Bibeln

 

1 Mose 43

Studie

   

1 Und die Hungersnot war schwer im Lande.

2 Und es geschah, als sie das Getreide aufgezehrt hatten, das sie aus Ägypten gebracht, da sprach ihr Vater zu ihnen: Ziehet wiederum hin, kaufet uns ein wenig Speise.

3 Und Juda sprach zu ihm und sagte: Der Mann hat uns ernstlich bezeugt und gesagt: Ihr sollt mein Angesicht nicht sehen, es sei denn euer Bruder bei euch.

4 Wenn du unseren Bruder mit uns senden willst, so wollen wir hinabziehen und dir Speise kaufen;

5 wenn du ihn aber nicht sendest, so werden wir nicht hinabziehen; denn der Mann hat zu uns gesagt: Ihr sollt mein Angesicht nicht sehen, es sei denn euer Bruder bei euch.

6 Da sprach Israel: Warum habt ihr mir das Leid angetan, dem Manne kundzutun, daß ihr noch einen Bruder habt?

7 Und sie sprachen: Der Mann erkundigte sich genau nach uns und unserer Verwandtschaft und sprach: Lebt euer Vater noch? Habt ihr noch einen Bruder? und wir taten es ihm kund nach diesen Worten. Konnten wir denn wissen, daß er sagen würde: Bringet euren Bruder herab?

8 Und Juda sprach zu Israel, seinem Vater: Sende den Knaben mit mir, und wir wollen uns aufmachen und ziehen, daß wir leben und nicht sterben, sowohl wir als du, als auch unsere Kinder. (O. Kindlein; so öfters)

9 Ich will Bürge für ihn sein, von meiner Hand sollst du ihn fordern; wenn ich ihn nicht zu dir bringe und ihn vor dein Angesicht stelle, so will ich alle Tage gegen dich gesündigt haben;

10 denn hätten wir nicht gezögert, gewiß, wir wären jetzt schon zweimal zurückgekehrt.

11 Und Israel, ihr Vater, sprach zu ihnen: Wenn es denn also ist, so tut dieses: Nehmet von dem Besten (And. üb.: dem Ertrag) des Landes in eure Gefäße und bringet dem Manne ein Geschenk hinab: ein wenig Balsam und ein wenig Traubenhonig, Tragant und Ladanum, Pistazien und Mandeln.

12 Und nehmet doppeltes Geld in eure Hand, und bringet das Geld, das euch oben in euren Säcken wieder geworden ist, in eurer Hand zurück; vielleicht ist es ein Irrtum.

13 Und nehmet euren Bruder und machet euch auf, kehret zu dem Manne zurück.

14 Und Gott, (El) der Allmächtige, gebe euch Barmherzigkeit vor dem Manne, daß er euch euren anderen Bruder und Benjamin loslasse. Und ich, wenn ich der Kinder beraubt bin, so bin ich der Kinder beraubt!

15 Da nahmen die Männer dieses Geschenk und nahmen doppeltes Geld in ihre Hand und Benjamin, und machten sich auf und zogen nach Ägypten hinab. Und sie traten vor Joseph.

16 Und als Joseph den Benjamin bei ihnen sah, sprach er zu dem, der über sein Haus war: Führe die Männer ins Haus und schlachte Schlachtvieh und richte zu; denn die Männer sollen mit mir zu Mittag essen.

17 Und der Mann tat, wie Joseph gesagt hatte; und der Mann führte die Männer in das Haus Josephs.

18 Da fürchteten sich die Männer, daß sie in das Haus Josephs geführt wurden, und sprachen: Um des Geldes willen, das im Anfang wieder in unsere Säcke gekommen ist, werden wir hineingeführt, daß man über uns herstürze und über uns herfalle und uns zu Knechten nehme, samt unseren Eseln.

19 Und sie traten zu dem Manne, der über das Haus Josephs war, und redeten zu ihm am Eingang des Hauses

20 und sprachen: Bitte, mein Herr! Wir sind im Anfang herabgezogen, um Speise zu kaufen.

21 Und es geschah, als wir in die Herberge kamen und unsere Säcke öffneten, siehe, da war eines jeden Geld oben in seinem Sacke, unser Geld nach seinem Gewicht; und wir haben es in unserer Hand zurückgebracht.

22 Und anderes Geld haben wir in unserer Hand herabgebracht, um Speise zu kaufen. Wir wissen nicht, wer unser Geld in unsere Säcke gelegt hat.

23 Und er sprach: Friede euch! Fürchtet euch nicht! Euer Gott und der Gott eures Vaters hat euch einen Schatz in eure Säcke gegeben; euer Geld ist mir zugekommen. Und er führte Simeon zu ihnen heraus.

24 Und der Mann führte die Männer in das Haus Josephs und gab ihnen Wasser, und sie wuschen ihre Füße; und er gab ihren Eseln Futter.

25 Und sie bereiteten das Geschenk zu, bis Joseph am Mittag kam; denn sie hatten gehört, daß sie daselbst essen sollten.

26 Als Joseph nach Hause kam, da brachten sie ihm das Geschenk, das in ihrer Hand war, ins Haus und beugten sich vor ihm nieder zur Erde.

27 Und er fragte nach ihrem Wohlergehen und sprach: Geht es eurem Vater wohl, dem Greise, von dem ihr sprachet? Lebt er noch?

28 Da sprachen sie: Es geht deinem Knechte, unserem Vater, wohl; er lebt noch. Und sie verneigten sich und beugten sich nieder.

29 Und er erhob seine Augen und sah seinen Bruder Benjamin, den Sohn seiner Mutter, und sprach: Ist das euer jüngster Bruder, von dem ihr zu mir sprachet? Und er sprach: Gott sei dir gnädig, mein Sohn!

30 Und Joseph eilte (denn sein Innerstes wurde erregt über seinen Bruder) und suchte einen Ort, (O. viell.: und es drängte ihn) um zu weinen, und er ging in das innere Gemach und weinte daselbst.

31 Und er wusch sein Angesicht und kam heraus und bezwang sich und sprach: Traget Speise auf!

32 Und man trug für ihn besonders auf und für sie besonders und für die Ägypter, die mit ihm aßen, besonders; denn die Ägypter dürfen nicht mit den Hebräern essen, denn das ist den Ägyptern ein Greuel.

33 Und sie aßen vor ihm, der Erstgeborene nach seiner Erstgeburt und der Jüngste nach seiner Jugend; und die Männer sahen einander staunend an.

34 Und man trug Ehrengerichte (O. Gastgeschenke. Vergl. 2. Sam. 11,8) von ihm zu ihnen; und das Ehrengericht Benjamins war fünfmal größer als die Ehrengerichte von ihnen allen. Und sie tranken und tranken sich fröhlich mit ihm.

   

Från Swedenborgs verk

 

Arcana Coelestia #5668

Studera detta avsnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

5668. And gave waters. That this signifies a general influx of truth from the internal, is evident from the signification of “waters,” as being truth (see n. 2702, 3058, 3424, 4976), and indeed truth in general. Hence “giving waters” signifies a general influx of truth. That it is from the internal, is because it was in Joseph’s house (n. 5667). A general influx of truth is the enlightenment which gives the capacity of apprehending and understanding truth. This enlightenment is from the light of heaven that is from the Lord, which light is nothing else than the Divine truth (see n. 2776, 3138, 3167, 3195, 3223, 3339, 3485, 3636, 3643, 3993, 4302, 4413, 4415, 5400).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Från Swedenborgs verk

 

Arcana Coelestia #2180

Studera detta avsnitt

  
/ 10837  
  

2180. And took a son of an ox tender and good. That this signifies the celestial natural which the rational associated to itself, in order that it might conjoin itself with the perception from the Divine, is evident from the signification in the Word of a “bullock” or “son of an ox,” as being natural good. And as the Lord’s rational is treated of, it is called “tender” from the celestial-spiritual, or the truth of good; and “good” from the celestial itself, or good itself. In the genuine rational there is the affection of truth and the affection of good; but its chief thing [primarium] is the affection of truth (as before shown, n. 2072). Hence it is first called “tender,” and yet is called both “tender and good,” according to the usual practice in the Word, to indicate the marriage of good and truth (spoken of above, n. 2173).

[2] That a “bullock,” or “son of an ox,” signifies the celestial natural, or what is the same, natural good, is especially evident from the sacrifices, which were the principal representatives of worship in the Hebrew Church, and afterwards in the Jewish. Their sacrifices were made either from the herd or from the flock, thus from animals of various kinds that were clean, such as oxen, bullocks, he-goats, sheep, rams, she-goats, kids, and lambs; besides turtledoves and young pigeons, all of which animals signified internal things of worship, that is, things celestial and spiritual (n. 2165, 2177); the animals taken from the herd signifying celestial natural things, and those from the flock celestial rational things; and as both the natural and the rational things are more and more interior, and are various, therefore so many kinds and species of those animals were made use of in the sacrifices; as is also evident from its being prescribed what animals should be offered-in the burnt-offerings; in the sacrifices of various kinds, as in those that were daily, those of the Sabbaths and festivals, those that were voluntary, those for thanksgiving and vows, those expiatory of guilt and sin, those of purifying and cleansing, and those of inauguration-and also from their being expressly named, and how many of them should be used in each kind of sacrifice; which would never have been done unless each had signified some special thing. This is very evident from those passages where the sacrifices are treated of (as Exodus 29; Leviticus 1, 3, 4, 9, 16, 23; Numbers 7, 8, 15, 29). But this is not the place to set forth what each one signified. The case is similar in the Prophets where these animals are named, and from them it is evident that “bullocks” signified celestial natural things.

[3] That no other than heavenly things were signified, is also evident from the cherubs seen by Ezekiel, and from the animals before the throne seen by John. Concerning the cherubs the Prophet says:

The likeness of their faces was the face of a man, and they four had the face of a lion on the right side, and they four had the face of an ox on the left side, and they four had the face of an eagle (Ezekiel 1:10).

Concerning the four animals before the throne John says:

Around the throne were four animals; the first animal was like a lion, the second animal like a young bullock, the third animal had a face like a man, the fourth animal was like a flying eagle; saying, Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, who was, and who is, and who is to come (Revelation 4:6-8).

Everyone can see that holy things were represented by the cherubs and by these animals, and also by the oxen and young bullocks in the sacrifices. In like manner in the prophecy of Moses concerning Joseph:

Let it come upon the head of Joseph, and upon the crown of the head of him that was a Nazirite from his brethren. The firstling of his ox, honor is his; and his horns are the horns of the unicorn, with them he shall push the peoples together, to the ends of the earth (Deuteronomy 33:16-17).

None can understand these things unless it is known what an ox, a unicorn, horns, and other things signify in the internal sense.

[4] As regards sacrifices in general, they were indeed enjoined through Moses on the people of Israel, but the Most Ancient Church, that existed before the flood, knew nothing whatever about sacrifices; nor did it even come into their minds to worship the Lord by slaughtering animals. The Ancient Church, that existed after the flood, was likewise unacquainted with sacrifices. This church was indeed in representatives, but not in sacrifices. In fact sacrifices were first instituted in the following church, which was called the Hebrew Church, and from this spread to the nations, and from the same source they came to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and thus to the descendants of Jacob. That the nations were in a worship of sacrifices, was shown above (n. 1343); and that so were Jacob’s posterity before they went out of Egypt, thus before sacrifices were commanded by Moses upon Mount Sinai, is evident from what is said in Exodus 5:3; 10:25, 27; 18:12; 24:4-5; and especially from their idolatrous worship before the golden calf.

[5] Thus described in Moses:

Aaron built an altar before the calf, and Aaron made proclamation and said, Tomorrow is the feast of Jehovah. And they rose up early on the morrow, and offered burnt-offerings and brought peace-offerings; and the people sat down to eat, and to drink, and rose up to play (Exodus 32:5-6).

This was done while Moses was upon Mount Sinai, and thus before the command concerning the altar and the sacrifices came to them. The command came on this account-that the worship of sacrifices had become idolatrous with them, as it had with the gentiles, and from this worship they could not be withdrawn, because they regarded it as the chief holy thing. For what has once been implanted from infancy as holy, especially if by fathers, and thus inrooted, the Lord never breaks, but bends, unless it is contrary to order itself. This is the reason why it was directed that sacrifices should be instituted in the way described in the books of Moses.

[6] That sacrifices were by no means acceptable to Jehovah, thus were merely permitted and tolerated for the reason just stated, is very evident in the Prophets, as we read in Jeremiah:

Thus saith Jehovah Zebaoth the God of Israel, Add your burnt-offerings to your sacrifices, and eat flesh. I spoke not unto your fathers, and I commanded them not in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt-offering and sacrifice; but this word I commanded them, saying, Obey My voice, and I will be your God (Jeremiah 7:21-23).

In David:

O Jehovah, sacrifice and offering Thou hast not willed, burnt-offering and sin-offering Thou hast not required. I have desired to do Thy will, O my God (Psalms 40:6, 8).

In the same:

Thou delightest not in sacrifice, that I should give it; burnt-offering Thou dost not accept. The sacrifices of God are a broken 1 spirit (Psalms 51:16-17).

In the same:

I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he-goats out of thy folds; sacrifice to God confession (Psalms 50:9, 13-14; 107:21-22; 116:17; Deuteronomy 23:19).

In Hosea:

I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, and the knowledge of God more than burnt-offerings (Hos. 6:6).

Samuel said to Saul:

Hath Jehovah pleasure in burnt-offerings and sacrifices? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, to hearken than the fat of rams (1 Samuel 15:22).

In Micah:

Wherewith shall I come before Jehovah, and bow myself to the high God? Shall I come before Him with burnt-offerings, with calves of a year old? Will Jehovah be pleased with thousands of rams, with ten thousands of rivers of oil? He hath showed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth Jehovah require of thee, but to do judgment, and to love mercy, and to humble thyself in walking with thy God (Micah 6:6-8).

[7] From all this it is now evident that sacrifices were not commanded, but permitted; also that nothing else was regarded in the sacrifices than what is internal; and that it was the internal, not the external, that was acceptable. On this account also, the Lord abrogated them, as was likewise foretold by Daniel in these words:

In the midst of the week shall He cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease (Daniel 9:27),

where the Lord’s advent is treated of. (See what is said concerning sacrifices in volume 1, n. 922-923, 1128, 1823.) As regards the “son of an ox” which Abraham “made” or prepared for the three men, the case is the same as with that animal in the sacrifices. That it had a like signification is evident also from his telling Sarah to take three measures of fine flour. Concerning the fine flour to a bullock, we read in Moses:

When ye be come into the land; when thou shalt make a son of an ox a burnt-offering or a sacrifice, in pronouncing publicly a vow, or peace-offerings unto Jehovah, thou shalt offer upon the son of an ox a meat offering of three tenths of fine flour, mingled with oil (Numbers 15:8-9), where it is in like manner “three,” here “three tenths,” and above, “three measures;” but to a ram there were to be only two tenths, and to a lamb one tenth (Numbers 15:4-6).

Fotnoter:

1. Contritus; but infractus n. 9818.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.