ബൈബിൾ

 

Genesis 35

പഠനം

   

1 Dievas tarė Jokūbui: “Kelkis ir eik į Betelį, ir apsistok ten; pastatyk aukurą Dievui, kuris tau pasirodė, kai bėgai nuo savo brolio Ezavo”.

2 Jokūbas įsakė saviesiems ir visiems, buvusiems su juo: “Pašalinkite svetimus dievus, kurie yra tarp jūsų, apsivalykite ir pakeiskite drabužius!

3 Eikime į Betelį, ten pastatysiu aukurą Dievui, kuris mane išklausė pavojuje ir buvo su manimi kelyje, kuriuo aš ėjau!”

4 Jie atidavė Jokūbui visus svetimus dievus, kuriuos jie turėjo, ir auskarus, o Jokūbas juos užkasė po ąžuolu prie Sichemo.

5 Jie iškeliavo, ir siaubas nuo Dievo apėmė aplinkinius miestus, kad niekas nedrįso vytis Jokūbo sūnų.

6 Taip Jokūbas ir visi su juo esantys žmonės atėjo į Lūzą, dar vadinamą Beteliu, kuri yra Kanaano šalyje.

7 Ten jis pastatė aukurą ir tą vietą pavadino El Betelis, nes ten jam pasirodė Dievas, kai jis bėgo nuo savo brolio veido.

8 Ten mirė Debora, ebekos auklė, ir buvo palaidota prie Betelio po ąžuolu, kurį pavadino audos ąžuolu.

9 Dievas vėl pasirodė Jokūbui, kai jis atvyko iš Mesopotamijos, ir jį palaimino.

10 Ir Dievas tarė jam: “Tavo vardas Jokūbas, bet tu nebesivadinsi Jokūbu. Tavo vardas bus Izraelis!

11 Aš esu Dievas Visagalis. Būk vaisingas ir dauginkis! Tauta ir daugelis tautų atsiras iš tavęs, ir karaliai išeis iš tavo strėnų!

12 Tą žemę, kurią daviau Abraomui ir Izaokui, atiduosiu tau ir po tavęs duosiu tavo palikuonims”.

13 Tada Dievas pasitraukė nuo jo iš tos vietos, kur su juo kalbėjo.

14 Jokūbas pastatė akmeninį paminklą toje vietoje, kur Dievas kalbėjo su juo, išliejo ant jo geriamąją auką ir aliejaus.

15 Jokūbas pavadino tą vietą, kur Dievas su juo kalbėjo, Beteliu.

16 Iš Betelio jie keliavo toliau. Nepasiekus Efratos, achelė gimdė, ir jos gimdymas buvo sunkus.

17 Jai esant gimdymo kančiose, pribuvėja jai tarė: “Nebijok! Ir šį kartą turėsi sūnų”.

18 Kai jos siela buvo beatsiskirianti, nes ji buvo prie mirties, ji pavadino jį Ben Oniu, bet tėvas jį pavadino Benjaminu.

19 Ir achelė mirė ir buvo palaidota prie kelio, einančio į Efratą, tai yra Betliejų.

20 Jokūbas pastatė ant jos kapo paminklą; tas achelės kapo paminklas tebestovi iki šios dienos.

21 Izraelis keliavo toliau ir apsistojęs pasistatė palapines anapus Edero bokšto.

22 Izraeliui gyvenant anoje šalyje, ubenas miegojo su savo tėvo sugulove Bilha. Izraelis tai sužinojo. Jokūbo sūnų buvo dvylika.

23 Lėjos sūnūs: Jokūbo pirmagimis ubenas, Simeonas, Levis, Judas, Isacharas ir Zabulonas.

24 achelės sūnūs: Juozapas ir Benjaminas.

25 achelės tarnaitės Bilhos sūnūs: Danas ir Neftalis.

26 Lėjos tarnaitės Zilpos sūnūs: Gadas ir Ašeras. Šitie yra Jokūbo sūnūs, gimę jam Mesopotamijoje.

27 Jokūbas atėjo pas savo tėvą Izaoką į Mamrę, į Kirjat Arbos miestą, tai yra Hebroną, kur Abraomas ir Izaokas buvo ateiviai.

28 Izaokas sulaukė šimto aštuoniasdešimties metų.

29 Ir Izaokas atidavė savo dvasią, ir mirė, ir susijungė su savo tauta, būdamas senas ir pasisotinęs gyvenimu. Jį palaidojo jo sūnūs Ezavas ir Jokūbas.

   

സ്വീഡൻബർഗിന്റെ കൃതികളിൽ നിന്ന്

 

Arcana Coelestia #4563

ഈ ഭാഗം പഠിക്കുക

  
/ 10837  
  

4563. And Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, died. That this signifies that hereditary evil was expelled, is evident from the signification of “dying,” as being the end, or that a thing ceases to be such (see n. 494, 3253, 3259, 3276), here therefore expelled, because the subject treated of is hereditary evil; and from the representation of Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, as being hereditary evil. In nourishing and suckling an infant a nurse properly signifies the insinuation of innocence by means of what is celestial spiritual, for milk denotes the celestial spiritual (n. 2184), and the infant she suckles denotes innocence (n. 430, 1616, 2126, 2305, 2306) But here by “Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse,” is signified that which was received from the mother and nourished from infancy. That this was the hereditary evil from the mother against which the Lord fought, may be seen from what has been shown regarding this hereditary (n. 1414, 1444, 1573), and from His expelling it, so that at last He was not the son of Mary (see n. 2159, 2574, 2649, 3036).

[2] It is known that man derives evil from both his parents, and that this evil is called hereditary evil. He is therefore born into it, but still it does not manifest itself until the man becomes an adult and acts from his understanding and the derivative will, and meanwhile it lies hidden, especially during infancy. And as of the Lord’s mercy no one is blamed for what is hereditary, but for what is actual (n. 966, 2308), and what is hereditary cannot become actual until the man acts from his own understanding and his own will, therefore infants are led by the Lord by means of infants and angels from Him, and hence they appear in a state of innocence while hereditary evil still lurks in everything they do (n. 2300, 2307, 2308). This hereditary evil yields them nourishment, or is as a nurse, until the time when they judge for themselves (n. 4063); and then if they are being regenerated they are brought by the Lord into a state of new infancy, and at last into heavenly wisdom; thus into genuine infancy, that is, into innocence; for genuine infancy or innocence dwells in wisdom (n. 2305, 3183). The difference is, that the innocence of infancy is without, and hereditary evil within; whereas the innocence of wisdom is within, and evil both actual and hereditary is without. From these and other things that have been already stated, it is evident that hereditary evil acts as a nurse from the earliest infancy to the age of new infancy; and hence it is that by a “nurse” is signified hereditary evil, and also that by a “nurse” is signified the insinuation of innocence by means of the celestial spiritual.

[3] As in the internal sense of this chapter the disposition and arrangement of truths by good in the Lord’s natural is treated of (n. 4536), and the consequent progression to interior things, therefore hereditary evil is also treated of, in that it was expelled. This is the reason why mention is made in this verse of Deborah, Rebekah’s nurse, that she died and was buried under an oak, which is not a thing of sufficient moment to interrupt the series unless it involved such things.

[4] The very mystery that is specifically signified by “Rebekah’s nurse” cannot as yet be disclosed, for before this is done it is necessary to know the nature of the influx of the rational into the natural, namely, that it is from the good of the rational immediately into the good of the natural, and from the good of the rational mediately, through the truth there into the good of natural truth. “Rebekah” is the truth of the rational (n. 3012, 3013, 3077); and “Isaac” is the good of the rational (n. 3012, 3194, 3210); “Esau” is the good of the natural by immediate influx from the good of the rational, or “Isaac;” and “Jacob” is the good or good of truth of the natural by mediate influx through the truth of the rational, or “Rebekah.” (In regard to this influx, mediate and immediate, see above, n. 3314, 3573.) This must be known before it is possible to have any specific knowledge of the mystery why by “Rebekah’s nurse” is here signified and described hereditary evil; for it is from this that the nature of this evil can be seen.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

സ്വീഡൻബർഗിന്റെ കൃതികളിൽ നിന്ന്

 

Arcana Coelestia #4063

ഈ ഭാഗം പഠിക്കുക

  
/ 10837  
  

4063. And he heard the words of Laban’s sons, saying. That this signifies the truths of the good signified by “Laban,” of what quality they were relatively to the good acquired thereby by the Lord in the natural, is evident from the signification of “sons,” as being truths (see n. 489, 491, 533, 1147, 2623, 3373); and from the representation of Laban, as being collateral good of a common stock (n. 3612, 3665, 3778), and thus such goods as may serve for the introducing of genuine goods and truths (n. 3974, 3982, 3986 at the end); here, the good that had so served, for its separation is treated of. Jacob’s “hearing the words” involves in the internal sense what their quality was relatively to the good acquired by the Lord in the natural, as may be seen from what now follows; for they were words of indignation, and declared that Jacob had taken all that was their father’s, and Jacob saw the faces of Laban, that he was not as yesterday and the day before. (That Jacob represents the Lord’s natural, and in the foregoing chapter the good of truth therein, may be seen above, n. 3659, 3669, 3677, 3775, 3829, 4009)

[2] How the case is with the good signified by “Laban” relatively to the good of truth represented by Jacob, may be seen from what has been stated and shown in the foregoing chapter. This may be further illustrated by the states of man’s regeneration, which in the representative sense is also here treated of. When a man is being regenerated, he is kept by the Lord in a kind of mediate good. This good serves for introducing genuine goods and truths; but after these have been introduced, it is separated from them. Everyone who has learned anything about regeneration and about the new man, can understand that the new man is altogether different from the old; for the new man is in the affection of spiritual and heavenly things, and these produce its delights and pleasantnesses; whereas the old man is in the affections of worldly and earthly things, and these produce its delights and pleasantnesses; consequently the new man has regard to ends in heaven, but the old man to ends in the world. From this it is manifest that the new man is altogether different and diverse from the old.

[3] In order that a man may be brought from the state of the old man into that of the new, the concupiscences of the world must be put off, and the affections of heaven must be put on. This is effected by innumerable means, which are known to the Lord alone, and many of which have also been made known by the Lord to angels; but few if any to man. Nevertheless all of them both in general and particular have been made manifest in the internal sense of the Word. When therefore a man, from being the old man is made a new one (that is, when he is being regenerated), it is not done in a moment, as some believe, but through a course of years; nay, during the man’s whole life, even to its end; for his concupiscences have to be extirpated, and heavenly affections have to be insinuated; and the man has to be gifted with a life which he had not before, and of which indeed he knew scarcely anything. Seeing therefore that the man’s states of life have to be so greatly changed, it must needs be that he is long kept in a kind of mediate good, that is, in a good which partakes both of the affections of the world, and of the affections of heaven; and unless he is kept in this mediate good, he in no wise admits heavenly goods and truths.

[4] This mediate or middle good is what is signified by “Laban and his flock.” But man is kept in this middle good no longer than until it has served this use; but this having been served, it is separated. This separation is treated of in this chapter. That there is an intermediate good, and that it is separated after it has subserved its use, may be illustrated by the changes of state which every man undergoes from infancy even to old age. It is known that a man’s state is of one kind in infancy, of another in childhood, another in youth, another in adult age, and another in old age. It is also known that a man puts off his state of infancy with its toys when he passes into the state of youth; that he puts off his state of youth when he passes into the state of young manhood; and this again when he passes into the state of mature age; and at last this state when he passes into that of old age. And if one will consider he may also know that every age has its delights, and that by these he is introduced by successive steps into those of the age next following; and that these delights had served the purpose of bringing him thereto; and finally to the delight of intelligence and wisdom in old age.

[5] From all this it is manifest that former things are always left behind when a new state of life is put on. But this comparison can serve only to show that delights are means, and that these are left behind when the man enters into the state next following; whereas during man’s regeneration his state becomes altogether different from his former one; and he is led to it, not in any natural manner, but by the Lord in a supernatural manner; nor does anyone arrive at this state except by the means or media of regeneration, which are provided by the Lord alone, and thus by the mediate good of which we have been speaking. And when the man has been brought to that state in which he has no longer worldly, earthly, and corporeal things as his end, but those which are of heaven, then this mediate good is separated. To have anything as the end is to love it more than anything else.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.