Die Bibel

 

Genesis 27

Lernen

   

1 Izaokas paseno, ir jo akys taip aptemo, kad jis nebegalėjo matyti. Jis pasišaukė savo vyresnįjį sūnų Ezavą ir tarė jam: “Mano sūnau”. Tas atsiliepė: “Aš čia”.

2 Jis tarė: “Aš jau pasenau, nežinau savo mirties dienos.

3 Imk savo medžioklės įrankius, strėlinę ir lanką, ir, išėjęs į lauką, sumedžiok ką nors.

4 Paruošk man valgį, kokį mėgstu, atnešk jį man, kad valgyčiau ir mano siela tave palaimintų, prieš man numirštant”.

5 ebeka girdėjo Izaoką kalbant savo sūnui Ezavui. Kai Ezavas išėjo į lauką medžioti,

6 ebeka tarė savo sūnui Jokūbui: “Aš girdėjau tėvą kalbant tavo broliui Ezavui:

7 ‘Sumedžiojęs ką, paruošk man skanų valgį, kad pavalgęs galėčiau tave palaiminti Viešpaties akivaizdoje prieš savo mirtį’.

8 Taigi dabar, sūnau, klausyk mano patarimo, ką tau sakysiu.

9 Eik ir išrink iš kaimenės du geriausius ožiukus ir atnešk, kad paruoščiau iš jų tėvo mėgstamą valgį.

10 Tu jį įneši tėvui, kad jis valgytų ir tave palaimintų prieš savo mirtį”.

11 Bet Jokūbas atsakė savo motinai ebekai: “Mano brolio Ezavo kūnas apaugęs plaukais, o aš žmogus neplaukuotas.

12 Jei mano tėvas mane palytės, tada pasirodysiu kaip apgavikas. Taip užsitrauksiu prakeikimą­ne palaiminimą”.

13 Tačiau motina jam atsakė: “Sūnau, tas prakeikimas tekrinta ant manęs! Tik klausyk manęs ir nuėjęs atnešk, ką sakiau!”

14 Taigi jis nuėjęs atnešė motinai ožiukus, o ji pagamino skanų valgį, kurį mėgo tėvas.

15 Tada ebeka, paėmusi savo vyriausiojo sūnaus Ezavo geriausius drabužius, kurie buvo namie, apvilko jais jaunesnįjį sūnų Jokūbą,

16 o ožiukų kailiais apvyniojo jo neplaukuotas rankas ir kaklą.

17 Tada ji padavė paruoštą valgį ir duonos savo sūnui Jokūbui.

18 Jokūbas, įėjęs pas savo tėvą, tarė: “Mano tėve!” O tas atsiliepė: “Aš čia. Kas tu esi, mano sūnau?”

19 Jokūbas atsakė: “Aš esu Ezavas, tavo pirmagimis. Padariau, kaip man liepei. Kelkis, sėsk ir valgyk, ką sumedžiojau, kad tavo siela palaimintų mane”.

20 Izaokas paklausė: “Kaipgi, mano sūnau, taip greitai suradai?” Tas atsakė: “Viešpats, tavo Dievas, suteikė man laimės”.

21 Izaokas tarė Jokūbui: “Prieik, kad galėčiau paliesti tave, mano sūnau, ir įsitikinčiau, ar tu tikrai esi mano sūnus Ezavas”.

22 Jokūbas priėjo prie savo tėvo. Tas, jį palietęs, tarė: “Balsas Jokūbo, bet rankos Ezavo”.

23 Jis neatpažino jo, nes rankos buvo plaukuotos kaip jo brolio Ezavo; taip Izaokas palaimino Jokūbą.

24 Tėvas paklausė: “Ar tu tikrai esi mano sūnus Ezavas?” Tas atsiliepė: “Taip, esu”.

25 Izaokas tarė: “Atnešk, ką sumedžiojai, kad mano siela galėtų tave palaiminti”. Jokūbas atnešė jam, ir šis valgė, ir jis atnešė jam vyno, ir šis gėrė.

26 Tada jo tėvas Izaokas jam tarė: “Prieik ir pabučiuok mane, sūnau!”

27 Šis priėjęs pabučiavo jį, o tėvas, užuodęs Ezavo drabužių kvapą, laimindamas jį tarė: “Mano sūnaus kvapas, kaip kvapas laukų, kuriuos palaimino Viešpats.

28 Tau Dievas teduoda dangaus rasos, derlingos žemės ir apsčiai javų bei vyno!

29 Tetarnauja tau tautos ir tenusilenkia prieš tave giminės! Viešpatauk savo broliams, ir tesilenkia prieš tave tavo motinos sūnūs! Kas tave keiktų, tebūna prakeiktas, o kas tave laimintų, tebūna palaimintas!”

30 Izaokui baigus laiminti Jokūbą ir jam tik išėjus iš savo tėvo Izaoko, jo brolis Ezavas grįžo iš medžioklės.

31 Jis irgi paruošė skanų valgį ir, atnešęs tėvui, tarė: “Kelkis, tėve, ir valgyk savo sūnaus medžioklės laimikio, kad tavo siela mane palaimintų!”

32 Bet Izaokas klausė: “Kas tu esi?” Šis atsakė: “Aš esu tavo sūnus, tavo pirmagimis Ezavas”.

33 Tada Izaokas išsigando ir drebėdamas tarė: “Kas gi buvo tas, kuris anksčiau sumedžiojo ir man atnešė valgį? Aš, prieš tau pareinant, valgiau ir jį palaiminau. Jis ir bus palaimintas!”

34 Ezavas, išgirdęs savo tėvo žodžius, pradėjo labai garsiai ir graudžiai verkti, sakydamas tėvui: “Mano tėve, palaimink ir mane!”

35 Bet tėvas atsakė: “Tavo brolis klasta gavo tavo palaiminimą”.

36 Ezavas tarė: “Teisingai jį pavadino Jokūbu. Juk jis jau du kartus apgavo mane: paėmė mano pirmagimio teisę ir štai dabar­tavo palaiminimą. Nejaugi tu man nepalikai palaiminimo?”

37 Izaokas atsakė Ezavui: “Aš jį padariau tavo valdovu ir visus jo brolius atidaviau jam tarnais, javais ir vynu jį aprūpinau. Ką gi galiu padaryti dėl tavęs, mano sūnau?”

38 Ezavas tarė tėvui: “Tėve, ar tik vieną turi palaiminimą? Palaimink ir mane!” Ir Ezavas balsu verkė.

39 Jo tėvas Izaokas atsakė: “Tu neturėsi derlingos žemės savo gyvenvietėje ir dangaus rasos.

40 Savo kardu tu maitinsies ir savo broliui tarnausi. Bet ateis laikas, kada pasipriešinsi ir nusimesi jo jungą”.

41 Ezavas nekentė Jokūbo dėl tėvo palaiminimo. Ir Ezavas sakė savo širdyje: “Artėja gedulo dienos dėl tėvo, tada užmušiu savo brolį Jokūbą!”

42 ebekai buvo perduoti jos vyresniojo sūnaus žodžiai. Ji tada pasišaukė savo jaunesnįjį sūnų Jokūbą ir tarė: “Tavo brolis Ezavas rengiasi atkeršyti tau ir nori užmušti tave.

43 Taigi dabar, mano sūnau, klausyk manęs! Bėk pas mano brolį Labaną į Charaną

44 ir gyvenk pas jį, kol paliaus tavo brolio rūstybė,

45 kol tavo brolio pyktis atsileis ir jis pamirš, ką jam padarei! Po to aš nusiųsiu ką nors, kad tave pargabentų. Kodėl turėčiau jūsų abiejų netekti vieną dieną?”

46 ebeka tarė Izaokui: “Man įgriso mano gyvenimas dėl hetitų dukterų. Jei dar ir Jokūbas ves hetitę, tai kam man begyventi?”

   

Aus Swedenborgs Werken

 

Arcana Coelestia #3519

studieren Sie diesen Abschnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

3519. And take me from thence two good kids of the she-goats. That this signifies the truths of this good, is evident from the signification of “kids of the she-goats,” as being the truths of good, concerning which in what follows. The reason there were two, is that as in the rational, so in the natural, there are things which are of the will and things which are of the understanding. The things in the natural that have relation to the will are delights, and those which have relation to the understanding are memory-knowledges, and in order to be something these two must be conjoined together.

[2] That “kids of the she-goats” signify the truths of good, may be seen from those passages of the Word where “kids” and “she-goats” are mentioned. Be it known that in the genuine sense all the tame and useful beasts mentioned in the Word signify the celestial things of good and the spiritual things of truth (see n. 45, 46, 142, 143, 246, 714, 715, 2180, 2781, 3218); and because there are various kinds of celestial things or goods, and consequently various kinds of spiritual things or truths, one kind is signified by one beast, and another by another; thus one kind is signified by a “lamb,” another by a “kid,” another by a “sheep,” by a “she-goat,” a “ram,” a “he-goat,” a “bullock,” an “ox;” another also by a “horse” and by a “camel;” another likewise by birds; and also another by the beasts of the sea, as by “whales” and “fishes.” There are more genera of celestial and spiritual things than can be enumerated, consequently of goods and truths, although when the celestial or good is mentioned, and also the spiritual or truth, it appears as if it were not manifold, but only one. But how manifold they both are, or how innumerable their genera are, may be seen from what has been said concerning heaven (n. 3241), namely, that it is distinguished into innumerable societies, and this according to the genera of celestial and spiritual things, or of the goods of love and thence of the truths of faith; and moreover every single genus of good, and every single genus of truth, has innumerable species into which the societies of each genus are distinguished, and every species in like manner.

[3] The most universal genera of good and truth are what were represented by the animals that were offered in the burnt-offerings and sacrifices; and because the genera are most distinct from one another it was expressly enjoined that such and no other should be offered-in some cases, for instance, male and female lambs, also male and female kids; in some cases rams and sheep, and also he-goats; but in others, calves, bullocks, and oxen; also pigeons and turtle-doves (n. 922, 1823, 2180, 2805, 2807, 2830, 3218). What was signified by “kids” and “she-goats” may be seen both from the sacrifices in which they were offered, and also from other passages in the Word; whence it is evident that male and female “lambs” signified the innocence of the internal or rational man, and that “kids” and “she-goats” signified the innocence of the external or natural man, thus the truth and good thereof.

[4] That the truth and good of the innocence of the external or natural man is signified by “kids” and “she-goats” is evident from the following passages in the Word.

In Isaiah:

The wolf shall abide with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf, and the young lion, and the sheep 1 together; and a little child shall lead them (Isaiah 11:6); where the Lord’s kingdom is treated of, and a state of no fear from evil, or of no dread on account of hell, because one of presence with the Lord. The “lamb” and the “kid” denote those who are in innocence, and because these are the safest of all, they are mentioned first.

[5] When all the firstborn of Egypt were smitten, it was commanded that they should slay perfect and male young of the flock, of lambs or of kids, and should put some of the blood on the door-posts and on the lintel of the houses, and thus there should not be a plague on them from the destroyer (Exodus 12:5, 7, 13). The “firstborn of Egypt” denotes the good of love and charity extinct (n. 3325); “lambs” and “kids” are states of innocence; and those who are in these states are safe from evil, for all in heaven are protected by the Lord through states of innocence; and this protection was represented by the slaying of a lamb or kid, and by the blood upon the door-posts and lintel of the houses.

[6] When Jehovah appeared to anyone through an angel, a kid of the goats was sacrificed, lest the man should die-as when he appeared to Gideon (Judges 6:19), and to Manoah (13:15-16, 19). The reason was that Jehovah or the Lord cannot appear to anyone, not even to an angel, unless he to whom He appears is in a state of innocence; and therefore as soon as the Lord is present with anyone he is let into a state of innocence; for the Lord enters through innocence, even with the angels in heaven. On this account no one can come into heaven unless he has somewhat of innocence, according to the words of the Lord in Matthew 18:3; Mark 10:15; Luke 18:17. That men believed they should die when Jehovah appeared, unless they offered such a burnt-offering may be seen in Judges 13:22-23.

[7] Inasmuch as genuine conjugial love is innocence (see n. 2736), it was customary in the representative church to enter in unto a wife by a present of a kid of the she-goats; as we read of Samson (Judges 15:1); likewise of Judah when he went in unto Tamar (Genesis 38:17, 20, 23). That a “kid” and a “she-goat” signified innocence, is also evident from the sacrifices of guilt, which they were to offer when anyone had sinned through error (Leviticus 1:10; 4:28; 5:6); sin through error is a sin of ignorance in which is innocence. The same is evident from the following Divine command in Moses:

The first of the first-fruits of thy ground thou shalt bring into the house of Jehovah thy God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in its mother’s milk (Exodus 23:19; 34:26); where by the “first-fruits of the ground, which they were to bring into the house of Jehovah,” is signified the state of innocence which is in infancy; and by “not seething a kid in its mother’s milk,” that they should not destroy the innocence of infancy. Because these things are signified, in both passages the one command follows the other without a break; and yet in the literal sense they appear to be altogether different; but in the internal sense they cohere together.

[8] Because as before said “kids” and “she-goats” signified innocence, it was also commanded that the curtain of the tent over the tabernacle should be made of the wool of she-goats (Exodus 25:4; 26:7; 35:5-6, 23, 26; 36:14), for a sign that all the holy things therein represented derived their essence from innocence. By the “wool of she-goats” is signified the ultimate or outermost of the innocence that is in ignorance, such as exists with the Gentiles; and who in the internal sense are the “curtains” of the tabernacle. From all this it is evident what and of what quality are the truths of good that are signified by the “two good kids of the she-goats” concerning which Rebekah his mother spoke unto Jacob her son, namely, that they are those of innocence or of infancy, being in fact those which Esau was to bring to his father Isaac; concerning which above (n. 3501, 3508); and which indeed were not these truths of good, but at first appeared as if they were; and it is for this reason that by means of these Jacob simulated Esau.

Fußnoten:

1. The Hebrew for “sheep” (ovis) here is meri, which in the A. V. is rendered “fatling” three times, “fat cattle” twice, “fat beast” once, “fed beast” once. By Swedenborg it is rendered saginatum seven times, pinguis once, pingue pecus once, and ovis once. In the passage before us he has rendered it saginatum in n. 10132; True Christian Religion789; Apocalypse Explained514, 780, 781; pingue pecus in n. 430 and ovis here in n. 3519 of the same work. The commentators usually understand by it a fattened calf; some rabbis a wild ox (buffalo or bubalus); none have “sheep.”

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.