Jesus Teaches in the Temple

A spiritual kingdom

When Jesus entered Jerusalem in kingly style, riding on a colt, the people believed that He was about to reign as their king. Therefore, quoting ancient prophesy, they shouted with joy, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord” (Luke 19:38).

They were not mistaken about the fact that Jesus was coming as their king. They were, however, mistaken about what kind of a king He would be. They believed that He would be a worldly king who would sit on a throne, deliver the people from their oppressors, and restore Israel to the glory that it had under the rule of King David. This would be the fulfillment of the promise given to David a thousand years earlier about the coming of the Messiah. As it is written in the Hebrew scriptures, “He will reign on the throne of David and over his kingdom forevermore” (Isaiah 9:7).

In the light of this prophecy, it was widely believed that Jesus was “the son of David,” the long-awaited Messiah who was about to establish His kingdom. The people did not yet understand that Jesus’ kingdom would be a spiritual kingdom, not a worldly one. As Jesus had already said earlier in this gospel, “the kingdom of God is within you” (Luke 17:21). They would soon discover that Jesus did not come to help them conquer their natural enemies or to promote their economic prosperity. As the Messiah, Jesus came to establish the kingdom of God—a spiritual kingdom that would endure forever. ¹

Just as a worldly ruler governs by means of civil law, God governs by means of spiritual law. Therefore, when Jesus comes into Jerusalem, He does not sit on a physical throne. Instead, He goes directly to the temple where He casts out the buyers and sellers before He begins to teach. This represents the spiritual law that falsity must first be removed before truth can be received. The “buyers and sellers” who are cast out represent those states in us that make worldly success more important than heavenly blessings. They make profit, fame, and worldly pleasures more important than loving God and serving the neighbor. ²

Jesus then gives a series of lessons in the temple, beginning with the words, “It is written. ‘My house is a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves’” (Luke 19:46). When our minds are cluttered with false teachings, we are being robbed of the opportunity to learn spiritual truth and develop a deeper understanding. This first lesson in the temple, then, reminds us that a major emphasis in the Gospel According to Luke is the development of the understanding. The understanding is “the temple of God” within us. When this temple is filled with God’s truth, it is a “holy temple” and a “house of prayer.” As we mentioned earlier, people who think from truth, with love in their heart, are continually at prayer. ³

The next two chapters in the Gospel According to Luke take place in the temple. Most scholars agree that Jesus’ teaching in the temple began on Monday or Tuesday of “holy week,” just a few days before His crucifixion on Friday and His resurrection on Sunday. During this final week, Jesus spends the first few days in the temple, teaching the laws of the spiritual kingdom. In so doing, He demonstrates not only that He is the promised Messiah, but also that He has come to set up a spiritual kingdom, not a natural one.

The Religious Leaders Challenge Jesus’ Authority

1. And it came to pass on one of those days, as He taught the people in the temple, and brought good tidings, the chief priests and the scribes stood by with the elders,

2. And spoke to Him, saying, Tell us, by what authority doest Thou these things, or who is he that gave Thee this authority?

3. And He answered and said to them, I will also ask you one word, and answer Me:

4. The baptism of John, was [it] from heaven, or from men?

5. And they reasoned with themselves, saying, If we say, From heaven, He will say, Why then did you not believe him?

6. But if we say, From men, all the people will stone us; for they are persuaded that John was a prophet.

7. And they answered that they knew not whence [it was].

8. And Jesus told them, Neither do’ I say to you by what authority I do these things.

At the end of the previous chapter, Jesus was in the temple, clearing out the buyers and sellers. As this next chapter begins, Jesus is still there. As it is written, “Now it happened on one of those days as He taught the people in the temple and preached the gospel, that the chief priests and the scribes, together with the elders, confronted Him” (Luke 20:1). Even though Jesus has momentarily “cleansed the temple,” troublemakers are back again to defy His authority. These are the “chief priests, scribes, and elders” within us who refuse to let go of false beliefs and selfish desires. We may subdue them for a while, but if we take our attention away from the things of heaven, these selfish desires, along with the false beliefs that support them, will be back to raise doubts so that they can reassert control over our lives. ⁴

One of the first things they will do is question Jesus’ authority. This is illustrated in the next episode when the religious leaders approach Jesus and say, “By what authority are You doing these things? Who gave You this authority?” (Luke 20:2). The question of authority is an important one. The temple leaders, and especially the chief priests, were a select group of people. They were direct descendants from the tribe of Levi, and they were thoroughly trained for their position. By the commonly accepted standards of the day, they were the only people who were fully authorized to give religious instruction. In brief, they were saying to Jesus, “Just who do You think You are? Where are Your credentials? And who has given You the authority to preach in our temple?”

This moment of confrontation pictures those times when doubts arise in our mind about Jesus’ teachings and their authority in our lives. This is when the “chief priests and scribes” in us rise up and insinuate thoughts such as, “How can I be sure that Jesus’ teachings are true?” This is our old nature raising doubts about the truth. It’s a very old story. When new truth comes into our lives, it can be upsetting to our former beliefs, especially when those beliefs support our selfish interests. Therefore, we doubt. We resist. Our selfish nature refuses to allow this new “government” to reign over us.

This new government that Jesus comes to inaugurate is a kingdom of love, wisdom, and useful service. It is a kingdom whose laws can be known through a deeper understanding of God’s Word. Not everyone, however, is ready to say, “Thy kingdom come.” For example, when Jesus came to reveal this deeper meaning to the people, the religious leaders saw it not as a revelation about a new way to live, but rather as a threat to their authority. In brief, Jesus was challenging their interpretation of the scriptures. That’s why they confronted Him, saying, “Who gives you the authority to do this?”

Moreover, it was not just the religious leaders who were challenged by Jesus’ words and deeper interpretation of scripture. This was also a challenge for everyone who took the scriptures literally, expecting a worldly king to save their nation, make them a world power, and restore prosperity. After all, it had been prophesied in the scriptures that when the Messiah comes, “He shall rule in the midst of His enemies…. He shall crush the rulers of the whole earth” (Psalms 110:2, 6), and “He shall make them prosperous again” (Psalms 14:7).

It is understandable, then, that the people are confused, and the religious leaders are threatened. Jesus is teaching a different way of life. In a culture that was steeped in the idea of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” (Leviticus 24:20), Jesus was teaching that we must not take vengeance upon our enemies. Rather, we must turn away from evil states within ourselves—our spiritual enemies.

At this point in the gospel narrative, many have been healed by Jesus or have witnessed His healings. Many have witnessed Jesus’ miracles or heard about them. And multitudes have come to hear Jesus teach and marveled at His wisdom. They know that there is something special about Jesus and they believe that He is the promised Messiah. But the message of this Messiah is not about world conquest, national glory, or material prosperity. Rather, it’s about faith in God, loving one’s neighbor, and forgiving one’s enemies.

In order to understand, accept, and live by the new truths that Jesus is teaching, the people will need to let go of old beliefs and habitual patterns. It’s never easy, especially when our selfish side resists. No wonder the religious leaders felt threatened by Jesus and questioned His authority.

The baptism of John

Admittedly, letting go of acquired beliefs and entrenched habits can be a difficult process. When the scriptures contradict our false beliefs and selfish desires a struggle ensues. Doubts arise about the authority of the Word. As we have mentioned, this is represented by the religious leaders who question Jesus’ authority. Momentarily setting aside their challenge to His authority, Jesus shifts the focus to a question about John’s right to baptize people. “Answer Me,” says Jesus. “The baptism of John—was it from heaven or from men?” (Luke 20:3).

The question of baptism is an important one. Even today, two thousand years later, people still wonder about baptism. They ask, “Is baptism a sacrament designed by God for the washing away of sin? Or is it merely an external act invented by men?” In other words, “Is it from heaven or from men.” Stumped by Jesus’ question, they refuse to respond. They know that if they say that John’s authority is from heaven, Jesus will say, ‘Why, then, did you not believe him?’ But if they say, “From men,” the people will oppose them, for the people believe that John is a prophet (Luke 20:6). Caught between their resentment of John the Baptist and their fear of public disapproval, the religious leaders cannot give a decisive reply. Instead, they answer that they do not know the origin of John’s authority (Luke 20:7).

As we have mentioned before, John the Baptist signifies the literal sense of the Word. Once this signification is established, Jesus’ question takes on increased significance. At the literal level, baptism by water represents a willingness to learn the introductory truths of religion. Baptism at this level is a response to the question, “Do you desire to be instructed in the literal truths of the Word?” More deeply, the question about baptism might be formulated in this manner: “Do you believe that despite its rough appearance, symbolized by John being clothed in camel’s hair, the literal sense of the Word is from heaven and therefore has authority?”

An affirmative response to this question indicates that the individual believes that the Word of God is holy, both in its letter and in its spirit, and therefore desires to be instructed in the truths that are contained in the scriptures, beginning with the literal teachings. This is the “water” of truth, which is also called “the baptism of John.” To the extent that people learn these truths and put them into their lives, their spirits are made “clean,” just as physical water washes away dirt. ⁵

Therefore, when Jesus asks about the baptism of John, He is raising a question about the authority of the literal sense of the Word. The question that He is putting before the religious leaders, and before each of us, is this: “Are the literal words of sacred scripture from heaven or from men?” Do we believe that the scriptures are man-made or God-breathed? ⁶

This is an important question. It is true that there are things in the literal sense of the Word that are difficult to understand. Sometimes it says that the Lord is full of “tender mercies” (Psalms 145:9) and at other times it says that God will “utterly destroy” the nations (Isaiah 34:2). But if we hold on to the idea that the literal sense is from heaven, and can be understood more deeply, it can become authoritative for us. Those literal teachings of scripture, like John the Baptist, “prepare the way” for the coming of deeper truth into our life. They prepare the way for Jesus to enter our inner Jerusalem, and then go into the temple of our minds where He first casts out false beliefs, and then teaches us the truths of His Word. It can be said, in fact, that those literal truths, even when they seem to be “man-made,” are far from it. They are from heaven and they contain the inner meaning of the Word, clothed in parable and symbol. ⁷

A practical application

When we believe that the literal sense of the Word is holy because it contains heavenly truths, it can have a powerful influence on our lives. In this regard, it becomes authoritative. As a spiritual practice, then, keep in mind that the literal words of scripture contain infinite depths of truth. When you read the literal sense of scripture in the light of its inner meaning, you will be allowing the Lord to speak to you through both the letter and spirit of His Word. To put it another way, you will be receiving the power of the literal sense and the glory of the internal sense simultaneously. This is how the Lord speaks to you, authoritatively, through His Word.

The Parable of the Wicked Vinedressers

9. And He began to say to the people this parable: A certain man planted a vineyard, and let it out to farmers, and went abroad for a considerable time.

10. And at the time, he sent a servant to the farmers, that they should give him [some] of the fruit of the vineyard; but the farmers beat him, and sent [him] away empty.

11. And again he sent another servant; and they beat him also, and treating [him] shamefully, they sent [him] away empty.

12. And he added to send a third; and they also wounded him, and cast [him] out.

13. And the lord of the vineyard said, What shall I do? I will send my beloved son; likely when they see him they will have respect for [him].

14. But when the farmers saw him, they reasoned to themselves, saying, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may become ours.

15. And they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed [him]. What therefore shall the lord of the vineyard do to them?

16. He shall come, and shall destroy these farmers, and shall give the vineyard to others. And when they heard, they said, Let it not be so.

17. And He looked at them and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same has become the head of the corner?

18. Everyone who falls upon that stone shall be broken; but on whomever it shall fall, it will grind him to powder.

19. And the chief priests and scribes sought to put [their] hands on Him in that same hour; and they feared the people, for they knew that He had spoken this parable towards them.

In contrast to the people who were “very attentive to hear Him” (Luke 19:48), the temple leaders are eager to demean and discredit Jesus, challenging His authority. Undeterred by the negative attitude of these religious leaders, Jesus begins to instruct them in a different way. Once again, He uses the method of the parable, allowing them to overhear what He says to the people.

The parable begins in a seemingly indirect manner. It’s about a man who planted a vineyard, leased it to vinedressers, and then went into a far country where he stayed for a long time (Luke 20:9). When harvest time comes, the owner of the vineyard sends one of his servants to collect some of the fruit of the vineyard. But instead of giving the servant some of the fruit, they beat the servant and send him away with nothing (Luke 20:10). A second servant and then a third servant are sent to collect some fruit, but they are treated similarly. Finally, the owner of the vineyard sends his “beloved son,” saying, “When they see him, they will have respect for him” (Luke 20:13).

Knowing that the religious leaders are plotting to kill Him, Jesus then describes what happens to the beloved son. Jesus says, “But when the vinedressers saw him, they reasoned to themselves, saying, ‘This is the heir; come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may become ours’” (Luke 20:15). As Jesus concludes the parable, He asks a significant question: “Therefore,” says Jesus, “what will the owner of the vineyard do to them?” (Luke 20:15).

Vaguely disguised in the language of parable, it is now evident that Jesus’ words are directed at the temple leaders. The question, “What will the owner of the vineyard do to the vinedressers who killed the owner’s beloved son?” is actually, “What will God do to the religious leaders who are plotting to murder Jesus?” God has given the religious leaders the opportunity to do great good. The truths of His Word are a beautiful spiritual vineyard. What have the religious leaders done with those truths? Do they have any fruit? Have they produced any goodness? What can they show for their efforts?

Sadly, the religious leaders have nothing to give. The Hebrew scriptures record how the ancestors of these religious leaders beat the prophets that were sent to them. For example, the prophet Elijah had said to the Lord, “The Israelites have rejected your covenant, torn down your altars, and put your prophets to death with the sword. I am the only one left, and now they are trying to kill me” (1 Kings 19:10). In the parable, this is represented by the way the wicked vinedressers brutally treated the first three servants that were sent to them. And now, they are planning to murder the owner’s beloved son. The parable is a warning to the religious leaders. Jesus is telling them that their punishment will be severe. As Jesus puts it, the owner of the vineyard will “come and destroy the vinedressers and give the vineyard to others” (Luke 20:16).

Jesus knows how corrupt the religious leaders have become. He knows they are deaf to the warnings of the prophets. Just as they refused to listen to John the Baptist, they refuse to listen to Jesus. Instead, they are determined to kill Him. Although they have been given ample opportunity to repent and reform, they have refused. Neither the voice of the prophets, nor the voice of the scriptures, nor the voice of Jesus can get through to them. Therefore, their time is up. Their tenure will shortly end, and they will be replaced by something new. Jesus will inaugurate a new kind of faith for those willing to be raised up into a higher level of understanding and willing to live a more loving way of life. These people will become the new vinedressers. As it is written, “the vineyard will be given to others” (Luke 20:16). ⁸

This is good news for us. It means that there is always hope. We can repent; we can pray; we can allow the Lord to reform our understanding; and we can begin again. When this happens, we will no longer be ruled by the corrupt religious leaders within us. These are the false beliefs that have led us astray and produced so much misery. They have rejected the prophets and tried to kill the Lord. But they will no longer be allowed to have their say. They will be removed, set to the side, and silenced. In the language of sacred scripture, this is what is contained within the literal warning that the owner is about to come and “destroy” those wicked vinedressers. All that is selfish and corrupt in ourselves will no longer determine what is true. Instead, the Lord’s vineyard will be under new management. The Lord’s vineyard will be given to those parts of ourselves that are willing to be led by the Lord.

This, however, is not what the religious leaders hear. They see that the parable is about them and they hear it as a stern warning to repent before God destroys them and gives the vineyard to others. But they refuse to believe it. Instead, they deny that their leadership is corrupt or that God will remove them and have new leaders take their place. Therefore, they cry out, “Surely not” (Luke 20:16), meaning that this will never happen. Once again, they refuse to believe Jesus.

The stone that the builders rejected

Up until this point, Jesus has been speaking to the people, knowing, full well, that the religious leaders are listening. When the religious leaders realize that the parable is about them, they vehemently reject it. Jesus takes advantage of this rejection, and uses it to remind them that His coming and His rejection were prophesied in the psalms of David. As Jesus puts it, “The stone that the builders rejected has become the head of the corner” (Luke 20:17; Psalms 118:22). In recalling this prophecy, Jesus is openly declaring that the divine truth He has come to teach is the stone that the religious leaders have been rejecting. Moreover, Jesus is saying that these truths will be the foundation for an entirely new religious system, with faith in Him as the cornerstone. ⁹

After declaring Himself to be the cornerstone of this new faith, Jesus adds this warning: “Whoever falls on that stone will be broken; but on whomever it falls, it will grind him to powder” (Luke 20:18). Through these words, Jesus is once again recalling the warnings given through the prophets about the dangers associated with rejecting the Messiah. As it is written, “[The Messiah] will be a sanctuary [for some], but a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense [for others]. Many shall stumble. They shall fall and be broken” (Isaiah 8:14-15). And when asked to interpret King Nebuchadnezzar’s dream, the prophet Daniel says that a stone will “crush to powder” the great image the king saw in his dream (Daniel 2:31-35).

Indeed, the Word of God is a sanctuary for those who have ears to hear, and a rock of offense to those who refuse to listen. In fact, the more anyone relies on the Word, finding sanctuary in its truth, the stronger one’s faith becomes. People who choose to deny the Lord and the truth that He offers might still feel that they are strong and mighty. Eventually, however, the persistent denial of spiritual truth will leave them weak and powerless, broken and crushed. ¹⁰

Taken together, both the parable and Jesus’ reminder that they will be “broken” and “crushed to powder” are too much for the religious leaders. They are now more determined than ever to destroy Jesus—just as Jesus foretold in the parable. As it is written in the closing verse of this episode: “And the chief priests and the scribes that very hour sought to lay hands on Him, but they feared the people—for they knew He had spoken this parable against them” (Luke 20:18).

Is it Lawful to Pay Taxes to Caesar?

20. And watching [Him] closely, they sent out spies, feigning themselves to be just, that they might take hold of His word, to deliver Him up to the rule and authority of the governor.

21. And they asked Him, saying, Teacher, we know that Thou sayest and teachest rightly, and receivest not [merely] the face, but teachest the way of God in truth.

22. Is it permitted for us to give tribute to Caesar, or not?

23. But He, considering their craftiness, said to them, Why do you tempt Me?

24. Show Me a denarius. Whose image and inscription has it? And answering they said, Caesar’s.

25. And He said to them, Render therefore the [things] of Caesar unto Caesar, and the [things] of God unto God.

26. And they were not able to take [hold] of His saying before the people, and marveling at His answer, they were silent.

When Jesus completed the parable about the wicked vinedressers, the religious leaders knew it was about them. Offended and angry, they wanted to lay their hands on Jesus immediately, but because they were aware of Jesus’ growing popularity among the people, they drew back. As it is written, “they feared the people” (Luke 20:19). Therefore, instead of confronting Jesus themselves, they decided to send out spies who would seize upon Jesus’ words “in order to deliver Him to the power and the authority of the governor” (Luke 20:20).

Once again, the religious leaders are trying to trap Jesus in a controversial question. Jesus’ answer to the question will either make Him unpopular among the people or prove that He is a dangerous radical determined to defy the Roman government. In other words, they were endeavoring to trap Jesus in a dilemma where there would be no right answer.

The trap begins when the spies approach Jesus and ask a seemingly innocent question. “Teacher,” they say, “Is it lawful for us to pay taxes to Caesar or not” (Luke 20:22). The subject of paying taxes to Caesar is a sensitive issue among the people. Many feel that paying taxes to Caesar, the reigning king, is a crime against God. The rallying cry for this group is, “We have no king, but God.” These are the people who champion a fierce independence, even to the point of armed revolution. Therefore, if Jesus suggests that they should not pay taxes, His words will be construed as defying the government, and the Roman officials will be able to arrest Him for treason. This will be playing directly into the hands of the religious leaders. This question, then, is designed to trap Jesus between two extremes: disloyalty to the people or treason against the state. Either way, Jesus will be in trouble.

Knowing the nature of their question, Jesus says, “Why do you test Me? Show Me a denarius. Whose image and inscription does it have?” (Luke 20:23). The spies give a simple answer. They say that the image on the Roman coin is “Caesar’s.” (Luke 20:24). In reply, Jesus says, “Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s” (Luke 20:25).

Jesus’ response not only avoids the trap, but uses this as an opportunity to teach that true spirituality is not separate from daily life. While God’s rule should always be first and foremost in our minds, we should also obey the rule of legitimate government. In the same way that the preservation of our spiritual lives depends upon a life according to divine order, the preservation of our natural lives depends upon there being civil order. Without civil order, society would fall apart, and the human race could not survive. We need both spiritual law and civil law. ¹¹

Ideally, spiritual law and civil law should work in harmony. The laws of spiritual government should be consistent with the laws of civil government. When this is not the case, problems arise. A tyrannical, despotic government that makes laws that are injurious to the welfare of the people should, of course, be resisted. Similarly, a focus on religious devotion to the exclusion of civil responsibilities can also be a problem. We cannot love God without also loving our neighbor. The clever rationalizations of the “spies” within us, who pretend to be righteous, will often lead us to believe we have done our whole duty by fulfilling our religious obligations. These are the times when it is essential to remember the brevity and power of Jesus’ reply, “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and unto God what is God’s.” ¹²

Unable to trick Jesus with this second question, the spies are left speechless. As it is written at the close of this episode, “Marveling at His answer, they were silent” (Luke 20:26).

A practical application

In His response to the question about paying taxes, Jesus reminds us that our duties are two-fold. There are two sides to the coin. On one side, is a picture of God. That is, we are to render to God what is God’s. On the other side is a picture of our neighbor whom we should love as ourself. This includes doing our jobs well, treating all people with respect, and even paying our taxes willingly, knowing that it is for the benefit of the public good. That is, we should not only render unto God what is God’s, but also render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s. ¹³

Is There Resurrection After Death?

27. But certain of the Sadducees, who deny that there is any resurrection, came to [Him] and asked Him,

28. Saying, Teacher, Moses wrote to us, If someone’s brother die having a wife, and he die childless, then his brother should take his wife, and raise up seed to his brother.

29. There were therefore seven brothers, and the first took a wife, and died childless.

30. And the second took the wife, and he died childless.

31. And the third took her, and likewise the seven also, and they left no children, and died.

32. And last of all the woman died also.

33. In the resurrection therefore, whose wife of them is she? for the seven had her to wife.

34. And Jesus answering said to them, The sons of this age wed and are given to be wed;

35. But they who shall be held worthy to attain to that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither wed, nor are given to be wed;

36. For they cannot die any more; for they are equal to the angels, and are the sons of God, being sons of the resurrection.

37. But that the dead are raised, even Moses showed at the bramble, when he calls the Lord the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob;

38. And He is not God of the dead, but of the living, for all live to Him.

39. And some of the scribes answering, said, Teacher, Thou hast well said.

40. And after that they no longer dared to question Him [about] anything

Arranged marriages

The next group of religious leaders who endeavor to trap Jesus with a controversial question is the Sadducees. This time it is a question about the resurrection. It was well-known that this religious group did not believe that there was any life after death. As it is written, “Certain of the Sadducees, who deny that there is any resurrection, came to Him” (Luke 20:27). The Sadducees regarded only the first five books of the Hebrew scriptures as having divine authority. In these books they found no suggestion that human beings live after death. Therefore, when they come to Jesus with a question about the resurrection, it is another question designed to discredit Jesus. Their question would show that Jesus’ lofty teachings about heaven and dire warnings about hell are false. After all, according to the Sadducees, there is no afterlife.

In order to prove how foolish it is to believe in life after death, the Sadducees describe a situation in which seven brothers in succession all take the same wife. The first brother dies, leaving no children; then the second brother dies, leaving no children, and so on until all seven have married the woman and then die, leaving no children. The Sadducees then ask Jesus this question: “In the resurrection whose wife will she become?” (Luke 20:33).

According to the Sadducees, the only possible continuation of life was in the passing on of the family name along with any wealth that the family possessed. This was so important that laws were in place stipulating that if a man died, his brother should marry his brother’s widow and have children by her. Otherwise, the family name would be “blotted out.” As it is written in the Hebrew scriptures, “If brothers dwell together, and one of them dies and has no son, the widow of the dead man shall not be married to a stranger outside of the family; her husband’s brother shall go in to her, to take her as his wife, and perform the duty of a husband’s brother to her. And it shall be that the firstborn son which she bears will succeed to the name of his dead brother, that his name may not be blotted out of Israel” (Deuteronomy 25:5-6).

Therefore, in order to preserve the family name and to ensure that the family property would not fall into the hands of strangers, the woman was “given in marriage” to all seven brothers. There are many examples of this in the Hebrew scriptures. Zipporah was given in marriage to Moses (Exodus 2:21); Rebecca was given in marriage to Isaac (Genesis 24:51); and both Leah and Rachel were given in marriage to Jacob (Genesis 29:19,28). In each case, a father had the right of ownership over his daughter. It was by his authority and with his permission that his daughter was “given in marriage.” Similarly, the woman in the story was “given” from one brother to another until “all seven had her” (Luke 20:33). Their far-fetched story is intended to make the idea of a resurrection seem to be an absurdity. They believe that their concluding question, “In the resurrection, whose wife does she become?” will clinch their argument. It will conclusively prove the irrationality of a belief in an afterlife.

Heavenly marriage

Jesus knows that the question of the Sadducees is designed to discredit His teachings about the afterlife. Nevertheless, Jesus turns their question into an opportunity to teach about the eternity of the marriage covenant. Jesus begins by saying, “The sons of this age marry and are given in marriage, but those who are counted worthy to attain that age, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry nor are given in marriage; nor can they die anymore, for they are equal to the angels and are the sons of God, being sons of the resurrection” (Luke 20:34-36).

Jesus’ answer to the question is clear and straightforward. He says that there is resurrection after death. And He backs this up by reminding the Sadducees that in the burning bush passage, Moses showed that the dead are raised. Jesus then adds that those who are resurrected neither marry nor are given in marriage. We have already seen that the kind of marriages the Sadducees are speaking about are worldly arrangements for the preservation of the family name and the inheritance of the family fortune. It had little to do with love, or God, or the commandments. These worldly marriages, like all civil unions, end at death. Therefore, when Jesus says that in the resurrection they “neither marry nor are given in marriage,” He is saying that the kind of marriage the Sadducees are talking about, where a woman is given to a man for worldly reasons and without her consent, does not take place in heaven.

At a deeper level, Jesus is talking about the spiritual marriage that takes place between every individual and the Lord. It is a conjunction that takes place on earth when people freely choose to let the Lord into their life and strive to live by His teachings. This marriage, which begins on earth, continues after death. Once we are spiritually “married to the Lord” on earth, there is no reason to be married to the Lord again in heaven. ¹⁴

Jesus’ answer to the Sadducees, then, is not about arranged marriages that take place merely for worldly purposes. Jesus is talking about spiritual marriages, and especially about the heavenly marriage that takes place between an individual and the Lord. ¹⁵

What about a marriage between two people? Does it continue in heaven?

Many people marry for practical reasons. They may find that a marriage arrangement works for them. It satisfies their need for security, significance, sex, communication, and friendship. They may get along fine and even share common interests, for example in sports, diet, and music. They may agree on methods of child-rearing. All of this can be useful, but if their relationship lacks a spiritual dimension, it will be no more than a civil contract. And, like all legal partnerships, it will end at death.

It is different, however, when husband and wife come together before the Lord believing not only that the Lord has brought them together but that He will keep them together both in this world, and in the next. These people often feel that there is something spiritual about their meeting, that they are “meant to be together,” that they are “born for each other,” that their marriage is “bigger than both of them,” and that their marriage is “forever.” Somehow, they sense that their love will transcend time, and that the words “till death do you part” do not apply to their relationship. This idea, that there is a spiritual dimension to marriage, has inspired romantic poetry, music, and art because it is grounded in a fundamental truth: true marriage is eternal. ¹⁶

But simply believing that some magical force has brought them together and will keep them together is not enough. They must also accept the divine invitation to follow the Lord in this life, to love Him, and live according to His commandments. In return, the Lord fills them with goodness, according to the truth they learn from Him and apply to their lives. As a result, they find that they are protected from spiritual harm, blessed with inner peace, and guided in ways that will bring about their greatest happiness, both in this world and the next. ¹⁷

As this episode comes to an end, the scribes who have been overhearing the conversation between Jesus and the Sadducees, are impressed. They say, “Teacher, You have spoken well” (Luke 20:39). For the moment, the religious leaders within us are silenced. As it is written, “After that, they no longer dared to question Him about anything” (Luke 20:40).

A practical application

In this episode, Jesus teaches not only that there is a resurrection but also that there is marriage in heaven. This is a crucial teaching, especially for people who yearn for the continuation of their marriage in the next world. It is here that human reason and divine wisdom perfectly concur. It simply makes sense that we are born to live forever and that true marriages will continue to exist “in the resurrection.” When husband and wife have become united in this life through a mutual desire to learn from God and do His will, their marriage will be an eternal one. That’s because self-interest, egotism, greed, and selfishness can no longer separate “what God has joined together.” In the light of this teaching, strive to honor the “spiritual marriage” with your spouse by subordinating self-interest. What can you change in your thoughts, attitudes, and actions that will make your spouse’s experience of being with you a little better? Whether married or not, do the same in terms of your “heavenly marriage” with God—a marriage which begins on earth and continues for eternity.

Is the Christ the Son of David?

41. And He said to them, How say they that the Christ is [the] son of David?

42. And David himself says in the Book of Psalms, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit Thou on My right hand,

43. Until I put Thine enemies [as] a footstool of Thy feet.

44. David therefore calls Him Lord, and how is He his son?

45. And in the hearing of all the people He said to His disciples,

46. Beware of the scribes who desire to walk in robes, and love greetings in the markets, and the first seats in the synagogues, and the first places to recline at suppers,

47. Who eat up widows’ houses, and for a pretense make long prayers; these shall receive all the more judgment.

The religious leaders, who were unable to trap Jesus in their controversial questions, are temporarily finished interrogating Him. In this next episode, then, Jesus asks the first question. He begins by asking them about the Messiah, who is also called “the Christ,” and is often referred to as the son of David. Jesus says, “How can they say that the Christ is David’s Son?” (Luke 20:41).

It had been prophesied that a direct descendant of King David would, like his forefather, reign as a king in Israel. In this regard, people often addressed Jesus as “David’s son” or as “the son of David.” As early as the first verse of the Gospel According to Matthew it is written that “This is the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the Son of David” (Matthew 1:1). And now, as Jesus approaches the final days of His ministry, He focuses on the question of His identity, setting it before the religious leaders like this: “Now David himself said in the Book of Psalms, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool.’ If David, therefore, calls Him ‘Lord,’ how then is He David’s Son?” (Luke 20:42-44).

When Jesus says, “The Lord said to my Lord,” He is referring to the first verse of Psalms 110 which begins with a picture of Jehovah speaking to the promised Messiah. In the original Hebrew, the speaker is Jehovah, the one God of the universe. He is communicating with the promised Messiah, the one who will come to earth as a king, anointed by God to set up an everlasting kingdom. This is why David, who sees all of this in spirit, does not refer to the Messiah as “my son,” but rather as “my Lord.” As Jesus says, “If David, therefore, calls Him ‘Lord,’ how then is He David’s Son?”

In raising this question, Jesus is directly addressing the original question asked by the religious leaders when they confronted Him in the temple. At that time, they questioned His authority, asking essentially, “Who gave you this authority? (Luke 20:2). Jesus is now, in this episode, answering that question. He is indicating that His authority comes not from man but from God. Furthermore, God will give Him the authority not only to set up a new kingdom, but also the power to lead His people to victory over all enemies. In the language of sacred scripture, the power to defeat spiritual enemies is described as “sitting at the right hand of God.” And subjugating those enemies is described as making them His “footstool.” ¹⁸

As we engage more deeply with Jesus’ question, we note that He is speaking about the power of divine love (Jehovah) which comes forth through divine truth (Jesus). This, then, is the deeper message contained in the scriptural statement, “Jehovah said to my Lord, sit at My right hand, till I make Your enemies Your footstool.” It refers to what happens when the divine love comes into each of our lives through the divine truth that Jesus teaches. Our spiritual enemies are conquered. ¹⁹

This is not the last lesson that Jesus will deliver while in the temple during these final days, but it is a powerful one. He is making it clear that He is not David’s son but rather David’s Lord, the promised Messiah who will sit at the right hand of God, making His enemies His footstool. In the literal sense, this a reference to the practice of triumphant kings who placed their foot upon the conquered enemy to represent victory. In David’s mind, this is a picture of the Messiah being empowered to wipe out all His enemies—turning them, so to speak, into His “footstool.” But Jesus, as Messiah, has come to establish a spiritual kingdom within each of us. Spiritually, this means that God can give us the power to subordinate the loves of self and of the world to all that is higher, the love of God and the love of the neighbor.

Ordained by God

As we have seen, the religious leaders tried to do everything they could to discredit Jesus. Their primary method was to raise controversial questions and then trap Him in His words. In this way, they hoped to show that Jesus was unauthorized to teach. If successful, they would be able to retain their power, and secure their positions of authority. They were unable to do so, however, because Jesus’ power and authority came from a different source.

Unlike the religious leaders, Jesus did not need to go around in long robes, or have the best seat in the synagogue in order to prove His authority or reveal the deeper meaning of the scriptures. He was not ordained by rabbinical councils, but rather by God. The love of God was His very essence, and it came forth in the truth He spoke. This was the only ordination He needed. As Jesus puts it, “Beware of the scribes, who desire to walk in long robes, love greetings in the marketplaces, the best seats in the synagogues, and the best places at feasts” (Luke 20:46).

Jesus also adds that the so-called religious “authorities” were neglecting their responsibilities. Instead of teaching people the truth, as they should have done, they were “devouring widows’ houses” (Luke 20:46-47). The phrase, “devouring widows’ houses” is sacred symbolism. It describes what takes place when people long for truth, but are deprived of that truth. It is compared to the deep grief a widow feels when she longs for her lost husband. Therefore, when Jesus accuses the religious leaders of “devouring widows’ houses,” He is saying that these corrupt leaders have been depriving people of the truth. They are the spiritual thieves and robbers in our own mind who mislead us by distorting, twisting, and perverting the truth. This is why Jesus concludes this episode by saying that the religious leaders “will receive greater condemnation” (Luke 20:47). ²⁰

A practical application

In this episode, Jesus describes Himself as “sitting at the right hand of God” where He receives power from on high to make His enemies His “footstool.” This is powerful imagery. The “right hand” of God describes the power of God’s love. It is so powerful that it can overcome all of our spiritual enemies—anger, resentment, self-pity, etc. But we can only receive this power through the truth that God gives us. With this in mind, select a passage of sacred scripture, seeing it as a container of deeper truth and designed to receive God’s inflowing love. As you strive to apply that truth to your life, notice how the divine love pours in with power to help you subjugate your tendencies towards selfishness. This is how God will make “your enemies your footstool.”

Fußnoten:

223. And the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from My God, signifies the doctrine of the new church, which is in the heavens. This is evident from the signification of "the city of My God," as being the doctrine of Divine truth (of which presently); also from the signification of "the New Jerusalem," as being the church in respect to doctrine (See the small work on The New Jerusalem 6); also from the signification of "which cometh down out of heaven from My God," as being that it is out of heaven from Divine truth there. That "God" means in the Word Divine truth, see above (n. 220, 222). And as Divine truth, which is in heaven and which comes down from heaven, is from the Lord alone, the Lord calls it His God. That "the city of My God" signifies the doctrine of Divine truth seems at first view remote, for the mind cannot readily think of doctrine when "city" is mentioned, or think of the church when a "land" is mentioned; yet in the Word, "cities" [civitates aut urbes] mean nothing else in the spiritual sense; and for the reason that the idea of a city is merely natural, but the idea of doctrine in a city is spiritual. Angels, because they are spiritual, can have no other idea of a city than of the people therein in respect to doctrine, as they can have no other idea of a land than of the people therein in respect to their church or their religion. The reason of this is that the societies into which the heavens are divided are for the most part like cities [communities], all differing from one another in respect to the reception of Divine truth in good; when, therefore, a "city" is mentioned angels think of the doctrine of truth. (That the heavens are divided into societies according to the differences of the good of love and faith, see in the work on Heaven and Hell 41-50; and that their habitations are disposed into the form of cities, n. 184).

[2] That "cities" [civitates seu urbes] in the Word signify doctrines can be seen from many passages there, of which I will cite here only the following.

In Jeremiah:

Behold I have given thee this day for a fenced city against the whole land (Jeremiah 1:18).

These things are said to the prophet, because "a prophet" in the Word signifies one who teaches truth, and in an abstract sense, the doctrine of truth; and as this is what "prophet" signifies, it is said to him, "I have given thee for a fenced city," which signifies the doctrine of truth defending against falsities. (That "prophet" in the Word signifies one who teaches truth, and in the abstract sense, the doctrine of truth, see Arcana Coelestia (2534[1-6]), n. 7269.)

In the same:

The crown of your splendor cometh down. The cities of the south are shut (Jeremiah 13:18-19).

Here the falsification of truth is treated of; and "the crown of their splendor cometh down" means that intelligence comes down; and "the cities of the south are shut" means that all the truths of doctrine are closed, which otherwise would be in the light. (That "crown" means intelligence and wisdom, see above, n. 126, 218; and that "south" means a state of light, see in the work on Heaven and Hell 148, 149, n. 151).

[3] In Isaiah:

Thou hast done [wonderful things, Thy] counsels from afar [are] truth, fidelity; and Thou hast made of a city a heap, of a fenced city a ruin, a palace of strangers to be no city, that it may not be built for ever; therefore a strong people shall honor Thee, a city of powerful nations shall fear Thee (Isaiah 25:1-3).

The vastation of the former church, and the establishment of a new one, are here treated of; the vastation of the church in respect to doctrine is meant by "Thou hast made of a city a heap, of a fenced city a ruin, a palace of strangers to be no city;" and the establishment of a new church in respect to doctrine is meant by "a strong people shall honor Thee, a city of powerful nations shall fear Thee."

In the same:

In that day shall a song be sung in the land of Judah; We have a strong city; salvation will He appoint for walls and bulwarks. Open ye the gates, that the righteous nation that keepeth faithfulness may enter in (Isaiah 26:1-2).

Here "a strong city" signifies the doctrine of genuine truth, which falsities cannot destroy; "walls and bulwarks" signify truths defending; "gates" signify admission (as above, n. 208); "the righteous nation keeping faithfulness" means those who are in good and in truths therefrom.

[4] In the same:

How art thou fallen from heaven O Lucifer, how art thou cut down to the earth: that made the world as a wilderness, and threw down the cities thereof. Prepare slaughter for his sons, that they may not rise up and possess the land, and fill the faces of the world with cities (Isaiah 14:12, 17, 21).

Here "Lucifer" means Babylon, where every truth of the doctrine of the church was either falsified or annihilated; "he made the world as a wilderness, and threw down the cities thereof," signifies that this was done to the church and its doctrines; "prepare slaughter for his sons, that they may not rise up," signifies that its falsities must be destroyed; "and may not possess the land, and fill the faces of the world with cities," signifies in order that a church and doctrine may be there.

In Revelation:

And the great city was broken ¹ into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell (Revelation 16:18-19).

Here also Babylon is treated of; the doctrine of its falsities is what is meant by "a city broken ² into three parts," and the doctrine of evils therefrom by "the cities of the nations which fell."

[5] In David:

The redeemed of Jehovah wandered in the wilderness in loneliness of life; ³ they found not a city of habitation; hungry and thirsty [their soul fainted in them]. He led them into a straight way, that they might go to a city of habitation (Psalms 107:2, 4-5, 7).

"To wander in the wilderness and in loneliness of way," is to be in want of the knowledges of truth and good; "to find not a city of habitation" means not to find the doctrine of truth according to which they may live; "the hungry and thirsty" are those who have a longing to know good and truth; "to lead them into a straight way, that they might go to a city of habitation" is to lead them into genuine truth, and into the doctrine of life.

In Isaiah:

I said, Lord, how long? And He said, Until the cities shall be so devastated as to be without inhabitant, and the houses so that no man be in them, and the land be reduced to a waste (Isaiah 6:11).

Here the total vastation of the church is treated of; "cities" are the truths of doctrine; "houses" the goods thereof; and "land" the church.

[6] In the same:

The land shall be emptied, the land shall be confounded, the land shall be profaned under its inhabitants; the empty city shall be broken, every house shall be shut, a cry over the wine in the streets, the remnant in the city is a waste, and the gate shall be beaten down even to devastation (Isaiah 24:3-5, 10-12).

Here also the devastation of the church is treated of; "the land which is said to be emptied, confounded, and profaned," is the church; "city" is the truth of doctrine, "house" is its good; "wine, over which there is a cry in the streets," is the truth of doctrine falsified, over which there is contest and indignation.

[7] In Zephaniah:

I will cut off the nations; I will desolate their streets, and their cities shall be laid waste (Zephaniah 3:6).

Here "nations" are those who are in evils; "to desolate streets" means to desolate truths, and "to lay waste cities" means to lay waste doctrines. In Jeremiah:

The lion is gone up from the thicket, to reduce thy land to a waste; thy cities shall be destroyed; I saw Carmel a wilderness, and all its cities desolate; for this shall the land mourn; the whole city fleeing at the voice of a horseman and of the bowmen; the whole city is forsaken, not a man dwelling therein (Jeremiah 4:7, 26-29).

The "lion from the thicket" is falsity from evil; "the land" is the church, "cities" are the truths of doctrine; "Carmel" is the spiritual church; "the voice of the horseman and the bowmen," because of which "the city will flee," is reasoning and combat from falsities.

[8] In the same:

The devastator shall come upon every city, and no city shall escape; and the valley shall perish, and the plain shall be destroyed (Jeremiah 48:8).

These words describe the total vastation of the church, until nothing of the truth of doctrine shall remain. In the same:

Behold, waters rising up out of the north, which shall become an overflowing brook, and shall overflow the land, the city, and them that dwell therein (Jeremiah 47:2).

Vastation also is signified by "an overflowing brook." In the same:

If ye hallow the day of the Sabbath, there shall enter in through the gates of this city kings and princes, riding in chariot and on horses, and this city shall be inhabited to eternity (Jeremiah 17:24-25).

"Hallowing the Sabbath" in the spiritual sense signifies holy acknowledgment of the Lord's Divine Human and of His conjunction with heaven and the church; "kings and princes entering in through the gates of the city" signify the truths of the church; "their riding in a chariot and on horses" signifies that they shall be in the truths of doctrine and in intelligence; "the city," which here is Jerusalem, is the church in respect to doctrine. Such is the spiritual sense of these words; such therefore is the sense in heaven.

[9] In Zechariah:

Thus said Jehovah; I will return to Zion, and will dwell in the midst of Jerusalem; whence Jerusalem shall be called a city of truth. And the streets of the city shall be full of boys and girls playing in the streets (Zechariah 8:3-5).

Here "Zion" does not mean Zion, nor "Jerusalem" Jerusalem; but "Zion" means the celestial church, and "Jerusalem" that church in respect to the doctrine of truth; therefore it is called "a city of truth;" "the streets of the city" signify the truths of doctrine; "boys and girls playing in the streets" signify the affections of truth and good. (That "Zion" signifies the celestial church, see Arcana Coelestia 2362, 9055; that "Jerusalem" signifies the church in respect to doctrine, n. 402, 3654, 9166; and in the small work on The New Jerusalem, 6; that "streets" signify the truths of doctrine, n. 2336; that "boys girls" signify the affections of truth good, in which there is innocence 3067, 3110, 3179, 5236, 6742; that "to play" means what pertains to interior festivity, which is the affection of truth and good, n. 10416).

[10] Because "Zion" signifies the celestial church, and "Jerusalem" the church in respect to the doctrine of truth, Zion is called "the city of Jehovah," and Jerusalem is called "the holy city," "the city of God" and "the city of the great king."

As in Isaiah:

They shall call thee, The city of Jehovah, the Zion of the Holy One of Israel (Isaiah 60:14).

In Ezekiel:

The prophet saw upon a high mountain the frame of a city on the south, and an angel measured the wall, the gate, the chambers, the porch of the gate; and the name of the city was Jehovah-is-there (Ezekiel 40:1; 48:35).

In Isaiah:

Behold, Jehovah hath caused it to be heard, even to the end of the earth, Say ye to the daughter of Zion, Behold, thy salvation cometh. And thou shalt be called a city that is sought (Isaiah 62:11-12).

In David:

As we have heard so have we seen in the city of Jehovah of hosts, in the city of our God; God will establish it forever (Psalms 48:8).

(What the celestial church is, and what the spiritual church, see in the work on Heaven and Hell 20-28.)

These two cities are called "holy cities," in Isaiah:

Thy holy cities are become a wilderness, Zion is become a wilderness, Jerusalem a waste (Isaiah 64:10).

Jerusalem in particular is called "the holy city," in Revelation:

The nations shall tread down the holy city (Revelation 11:2).

Again:

I saw the holy city, coming down from God out of heaven (Revelation 21:2).

In Matthew:

The devil took Jesus into the holy city (Matthew 4:5).

And in the same:

Coming forth out of the tombs, they entered into the holy city (Matthew 27:53).

[11] Jerusalem was called "the holy city" because it signified the church in respect to the doctrine of truth; and Divine truth proceeding from the Lord is what is called "holy" (See Arcana Coelestia 6788, 8302, 9229, 9820, 10361). That city, apart from such representation and consequent signification, was not at all holy, but rather profane, is evident from the Lord's having been rejected and crucified there; and for this reason it is also called "Sodom and Egypt" (Revelation 11:8). But because it signified the church in respect to the doctrine of truth, it was called not only "the holy city," but also "the city of God," and "the city of the great king."

Thus in David:

There is a river, the streams whereof have made glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacle of the Most High. God is in the midst of her (Psalms 46:4-5).

In the same:

Great is Jehovah in the city of our God, beautiful in situation the city of the great king (Psalms 48:1-2).

In Matthew:

Swear not by the earth, for it is the footstool of God's feet; neither by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great king (Matthew 5:35).

Jerusalem was called "the city of God" because "God" in the Word of the Old Testament means Divine truth proceeding from the Lord (as may be seen above, n. 220, 222); and it was called "the city of the great king," because "king" also signifies, in reference to the Lord, Divine truth proceeding from Him (See above, n. 31). From this then it is that Jerusalem is called "the city of truth" (Zechariah 8:3).

[12] In Isaiah:

Thus saith Jehovah, thy Redeemer and Former from the womb, I make void the signs of liars; turning wise men backward, and making their knowledge foolish; saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be inhabited; and to the cities of Judah, Ye shall be built, and I will raise up the desolate places thereof (Isaiah 44:24-26).

This treats of the rejection of the church whose doctrine is from self-intelligence, and of the establishment of a new church, whose doctrine is from the Lord. Doctrine from self-intelligence is meant by "I make void the signs of liars, turning wise men backward, and making their knowledge foolish," and doctrine that is from the Lord by "saying to Jerusalem, Thou shalt be inhabited; and to the cities of Judah, Ye shall be built."

[13] In Jeremiah:

Seest thou not what they do in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem? I will cause to cease from the cities of Judah, and from the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of joy and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, for the land shall become a waste (Jeremiah 7:17, 34).

Here also "the cities of Judah and the streets of Jerusalem" signify the truths of doctrine; "the voice of joy and the voice of gladness" is delight from the affection of good and truth; "the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride" are those affections themselves; and that these are to cease is meant by "the land shall become a waste;" the "land" is the church.

[14] In Isaiah:

I will commingle Egypt with Egypt that they may fight a man against his brother, and a man against his companion; city against city, kingdom against kingdom. In that day there shall be five cities in the land of Egypt that speak with the lip of Canaan and that swear to Jehovah of Hosts. In that day there shall be an altar to Jehovah in the midst of Egypt (Isaiah 19:2, 18-19).

"Egypt" means the natural man and its knowledge [ejus scientificum]; "that they may fight a man against his brother, and a man against his companion," means against good and truth; "city against city, and kingdom against kingdom," signifies doctrine against doctrine, and church against church; "in that day" signifies the Lord's coming, and the state then of those who are natural and in true knowledges [scientificis]; "five cities in the land of Egypt that speak with the lip of Canaan" signify the truths of doctrine in abundance, which are genuine truths of the church, "five" meaning many or in abundance; "cities" truths of doctrine; "the lip of Canaan" genuine truths of the church. "An altar to Jehovah" here signifies worship from the good of love.

[15] In the same:

The highways have been laid waste, he that passeth through the way hath ceased; he hath rejected the cities, he regardeth not man. The land mourneth, it languisheth; Lebanon hath faded away (Isaiah 33:8-9).

"The highways that have been laid waste, and the way that is not passed through," are truths leading to heaven, which are truths of the church; "to reject the cities" is to reject the truths of doctrine; "to regard not man" is to regard not truth and good. "The land that mourneth and languisheth" is the church in respect to good; "Lebanon that hath faded away" is the church in respect to truth.

[16] In the same:

Sing, O barren, that did not bear, for more are the sons of the desolate than the sons of the married one. Enlarge the place of thy tent; thy seed shall inherit the nations, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited (Isaiah 54:1-3).

"The barren that did not bear" signifies the nations that have not as yet truths from the Word; "the sons of the desolate" are the truths that these will receive; "the sons of the married one" are the truths that are with those who are in the church; "to enlarge the place of the tent" means that their worship is from good; "seed" is truth therefrom; "the nations which the seed will inherit" are goods; and "the cities which shall be inhabited" are the doctrines therefrom.

[17] In Jeremiah:

I will bring upon them every good; they shall buy fields with silver, and this by writing in a book, in the cities of Judah, and in the cities of the mountain, and in the cities of the plain, and in the cities of the south (Jeremiah 32:42, 44; 33:13).

These things are said of those in the church who are in good and in truths therefrom; "to buy fields with silver" is to acquire for themselves the good of the church by means of truths; "to write in a book" is to implant in the life; "the cities of Judah" and "the cities of the mountain" are the truths of doctrine which those have who are of the Lord's celestial kingdom; "the cities of the plain, and the cities of the south," are the truths of doctrine which those have who are in the Lord's spiritual kingdom.

[18] In Matthew:

Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on a mountain cannot be hid. Neither do they light a lamp and put it under a bushel (Matthew 5:14-15).

These things were said to the disciples, by whom all truths and goods in the complex are signified; therefore it is said, "Ye are the light of the world;" for "light" signifies Divine truth and intelligence therefrom. Because that is what the words signify, "Ye are the light of the world," therefore it is said, "A city that is set on a mountain cannot be hid. Neither can a lamp be lighted and be put under a bushel;" for "a city set on a mountain" signifies the truth of doctrine from the good of love; and "a lamp" signifies in general truth from good and intelligence therefrom.

[19] In the same:

Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation, and every city and house divided against itself standeth not (Matthew 12:25).

"Kingdom," in the spiritual sense, signifies the church; "city" and "house" the truth and good of its doctrine, which do not stand but fall, if they do not unanimously agree.

[20] In the same:

Jesus sends forth the twelve disciples, saying to them, Go not off into the way of the nations, and enter not into a city of the Samaritans; go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel (Matthew 10:5-6)

"The way of the nations" into which they were not to go off, signifies falsity from evil; "a city of the Samaritans" into which they were not to enter, signifies the false doctrine of those who reject the Lord; "the lost sheep of the house of Israel" signify those who are in the good of charity and in faith therefrom, "Israel" meaning all such wherever they may be. "A city of the Samaritans" signifies the false doctrine of those who reject the Lord, because the Samaritans did not receive Him (as may be seen in Luke 9:52-56).

[21] In the same:

Jesus said, When they persecute you in one city they should flee ⁴ into another (Matthew 10:23).

Here also by "city" is meant the doctrine of falsity from evil; that where this doctrine is the doctrine of truth will not be admitted, is meant by "when they persecute you in one city flee ye into another."

[22] In Luke:

Then the master of the house being angry, said to his servants, Go out quickly into the streets and lanes of the city, and bring in hither the poor and maimed and blind and halt (Luke 14:21).

"Their going out into the streets and lanes of the city" signifies that they should enquire where those are who receive the truths of the doctrine; for "streets" and "lanes" are the truths of doctrine (as above); and "city" means doctrine. The "poor," "the maimed," "the halt," and "the blind," signify those who are not in truths and goods, and yet long for them. (Who are signified specifically by "the poor," who by "the maimed," "the halt," and "the blind," may be seen in The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem 107, from Arcana Coelestia.)

[23] In the same:

A certain nobleman going into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, gave to his servants ten pounds for trading; when he returned, he commanded the servants to be called. The first came, saying, Thy pound hath gained ten pounds. He said to him, good servant, because thou hast been faithful over the least, thou shalt have authority over ten cities. Then the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath made five pounds. He said to him, Be thou also over five cities (Luke 20:12-19 seq.).

These words signify, in the spiritual sense, much more than can be expressed in a few words; let it be noted merely that by "cities" here are not meant cities but the doctrinals of truth and good; and by "having authority over them" intelligence and wisdom are meant; by "ten" much, and by "five" some. (That "ten" in the Word signifies much, see Arcana Coelestia 1988, 3107, 4638, 9757; and that "five" signifies some, n. 4638, 9604.) From this it can now be seen that "the name of the city of My God, the New Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from My God," signifies the doctrine of the new church, which is in the heavens. (This doctrine is also given in a separate small work, entitled The New Jerusalem and its Heavenly Doctrine.)

Fußnoten: