IBhayibheli

 

Genesis 31

Funda

   

2 Iay Yaqub əṃəttəy daɣ mazalan ən Laban fəl win n anin.

3 Iṇṇa Əməli i Yaqub: «Əqqəl akal ən marawan nak, ɣur aɣaywan n abba nnak, əṣṣana daɣ ak.»

4 Iɣra ddu Yaqub Raxil əd Leyya s əṣuf wa iha ənta d aharay-net wa ənḍərran.

5 Iṇṇ asnat: «Əgrəɣ in as šiṃətəkwəyen n abba nnakmat wər di əṇfenat šilat n anin, mišan Məššina n abba nin illa ɣur-i.

6 Təṣṣanmat iṃan nakmat as wər din əglema daɣ təɣurad in wala, y əššəɣəl n abba nnakmat.

7 Mišan iyyəwan i təkaddilt, iyyəwan əsəṃṃəttəy n alxaqq in. Mišan wər t'ikfa Məššina turagat n a di agu əššur.

8 S əmmək en da kud a iṇṇa win šaɣarnen a əṃosnen alxaqq in, ket-nasnat təntawen erawnat du ikərwatan šaɣarnen, kudeɣ iṇṇa win golənditan a iṃosan alxaqq in ənta da təntawen erawnat du ikərwatan əganen igolənditan.

9 Məššina iṃan-net as di ikfa daɣ aharay n abba nnakmat

10 Daɣ tamert ta n sabdar ən təmenesen ad ənaya daɣ tərgət isawalan əganen əgolənditan əd wiyyad šaɣarnen əd wiyyad farfoznen, as əzagan təntawen n aharay a.

11 Iṇṇ'i angalos ən Məššina daɣ tərgət "Yaqub" Əṇṇeɣ-as "hun".

12 Iṇṇ'i: "Ədkəl aṣawad nak, ad tagga isawalan win əzagnen təntawen n aharay əgan əgolənditan, šaɣera madeɣ farfoza. Adi wər t id'eway ar as ənaya a wa dak iga Laban.

13 Nak Məššina ən Betel wa dak d'inafalalan ɣur Betel edag wa daɣ tənɣala widi fəl təhunt, edag wa daɣ i tədkala arkawal. Əmərədda, əṇkər,əg̣məd akal a, əqqəl akal ən marwan nak.»

14 Təṇṇa Raxil əd Leyya i Yaqub: «Wər nəla tadagart ən təkasit daɣ abba nnana.

15 Idkal ana šilat ən təmagaren id inazzan danaɣ in iga, inɣa azrəf wa din nənza, awalla za ar inɣ ay, azrəf wa as imməkkan a tu nilu.

16 Daɣ adi təgərgist kul ta dd'ibaz Məššina daɣ abba nnana šin maddan-nəna. Əmərədda agu a w'as dak iṇṇa Məššina.»

17 Isammatag Yaqub i təzrek, issəwan maddan-əs əd təḍoden-net olaman,

18 izzərgaz ihərwan-net, eway ərrəzəɣan kul win sər-əs əggaznen daɣ Mesofotami, ikk' akal wa n Kanan ɣur Isxaq abba nnet.

19 Ikka Laban edagg ən talazay ən təḍuft n aharay nnet, tokar du Raxil aṣṣənaṃan-net dəffər-əs.

20 Ikkərras Yaqub Laban wa n aw Aram s as iḍḍəggag dəffər-əs wər das imel.

21 Iḍḍəggag d a wa ila kul, iɣras agarew wa n Fərat, innəmad ikallan n ədɣaɣan win Gilhad.

22 Əzəl wa n karad igraw Laban isalan n əḍəggəg ən Yaqub.

23 Ilkam as ənta əd meddan ən šəqqaɣan-net ewadan tu dəffər əṣṣ' aḍan n əšikəl daɣ ədɣaɣan win Gilhad.

24 As ig' ahad inafalal Məššina i Laban daɣ tərgət iṇṇ'as: «Ənkəd y ad taga arat i Yaqub gər olaɣ wala ibrar.»

25 As ewad Laban Yaqub ikras ahaket-net daɣ akal wa n ədɣaɣan ən Gilhad. Iga Laban əd meddan-net a wen da.

26 Iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Ma təge da? Təkkərrasaɣ i, tewaya šibararen in as taṇṇa šiməskasa n əməgər?

27 Ma fəl du təḍəggaga daɣ əssir? Mas di təkkərrasa sas di wər təmela? Ənnar di təmala ayyaq qay tagla du daɣ tədəwit d aṣak daw maslan ən tandiwen d əṇzadan.

28 Wər di toyyeɣ ad əzələmmeɣ ihayawan in əd təbararen in, agaɣ asan šiwaṭriwen. Təgeɣ təṃətəkwəyt n əmeskəl!

29 Əleɣ fərregat n ad awan əɣšada. Mišan ənḍod imməgrad sər-i Məššina n abba nnak, iṇṇ'i: "Ənkəd y ad tagaɣ arat i Yaqub gər olaɣ wala ibrar."

30 Əgreɣ teklay nak fəlas əṣuf a kay iggazan n aɣaywan nawan mišan ma fəl tokara du aṣṣanaman in?»

31 Iṇṇa Yaqub i Laban: «Awalla, təksəda a əgeɣ as a daɣ i tabəza ašš-ek əs təɣurad.

32 Daɣ batu n aṣṣanaman nak i ɣur tan du təgrawa ad aṃṃat! Səffətəktək a wa əle tədkəla a wa təle dat təgiyyawen n aytedan nana!» Wər iṣṣen Yaqub as Raxil a du tokarat aṣṣanaman.

33 Igla Laban isaffataktak ehan wa n Yaqub d ahan wa n Leyya əd wa n təwahayen-net an ṣanatat, wər igrew wala. Ɣur ag̣amad-net ehan wa n Leyya iggaz wa n Raxil. Ənta Raxil a tədkalat aṣṣanaman təɣbar tan daɣ təxawit-net, təqqim daɣ-as. Adi da fəl təṇṇa y abba-net assaɣa wa d'iggaz šin əsəffətəktək n ahaket-net: «Ad wər təššəka abba nin as wər əbdeda ɣur iguz nak fəlas alɣadat a di təgrawat.» Isaffataktak Laban ahaket-net kul mišan wər igrew aṣṣanaman-net.

36 Iggaz alham Yaqub təzzar imməṣtan əd Laban iṇṇa: «Məni a wa əɣšada? Ma iṃos abakkad in as di təhhore?

37 Daɣ adi əmərədda ad təsaffataktaka ilalan nin kul ma du təgrawa təleq qu? Sakn'ay y aytedan in əd win nak ad aggayen fəl a wa illan gar-ena!

38 Əmərədda ṣanatat təṃərwen n awatay a əge əlle ɣur-ək. Wər kala əgarnat ayfəd nak wala wəlli nnak, wər kala ətšeɣ ijəɣal n əsəgən nak.

39 Teɣsay nak ətšan wəxsan wər dak du tiwəya iləzgan-net, nak tat irazzaman daɣ təɣurad in id təḍgazaɣ i gər təmmitša ehad wala ezal.

40 Nak a təkaggay təfuk s azal, inɣ'i asamed s ahad, aṃaran faw iṃṃokar eṭəs in.

41 Əmmək en da as daɣ ṣanatat təṃərwen n awatay šin əge ɣur-ək: Maraw elan d əkkoz taggalt ən təbararen nak ṣanatat, ṣədis elan fəl aharay-nnak, təyyəwanaɣ əsəṃṃəttəy n alxaqq in.

42 Kundab' as Məššina n abba nin Ibrahin, wa iksud abba nin Isxaq as əheɣ taɣlift-net, illikan as əmərədda təstaɣaɣ i da əqquran fassan nin. Mišan Məššina ogga arkaṇay nin d iket n əššəɣəl iṣṣohen wa dak əge, adi da fəlas əṇdod, immigrad daɣ batu nin.»

43 Iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Šibararen a ši nnu, bararan a i nnu, eharay a i nnu, a wa təhaṇṇaya da kul i nnu. Mišan, əmərədda, wər əle batu fəl təbararen in əd bararan nasnat.

44 «Daɣ a di əmərədda nənəmətkəlet arkawal ən tassaq ad iqqal təgiyya gar-i dər-ək.

45 Təzzar itkal Yaqub təhunt issəɣt-et əs təzzəgrət-net, təqqal təṃətirt.

46 Təzzar iṇṇa Yaqub y aytedan-net: «Amədat-du šihun!» Əgan-tanat sakfaw, ətšan fall-as.

47 Iga Laban i sakfaw wen eṣəm Yəgar-Sahaduta (almaɣna sakfaw wa n təgiyya), daɣ awal-net, ig-as Yaqub eṣəm əntada Galed (almaɣna sakfaw wa n təgiyya).

48 Iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Sakfaw a ən təhun a da ənta iṃosan təgiyya gar-i dər-ək azalada», a di da fəl iga eṣəm Galed.

49 Iga eṣəm tolas Mitsfa (almaɣna edag n ag̣g̣az), id Laban iṇṇa tolas: «Aglet Əməli išišawalana a nəga daɣ ənəməggag.

50 «As təjajjargana šibararen-in madeɣ təzlafa šiyyad šiḍoden, aktəw iṃan-nak as kud ɣur-na wər illa awedan da Məššina a iṃosan təgiyya n arkawal wa nənamatkal!» Təzzar iṇṇa Laban i Yaqub: «Təhunt ta əssəɣta da əs təzzəgrət-net əd sakfaw wa,əssəbdadaq-qan gar-i dər-ək, ad aggayyen as wər ana z-iggəz i tan z-akəyan əhan tu arak ṃan.

53 «Məššina n Ibrahim d Əməli ən Naxor ələkanet-ana!» Dəffər a wen ihad Yaqub əs Məššina wa iksud abba-nnet Isxaq ar ad-iṭṭəf arkawal.

54 Təzzar iga Yaqub takutay fəl adɣaɣ, iššedaw du sər-əs iššəqqaɣan-net. Ədrawan-tat, ənamaṇsan ahad wə di fəl adɣaɣ.

   

Okususelwe Emisebenzini kaSwedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #4189

Funda lesi Sigaba

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

4189. And now come, let us make a covenant, I and thou, and let it be for a witness between me and thee. That this signifies the conjunction of the Divine natural with the goods of works, in which are they who are aside, or the Gentiles, is evident from the signification of a “covenant,” as being conjunction (see n. 665, 666, 1023, 1038, 1864, 1996, 2003, 2021); from the representation here of Laban, who is “I,” as being the goods of works, as shown in what follows; and from the representation of Jacob, who here is “thou,” as being the Divine natural.

[2] That by “Laban” are here signified the goods of works in which are those who are aside, or the Gentiles, is for the reason that as Laban is now separated from Jacob (that is, mediate good from the good Divine of the natural), he can no longer represent mediate good; but as he had served for a means, he therefore represents some good, and indeed good that is aside, or collateral good. Before Laban had been thus conjoined with Jacob, he represented collateral good (see n. 3612, 3665, 3778), and accordingly good that is aside, the nature of which will be stated in what follows. It is similar with Laban as with Lot and Ishmael. So long as Lot was with Abraham, he represented the Lord as to the external sensuous man (n. 1428, 1434, 1547, 1597, 1598, 1698); but when he had been separated from Abraham, he represented those who are in external worship, but yet in charity (n. 2317, 2324, 2371, 2399), and also several states of the church successively (n. 2422, 2459).

[3] It was so with Ishmael: so long as he was with Abraham, he represented the Lord’s first rational (n. 1893, 1949-1951); but when he was afterwards separated, he represented those who are called the spiritual (n. 2078, 2691, 2699, 3263, 3268). Such also is the case with Laban. The reason is, that although a separation has been made, conjunction still remains, but not that which existed before. It is for this reason that Laban here and in what now follows represents the goods of works, such as are with those who are aside, that is, with the Gentiles. The Gentiles are said to be aside, or in collateral good, because they are outside of the church. Those within the church who are in truth and good are not in a collateral line, but in the direct line, for they have the Word, and through the Word they have direct communication with heaven, and through heaven with the Lord; but not so the Gentiles, for these have not the Word, and know not the Lord. For this reason they are said to be aside. Those Gentiles are meant who are in the goods of works, that is, who are in externals within which there is the good of charity. These are what are called the “goods of works,” but not “good works;” for good works may exist without having goods within, but not so the goods of works.

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Okususelwe Emisebenzini kaSwedenborg

 

Arcana Coelestia #3665

Funda lesi Sigaba

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

3665. To the house of Bethuel, thy mother’s father, and take thee from thence a woman of the daughters of Laban, thy mother’s brother. That this signifies collateral external good, and the derivative truth that was to be conjoined, is evident from the representation of Bethuel, as being the good of the Gentiles of the first class (see n. 2865); from the representation of Laban, as being the affection of good in the natural man, that is the affection of external good, and properly the collateral good of a common stock (n. 3129, 3130, 3160, 3612); and from the signification of “taking a woman of his daughters,” as being to be associated to or conjoined with the derivative affections of truth. That “taking a woman” denotes to be conjoined, is manifest, and that “daughters” are affections, may be seen above (n. 568, 2362, 3024). Hence it is evident what these words signify, namely, that the good of the natural, here represented by Jacob, was to be conjoined with the truths derived from collateral external good.

[2] The case herein is this: When man is being regenerated, he is at first led by the Lord as an infant, then as a child, afterwards as a youth, and at last as an adult. The truths he learns as an infant child are altogether external and corporeal, for as yet he is unable to apprehend interior truths. These truths are no other than knowledges of such things as contain, in their inmost, things Divine; for there are knowledges of things that do not contain anything Divine in their inmost; and there are knowledges that do contain it. The knowledges that do contain what is Divine are such that they can admit interior truths more and more, successively, and in order; whereas the knowledges which do not contain what is Divine are such that they do not admit, but reject these interior truths; for the knowledges of external and corporeal good and truth are like ground, which according to its quality admits seeds of one nature and not of another, bringing to maturity one kind of seeds, and suffocating another. Knowledges which contain in their inmost what is Divine, admit into them spiritual and celestial truth and good, possessing this capacity from the Divine which is within, and which disposes; but the knowledges which do not contain in them what is Divine, admit only what is false and evil, such being their nature. Those knowledges of external and corporeal truth which admit spiritual and celestial truth and good, are here signified by the “daughters of Laban of the house of Bethuel;” but those which do not thus admit them, are signified by the “daughters of Canaan.”

[3] The knowledges which are learned from infancy to childhood are like most general vessels, which are to be filled with goods, and in proportion as they are filled the man is enlightened. If the vessels are such as to admit into them genuine goods, then the man is enlightened from the Divine that is within them, and this successively more and more; but if they are such that genuine goods cannot be in them, then the man is not enlightened. It does appear that he is enlightened, but this is from a fatuous light, which is that of falsity and evil, whereby he is more and more darkened in respect to good and truth.

[4] Such knowledges are manifold, and so manifold that their genera can scarcely be counted; still less can their species be discriminated; for they are derived in many ways from the Divine through the rational into the natural. For some flow in immediately through the good of the rational, and thence into the good of the natural; and also into the truth of this good, and thence further into the external or corporeal natural, where also they divide into various streams. And some flow in mediately through the truth of the rational into the truth of the natural, and also into the good of this truth, and thence further into the external or corporeal natural (see n. 3573, 3616). They are like nations, families, and houses, and like the blood-relationships and the connections therein, there being in them some which descend in a direct line from the first father, and some which descend in a line more and more indirect or collateral. In the heavens these things are most distinct, for all the societies therein, and thus the proximities, are distinguished according to the genera and species of good and truth (n. 685, 2508, 2524, 2556, 2739, 3612). These societies and proximities were represented by the most ancient people, who were celestial men, by their dwelling together classified in this manner into nations, families, and houses (n. 470, 471, 483, 1159, 1246); and for this reason it was enjoined that they who were of the representative church should contract marriages within the families of their own nation; for in this way they could represent heaven, and the conjunction of its societies as to good and truth-as was the case here with Jacob, in that he was to go to the house of Bethuel, his mother’s father, and take him a woman of the daughters of Laban, his mother’s brother.

[5] With regard to these very knowledges of external or corporeal truth which are from collateral good, and which as before said contain in them what is Divine, and thus are capable of admitting genuine goods-such as are the knowledges with young children who are afterwards regenerated-they are in general such as are contained in the historicals of the Word, such as what is said therein concerning paradise, concerning the first man in it, concerning the tree of life in its midst, and concerning the tree of knowledge, where was the serpent that practiced the deception. These are the knowledges that contain within them what is Divine, and admit into them spiritual and celestial goods and truths, because they represent and signify these goods and truths. Such knowledges also are all other things in the historicals of the Word, as what is said concerning the tabernacle and the temple and concerning the construction of these; in like manner what is said concerning the garments of Aaron and of his sons; also concerning the feasts of tabernacles, of the firstfruits of harvest, of unleavened bread, and concerning other like things. When such knowledges as these are known and thought of by a young child, the angels who are with him think of the Divine things which they represent and signify; and because the angels are affected therewith, their affection is communicated, and causes the delight and pleasure which the child experiences therein; and prepares his mind to receive genuine truths and goods. Such and very many others are the knowledges of external and corporeal truth that are derived from collateral good.

  
Yiya esigabeni / 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.