Bible

 

Исход 33

Studie

   

1 И сказал Господь Моисею: пойди, иди отсюда ты и народ, который ты вывел из земли Египетской, в землю, о которой Я клялся Аврааму,Исааку и Иакову, говоря: потомству твоему дам ее;

2 и пошлю пред тобою Ангела, и прогоню Хананеев, Аморреев, Хеттеев, Ферезеев, Евеев и Иевусеев,

3 и введет он вас в землю, где течет молоко и мед; ибо Сам не пойду среди вас, чтобы не погубить Мне вас на пути, потому что вы народ жестоковыйный.

4 Народ, услышав грозное слово сие, возрыдал, и никто не возложил на себя украшений своих.

5 Ибо Господь сказал Моисею: скажи сынам Израилевым: вы народ жестоковыйный; если Я пойду среди вас, то в одну минуту истреблю вас; итак снимите с себя украшения свои; Я посмотрю, что Мне делать с вами.

6 Сыны Израилевы сняли с себя украшения свои у горы Хорива.

7 Моисей же взял и поставил себе шатер вне стана, вдали от стана, и назвал его скиниею собрания; и каждый, ищущий Господа, приходил в скинию собрания, находившуюся вне стана.

8 И когда Моисей выходил к скинии, весь народ вставал, и становился каждый у входа в свой шатер и смотрел вслед Моисею, доколе он не входил в скинию.

9 Когда же Моисей входил в скинию, тогда спускался столп облачный истановился у входа в скинию, и Господь говорил с Моисеем.

10 И видел весь народ столп облачный, стоявший у входа в скинию; и вставал весь народ, и поклонялся каждый у входа в шатер свой.

11 И говорил Господь с Моисеем лицем к лицу, как бы говорил кто с другом своим; и он возвращался в стан; а служитель его Иисус, сын Навин, юноша, не отлучался от скинии.

12 Моисей сказал Господу: вот, Ты говоришь мне: веди народ сей, а не открыл мне, кого пошлешь со мною, хотя Ты сказал: „Я знаю тебя по имени, и ты приобрел благоволение в очах Моих";

13 итак, если я приобрел благоволение в очах Твоих, то молю: открой мне путь Твой, дабыя познал Тебя, чтобы приобрести благоволение в очах Твоих; и помысли, что сии люди Твой народ.

14 Господь сказал: Сам Я пойду, и введу тебя в покой.

15 Моисей сказал Ему: если не пойдешь Ты Сам с нами , то и не выводи нас отсюда,

16 ибо по чему узнать, что я и народ Твой обрели благоволение в очахТвоих? не по тому ли, когда Ты пойдешь с нами? тогда я и народ Твой будем славнее всякого народа на земле.

17 И сказал Господь Моисею: и то, о чем ты говорил, Я сделаю, потому что ты приобрел благоволение в очах Моих, и Я знаю тебя по имени.

18 Моисей сказал: покажи мне славу Твою.

19 И сказал Господь : Я проведу пред тобою всю славу Мою и провозглашу имя Иеговы пред тобою, и кого помиловать – помилую, кого пожалеть – пожалею.

20 И потом сказал Он: лица Моего не можно тебе увидеть, потому что человек не может увидеть Меня и остаться в живых.

21 И сказал Господь: вот место у Меня, стань на этой скале;

22 когда же будет проходить слава Моя, Я поставлю тебяв расселине скалы и покрою тебя рукою Моею, доколе не пройду;

23 и когда сниму руку Мою, ты увидишь Меня сзади, а лице Мое не будет видимо.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 10555

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

10555. 'As a man (vir) speaks to [his] neighbour' means the joining together of truth and good. This is clear from the meaning of 'speaking' as reciprocal perception and the consequent joining together, as immediately above in 10554; from the meaning of 'man' (vir) as truth, dealt with in 3134, 3459, 4823, 7716, 9007; and from the meaning of 'neighbour' as good to which truth is joined. Various places in the Word use the expression 'man and neighbour' or 'man and companion', and by it in a reciprocal way is meant, as also by 'man and brother'. And when in a reciprocal way is meant a reciprocal joining together should be understood, like that of truth and good. For truth joins itself in a reciprocal way with good, because truth derives its being from good, and good receives its specific quality in truth. No truth exists in heaven that is not joined to good, because without good truth is not anything; nor is good anything without truth. For truth without good is like the receiver of being without the giver of being, and good without truth is like the giver of it without the receiver. Or truth without good is like a body without life, and good without truth is like life without a body. Therefore unless the two are joined together they are not anything that can accomplish anything; that is, they are not anything to which anything of heaven and the Church can be attributed.

[2] The situation when one is without the other is similar to that when the human understanding exists without the will, or the will without the understanding. One may indeed become separated from the other, as when there is an understanding of what is true and good but no will to do it. In this case however the understanding has a will derived from a source other than that which is good. It derives it from willing well to self, or [to others] for the sake of self, with the understanding of what is true and good serving as means to this end. Those who reflect correctly on the matter may recognize that the human understanding derives its life from its will, without which it is not anything, and also that understanding and will turn to each other and are linked together. A similar situation exists with truth and good, consequently with faith and love. Unless truth is linked to good, or faith to love, there is no truth or good, nor any faith or love. These matters have been mentioned in order that people may know what to understand by a linking of each to the other, meant in the spiritual sense by 'man and companion' or 'man and neighbour', and also by 'man and brother'.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4823

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4823. 'And she conceived again and bore a son' means evil. This is clear from the meaning of 'a son' as truth and also good, dealt with in 264, and so in the contrary sense as falsity and also evil, though evil that arises out of falsity. Essentially this kind of evil is falsity, because it has its origin in this. For anyone who does what is evil arising out of false teaching does what is false; but because this falsity is realized in action it is called evil. The meaning which the firstborn carries of falsity and consequent evil is evident from the statement made here regarding this [second] son, to the effect that in action he did what was evil. The actual words are 'he spilled his seed on the ground, so that he should not provide seed for his brother; and what he had done was evil in the eyes of Jehovah; and He caused him to die also', verses 9-10. The fact that this evil arose out of falsity is also evident at that point. What is more, in the ancient Churches the secondborn meant the truth of faith realized in action; therefore the second son here means falsity realized in action, which is evil. It may also be recognized that evil is meant by this son from the fact that the firstborn was named Er by his father or Judah, but this son, Onan, by his mother, the daughter of Shua, as may be seen in the original language. For 'man' in the Word means falsity and his wife (mulier) evil, see 915, 2517, 4510; and so also does 'the daughter of Shua' mean evil, 4818, 4819. Therefore because he was given his name by his father, 'Er' means falsity; and because Onan was given his name by his mother, evil is meant by him. Thus the first was so to speak the father's son, the second so to speak the mother's son.

[2] In the Word the expression 'man and wife' (vir et uxor) is used many times, as also is 'husband and wife' (maritus et uxor). When 'man and wife' is used, 'man' means truth and 'wife' good; or in the contrary sense 'men' means falsity and 'wife' evil. But when 'husband and wife' is used, 'husband' means good and 'wife' truth; or in the contrary sense 'husband' means evil and 'wife' falsity. The reason underlying this arcanum is this In the celestial Church good resided with the husband and the truth of that good with the wife; but in the spiritual Church truth resided with the man and the good of that truth with the wife: Such is and was the actual relationship between the two, for in human beings interior things have undergone this reversal. This is the reason why in the Word, when celestial good and celestial truth from this are the subject, they are called 'husband and wife', but when spiritual good and spiritual truth from this are dealt with, these are called 'man and wife', or rather 'man and woman' (vir et mulier). From this, as well as from the actual expressions used, one can come to know which kind of good and which kind of truth are being dealt with in the internal sense of the Word.

[3] Here also is the reason why it has been stated already in various places that marriages represent the joining of good to truth, and of truth to good. Furthermore conjugial love has its origin in these two joined together. Among celestial people conjugial love has its origin in good joined to truth, but among spiritual people in truth joined to good. Marriages also correspond in actual fact to these joinings together. From all this one may see what is implied by the father giving the first son his name, but the mother giving the second and also the third sons theirs, as is clear from the original language. The father named the first son because the first son meant falsity, while the mother named the second son because the second son meant evil.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.