ბიბლია

 

1 Mose 38

Სწავლა

   

1 Und es geschah zu selbiger Zeit, daß Juda von seinen Brüdern hinabzog und zu einem Manne von Adullam einkehrte mit Namen Hira.

2 Und Juda sah daselbst die Tochter eines kanaanitischen Mannes, mit Namen Schua; und er nahm sie und ging zu ihr ein.

3 Und sie wurde schwanger und gebar einen Sohn, und er gab ihm den Namen Gher.

4 Und sie wurde abermals schwanger und gebar einen Sohn, und sie gab ihm den Namen Onan.

5 Und wiederum gebar sie einen Sohn, und sie gab ihm den Namen Schela; Juda (W. er; and. l. sie) war aber zu Kesib, als sie ihn gebar.

6 Und Juda nahm ein Weib für Gher, seinen Erstgeborenen, und ihr Name war Tamar.

7 Und Gher, der Erstgeborene Judas, war böse in den Augen Jehovas, und Jehova tötete ihn.

8 Da sprach Juda zu Onan: Gehe ein zu dem Weibe deines Bruders, und leiste ihr die Schwagerpflicht und erwecke deinem Bruder Samen.

9 Da aber Onan wußte, daß der Same nicht sein eigen sein sollte, so geschah es, wenn er zu dem Weibe seines Bruders einging, daß er ihn verderbte zur Erde, um seinem Bruder keinen Samen zu geben.

10 Und es war übel in den Augen Jehovas, was er tat; und er tötete auch ihn.

11 Da sprach Juda zu Tamar, seiner Schwiegertochter: Bleibe Witwe im Hause deines Vaters, bis mein Sohn Schela groß sein wird. Denn er sagte: Daß nicht auch er sterbe wie seine Brüder! Und Tamar ging hin und blieb im Hause ihres Vaters.

12 Als der Tage viele geworden, da starb die Tochter Schuas, das Weib Judas. Und als Juda getröstet war, ging er zu seinen Schafscherern hinauf, er und Hira, sein Freund, der Adullamiter, nach Timna.

13 Und es wurde der Tamar berichtet und gesagt: Siehe, dein Schwiegervater geht nach Timna hinauf, um seine Schafe zu scheren.

14 Da legte sie die Kleider ihrer Witwenschaft von sich und bedeckte sich mit einem Schleier (Vergl. die anm. zu Kap. 24, 65) und verhüllte sich; und sie setzte sich an den Eingang von Enaim, das am Wege nach Timna liegt; denn sie sah, daß Schela groß geworden war und sie ihm nicht zum Weibe gegeben wurde.

15 Und Juda sah sie und hielt sie für eine Hure, denn sie hatte ihr Angesicht bedeckt.

16 Und er bog zu ihr ab in den Weg und sprach: Wohlan, laß mich zu dir eingehen! Denn er wußte nicht, daß sie seine Schwiegertochter war. Und sie sprach: Was willst du mir geben, daß du zu mir eingehst?

17 Da sprach er: Ich will dir ein Ziegenböcklein von der Herde senden. Und sie sprach: Wenn du ein Pfand gibst, bis du es sendest.

18 Und er sprach: Was für ein Pfand soll ich dir geben? Und sie sprach: Deinen Siegelring und deine Schnur und deinen Stab, der in deiner Hand ist. Da gab er es ihr und ging zu ihr ein, und sie ward schwanger von ihm.

19 Und sie stand auf und ging hin, und sie legte ihren Schleier von sich und zog die Kleider ihrer Witwenschaft an.

20 Und Juda sandte das Ziegenböcklein durch die Hand seines Freundes, des Adullamiters, um das Pfand aus der Hand des Weibes zu nehmen; aber er fand sie nicht.

21 Und er fragte die Leute ihres Ortes und sprach: Wo ist jene Buhlerin, (Eig. Geweihte, d. h. dem Dienste der Astarte, der Liebesgöttin der Kanaaniter, geweiht) die zu Enaim am Wege war? Und sie sprachen: Hier ist keine Buhlerin gewesen.

22 Und er kehrte zu Juda zurück und sprach: Ich habe sie nicht gefunden, und auch sagten die Leute des Ortes: Hier ist keine Buhlerin gewesen.

23 Da sprach Juda: Sie behalte es für sich, daß wir nicht zum Gespött werden; siehe, ich habe dieses Böcklein gesandt, und du hast sie ja nicht gefunden.

24 Und es geschah nach etwa drei Monaten, da wurde dem Juda berichtet und gesagt: Tamar, deine Schwiegertochter, hat gehurt, und siehe, sie ist auch schwanger von Hurerei. Da sprach Juda: Führet sie hinaus, daß sie verbrannt werde!

25 Als sie hinausgeführt wurde, da sandte sie zu ihrem Schwiegervater und ließ ihm sagen: Von dem Manne, dem dieses gehört, bin ich schwanger; und sie sprach: Erkenne doch, wem dieser Siegelring und diese Schnur und dieser Stab gehört!

26 Und Juda erkannte es und sprach: Sie ist gerechter als ich, darum daß ich sie nicht meinem Sohne Schela gegeben habe; und er erkannte sie hinfort nicht mehr.

27 Und es geschah zur Zeit, als sie gebären sollte, siehe, da waren Zwillinge in ihrem Leibe.

28 Und es geschah, während sie gebar, da streckte einer die Hand heraus, und die Hebamme nahm sie und band einen Karmesinfaden um seine Hand und sprach: Dieser ist zuerst herausgekommen.

29 Und es geschah, als er seine Hand zurückzog, siehe, da kam sein Bruder heraus; und sie sprach: Wie bist du durchgebrochen! Auf dir sei der Bruch! (O. sprach: Was für einen iß hast du um dich gerissen) Und man gab ihm den Namen Perez. (Bruch, iß)

30 Und danach kam sein Bruder heraus, um dessen Hand der Karmesinfaden war, und man gab ihm den Namen Serach. (Aufgang, Glanz)

   

სვედენბორგის ნაშრომებიდან

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4837

შეისწავლეთ ეს პასაჟი.

  
/ 10837  
  

4837. 'And so it was, when he came [in] to his brother's wife, that he spilled it on the ground' means the reverse of conjugial love. [This is clear from the following considerations:] 'Er, Judah's firstborn' is used to describe falsity springing from evil which reigned in the Jewish nation at first, and 'Onan the secondborn' to describe evil begotten by falsity springing from evil which reigned in that nation later on. And 'Shelah the third son' is used to describe the idolatry which followed on from this and reigned in that nation at a still later time, 4826. Evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is described by the action Onan took, which was this: Being unwilling to provide seed for his brother, he spilled it on the ground. The reason this means that which is the reverse of conjugial love is that the conjugial relationship is used to mean in the internal sense that which is the essential element of the Church. Essentially the Church is a marriage of goodness and truth; and evil begotten by falsity springing from evil is the complete reverse of that marriage, that is, those with whom that kind of evil exists are the reverse of it.

[2] Nothing of true marriage meant both in a spiritual sense and in a natural one existed with that nation. This is quite evident from the fact that men were permitted to marry more than one wife; for where a marriage meant in a spiritual sense exists - that is, where the good and truth of the Church exist, consequently where the Church exists - that practice is not at all permitted. Genuine marriage cannot possibly exist except among those with whom the Lord's Church or kingdom exists, yet not with these except between pairs, 1907, 2740, 3246. The marriage of a pair in whom genuine conjugial love is present corresponds to the heavenly marriage, that is, to good and truth joined together. That is to say, the husband corresponds to good and the wife to the truth of that good. Also, when genuine conjugial love is present in them, that heavenly marriage is present too. Therefore where the Church exists men are never permitted to marry more than one wife. But because no Church existed among those descended from Jacob, only that which was a representative of the Church - that is, the external shell of the Church without its internal substance, 4307, 4500 - they were therefore permitted to have more than one. Furthermore the marriage of one husband to a number of wives would present in heaven an idea or image in which so to speak one good was joined to a number of truths which do not agree with one another, and so an image in which there was no good at all. For when its truths do not agree with one another good ceases to be good, since good receives its particular nature from truths and their agreement with one another.

[3] It would also present an image in which so to speak the Church was not one Church but many, set apart from one another along the lines of the truths of faith, that is, along doctrinal lines, when in fact the Church is one if good is the essential element there and this receives its particular nature from truths and is so to speak moderated by these. The Church is an image of heaven, because it is the Lord's kingdom on earth. Heaven consists of many distinct and separate general communities, and of smaller ones subordinate to these general ones; nevertheless good makes them a united whole. Good there enables the truths of faith to stand in agreement with one another; for these look to good and are grounded in it. If the truths of faith and not good were the lines along which parts of heaven were separated from one another, heaven would cease to be heaven, because there would not be any unanimity at all. For their oneness of life or unity in soul could not come to them from the Lord and exist among them. That oneness dwells solely within good, that is, within love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour. Love binds everyone together, and when the love of what is good and true is present in each individual, everyone shares that which comes from the Lord, so that the Lord is the One who binds everyone together. The love of what is good and true is called love towards the neighbour, for the neighbour is one with whom good and accompanying truth are present, and in the abstract sense good itself and its truth. From these considerations one may see why within the Church marriage must be a relationship involving one husband and one wife, and why the descendants of Jacob were permitted to marry more than one wife. They were permitted to do so for the reason that no Church existed among them, and therefore a representative of the Church could not be established among them by means of marriages, because the reverse of conjugial love reigned among them.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

სვედენბორგის ნაშრომებიდან

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3246

შეისწავლეთ ეს პასაჟი.

  
/ 10837  
  

3246. 'And to the concubines' sons, whom Abraham had, Abraham gave gifts' means that places in the Lord's spiritual kingdom were allotted to spiritual people adopted by the Lord's Divine Human. This is clear from the meaning of 'the concubines' sons' as those who are spiritual, to be dealt with below; from the representation of 'Abraham' here as the Lord's Divine Human (so that the words 'whom Abraham had' mean that they - those who were spiritual - were adopted by the Lord's Divine Human); and from the meaning of 'the gifts which Abraham gave them' as allotted places in the Lord's spiritual kingdom.

[2] From what has been shown several times already about those who constitute the Lord's spiritual kingdom and who are called the spiritual, as in 3235 and elsewhere, it becomes clear that they are not sons of the marriage itself of good and truth, but of a certain covenant not so conjugial. They are indeed descended from the same father but not from the same mother, that is, from the same Divine Good but not from the same Divine Truth. Indeed with those who are celestial, since they are the product of the marriage itself of good and truth, good exists and truth rooted in that good. They never make investigations into what the truth may be but have a perception of it from good. Nor in conversation do they say more than this regarding what is true, 'Yes, that is so', in keeping with the Lord's teaching in Matthew,

Let your words be Yes, yes; No, no; anything beyond this is from evil. 1 Matthew 5:37.

But those who are spiritual, since they are the product of a covenant not so conjugial, do not have any perception from which they can know what is true. Instead they call that the truth which parents and teachers have told them to be the truth. Consequently with them there is no marriage of good and truth. Nevertheless that which they believe to be the truth for the reason just given is adopted by the Lord as truth when goodness of life exists with them; see 1832. This now explains why the spiritual are here called 'the concubines' sons', which is used to mean all the sons of Keturah mentioned already, and also those descended from Hagar, dealt with shortly below in verses 12-18.

[3] In former times - to enable both those who are celestial and those who are spiritual to be represented in marriages - a man was allowed to have a concubine in addition to a wife. That concubine was given to the husband by his wife (uxor), in which case the concubine was called his wife (mulier), or was said to have been given to him as a wife (mulier), as when Hagar the Egyptian was given to Abraham by Sarah, Genesis 16:3, when the servant-girl Bilhah was given to Jacob by Rachel, Genesis 30:4, and when the servant-girl Zilpah was given to Jacob by Leah, Genesis 30:9. In those cases they are called 'wives' (mulier), but elsewhere concubines, as is Hagar the Egyptian in the present verse, Bilhah in Genesis 35:22, and even Keturah herself in 1 Chronicles 1:32.

[4] The reason why those men of old had concubines in addition to a wife, as not only Abraham and Jacob did, but also their descendants, such as Gideon, Judges 8:31; Saul, 2 Samuel 3:7; David, 2 Samuel 5:13; 15:16; Solomon, 1 Kings 11:3, was that they were permitted to do so for the sake of the representation. That is to say, the celestial Church was represented by the wife, and the spiritual Church by the concubine. They were permitted to do so because they were the kind of men with whom conjugial love did not exist; so that to them marriage was not marriage but merely copulation for the sake of begetting off-spring. With such persons those permissions were possible without any harm being done to love or consequently to the conjugial covenant. But such permissions are never possible among people with whom good and truth are present and who are internal people, or potentially so. For as soon as good and truth, and internal things, exist with the human being, such permissions come to an end. This is why Christians are not allowed, as the Jews were, to take a concubine in addition to a wife, and why such is adultery. Regarding the adoption of those who are spiritual by the Lord's Divine Human, see what has been stated and shown already on the same subject in 2661, 2716, 2833, 2834.

სქოლიოები:

1. or from the evil one

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.