ബൈബിൾ

 

以西结书 48

പഠനം

   

1 众支派按名所得之地记在下面:从头,由希特伦往哈马口,到大马色地界上的哈萨以难。边靠着哈马地(各支派的地都有东西的边界),是但的分。

2 挨着但的地界,从东到西,是亚设的分。

3 挨着亚设的地界,从东到西,是拿弗他利的分。

4 挨着拿弗他利的地界,从东到西,是玛拿西分。

5 挨着玛拿西的地界,从东到西,是以法莲分。

6 挨着以法莲的地界,从东到西,是流便的分。

7 挨着流便的地界,从东到西,是犹大分。

8 挨着犹大的地界,从东到西,必有你们所当献的供地,宽二万五肘。从东界到西界,长短与各分之地相同,圣地当在其中。

9 你们献与耶和华的供地要长二万五肘,宽一万肘。

10 供地要归与祭司长二万五肘,西宽一万肘,东宽一万肘,长二万五肘。耶和华的地当在其中。

11 这地要归与撒督的子孙中成为祭司,就是那守我所吩咐的。当以色列人走迷的时候,他们不像那些利未人走迷了。

12 这要归与他们为供,是全中至的。供挨着利未人的界。

13 利未人所得的地要长二万五肘,宽一万肘,与祭司的地界相等,都长二万五肘,宽一万肘。

14 不可,不可换,初熟之物也不可归与别人,因为是归耶和华的。

15 这二万五肘前面所剩下五肘宽之地要作俗用,作为造城盖房郊野之地。城要在当中。

16 城的尺寸乃是如此:肘,肘,东面肘,西面肘。

17 城必有郊野,向北五十肘,向南五十肘,向东二五十肘,向西二五十肘。

18 靠着供地的馀地,东长一万肘,西长一万肘,要与供地相等;其中的土产要作城内工人的食物。

19 所有以色列支派中,在城内做工的,都要耕种这地。

20 你们所献的供地连归城之地,是方的:长二万五肘,宽二万五肘。

21 供地连归城之地,两边的馀地要归与王。供地东边,南北二万五肘,东至东界,西边南北二万五肘,西至西界,与各分之地相同,都要归王。供地和殿的地要在其中,

22 并且利未人之地,与归城之地的东西两边延长之地(这两地在王地中间),就是在犹大和便雅悯两界中间,要归与王。

23 论到其馀的支派,从东到西,是便雅悯的分。

24 挨着便雅悯的地界,从东到西,是西缅分。

25 挨着西缅的地界,从东到西,是以萨迦的分。

26 挨着以萨迦的地界,从东到西,是西布伦的分。

27 挨着西布伦的地界,从东到西,是迦得的分。

28 迦得地的界是从他玛到米利巴加低斯的水,延到埃及小,直到

29 这就是你们要拈阄分给以色列支派为业之,乃是他们各支派所得之分。这是耶和华的。

30 城的肘。出城之处如下;

31 城的各要按以色列支派的名字面有为流便犹大为利未

32 东面肘,有为约瑟为便雅悯为但

33 肘,有西缅为以萨迦为西布伦

34 西面肘,有为迦得为亚设为拿弗他利

35 城四围共一万八肘。从此以後,这城的名字必称为耶和华的所在。

   

ബൈബിൾ

 

启示录 21:12

പഠനം

       

12 大的,有十二个门,门上有十二天使;门上又着以色列十二个支派的名字。

സ്വീഡൻബർഗിന്റെ കൃതികളിൽ നിന്ന്

 

Apocalypse Revealed #571

ഈ ഭാഗം പഠിക്കുക

  
/ 962  
  

571. And on its heads a blasphemous name. This symbolizes their denial of the Lord's Divine humanity and affirmation of their church's doctrine, drawn not from the Word but from their own intelligence.

The seven heads symbolize irrationality resulting from absolute falsities, as said in no. 568 above. And this irrationality utters blasphemy when it denies the Lord's Divinity present in His humanity. It also does this when it does not draw the doctrine of the church from the Word, but hatches it from its own intelligence.

As regards the first, that it is blasphemy to deny the Lord's Divinity present in His humanity, the reason is that someone who denies it goes against the creed accepted throughout the Christian world called the Athanasian Creed, which plainly says that in Jesus Christ, God and man - which is to say, the Divine and the human - are not two but one, and that they constitute one person, being united as soul and body. Consequently people who deny the Divinity in the Lord's humanity are close to being Socinians 1 and Arians, 2 especially when they think of the Lord's humanity by itself as being like that of any other man, and do not think at all then of His Divinity from eternity.

[2] As regards the second, that it is blasphemy not to draw the doctrine of the church from the Word, but to hatch it from one's own intelligence, the reason is that the church is founded on the Word and its character is such as its understanding of the Word (see The Doctrine of the New Jerusalem Regarding the Sacred Scripture, nos. 76-79), and the doctrine that faith alone - that is, faith apart from works of the law - justifies and saves, comes not from the Word, but from a single saying of Paul (Romans 3:28), 3 falsely interpreted (see no. 417).

Moreover, every doctrinal falsity takes it origin from no other source than people's own intelligence. For what is more universally taught in the Word than to refrain from evil and do good? And what is more evident there than the precept that God is to be loved, and the neighbor also? Who does not see, too, that no one is capable of loving the neighbor unless he lives in conformity with the works of the law? Also, anyone who does not love his neighbor does not love God either, for it is in love for the neighbor that the Lord conjoins Himself with a person and that a person conjoins himself with the Lord; that is to say, that it is in that love that God and man join together. What, then, is it to love the neighbor except to refrain from doing evil to him, in accordance with the commandments of the Decalogue (Romans 13:8-11)? And to the extent a person wills not to do evil to the neighbor, to the same extent he wills to do good to him.

It is apparent from this that it is blasphemy to eliminate works of the law from salvation, as those people do who make faith alone the only saving faith, namely, faith divorced from good works.

The blasphemy referred to in Matthew 12:31-32 means to deny the Lord's Divinity, as Socinians do, and to reject the Word. For people who so deny the Lord's Divinity cannot enter heaven, as the Lord's Divinity is everything in everything connected with heaven, and anyone who rejects the Word rejects everything connected with religion.

അടിക്കുറിപ്പുകൾ:

1. Disciples of Laelius Socinus (born Lelio Francesco Maria Sozini), 1525-1562, and his nephew Faustus Socinus (Fausto Paolo Sozzini), 1539-1604, who rejected a number of traditional Christian doctrines, such as the Trinity, the Divinity of Christ, and original sin, and who held that Christ was miraculously begotten and that salvation is granted to those who adopt Christ's virtues as a model for their lives.

2. Adherents of Arianism, a theological view based on the teachings of Arius (c. 250-336), who taught that Christ the Son was a created being, not consubstantial with God the Father, and thus not fully Divine.

3. "Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law." But by deeds of the law, Paul meant the ritual observances of the Jewish Church.

  
/ 962  
  

Many thanks to the General Church of the New Jerusalem, and to Rev. N.B. Rogers, translator, for the permission to use this translation.