zij hem op de sluwste wijze, en wel zo behendig, van het ene in het andere overgaand, dat indien de Heer geen bijstand verleende, de mens nooit anders zou weten, dan dat het zo is. Zo gaan zij eveneens te werk tegen de neigingen tot het ware, welke het geweten uitmaken; zodra zij iets van geweten waarnemen, van welke aard het ook mag zijn, vormen zij zich uit de valsheden en zwakheden bij de mens een neiging en daarmee verdonkeren zij het licht van het ware en verdraaien het op die wijze, of boezemen angst in en pijnigen; bovendien houden ze de gedachte hardnekkig op een punt vast en vullen die met fantasieën, behalve nog ontelbare andere kunstgrepen meer, die nooit in een begrijpelijke vorm beschreven kunnen worden. Het is slechts weinig en wel het meest algemene, dat tot het geweten van de mens kan doordringen, en vooral in het vernietigen van het geweten scheppen zij bovenal het grootste vermaak. Uit dit weinige, ja uiterst weinige, kan blijken van welke aard verzoekingen zijn, en dat in het algemeen de aard van de verzoekingen overeenkomt met de aard van de liefden. Hieruit kan ook blijken, van welke aard de verzoekingen van de Heer waren, namelijk de meest wrede, want hoe groter de liefde is, des te groter de wreedheid van de verzoekingen. De liefde van de Heer, welke het heil van het gehele menselijke geslacht betrof, was aller vurigst, en sloot bijgevolg alle neiging tot het goede en alle neiging tot het ware in de hoogste graad in. Tegen deze neigingen streden de hellen met de meest boosaardige list en gif, toch overwon de Heer ze door eigen macht; de overwinningen brengen dit met zich mee, dat de boosaardige genieën en geesten daarna niets meer durven doen; want hun leven bestaat hierin dat zij kunnen vernietigen, maar wanneer zij merken dat de mens van dien aard is, dat hij kan weerstaan, vluchten zij bij de eerste aanval, zoals dit gewoonlijk gebeurt, wanneer zij de eerste drempel van de hemel naderen. Zij worden dan terstond door ontzetting en schrik aangegrepen en storten zich achterwaarts.

201. Of the Lord's temptations.

The Lord beyond all others ¹ endured the most grievous and dreadful temptations, which are but little described in the sense of the letter of the Word, but much in the internal sense (n. 1663, 1668, 1787, 2776, 2786, 2795, 2814, 9528). The Lord fought from the Divine love towards the whole human race (n. 1690, 1691, 1812-1813, 1820). The love of the Lord was the salvation of the human race (n. 1820). The Lord fought from His own power (n. 1692, 1813, 9937). The Lord alone was made justice and merit, by the temptations, and victories which He gained therein from His own power (n. 1813, 2025-2027, 9715, 9809, 10019). By temptations the Lord united the Divine itself, which was in Him from conception, to His Human, and made this Divine, as He makes man spiritual by temptations (n. 1725, 1729, 1733, 1737, 3318, 3381, 3382, 4286). The temptations of the Lord were attended with despair at the end (n. 1787). The Lord, by the temptations admitted into Himself, subjugated the hells, and reduced to order all things in them, and in heaven, and at the same time glorified His Human (n. 1737, 4287, 9315, 9528, 9937). The Lord alone fought against all the hells (n. 8273). He admitted temptations into Himself from thence (n. 2816, 4295).

The Lord could not be tempted as to the Divine, because the hells cannot assault the Divine, wherefore He assumed a human from the mother, such as could be tempted (n. 1414, 1444, 1573, 5041, 5157, 7193, 9315). By temptations and victories He expelled all the hereditary from the mother, and put off the human from her, until at length He was no longer her son (n. 2159, 2574, 2649, 3036, 10830). Jehovah, who was in Him from conception, appeared in His temptations as if absent (n. 1815). This was His state of humiliation (n. 1785, 1999, 2159, 6866). His last temptation and victory, by which He fully subjugated the hells, and made His Human Divine, was in Gethsemane and on the cross (n. 2776, 2803, 2813-2814, 10655, 10659, 10828).

"To eat no bread and drink no water for forty days," signifies an entire state of temptations (n. 10686). "Forty years," "months," or "days," signify a plenary state of temptations from beginning to end; and such a state is meant by the duration of the flood, "forty days"; by Moses abiding "forty days" upon Mount Sinai; by the sojourning of the sons of Israel "forty years" in the desert; and by the Lord's temptation in the desert "forty days" (n. 730, 862, 2272-2273, 8098).

Fotnoter:

1573. 'And the Canaanite and the Perizzite were then dwelling in the land' means evils and falsities in the external man. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'the Canaanite' as hereditary evil from the mother in the external man, dealt with already in 1444, and from the meaning of 'the Perizzite' as derivative falsity, dealt with in what follows below. That hereditary evil from the mother resided with the Lord in His external Man, see what has been stated already in 1414, 1444. The fact that falsity resulted from that hereditary evil follows, for where there is hereditary evil falsity is present also. The one is born from the other, but falsity from evil cannot be born until a person has been endowed with facts and cognitions. Evil has nothing to work on or flow into except facts and cognitions. In this way evil belonging to the will part of the mind is turned into falsity in the understanding part, and therefore this falsity also was hereditary because it was born from what was hereditary, though not the falsity that is based on false principles. But it existed in the external man as that which the internal man could see was falsity.

[2] Because hereditary evil from the mother was present before the Lord had been endowed with facts and cognitions, that is, before 'Abram sojourned in Egypt' it is said in verse 6 of the previous chapter that 'the Canaanite was in the land' but not that the Perizzite was there, whereas in the present verse, now that He had been endowed with facts and cognitions, it is said that 'the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelt in the land'. From these considerations it is clear that 'the Canaanite' means evil and 'the Perizzite' falsity. It is also clear from the consideration that the mention of the Canaanite and the Perizzite does not bear any relation to the historical events among which it occurs, for nothing is said about either of them in what has gone before or in what follows. The same is also true with the mention of the Canaanite in verse 6 of the previous chapter. From this it is evident that some arcanum lies concealed here which one cannot know except from the internal sense.

[3] To some it may come as a surprise to say that hereditary evil from the mother was present with the Lord, but as such evil is spoken of so plainly here, and as in the internal sense the Lord is the subject, there can be no doubt that it was present. For no human being can possibly be born from another human being without deriving evil from him or her. But the hereditary evil that is derived from the father is one thing, that from the mother is another. Hereditary evil from the father is more internal and remains for ever, since it can never be rooted out. Such evil did not exist with the Lord because He was born of Jehovah as His Father, and thus was Divine, or Jehovah, as regards internals. But hereditary evil from the mother belongs to the external man, as it did with the Lord, and it is called 'the Canaanite in the land', and derivative falsity 'the Perizzite'. The Lord was in this sense born as any other, and had weaknesses as any other has them.

[4] That the Lord derived hereditary evil from the mother is quite clear from the fact that He underwent temptations. Nobody can ever be tempted who has no evil, for it is the evil present with man that tempts and by means of which he is tempted. That the Lord was tempted, undergoing temptations so serious that no other could ever endure one ten thousandth part of them, that He suffered all alone, and by His own power overcame evil, or the devil and the whole of hell, is also clear. Those temptations are spoken of in Luke as follows,

Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness. He was tempted for forty days by the devil, so that He ate nothing in those days. But after the devil had ended every temptation he departed from Him for a time. From there He returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee. Luke 4:1-2, 13-14.

[5] And in Mark,

The Spirit, driving Jesus, made Him go away into the wilderness; and He was in the wilderness forty days, tempted; and He was with the wild beasts. Mark 1:12-13.

Here 'beasts' means hell. In addition to this He is spoken of as being tempted to the point of death, so that His sweat was [like] drops of blood,

And when He was in agony He prayed more earnestly; and His sweat became as great drops of blood falling down upon the ground. Luke 22:44.

[6] No angel can possibly be tempted by the devil, the reason being that as an angel abides in the Lord, evil spirits cannot approach him, even when they are a long way off, but are instantly seized with horror and fright. Much less could hell have approached the Lord if He had been born Divine, that is, without evil from the mother clinging to Him.

[7] That the Lord bore the iniquities and evils of the human race is also a statement commonly made by preachers, yet the diversion of iniquities and evils to Himself can never come about except through a hereditary channel. The Divine cannot take evil upon Itself, and therefore in order that He might overcome evil by His own powers - which no human being has ever been able to do or ever can do - and in so doing might make Himself alone Righteousness, He was willing to be born like any other. Otherwise there would have been no need for Him to be born at all, for the Lord could have assumed Human Essence without going through the process of birth, as He had indeed sometimes done when seen by members of the Most Ancient Church, and also by prophets. Therefore in order that He might be furnished with evil against which He was to fight and over which He was to conquer, and in so doing might join together in Himself the Divine Essence to the Human Essence, He came into the world.

[8] In the Lord however there was no evil of His own, that is, He committed no actual evil, as He Himself also says in John,

Who of you is going to convict Me of sin? John 8:46.

From these considerations it may now be quite evident what is meant by the statement immediately preceding - 'there was strife between Abram's herdsmen and Lot's herdsman'. The reason was that 'the Canaanite and the Perizzite were dwelling in the land'.