Bibeln

 

Genesis 24

Studie

   

2 Əzəl iyyan iṇṇa Ibrahim y əkli-nnet wa n asahaw-net, wa inəṭṭafan əd təla-nnet kul: «Ag'əfus nak daw taɣma-nin,

3 amaran təhədaɣ-i s Əməli, Məššina ən jənnawan əd ṃədlan, as du-wər-za-tədkəla i barar-in tanṭut daɣ təbararen ən Kəl Kanan win ɣur əɣsara,

4 mišan ad-takka akal-in daɣ marwan-in tədkəla-du tanṭut i barar-in Isxaq.»

5 Ijjəwwab-as əkli: «Mijas tanṭut wər za-tardu s a-di-du-təlkəm əs kallan a da. Awak ad-awəya barar-nak s akal wa du-təg̣mada?»

6 Iṇṇ-as Ibrahim: «Kaššeday fəl ad-tewaya barar-in s akal en!

7 Əməli, Məššina wa n jənnawan, a di-du-ikkaṣan daɣ ahan n abba-nin əd marwan-in, iššewal-i təzzar idkal-i arkawal, iṇṇ-i: " Akal a da ad-t-akfa y əzzurriya-nnak", ənta iṃan-net ad-assaglu angalos-net dat-ək, amaran den da a-du-za-tədkəla tanṭut i barar-in.

8 As tugay tənṭut s a-dak-du-təlkəm təfal-kay təhuday ta d-i təge da. Mišan ad-wər-tawəya barar-in s akal en.»

9 Iga əkli əfus-net daw taɣma n Ibrahim, məšš-is, ihad as ad-ammazal a w'as das-iṇṇa.

10 Isannafran-du ṃaraw olaman daɣ ṃənas ən məšš-is, issəwər-tan aratan n Ibrahim win əlanen əlqimat. Iga anamod ən fallatan ən Mesofotami, ikka aɣrəm wa iha ahan ən Naxor, amaḍray n Ibrahim.

11 Issəgan olaman dagma n aṇu ihan ṭama n əɣrəm, ṭakəst, alwaq wa daɣ du-kattarnat təḍoden.

12 Iṭṭar s a wa: «Əməli, Məššina ən məšš-i Ibrahim, təṇsaraɣ-i azalada. Səṃṃətəkwəy əlluɣ-nak i məšš-i Ibrahim sa das-taga tara-nnet.

13 Nak da ɣur šaṭ a amaran šibararen n əɣrəm a-dd-əzrəgnat.

14 Ad-aṇsəya iyyat daɣ-asnat ad-i-du-takfu ətəkin-net ad-aššwa, as d-i-təṇṇa: " Yay ašəw, amaran ad-əššašwa olaman-nak tolas.", ad-əṣṣənaɣ as ənta a təfrana y əkli-nnak Isxaq. S asaway di ad-əṣṣəna as təsiṃatakwaya əlluɣ-nak i məšš-i.»

15 Wər iɣred d awal, as ogga Raqqiyetu təzay-du təssiwar ətəkin-net əzir-net, elles ən Bətuhel, rur-es ən Milka əd Naxor, amaḍray n Ibrahim.

16 Təmawat təgat šihussay šin əqqitasnen, wər təzday meddan. Təraṣ-du šaṭ, təḍnay ətəkin-net, təg̣g̣əzzay.

17 Ozal əkli issəlkad-as, iṇṇa: «Oṇsayaq-qam ad-i-taššašwa daɣ ətəkin-nam.»

18 Təṇṇ-as: «Ašəw, məšš-i!» Tərrorad əsəggətti n ətəkin y as ad-ašəw.

19 As išwa, təṇṇ-as: «Ad-əjjijəla y olaman-nak har ašwin kul.»

20 Tərrorad tanaɣla n ətəkin-net daɣ əɣlal, tozal təḍnay-t-idu har təššəšwa olaman kul.

21 A tat-izagaz-du aləs s əməkəyad da, wər iṇṇa arat fəl ad-inəy kud əməli a iṇsaran əšikəl-net wala.

22 As əšwan olaman, idkal-du aləs təzəbit n urəɣ təgat əzuk n ədinar ig-et daɣ tanjart-net. Idkal-du tolas ilkəzan əššin n urəɣ s akk-iyyan iga ṃaraw dinaran əd ṣəmmos, iqqan-as-tan.

23 «Ma kam erawan? Are daɣ-am ad-i-tu-təməla. Ill-ay adag daɣ ahan n abba-nnam daɣ ənṣeɣ ahad a nak əd win dər əddewa?»

24 Təjjəwwab-as: «Nak tabarart ən Bətuhel, rures ən Milka əd Naxor.»

25 Təṇṇ-as harwa: «Ehan-nana ih-ay əlmmuz d amassaḍon aggen d adag a daɣ tənṣeɣ.»

26 Issəjad aləs y Əməli, ig̣g̣oday-as.

27 Iṇṇa: «Əg̣g̣odayaɣ-ak ya Əməli, Məššina ən məšš-i Ibrahim! Təsannafalala harwa əlluɣ əd takawent-nak i məšš-i. Daɣ əšikəl a da, Əməli təzazzalalaɣaɣ-i əs marwan ən məšš-i.»

28 Tozal tabarart ad-tagu isalan y anna-nnet. Ənta Raqqiyetu təla amaqqar igan eṣəm Laban. As inay təzəbit d əlkəzan daɣ əfus ən tamaḍrayt-net, tolas isallu y awalan ən Raqqiyetu, təgannu: «A wa a di-iṇṇa aləs.» Iqqab-du, ozal, ikka-ddu aləs, ibdad illa ɣur olaman-net dagma ən šaṭ.

31 Təzzar iṇṇ-as: «Iyyaw məšš-is n albaraka n Əməli, mas din-təmala dəffər ahan? Nak əfradaɣ-ak ehan təggaza, d adag y ṃənas-nak?»

32 Ewaḍ-du aləs ehan, izazzabbat Laban ilalan fəl olaman, təzzar ikf-en ələmmuz, amaran d aṃan as iššorad aləs iḍaran-net əd ḍaran ən win dər iddew.

33 Dəffər a wen əkfan-tu teṭṭay. Mišan iṇṇa: «Nak wər z-atša iket wər əmelaɣ arat wa di-d-ewayan.» «Šiwəl!» iṇṇ-as Laban.

34 Təzzar iṇṇa: «Nak akli n Ibrahim.

35 Əməli ikfa məšš-i albaraka, iqqal amassehay ikf-ay ayfəḍ əd wəlli əd šitan, d əzrəf d urəɣ, d eklan əd taklaten, əd ṃənas d əzdan.

36 Sarata tanṭut ən məšš-i, təssaha-ddu barar daɣ tušaray-nnet i məšš-i; təzzar ikf-ay a wa ila kul.

37 Məšš-i issəhad-i as wər du-z-ədkəla i barar-net tanṭut daɣ təmawaḍen ən Kəl Kanan, daɣ akal wa təha təməɣsurt-net.

38 Mišan ad-akka ehan n abba-nnet əd marwan-net awəya-du i barar-net tanṭut.

39 Əṇṇeɣ i məšš-i: Mijas ad-tugəy tənṭut s ad-i-du-təlkəm.»

40 Ijjəwwab-i: «Əməli dat əjawanke, add-assaglu angalos-net idaw dər-ək. Təzzar iṇsər əšikəl-nak tədkəla-du i barar-in tanṭut ən marwan-in n aɣaywan n abba-nin.

41 A-kay-təfal təhuday ta di təge as din-toṣeɣ imarwan-in, kud tat-təgrawa wala.»

42 As d-oṣeɣ dagma ən šaṭ azalada, əgeɣ təwaṭray a da: «Əməli, Məššina ən məšš-i Ibrahim, təṇsaraɣ əšikəl a əgeɣ da.

43 Əmərədda ad əlle ɣur šaṭ ad aṇsəya təmawat ta du-təzragat a-di-tašašu daɣ ətəkin-net.

44 As di-təjjəwwab as:" Ašəw! amaran a-dak-əššašwa iṃənas-nak," ad-əṣṣənaɣ as ənta tanṭut ta təfrana i barar ən məšš-i.»

45 Harwa da wər əɣreda təwaṭray daɣ ṃan-in, as du-təraz Raqqiyetu, təssiwar ətəkin-net əzir-net toṣ-in šaṭ təjjojal. Oṇsayaq-qat: «Šašw-i-du, kud tarḍe.»

46 Tərrorad as di-du-təzzəl ətəkin-net, təṇṇ-i: «Ašəw, dəffər as təšwe ad-ak-aššašwa olaman-nak.» As əšwe, təššəšw-i olaman-in.

47 Assaɣa wa tat-əṣṣəstana əd wa tat-erawan, təjjəwwab-i: «Nak tabarart ən Bətuhel, rur-es ən Naxor, teraw Milka. Assaɣa di ad əge təzəbit daɣ tanjart-net, əgeɣ ilkəzan daɣ fassan-net.

48 Əssəjada y Əməli, əg̣g̣odayaɣ-as, Məššina ən məšš-i Ibrahim, a di-izazzalalaɣan s adag wa daɣ du-z-ədkəla i rur-es tabarart ən tagazay ən məšš-i.

49 Əmərədda əməlat-i kud təqbalam əs ṃan arḍanen a wa ira məšš-i. As wər ig'a di təməlam-i ad-səssəggəla s adagg iyyan.»

50 Ijjəwwab-as Laban əd Bətuhel: «A wa igi n Əməli iṃan-net daɣ a di wər nəfreg taṇṇa daɣ-as arat.

51 Raqqiyetu da, dat-ək da, idaw dər-əs. Təqqəlet tanṭut ən rures ən məšš-ik, s əmmək wa as t-iṇṇa Əməli.

52 As isla əkli n Ibrahim y awal wen, issəjad har aṃadal, ig̣g̣oday y Əməli.

53 Dəffər a wen ikkas-du daɣ lalan-net uɣənan n əzrəf d urəɣ əd təbəddaɣ ikf-en y Raqqiyetu. Ikfa amaqqar-net d anna-net šiṇufa əlanen əlqimat.

54 Itš'əkli n Ibrahim ənta əd win dər iddew, əšwan, ənṣan. As ṭufat aɣora ɣur taṇakra-nnasan iṇṇa əkli n Ibrahim y amaqqar d anna ən Raqqiyetu: «Sallamat-i ad əqqəla aɣaywan ən məšš-i.»

55 «Ad taqqam tabarart ɣur-na har tagu tamert iyyat, əḍḍəkud ən maraw aḍan, amaran taglu,» əṇṇan-as.

56 Iṇṇ-asan əkli tolas: «A di wər təsəllulem əmərədda ad iṇsar Əməli əšikəl-in. Ayyat-i ad-akka aɣaywan ən məšš-i.»

57 «Aɣratana tabarart ad-nəṣṣən a wa təṇṇa.»

58 Əɣran-du Raqqiyetu, əṣṣəstanan-tat: «Tareɣ tidawt n aləs a da?» Təṇṇa: «Awalla.»

59 Oyyan Raqqiyetu amaran əd təklit-net təddew d əkli n Ibrahim əd meddan-net.

60 Əgan albaraka-nnasan i Raqqiyetu, əṇṇan-as: «Əqqəl, kam tamaḍrayt-nana, maṣ ən giman ən giman ən meddan. Arnet əzzurriya-nnam iɣərəman win magzaran-net.»

61 Raqqiyetu əd taklaten-net əwaṇṇat olaman, əlkamnat y əkli. Təməwit a da as d-iddew əkli əd Raqqiyetu.

62 Ifal-du Isxaq aṇu ən Laxay-Roy, ihozan edag wa daɣ iɣsar daɣ aṃadal ən Negab.

63 Takəst iqqab iwilallag daɣ əṣuf, as ogga iṃənas a t-idu-zaynen.

64 Assaɣa w'ad togga Raqqiyetu Isxaq, tətaraggat-du fəl alam,

65 amaran təṣṣəstan akli: «Ma iṃos aləs wa dər za-naṃṃanay daɣ əṣuf?» «A wen məšš-i,» iṇṇ-as əkli. Amazay wen da ad təssəlsa udəm-net s əfər-net.

66 Issoɣal əkli y Isxaq a wa iga kul.

67 Dəffər a wen eway Isxaq Raqqiyetu s ahaket w'as kala tu-təha anna-nnet Sarata, təzzar izlaf-tat təqqal tanṭut-net, ir-et. Əknan ṃan-net dəffər iba n anna-nnet.

   

Från Swedenborgs verk

 

Arcana Coelestia #3036

Studera detta avsnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

3036. 'Who took me from my father's house and from the land of my nativity' means the Divine itself by whom the Lord freed Himself from the evils and from the falsities received from the mother. This is clear from the meaning of 'father's house' here and of 'land of nativity' as that received or inherited from the mother, which was the source of the evil and falsity which the Lord fought against and cast out, and in so doing made His Human Divine by His own power. Please see what has been stated in 3031 about the house and the land from which Abram came, and in what was stated previously to the effect that the Lord's heredity from Jehovah was Divine and from the mother evil, in 1414, 1444; that He fought against the evil inherited from the mother but never committed any evil of His own, 1444, 1573; and that the Lord cast out everything inherited from the mother till at length He was not her son, 2159, 2574, 2649. That which was inherited from the mother is what is meant in the internal sense by 'father's house' and 'land of nativity'. 'Father's house' means the evil inherited from the mother, 'land of nativity' the falsities inherited from her, for where evil exists falsities are present, for the two exist joined together. That He cast them out by His own power, see 1616, 1 1813, 1921, 2025, 2026, 2083, 2523.

Fotnoter:

11661 possibly intended

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Från Swedenborgs verk

 

Arcana Coelestia #1661

Studera detta avsnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

1661. 'And so it was in the days of Amraphel king of Shinar, Arioch king of Ellasar, Chedorlaomer king of Elam, and Tidal king of Goiim' means just so many kinds of apparent goods and truths which are not in themselves goods and truths, and which were present with the Lord's external Man. This becomes clear from the meaning of all these in the internal sense, and also from what follows. For the subject is the Lord's conflict against evils and falsities, here His first conflict which came during His childhood and earliest adolescence. That conflict He first entered into and endured after He had been endowed with knowledge and cognitions, hence the expression 'in the days of' these kings.

[2] Nobody can possibly fight against evils and falsities until he knows what evil and falsity are, not therefore until he has received instruction. A person does not know what evil is, still less what falsity is, before he is capable of understanding and of forming judgements for himself, which is the reason why a person does not enter into temptations until he has reached the age of maturity. Thus everyone is tempted in adult life, but the Lord was tempted even in childhood.

[3] Everyone fights first of all from the goods and truths he has received by means of cognitions, and it is from them and by means of them that he forms judgements concerning evils and falsities. Everyone furthermore when he first starts to fight imagines that these goods and truths from which he fights are his own, that is, he ascribes them to himself, and at the same time ascribes to himself the power by which he resists. This is allowed because a person cannot at the time know anything different. Before anyone has been regenerated he cannot possibly know, so as to be able to say that he knows, acknowledges, and believes, that no good or truth at all comes from self, but that everything good and true comes from the Lord; nor can he possibly know that he is unable by his own power to resist any evil or falsity. Indeed he does not know that evil spirits are activating and implanting the evils and falsities, still less that he is in communication with hell by means of evil spirits, and that hell presses on him like the sea against every part of a dike, which he can by no means resist by his own strength. Yet because he cannot do otherwise, until he has been regenerated, than imagine that he resists by his own strength, this too is permitted; and in this condition he is admitted into conflicts, or temptations. Subsequently however he becomes more and more enlightened.

[4] When a person's state is such that he imagines that good and truth originate in himself and that the power to resist is his own, the goods and truths from which he fights against evils and falsities are not really goods and truths, however much they appear to be so, for they have that which is his own within them, and he places self-merit in victory, boasting as though it were he that had overcome evil and falsity, when in fact it is the Lord alone who fights and overcomes. That this is indeed so none can know except those who are being regenerated by means of temptations.

[5] Because the Lord in earliest childhood was led into very serious conflicts against evils and falsities it was inevitable that at that time even He should think that way. This happened both because it was according to Divine order that His Human Essence should through continuous conflicts and victories be brought to the Divine Essence and united to it, and because the goods and truths from which He fought against evils and falsities belonged to the External Man. And because those goods and truths were not completely Divine they are for that reason called appearances of good and truth. His Divine Essence brought the Human Essence to itself in this way in order that it might overcome by its own power. The arcana here however are more than can possibly be described. In short, in those first conflicts the goods and truths residing with the Lord from which He fought were permeated by things inherited from the mother, and insofar as they were permeated by things inherited from the mother they were not Divine. Gradually however, as He overcame evil and falsity they were purified and made Divine.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.