IBhayibheli

 

Genesis 32

Funda

   

2 Wa iššokal Yaqub əsalkadan as du angalosan.

3 As tan inay Yaqub, iṇṇa: «A wa aɣaywan ən Məššina!» Adi da fəlas iga adagg en eṣəm Maxanayim (almaɣna əššin ɣawnatan).

4 Izozar du Yaqub inəmmuzal s amaqqar-net Esaw daɣ ədɣaɣan ən Sehir, akal n Edom.

5 Oṃar tan, iṇṇ'asan: «Ad taṇṇim i məšš-i Esaw a wa: "Iṇṇ'ak əkli nnak Yaqub: nak əqqimaɣ in ɣur Laban har azalada!

6 Əggaznat du sər-i šitan, d əzdan, d aharay wa ənḍərran, d eklan əd taklaten. Əzzozaraɣ in inəmmuzal in ad ak əməlan məšš-i, fəl ad əgrəwa ətəwəqbal ɣur-ək."»

7 Əqqalan du nəmmuzal Yaqub, əṇṇan as: «Noṣ'in amaqqar nak Esaw, ənta iṃan-net issilkad ak du, iddəw d əkkozat təṃad n aləs.»

8 As isla Yaqub y a wa, təggaz-tu ṭasa wəllen, inkad, izun aytedan-net d aharay-nnet wa ənḍərran əd šitan əd ṃənas, ig-en ṣanatat tərəkfen.

9 Id orda as as ikənnas Esaw əd tərəkəft iyyat, tahadatad təg̣məd.

10 Təzzar iṭṭar Yaqub: «Məššina n abba-nin Ibrahim, Məššina n abba-nin Isxaq, Əməli, kay a di-iṇṇan: "Əqqəl akal-nak, ɣur marwan-nak fəl ad ak-aga alxer!" wa di-təgeɣ d iḍuf n arkawal wa di təṣṣəkna, nak ann əkli-nnak ogaran-i. Id fəlas ɣur teklay-nin təburək ɣas a dər əɣrasa Yordan a, mišan, azala, as d-əqqala əṃosa ṣanatat tərəkfen.

12 «Oṇsayaq-qay ad-i tag̣əza daɣ amaqqar-in Esaw fəlas əksudaɣ ad-i-iṣrəy ihlək-i nak əd bararan əd təḍoden.

13 «Id kay iṃan-nak ad-i-iṇṇan: "A dak-aga alxer wəllen, əssəgeɣ əzzurriya-nnak šilat ən təblalen n aṃadal ən ṭama n agarew wər nəla aṃadin".»

14 Iga ṭanat n ad-aṇsu den da ahad wədi. Isaṇṇafran daɣ təla-nnet a iga ṣusay y amaqqar-net Esaw.

15 Sanatat təṃad ən taɣat əd ṣanatat təṃərwen n əzolaɣ, ṣanatat təṃad ən tilay əd ṣanatat təṃərwen n akar,

16 karadat təṃərwen ən talamt əd waran-nasnat, əkkozat təṃərwen ən ṭəst əd ṃaraw zəgran, ṣanatat təṃərwen ən tajat əd ṃaraw bangitan.

17 Izammazay isəgan isoḍaf-tan y eklan-net, iṇṇ-asan: «Izarat-i, tagim taffawt gar-ewwan.»

18 Dəffər a wen oṃar akli-nnet wa izzərgazan əsəgən wa zzaran: «As təṃənaya d amaqqarr-in Esaw iṣəstan kay: "Ma kay ilan? Mənis tədaga? Ma ilan eharay wa təzzərgaza?"

19 Taṇṇaɣ-as: "In məšši akli-nnak Yaqub. Isəgan a ṣusay a əṃosan i məšši Esaw. Yaqub iṃan-net ilkam-ana-du.»

20 Iga alamar wen da y eklan-net kul win əzzərgaznen isəgan win ṣusay.

21 «Taṇṇim-as tolas: "Akli-nnak Yaqub izay-du"» Id orda-as ad issəṣmad əs ṣusay wa din azzaran.Az-z-aṃṃanayan da mijas igraw ɣur-əs Yaqub ətəwəqbal.»

22 Issəgla Yaqub isəgan win iga ṣusay y amaqqar-net ad as in izaran.Ənta iṇsa ahad wen daɣ aɣaywan. Iṇkar ahad wədi da itkal šiḍoden-net an ṣanatat, əd təwahayen-net ṣanatat əd bararan-net ṃaraw d iyyan, issəɣras tan angi wan Yaboq. Dəffər a wen issəɣras a wa ila.

25 Iqqim-du ɣas-net, har t-id oṣa aləs iyyan Ibbəllan dər əs har affaw.

26 As inay aləs wa as wər ifreg əsənbəg ən Yaqub iḍas-tu daɣ təməllay ən taɣma, tərrəffat tətoɣast-net igla Yaqub iṭṭaf tu.

27 Iṇṇ-as aləs: «Šalw-i ad agla ezal iga!» Mišan iṇṇ-as Yaqub: «Wər kay z-ayya wər fall-i təgeɣ albaraka.»

28 Iṇṇ-as aləs: «Ma eṣəm-nak?» Ijjəwwab-as: «Yaqub.»

29 Aṃaran iṇṇ-as aləs: «Dəffər azala, aba as təgəɣ eṣəm Yaqub id təbbillana əd Məššina, əd meddan, təssənbaga. A di da fəlas əmərədda ad tagaɣ eṣəm Israyel (almaɣna ibbəllan əd Məššina)

30 Dəffər a wen iṣṣəstan-tu Yaqub: «Oṇsayaq-qay ad-i təməlaɣ eṣəm-nak» Miššan iṇṇ-as: «Ma fel təṣastana d eṣəm-in?» Iga fall-as albaraka.

31 Iga Yaqub y adagg-en eṣəm Fənyel (almaɣna udəm ən Məššina), id iṇṇa: «Əṇaya Məššina udəm s udəm, əgleɣ, əddara!»

32 As ig̣mad Yaqub Fənyel, əg̣əzzəy ən təfuk. Iṣigadal əs tətoɣast-net.

33 Əddəlil n a wen da as har azala Kəl Israyel wər təṭṭin azar wa n taɣma osaɣan isəmməɣras ən tətoɣast daɣ ṣan as ənɣan teɣsay, fəlas ənta a itawaḍasan daɣ Yaqub.

   

Okususelwe Emisebenzini kaSwedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #4145

Funda lesi Sigaba

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

4145. Because longing thou hast longed toward thy father’s house. That this signifies a longing for conjunction with Divine good that flows in directly, is evident from the signification here of “father’s house” (that is, the house of Isaac and Abraham), as being the good that inflows directly. (That “house” denotes good, see above, n. 2233, 2234, 3652, 3720; that “father” also denotes good, n. 3703; that “Isaac” is the good of the rational, see n. 3012, 3194, 3210.) and besides, Abraham together with Isaac represents the Divine good that inflows directly, and Laban collateral good, or that which does not inflow directly (see n. 3665, 3778). Collateral good, or that which does not inflow directly, is that good which has been called mediate good, for this good derives many things from worldly things which appear as goods, but are not goods; while the good that flows in directly is that which comes immediately from the Lord, or from the Lord mediately through heaven, and is Divine good separated from such worldly good as just referred to.

[2] Every man who is being regenerated is first in mediate good, in order that it may serve for introducing genuine goods and truths; but after it has served this use, this good is separated, and the man is brought to good which flows in more directly. Thus the man who is being regenerated is perfected by degrees. For example: he who is being regenerated believes at first that the good which he thinks and does is from himself, and that he also merits something; for he does not yet know, and if he knows he does not comprehend, that good can flow in from some other source, nor that it can be otherwise than that he should be recompensed, because he does it from himself. Unless at first he believed this, he would never do any good. But by this means he is initiated not only into the affection of doing what is good, but also into knowledges concerning good and also concerning merit; and when in this manner he has been led into the affection of doing what is good, he then begins to think differently and to believe differently, namely, that good flows in from the Lord, and that by the good which he does from his own he merits nothing; and at last when he is in the affection of willing and doing what is good, he altogether rejects self-merit, and even has an aversion for it, and is affected with good from good. When he is in this state, good flows in directly.

[3] Take also as an example conjugial love: the good which precedes and initiates is beauty, or agreement of manners, or an outward adaptation of the one to the other, or equality of condition, or a desired condition. These goods are the first mediate goods of conjugial love. Afterwards comes conjunction of minds, wherein the one wills as the other, and perceives delight in doing that which pleases the other. This is the second state; and then the former things, though still present, are no longer regarded. Finally there follows a unition in respect to celestial good and spiritual truth, in that the one believes as the other, and the one is affected by the same good as the other. When this state comes, both are together in the heavenly marriage, which is that of good and truth, and thus are in conjugial love—for conjugial love is nothing else—and the Lord then flows into the affections of both as into one affection. This is the good that flows in directly; but the former goods, which flowed in indirectly, served as means of introduction to this.

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Okususelwe Emisebenzini kaSwedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #3720

Funda lesi Sigaba

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

3720. This is none other than the house of God. That this signifies the Lord’s kingdom in the ultimate of order, is evident from the signification of the “house of God.” Mention is made of the “house of God” in many passages of the Word, and in the external sense, or according to the letter, it signifies a consecrated building where there is holy worship; but in the internal sense it signifies the church; and in a more universal sense, heaven; and in the most universal sense, the Lord’s universal kingdom; in the supreme sense, however, it signifies the Lord Himself as to the Divine Human. In the Word we sometimes read of the “house of God,” sometimes of the “temple,” both having the same signification, but with this difference-that the “house of God” is mentioned where good is treated of; but the “temple” where truth is treated of. From this it is manifest that by the “house of God” is signified the Lord’s celestial church, and in a more universal sense the heaven of the celestial angels, and in the most universal sense the Lord’s celestial kingdom, and in the supreme sense the Lord as to Divine good; and that by the “temple” is signified the Lord’s spiritual church, and in a more universal sense the heaven of the spiritual angels, in the most universal sense the Lord’s spiritual kingdom, and in the supreme sense the Lord as to Divine truth (see n. 2048). The reason why the “house of God” signifies the celestial which is of good, and the “temple” the spiritual which is of truth, is that in the Word a “house” signifies good (n. 710, 2233, 2234, 2559, 3128, 3652), and also because among the most ancient people the houses were constructed of wood, for the reason that “wood” signifies good (n. 643, 1110, 2784, 2812); whereas “temple” signifies truth, because the temples were constructed of stones; and that “stones” signify truths, may be seen above (n. 643, 1296, 1298).

[2] That “wood” and “stone” have such a signification, is not only evident from the Word where they are mentioned, but also from the representatives in the other life; for they who place merit in good works, appear to themselves to cut wood; and they who place merit in truths, in that they have believed themselves to have been better acquainted with truth than others, and yet have lived evilly, appear to themselves to cut stones; which things have often been seen by me. From this I was assured what is the signification of wood and stone, namely that “wood” signifies good, and “stone” truth; and also from the experience that when a wooden house was seen, there was instantly presented an idea of good; but when a house of stone was seen, there was presented an idea of truth; concerning which I was instructed by angels. For this reason, when mention is made in the Word of the “house of God,” there is presented to the angels the idea of good, and good of such a quality as is treated of in that connection; and when mention is made of a “temple,” there is presented to them the idea of truth, and truth of such a quality as is treated of in that connection. From this again we can infer how deep and utterly hidden are the heavenly arcana in the Word.

[3] The reason why by the “house of God” is here signified the Lord’s kingdom in the ultimate of order, is that Jacob is treated of, by whom is represented the Lord’s Divine natural, as frequently shown above. The natural is in the ultimate of order, for in this all the interior things are terminated and are together; and because they are together, and thus things innumerable are viewed together as a one, there is relative obscurity there. This relative obscurity has been spoken of several times before.

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.