341. Dat de onschuld een ontvanger is van alle hemelse dingen, en dat dus de onschuld van kleine kinderen een basis is voor alle genegenheden voor goedheid en waarheid, kan duidelijk blijken uit hetgeen boven in nr. 276-383 werd gezegd over de onschuld van de engelen in de hemel. Daar werd aangetoond dat onschuld bestaat in de wil niet door zichzelf maar door de Heer geleid te worden. Bijgevolg zal de mens in onschuld verkeren voor zover hij van zijn eigen ik verwijderd is; en voor zover iemand van zijn eigen ik verwijderd is, zal hij in het eigen van de Heer zijn; en het eigen van de Heer is wat men Zijn gerechtigheid en verdienste noemt. De onschuld van de kinderen is niet de eigenlijke onschuld; werkelijke onschuld is wijsheid, want naarmate iemand wijs is, verlangt hij door de Heer geleid te worden of, wat hetzelfde is, naarmate iemand door de Heer geleid wordt, is hij wijs. Kinderen worden daarom van de uiterlijke onschuld waarin zij eerst zijn, en die de kinderlijke onschuld wordt genoemd, naar de innerlijke onschuld geleid, die de onschuld van de wijsheid is. Deze onschuld is het einddoel van al hun onderricht en van hun vooruitgang. Als zij dus tot de onschuld van de wijsheid geraken, wordt hen de onschuld van de kindsheid, die hen ondertussen als basis gediend heeft, toegevoegd. De bijzondere hoedanigheid van de kinderlijke onschuld werd mij voorgesteld door een zinnebeeld, alsof het hout was bijna zonder leven, dat levend gemaakt wordt als de kinderen vordering maken in de kennis van de waarheid en de geneigdheid tot het goede. Later werd mij de hoedanigheid van de ware onschuld voorgesteld door een zeer schoon kind, vol leven en geheel naakt; want de werkelijk onschuldigen, die in de binnenste hemel zijn en zo het naast bij de Heer, komen andere engelen geheel als kinderen voor, en enigen van hen zijn naakt; want onschuld wordt voorgesteld door naaktheid zonder schaamte, wals wij lezen van de eerste man en zijn vrouw in het paradijs (Genesis 2:25); daarom waren zij beschaamd over hun naaktheid en verborgen zij zich vanaf het ogenblik dat hun staat van onschuld verdween. (Genesis 3:7, 10) In één woord, hoe wijzer de engelen zijn, des te onschuldiger zijn zij ook, en hoe onschuldiger zij zijn, des te meer voelen zij zichzelf als kinderen; vandaar dat kindsheid in het Woord onschuld betekent. (zie nr. 278.)

22. I demonstrated in many sections of my book HEAVEN AND HELL that heaven and hell are from the human race; for instance, in the following. Nations and peoples outside the church in heaven (318-328). Children in heaven (329-345) The wise and the simple in heaven (345-356). The rich and the poor in heaven (357-365). Each individual is a spirit in his interiors (432-444). Man after death possesses a perfect human form (453-460). Man after death has every sense, memory, thought and affection which he had in the world, and leaves nothing behind except his earthly body (461-469). Man's first state after death (491-498); his second state (499-511); his third state (512-517). Further about the hells (536-588), All of these passages offer detailed proofs that heaven is not composed of a class of angels created from the beginning, nor hell of a devil and his crew, but only of those who were born as human beings.

499. THE SECOND STATE OF MAN AFTER DEATH

The second state of man after death is called the state of his interiors, because he is then let into the interiors of his mind, that is, of his will and thought; while his exteriors, which he had been in during his first state, are laid asleep. Whoever gives any thought to man's life and speech and action can know that everyone has exteriors and interiors, that is, exterior and interior thoughts and intentions. This he can know from these things. In civil life one thinks about others in accordance with what he has heard and learned of them by report or conversation; but he does not talk with them in accordance with his thought; and if they are evil he nevertheless treats them with civility. That this is so is known especially in the case of pretenders and flatterers, who speak and act in one way and think and will in a wholly different way; also in the case of hypocrites, who talk about God and heaven and the salvation of souls and the truths of the Church and their country's good and their neighbour as if from faith and love, although in heart they believe otherwise and love themselves alone.

[2] From these things it can be established that there are two kinds of thought, one exterior and the other interior; and that there are those who speak from exterior thought, while from their interior thought they have other sentiments, and that these two kinds of thought are kept separate, since the interior is carefully prevented from flowing into the exterior and becoming manifest in any way. By creation man is so formed as to have his interior and exterior thought make one by correspondence; and these make one in those who are in good, for such both think and speak what is good only. But in those who are in evil, interior and exterior thought do not make one, for such think what is evil and say what is good. With such there is an inversion of order, for good with them is on the outside and evil within; and in consequence, evil has dominion over good, and subjects it to itself as a servant, that it may serve it as a means for gaining its ends, which are of the same nature as their love. Because there is such an end in the good that they seek and do, it is evident that good with them is not good, but is infected with evil, however good it may appear in external form to those not acquainted with their interiors.

[3] It is otherwise with those who are in good. With such, order is not inverted; but good from interior thought flows into exterior thought, and thus into speech and act. This is the order into which man was created; for in heaven, and in the light of heaven, such are the interiors of those there. And as the light of heaven is the Divine Truth that goes forth from the Lord, and consequently is the Lord in heaven (126-140), therefore such are led by the Lord. All these things have been said to make known that every man has interior thought and exterior thought, and that these are distinct from each other. When thought is mentioned, will also is understood, for thought is from the will, and no one can think apart from the will. All this makes clear what is meant by the state of man's exteriors and the state of his interiors.