聖書

 

2 Mose 22

勉強

   

1 Wenn jemand einen Ochsen stiehlt oder ein Stück Kleinvieh, und schlachtet es oder verkauft es, so soll er fünf Ochsen erstatten für den Ochsen und vier Stück Kleinvieh für das Stück. -

2 Wenn der Dieb beim Einbruch betroffen wird, und er wird geschlagen, daß er stirbt, so ist es ihm (d. h. dem Schläger des Diebes; O. so ist seinetwegen, d. h. des Diebes wegen; so auch V. 3) keine Blutschuld;

3 wenn die Sonne über ihm aufgegangen ist, so ist es ihm eine Blutschuld. Er soll gewißlich erstatten; wenn er nichts hat, soll er für seinen Diebstahl verkauft werden.

4 Wenn das Gestohlene lebend in seiner Hand gefunden wird, es sei ein Ochse oder ein Esel oder ein Stück Kleinvieh, soll er das Doppelte erstatten.

5 So jemand ein Feld oder einen Weingarten (O. ein Gartenland) abweiden läßt und er sein Vieh hintreibt, und es weidet auf dem Felde eines anderen, so soll er es vom Besten seines Feldes und vom Besten seines Weingartens erstatten.

6 Wenn Feuer ausbricht und Dornen (d. h. wahrsch. eine Dornenhecke) erreicht, und es wird ein Garbenhaufen verzehrt, oder das stehende Getreide oder das Feld, so soll der gewißlich erstatten, der den Brand angezündet hat.

7 So jemand seinem Nächsten Geld oder Geräte in Verwahrung gibt, und es wird aus dem Hause dieses Mannes gestohlen, wenn der Dieb gefunden wird, so soll er das Doppelte erstatten;

8 wenn der Dieb nicht gefunden wird, so soll der Besitzer des Hauses vor die ichter treten, ob er nicht seine Hand nach der Habe seines Nächsten ausgestreckt hat. -

9 Bei jedem Falle von Veruntreuung betreffs eines Ochsen, eines Esels, eines Stückes Kleinvieh, eines Kleides, betreffs alles Verlorenen, wovon man sagt: "das ist es", soll beider Sache vor die ichter kommen; wen die ichter schuldig sprechen, der soll seinem Nächsten das Doppelte erstatten. -

10 So jemand seinem Nächsten einen Esel oder einen Ochsen oder ein Stück Kleinvieh oder irgend ein Vieh in Verwahrung gibt, und es stirbt oder wird beschädigt oder weggeführt, und niemand sieht es,

11 so soll der Eid Jehovas zwischen ihnen beiden sein, ob er nicht seine Hand nach der Habe seines Nächsten ausgestreckt hat; und sein Besitzer (d. h. des Viehes) soll es annehmen, und jener soll nichts erstatten.

12 Und wenn es ihm wirklich gestohlen worden ist, so soll er es seinem Besitzer erstatten.

13 Wenn es aber zerrissen worden ist, so soll er es als Zeugnis bringen; er soll das Zerrissene nicht erstatten.

14 Und wenn jemand von seinem Nächsten ein Stück Vieh entlehnt, und es wird beschädigt oder stirbt-war sein Besitzer nicht dabei, so soll er es gewißlich erstatten;

15 wenn sein Besitzer dabei war, soll er es nicht erstatten. Wenn es gemietet war, so ist es für seine Miete gekommen.

16 Und so jemand eine Jungfrau betört, die nicht verlobt ist, und liegt bei ihr, so soll er sie gewißlich durch eine Heiratsgabe sich zum Weibe erkaufen.

17 Wenn ihr Vater sich durchaus weigert, sie ihm zu geben, so soll er Geld darwägen nach der Heiratsgabe der Jungfrauen. -

18 Eine Zauberin sollst du nicht leben lassen. -

19 Jeder, der bei einem Vieh liegt, soll gewißlich getötet werden. -

20 Wer den Göttern opfert außer Jehova allein, soll verbannt (S. die Vorrrede) werden.

21 Und den Fremdling sollst du nicht bedrängen und ihn nicht bedrücken, denn Fremdlinge seid ihr im Lande Ägypten gewesen.

22 Keine Witwe und Waise sollt ihr bedrücken.

23 Wenn du sie irgend bedrückst, so werde ich, wenn sie irgendwie zu mir schreit, ihr Geschrei gewißlich erhören;

24 und mein Zorn wird entbrennen, und ich werde euch mit dem Schwerte töten, und eure Weiber sollen Witwen und eure Kinder Waisen werden. -

25 Wenn du meinem Volke, dem Armen bei dir, Geld leihst, so sollst du ihm nicht sein wie ein Gläubiger; (Eig. jemand, der um Zins Geld ausleiht) ihr sollt ihm keinen Zins auferlegen. -

26 Wenn du irgend deines Nächsten Mantel (Eig. Obergewand, das als Decke benutzt wurde. Vergl. die Anm. zu Kap. 12,34; 5. Mose 22,30) zum Pfande nimmst, so sollst du ihm denselben zurückgeben, ehe die Sonne untergeht;

27 denn es ist seine einzige Decke, sein Kleid für seine Haut; worin soll er liegen? Und es wird geschehen, wenn er zu mir schreit, so werde ich ihn erhören, denn ich bin gnädig. -

28 Die ichter sollst du nicht lästern, und einem Fürsten deines Volkes sollst du nicht fluchen.

29 Mit der Fülle deines Getreides und dem Ausfluß deiner Kelter (W. mit deiner Fülle und deinem Ausfluß) sollst du nicht zögern. Den erstgeborenen deiner Söhne sollst du mir geben.

30 Desgleichen sollst du mit deinem Ochsen tun und mit deinem Kleinvieh; sieben Tage soll es bei seiner Mutter sein, am achten Tage sollst du es mir geben. -

31 Und heilige Männer sollt ihr mir sein, und Fleisch, das auf dem Felde zerrissen worden ist, sollt ihr nicht essen; ihr sollt es den Hunden vorwerfen.

   

スウェーデンボルグの著作から

 

Arcana Coelestia#9190

この節の研究

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

9190. 'Anyone lying with a beast' means being joined to the evils that belong to the desires of self-love. This is clear from the meaning of 'lying with' as being joined to; and from the meaning of 'a beast' as a good affection with people who are good, and an evil affection with those who are evil, dealt with in 45, 46, 142, 143, 246, 714, 715, 719, 776, 2781, 3518, 3519, 5198, 7424, 7523, 7872, 9090, thus evil desires, at this point the desires of self-love. The term 'evil desires' is used to mean evil affections.

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

スウェーデンボルグの著作から

 

Arcana Coelestia#3519

この節の研究

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

3519. 'And take for me from there two good kids of the she-goats' means truths born from that good. This is clear from the meaning of 'kids of the she-goats' as truths born from good, dealt with below. The reason for having 'two' was that as in the rational so in the natural there are things of the will and those of the understanding. Things in the natural that belong to the will are delights, while those that belong to the understanding are facts. These two have to be joined together if they are to be anything at all.

[2] As regards 'kids of the she-goats' meaning truths born from good, this becomes clear from those places in the Word where kids and she-goats are mentioned. It should be recognized that all gentle and useful beasts mentioned in the Word mean in the genuine sense celestial things, which are forms of good, and spiritual things, which are forms of truth, see 45, 46, 142, 143, 246, 714, 715, 776, 2179, 2180, 2781, 3218. And since there are various genera of celestial things or forms of good, and consequently there are various genera of spiritual things or forms of truth, one beast has a different meaning from another; that is to say, a lamb has one meaning, a kid another, and a sheep, she-goat, ram, he-goat, young bull, or ox another, while a horse or a camel has yet another meaning. Birds have a different meaning again, as also do beasts of the sea, such as sea monsters, and fish. The genera of celestial and spiritual things, and consequently of forms of good and truth, are more than anyone can number, even though when that which is celestial or good is mentioned, and also when that which is spiritual or truth, this is not envisaged as being anything complex, consisting of many parts, but as a single entity. Yet how complex both of these are, that is, how countless the genera are of which they consist, may be seen from what has been stated about heaven in 3241, to the effect that it is distinguished into countless separate communities, according to the genera of celestial and spiritual things, that is, of goods of love and of derivative truths of faith. Furthermore each genus of good and each genus of truth has countless species into which the communities of each genus are separated. And each species in a similar way has separate sub-species.

[3] The commonest genera of good and truth are what the living creatures offered as burnt offerings and sacrifices represented. And because the genera are quite distinct and separate, people were explicitly commanded to use those living creatures and no others, that is to say, in some sacrifices lambs and ewe-lambs, and also kids and female kids of she-goats were to be used, in other sacrifices rams and sheep, and also he-goats, were to be used, while in other sacrifices again, calves, young bulls, and oxen, or else pigeons and doves, were to be used, see 992, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3218. What kids and she-goats meant however becomes clear both from the sacrifices in which they used to be offered and from other places in the Word. These show that lambs and ewe-lambs meant innocence belonging to the internal or rational man, and kids and she-goats innocence belonging to the external or natural man, and so the truth and the good of the latter.

[4] The fact that truth and good present in the innocence that belongs to the external or natural man is meant by a kid and a she-goat is clear from the following places in the Word: In Isaiah,

The wolf will dwell with the lamb, and the leopard will lie down with the kid, the calf also and the young lion and the sheep together; and a little child will lead them. Isaiah 11:6.

This refers to the Lord's kingdom and to the state there in which people have no fear of evil, that is, no dread of hell, because they are with the Lord. 'The lamb' and 'the kid' stand for people who have innocence within them, and who, being the most secure of all, are mentioned first.

[5] When all the firstborn of Egypt were smitten the people were commanded to kill from among the lambs or among the kids a male without blemish, and to put some of the blood on the doorposts and on the lintel of their houses; and so the destroyer would not strike them with the plague, Exodus 12:5, 7, 13. 'The firstborn of Egypt' means the good of love and charity that was wiped out, 3325. 'The lambs' and 'the kids' are states of innocence, in which those with whom these exist are secure from evil. Indeed all in heaven are kept secure by the Lord through states of innocence. That security was represented by the killing of the lamb or kid, and putting the blood on the doorposts and on the lintel of the houses. .

[6] To avert his own death when a person saw Jehovah manifested as an angel he would sacrifice 'a kid of the she-goats', as Gideon did when he saw Him, Judges 6:19, and also Manoah, Judges 13:15-16, 19. The reason they offered a kid was that Jehovah or the Lord cannot appear to anybody, not even to an angel, unless the one to whom He appears is in a state of innocence. Therefore as soon as the Lord is present people are brought into a state of innocence, for the Lord enters in by way of innocence, even with angels in heaven. Consequently no one is able to enter heaven unless he has a measure of innocence, according to the Lord's words recorded in Matthew 18:3; Mark 10:15; Luke 18:17. Regarding people's belief that they would die when Jehovah appeared to them if they did not offer such a burnt offering, see Judges 13:22-23.

[7] Since genuine conjugial love is innocence itself, 2736, it was customary in the representative Church for a man to go to his wife with the gift of a kid of the she-goats, as one reads of Samson in Judges 15:1, and also of Judah when he visited Tamar, Genesis 38:17, 20, 23. The fact that 'a kid' and 'a she-goat' meant innocence is also evident from the sacrifices made as guilt offerings that a person would offer if he had sinned through error, Leviticus 1:10; 4:28; 5:6. Sinning through error is sinning through ignorance that has innocence within it. The same is evident from the following Divine command in Moses,

You shall bring the first of the firstfruits of your land to the house of Jehovah your God. You shall not boil a kid in its mother's milk. Exodus 23:19; 34:26.

Here the requirement 'to bring the firstfruits of the land to the house of Jehovah' means the state of innocence which exists in early childhood; and 'not boiling a kid in its mother's milk' means that they were not to destroy the innocence of early childhood. This being their meaning, the one command, in both places referred to, follows directly after the other. In the literal sense there seems to be no connection at all between them as there is in the internal sense.

[8] Because kids and she-goats, as has been stated, meant innocence it was also required that the curtains over the tabernacle should be made from she-goat hair, Exodus 25:4; 26:7; 35:5-6, 23, 26; 36:14, as a sign that all the holy things represented in it depended for their very being on innocence. 'She-goat hair' means the last or outermost degree of innocence present in ignorance, such as exists with gentiles who in the internal sense are meant by the curtains of the tabernacle. These considerations now show what truths born of good are, and what the nature of these is, meant by the two good kids of the she-goats which Rebekah his mother spoke about to Jacob. That is to say, they are truths belonging to innocence or early childhood, meant also by the things which Esau was to bring to Isaac his father, dealt with in 3501, 3508. They were not in fact such truths, but initially they appeared to be. Thus it was that Jacob pretended by means of them to be Esau.

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.