2243. Dat de woorden ‘of zij, naar haar geroep, dat tot Mij gekomen is, de voleinding gedaan hebben, en zo niet, Ik zal het weten’ betekenen, of het boze het toppunt bereikt heeft, blijkt uit de betekenis van het geroep, namelijk het valse, waarover kort tevoren in nr. 2240; er zijn twee soorten valse, zoals daar aan het einde is gezegd: namelijk het valse dat uit het boze voortkomt en het valse dat het boze voortbrengt. Het valse dat uit het boze voortkomt, is alles wat de mens denkt wanneer hij in het boze is, namelijk wat het boze begunstigt, zoals bijvoorbeeld wanneer hij de echt breekt, dat hij dan over de echtbreuk denkt, dat het geoorloofd is, dat het gepast is, dat het een bekoring van het leven is, dat de voortbrenging van kinderen er door bevorderd wordt en dergelijke meer, hetgeen alle valsheden uit het boze zijn. Het valse dat het boze voortbrengt is echter dit, wanneer de mens het een of ander beginsel vanwege zijn religie aanneemt en dientengevolge gelooft, dat het goed of heilig is, hoewel het toch in zichzelf boos is, zo bijvoorbeeld, doet degene die vanwege zijn religie gelooft dat een mens zalig kan maken en deze mens daarom vereert en aanbidt, uit dit valse het boze; dus uit elke andere religie, die in zichzelf vals is. Daar het valse uit het boze voortkomt en het valse het boze voortbrengt, wordt het hier een geroep genoemd en betekent als iets algemeens, wat het insluit, namelijk het boze, hetgeen ook duidelijk hieruit blijkt, dat gezegd wordt ‘of zij naar haar geroep, dat tot Mij gekomen is, de voleinding gedaan hebben’ waar haar geroep in het enkelvoud wordt gezegd, en ‘zij hebben voleinding gedaan’ in het meervoud. Wat de voleinding is, is in het eerste deel in nr. 1857 aangetoond; bovendien kan men uit de Kerken opmaken, wat de voleinding is: de Oudste Kerk, Mens genaamd, was van alle de meest hemelse; deze ontaardde in de loop van de tijd zozeer van het goede van de liefde, dat er tenslotte niets hemels meer overbleef en toen was haar voleinding daar, en dit wordt beschreven door hun staat vóór de vloed. De Oude Kerk, die na de vloed bestond en Noach werd genoemd en minder hemels was, week ook na verloop van tijd zozeer van het goede van de naastenliefde af, dat er niets van de naastenliefde overbleef, want zij werd deels in magie veranderd, deels in afgoderij en deels in iets van de naastenliefde gescheiden dogmatisch, en toen was haar voleinding daar. Daarop volgde een andere Kerk, die de Hebreeuwse werd genoemd en nog minder hemels en geestelijk was; in uiterlijke riten stelden zij een bepaalde heilige eredienst; deze werd na verloop van tijd op velerlei wijze misvormd, en die uiterlijke eredienst veranderde in een afgodische, en toen was haar voleinding daar. De vierde Kerk werd daarna hersteld bij Jakobs nakomelingen, en deze had niets hemels en geestelijks, maar alleen het uitbeeldende daarvan, waarom deze Kerk een uitbeeldende Kerk van de hemelse en geestelijke dingen was, want wat de riten uitbeeldden en betekenden, wisten zij niet; maar zij werd ingesteld, opdat er toch nog enig verband zou zijn tussen de mens en de hemel, zoals er is tussen de uitbeeldingen van het goede en het ware en het goede en ware zelf; deze Kerk ging tenslotte zozeer in valsheden en boosheden over, dat elke rite een afgodische werd, en toen was haar voleinding daar. Toen dan ook, na de zo geleidelijk slinkende Kerken, in de laatste het verband tussen het menselijk geslacht en de hemel geheel en al verbroken was, dermate dat het menselijk geslacht te gronde zou zijn gegaan, daar er geen Kerk was om een verbinding of band te vormen, zie de nrs. 468, 637, 931, 2054, kwam de Heer in de wereld en verbond door de vereniging van het Goddelijk wezen met het Menselijk wezen in Zichzelf de hemel met de aarde en stichtte toen tevens de nieuwe Kerk, die de Christelijke Kerk werd genoemd. Deze Kerk was aanvankelijk in het goede van het geloof en men leefde onderling als broeders in naastenliefde, maar in de loop van de tijd week zij op verschillende wijzen af en is heden ten dage van dien aard geworden, dat men zelfs niet eens meer weet, dat de grondslag van het geloof de liefde tot de Heer en de liefde jegens de naaste is, en hoewel men volgens de leer zegt, dat de Heer de Zaligmaker van het menselijk geslacht is en men na de dood zal opstaan, dat er een hemel en een hel is, geloven het toch maar weinigen; daar deze Kerk van dien aard is geworden, is haar voleinding niet ver weg. Hieruit kan blijken wat de voleinding is, namelijk dat zij daar is, wanneer het boze het toppunt heeft bereikt; evenzo is het in het bijzonder gesteld, namelijk bij ieder mens; maar hoe het met de voleinding in het bijzonder bij eenieder is gesteld, zal door de Goddelijke barmhartigheid, gezegd worden in hetgeen volgt. In het Woord wordt herhaaldelijk over de voleinding gehandeld en de staat die voorafgaat beschreven door verwoesting en verlating, waarop bezoeking volgt.

171. Of Falsity.

There are innumerable kinds of falsity, namely, as many as there are evils, and evils and falsities are according to their origins, which are many (n. 1188, 1212, 4729, 4822, 7574). There is falsity from evil, or the falsity of evil; and there is evil from the falsity, or the evil of falsity; and falsity again from thence (n. 1679, 2243). From one falsity that is assumed as a principle, falsities flow in a long series (n. 1510-1511, 4717, 4721). There is falsity from the lusts of the love of self and of the world; and there is falsity from the fallacies of the senses (n. 1295, 4729). There are falsities of religion; and there are falsities of ignorance (n. 4729, 8318, 9258). There is falsity which contains good, and falsity which does not contain good (n. 2863, 9304, 10109, 10302). There is what is falsified (n. 7318-7319, 10648).

The quality of the falsity of evil (n. 6359, 7272, 9304, 10302). The quality of the evil of falsity (n. 2408, 4818, 7272, 8265, 8279). The falsities from evil appear like mists, and impure waters over the hells (n. 8138, 8146, 8210). Such waters signify falsities (n. 739, 790[1-4], 7307). They who are in hell speak falsities from evil (n. 1695, 7351-7352, 7357, 7392, 7699). They who are in evil cannot do otherwise than think what is false when they think from themselves (n. 7437).

There are falsities of religion which agree with good, and falsities which disagree (n. 9258). Falsities of religion, if they do not disagree with good, do not produce evil but with those who are in evil of life (n. 8318). Falsities of religion are not imputed to those who are in good, but to those who are in evil (n. 8051, 8149). Every falsity may be confirmed, and then it appears like truth (n. 5033, 6865, 8521, 8780). Care should be taken lest falsities of religion be confirmed, since the persuasion of falsity principally arises from thence (n. 845, 8780). How hurtful the persuasion of falsity is (n. 794, 806, 5096, 7686). A persuasion of falsity is perpetually exciting such things as confirm falsities (n. 1510-1511, 2477). They who are in the persuasion of falsity are interiorly bound (n. 5096). In the other life, they who are in a strong persuasion of falsity, when they approach others, close up their rational, and as it were suffocate it (n. 3895, 5128).

Truths which are not genuine, and also falsities, may be consociated with genuine truths; but falsities which contain good, and not falsities in which is evil (n. 3470-3471, 4551-4552, 7344, 8149, 9298). Falsities which contain good are received by the Lord as truths (n. 4736, 8149). The good which has its quality from falsity is accepted by the Lord, if there is ignorance, and therein is innocence and a good end (n. 7887).

Evil falsifies truth, because it draws aside and applies truth to evil (n. 8094, 8149). Truth is said to be falsified, when it is applied to evil by confirmations (n. 8602). Falsified truth is contrary to truth and good (n. 8602). For further particulars respecting the falsification of truth (see n. 7318-7319, 10648).

4818. 'And there Judah saw the daughter of a man, a Canaanite' means the affection for evil begotten by falsity springing from evil. This is clear from the meaning of 'the daughter' as the affection for good, dealt with in 2362, and in the contrary sense as the affection for evil, 3024; from the meaning of 'a man' as one who has intelligence and, in the abstract sense, as truth, but in the contrary sense as one who has no intelligence and as falsity, dealt with just above in 4816; and from the meaning of 'a Canaanite' as evil, dealt with in 1573, 1574. From these meanings it is evident that 'the daughter of a man, a Canaanite' means evil begotten by falsity springing from evil. What evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is will be stated below.

[2] Here the origins of the tribe of Judah must be stated first, since these are the subject in this chapter. That tribe, or the Jewish nation, has three origins, the first being Shelah, Judah's son by his Canaanite wife, the second and third being Perez and Zerah, Judah's sons by his daughter-in-law. The descent of the whole Jewish nation from these three sons of Judah is evident from the list of Jacob's sons and grandsons who accompanied him into Egypt, Genesis 46:12, and also from the grouping of them into families, referred to in Moses,

The sons of Judah according to their families were: of Shelah, the family of the Shelanites; of Perez, the family of the Parzites; of Zerah, the family of the Zarhites. Numbers 26:20; 1 Chronicles 4:21.

From this the nature of that nation's origin is evident; that is to say, a third of them were descended from a Canaanite mother and two thirds from a daughter-in-law. They were all therefore the product of an illicit union, because marriages to daughters of the Canaanites were strictly forbidden - as may be seen in Genesis 24:3; Exodus 34:16; Deuteronomy 7:3; 1 Kings 11:2; and Chapters 9, 10 of Ezra - while lying with a daughter-in-law was a capital offence, as is evident in Moses,

As regards a man who has lain with his daughter-in-law, both of them shall be killed; they have committed perversion; ¹ their blood shall be upon them. Leviticus 20:12.

What Judah and his daughter-in-law had done together was linked by him to the law regarding leviratical marriages, which lays down the duty of a brother but never of a father, as is evident from verse 26 of the present chapter. Judah's linking of their deed together to this law implies that the sons of Tamar were to be recognized as the sons of Er the firstborn, who was born from the Canaanite mother, and who was evil in Jehovah's eyes and was therefore made to die, verse 7. For initially those born in a leviratical marriage did not belong to the one from whom they had been conceived but to him whose seed was being raised up, as is clear from Deuteronomy 25:5-6, and also from verses 8 and 9 of the present chapter. Furthermore, the sons whom Tamar bore were the result of whoredom, for when Judah went in to her he thought she was a prostitute, verses 15-16, 21. From all this one can see the origin of the Jewish nation and what kind of origin this was; and one can see that their words in John were founded on a lie,

The Jews said to Him, We were not born of whoredom. John 8:41.

[3] As regards what that origin implies and what it represents, this is evident from what follows. That is to say, those people's interiors were the same or had the same origin. Judah's marriage to a Canaanite implies and represents an origin that consisted in evil begotten by falsity springing from evil, for this is what is meant in the internal sense by 'the daughter of a man, a Canaanite'. And his lying through whoredom with his daughter-in-law implies and represents condemnation due to truth falsified by evil, for throughout the Word 'whoredom' means the falsification of truth, see 3703. ² Evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is an evil life resulting from a false teaching hatched by the evil of self-love - that is, by those governed by this evil - and backed up by a use of the sense of the letter of the Word. This is what the origin of the evil in the Jewish nation is like, and what the origin of the evil is like in the Christian world, especially among those meant in the Word by Babel. The nature of that evil is such that it closes every path leading into the internal man, closing every path so completely that no conscience at all can be formed there. For if any evil done by a person is due to a false teaching, he believes that this is good because he believes that it is true. He accordingly does it, because he has warrant to do so, with a sense of freedom and delight. All this being so, heaven is closed so completely against him that it cannot be opened.

[4] As an example to explain what this evil is like, take those who from the evil of self-love believe the following: One nation alone is Jehovah's chosen people, in comparison with whom all the rest of mankind are slaves. The rest, they believe, are so base that they may be killed at will and may be treated in a cruel fashion. Such ideas, likewise backed up by a use of the sense of the letter of the Word, were the beliefs of the Jewish nation, as they are also of the Babylonish ³ nation at the present day. Whatever kind of evil done by the latter that is the result of that false teaching, and of any other false teachings built on that one as their foundation, is evil begotten by falsity springing from evil. It destroys the internal man and shuts out even the possibility of any conscience being formed there. These people are referred to in the Word as those immersed in bloodshed; for they treat in savage ways the entire human race because it does not venerate what they believe and so themselves too, and because it does not present its gifts on their altars.

[5] Take another example - those who from the evil of self-love and love of the world believe in the necessity for someone to act as the Lord's vicar on earth. They believe that this person has power to open and close heaven, and so to control everyone's mind and conscience, and they back up this falsity by a use of the sense of the letter of the Word. In their case whatever kind of evil they perform as a result of these ideas is evil begotten by falsity springing from evil, which similarly destroys the internal man in those who are led by that evil to lay claim to that power and so control others. That evil destroys the internal man so completely that people cease to know any longer what the internal man is, or to know of the existence of conscience in anyone, with the result that they cease to believe any longer in a life after death, or in the existence of hell and of heaven, however much they talk about these.

[6] The nature of this evil is such that people in the world cannot tell it apart from other evils; but in the next life angels recognize it quite clearly. For in the next life the countless differences in the essential nature and the origin of evils and falsities are in full view; and it is also the genera and species to which these evils and falsities belong that mark off the hells from one another. Of these countless differences man knows scarcely anything. He believes in the existence of evil but has no knowledge of its essential nature, for the simple reason that he does not know what good is, and does not know what good is because he does not know what charity is. If he knew what the good of charity was he would also know its opposites, which are evils, and also their differences.

Mga talababa: