Die Bibel

 

Genesis 34

Lernen

   

2 Inay-tat Šəkem, ahaya ən Xiwi, iṃos rures ən Xamor wa n əmənokal n akal, ibaz-tat issəxram daɣ-as. iṃan-net, Dina ta n elles ən Yaqub, ig-as tara n iblis ir-et wəllen aṃaran ad-igammay d a wa as tu-za-tirəw.

4 Iṇṇa Šəken y abba-nnet Xamor: «Agu arat kul wa fəl z-əzləfa tabarart a.»

5 Isla Yaqub as tabarart-net tətiwajajargan, mišan id zama as maddan-əs əhan əṣuf d aharay iffəsta, wər iṇṇa arat har d-əqqalan.

6 Xamor, šis ən Šəkem, ikka Yaqub dər-əs ammagrad

7 As d-əfalan maddanəs ən Yaqub əṣuf əgrawan isalan n a wa igan. Əɣšadan ṃan nasan, iggaz-tan alhan səksədan fəl as əmazal wa tan iṣṣəkna Šəkem iṃosan əsəxrəm daɣ Dina, elles ən Yaqub, isifallas Kəl Israyel.Əmazal wa iṃos arat wər nəmməkkan.

8 Iṇṇ-asan Xamor: «Barar-in, Šəkem təbaz-tu tarramt ən tabarart-nawan, areɣ daɣ-wan das-tat takfim y azalaf.

9 «Nazlafatana, akfat-ana ašše-kawan, təkəlam šin nana.

10 Təham əlxəyyar n ad-təɣsəram ɣur-naar-ena. Əgeɣ akal daɣ fassan nawan, əggəzat-tu, təssəɣləyam daɣ as tilem daɣ as ərrəzəɣan.»

11 Šəkem iṃan -net iṇṇa y abba ən Dina əd məqqaran-net: «Əqbəlat maṇsay-nin, a kawan-akfa a wa dər təṣṣəstanam kul.

12 «Əgməyat daɣ-i taggalt zəwwərat əd təṇafuten aggotnen ad awan-ərzəma a wa dər təṣṣəstanam kul mišan akfat-i tabarart a-tat-əzləfa!»

13 Maddan-əs ən Yaqub iḍgaz ətəwəjəjərgan ən tamaḍrayt nasan Dina as əjjəwwaban i Šəkem əd šis Xamor əkkrrasan tan.

14 Əṇṇan-asan: «Wər nəfreg ad-nakfu tamaḍrayt-nana aləs wər nəmməṇkad izləf-tat, id a di issiras-ana.

15 «Wər kawan-za-nakfu tərəddat-nana, ar s-ad-təsəmməṇkədam yayyan kul win əzdaɣnen aɣrəm a.

16 «Assaɣa di a-kawan-nakfu aššek-ana, nəzləf šin nawan, nəɣsər daɣ-wan, nəkrəs aɣrəf iyyan-da.

17 «Mišan as wər təqbelam ad-tammaṇkadam ad nətkəl tabarart-nana, naglu.»

18 Əljəmat ten ogaman-tat id Xamor əd rures Šəkem.

19 Daɣ əḍḍəguz ən tara ən tabarart ən Yaqub issətrab Šəkem əlqəbulat n a wa daɣ-san itawagmayan. Ənta iṃos wa itawaṣofan daɣ ahan-nasan.

20 Ikka Xamor əd rures Šəkem edag wa n əṃənəy daɣ əmi n əɣrəm, əmməgradan i meddan n əɣrəm, əṇṇan:

21 «Meddan en ənniyen-ana alxer, ayyatanaq-qan ad-əɣsəran daɣ akal,əssəɣləyan daɣ-as.Akal elwa fall-ana nakkanay dər-san! Nəfrəg azalaf n ašš-essan, nakf-en šin nana.

22 «Mišan dər əššərəd n as meddan en wər z-əqbəlan tartit dər-na, nəqqəl aɣrəf iyyan-da ar s ad-əmmiṇkadan yayyan-nana kul šilat-nasan.

23 «Ardatana s ad-nəqbəl əššərəd-di, aṃaran as əɣsaran daɣ-na, əddi ihərwan-nasan d ərrəzaɣan nasan ad-əqqəlan in nana.»

24 Əqbalan aytedan kul winn əɣrəm a wa dasan-iṇṇa Xamor əd rures Šəkem, aṃaran əmməṇkadan yayyan n əɣrəm.

25 Mišan əzəl wa n karad, daɣ əknan yayyan win əṃṃənkadnen təzzurt, ənkaran du maddanəs ən Yaqub əššin, iməqqaran ən Dina, Šimehon əd Lefi, ətkalan šikabiwen-nasan, əggazan aɣrəm wər nənked ad ənaqqan yayyan kul win t-əhanen.

26 Ənɣan Xamor iṃan-net əd rures Šəkem əs takoba, əbazan-du Dina daɣ ahan ən Šəkem, əglan dər-əs.

27 Maddanəs ən Yaqub saffaykan šiməɣsa, oɣan aɣrəm wa ijajjarganan tamaḍrayt-nasan.

28 Ətkalan eharay wa ənḍərran əd wa zuwwaran, d əzdan, d a wa ihan aɣrəm kul d əṣuf.

29 Oɣan, ewayan təgərgist-nasan kul, əd maddan-əsan əd təḍoden-nasan, d a wa ihan iṇan-nasan kul.

30 Iṇṇa Yaqub i Šimehon əd Lefi: «Təgam-i daɣ aššawaša, təgam-i ark aḍu dat Kəl-Kanan əd Kəl-Fəriz. Nak wər əleɣ ar təkəbəzzet ən meddan s iga adi əntanay as namannakan fall-i, əṣrayan-i, a-di-əhləkan nak d aɣaywan-in.»

31 Mišan əṇṇan-as: «Wər nəfreg ad-nayyu aləs wa išaššalan tamaḍrayt-nana əd tənəssexrəmt.»

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #4433

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

4433. And he took her, and lay with her, and forced her. That this signifies that in no other way could this truth be conjoined with the affection of the truth signified by the sons of Jacob her brothers, is evident from the signification of “taking her, lying with her, and forcing her,” as being to be conjoined, but not in a lawful way, as is done by betrothal. That by these words is signified that in no other way could it be conjoined, cannot be seen unless it is known how the case is. The interior truth from the ancients which is signified by “Shechem the son of Hamor the Hivite” is that truth which had been the internal of the church among the ancients, thus which was the internal in their statutes, judgments, and laws: in a word, in their rituals and the like. These truths were their doctrinal things according to which they lived, and indeed doctrinal things of charity; for in the ancient time those who were of the genuine church had no other doctrinal things. Relatively to doctrine the same may be called interior truths of faith, but goods relatively to life. If any church were to be instituted with the nation sprung from Jacob, it was necessary that they should be initiated into these truths and goods; for unless there are internal things within external ones, that is, unless men think of internal things when they are in external ones, and unless they are at the same time affected by the internal things, or at least unless they are affected by external things for the sake of internal things, there is not anything of the church. For internal things make the church, because in these is the Lord; for in these are the spiritual and celestial things which are from Him.

[2] But the nation sprung from Jacob, that is, the Israelitish and Jewish nation, could not be initiated into these internal things in the lawful way which is effected by betrothal, for the reason that their external worship did not correspond. For from their fathers, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, they received the worship instituted by Eber, which was different in its externals from the worship of the Ancient Church, as may be seen above (n. 1238, 1241, 1343, 2180). And because their worship was different, the interior truths that existed among the ancients could not be conjoined with it in the lawful manner, by betrothal, but in the way here described. From this it may be understood what is meant by saying that “in no other way could this truth be conjoined with the affection of the truth signified by the sons of Jacob, Dinah’s brothers.”

[3] But although the conjunction could be effected in this manner, according to a law also known to the ancients (see Exodus 22:15; Deuteronomy 22:28-29), still that nation was of such a character that they would by no means suffer any conjunction of the interior truth that was from the ancients with the externals of worship that existed among the descendants of Jacob (see n. 4281, 4290, 4293, 4307, 4314, 4316, 4317). For this reason there could not be any church instituted with that nation, but instead of it only the representative of a church (see n. 4281, 4288, 4307). That this nation was of such a character that not only was it impossible for them to receive interior truths, but that they also completely extinguished them in themselves, is here represented by the sons of Jacob answering Shechem and Hamor in fraud (verse 13); and then by Simeon and Leviticus smiting the city with the edge of the sword, and killing Shechem and Hamor (verses 25-26); and by the rest of the sons coming upon those who were pierced, and pillaging the city, and carrying away the flocks, the herds, and whatever was in the city, in the field, and in the house (verses 27-29). From this it is evident what is signified by the prophecy of Jacob, then Israel:

Simeon and Leviticus are brethren, instruments of violence are their swords; let not my soul come into their secret, let not my glory be united in their congregation; because in their anger they slew a man, and in their pleasure they unstrung an ox; cursed be their anger because it was vehement, and their fury because it was grievous; I will divide them in Jacob, and scatter them in Israel (Genesis 49:5-7).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.