聖書

 

Genesis 29

勉強

   

2 Daɣ əšikəl-net inay Yaqub aṇu daɣ əṣuf təhar təhunt zəwwərat, igan ɣur-əs aharay wa ənḍərran iṃosan karad səgan, əṣassinen den da faw.

3 Maran a wa ətaggan ṃadanan as d əddəwan hərwan nasan kul ad əntəgan təhunt ta təharat imi n aṇu, as əššəšwan əssuɣəlan tat edag-net.

4 As din ewad Yaqub aṇu iṣṣəstan iṃadanan: «Ma iṃos aɣaywan nawan, išəqqaɣan in?» «Nakkanay in Xaran», əṇṇan as.

5 Iṣṣəstan tan tolas: «Təzdayam Laban, ahaya ən Naxor?» «Awalla, nəzday tu,» əṇṇan as.

6 Iṇṇ'asan Yaqub: «Ma ixlak?», əṇṇan as: «Əlxar ɣas, aṃaran elles den Raxil təlkamat y aharay nnasan den.

7 Iṇṇ'asan: «Mas təqqalam da? Əzəl izagren, wər iga alwaq n əsəgən n aharay, šašwat tu təwətam tu əs təməḍint.»

8 Əjjəwwaban as ṃadanan: «wər nəfreg əšəšwəy-net iket wər d oṣen midawan nana kul, nəntəg təhunt ta təharat imi n aṇu.

9 Immigrad dər-san den da as du tewad Raxil, təlkam y əharay n abba nnet, id ənta a təṃosat tamaḍant-net.

10 Ogga Yaqub Raxil ɣas ta n elles ən Laban wa n aŋŋatṃas, təlkam y aharay nnet, ikk'aṇu intag təhunt ta təharat imi nnet, iššəšwa eharay n aŋŋatṃas Laban.

11 Təzzar izalammat Raxil, təkkas du daɣ-as tədəwit iṃəttawan.

12 Iṇṇa Yaqub i Raxil: «Nak tegazay nn-abba-nnam, id əṃosa rures ən Raqqiyetu.» Tozal təg'isalan y abba nnet.

13 Təga Raxil isalan n aṣṣa ən Yaqub i Laban ɣas, ozal, issəlkad as, izalammat tu. Təzzar ilway tu s aṃṃas n ahan-net. Imməgrad Yaqub sa wa fall-as igan. Iṇṇ'as Laban: «Illikan as kay iɣasan nin d əzni nin a təṃosa.» Iqqim ɣur-əs Yaqub har iga tallit.

15 Dəffər a wen iṇṇ'as Laban: «Wərge a wa as təṃosa tegazay nin a fəl di za təšɣəla bannan. Əməl i a wa iṃos alxaq nak.»

16 Ənta Laban ila šibararen ṣanatat, ta waššarat Leyya, ta ənḍərrat Raxil.

17 Leyya šiwinəɣat, mišan Raxil təhossay azzat-net, ihossay udəm-net.

18 Yaqub ira Raxil. Iṇṇa i Laban: «A dak aga əššəɣəl n əṣṣa elan iqqəl taggalt ən tabarart nak ta əṇḍərrat Raxil.

19 Iṇṇ'as Laban: «Əṣṣofa əkfeɣ ak kat, əkfeq qat y iyyan. Qam ɣur-i da da.»

20 Əmmək en da as iga Yaqub əššəɣəl n əṣṣa elan fəl əddəlil ən Raxil mišan a wa das iga daɣ tara əqqalan sər-əs arat n aḍan.

21 Dəffər adi iṇṇa Yaqub i Laban; «Təmastant tənda. Əmərədda akf'i taṇtut t'as ərzama taggalt-net.»

22 Daɣ a di iššedaw du Laban aytedan kul win n əɣrəm wa, issəkras as.

23 Mišan as iga ahad issok'ay Leyya.

24 Iššedaw tat əd təklit-net Zilfa fəl ad as təšɣəl. Inamaṇsa Yaqub əd Leyya.

25 Tufat aɣora iqqan aɣaf ən Yaqub fəl as Leyya a t id itwakfan. Igla, ikka Laban, iṇṇ'as: «Awak ma di təge da? Nak wərgeɣ əddəlil ən Raxil fəl dak əšɣala? Ma fel tətakaddalaɣ i?»

26 Iṇṇ'as Laban: «Adi wər itəwəggu daɣ-na əzəzləf ən tamaḍrayt dat tamaqqart.

27 Səkkəsəw takrəst ən Leyya dəffər a wen a kay nakfu Raxil təzləfaq qat. Eges a di taga əṣṣa elan wiyyad n əššəɣəl.»

28 Iga Yaqub adi da. As əɣradan əṣṣa aḍan ən təkrəst ən Leyya, ikf'ay Laban Raxil, izlaf tat.

29 Raxil iššedaw tat abba-net əd təklit-net Bilha fəl ad as təšɣəl.

30 Inamaṇsa Yaqub əd Raxil, ir'et, iṣṣof ənta Leyya. Išɣal i Laban har ig' əṣṣ' elan.

31 Inay Əməli as Ləyya wər tətawara ikf'et fərregat ən təla ən bararan, aṃaran Rahkil ənta təggəgra.

32 Təga Ləyya tadist, təgraw barar, tag'as eṣəm Ruben. «Fəlas, təṇṇa, Əməli ogga arkaṇay nin d as əmərədda aləs in ad i iru.»

33 Təlas igi ən tədist, təgraw barar, təṇṇa: «Fəlas Əməli isla as wər ətawara adi da fəl-i ilas tehakkay ən barar.» Təg'as eṣəm Šimehon.

34 Təga tadist tolas, təgraw barar. Təṇṇa: «Daɣ a ilkaman aləs in ad i aknu iḍuf, id əmərədda karad bararan ad t əkfe.» A wen da fəl das təga eṣəm Lafi.

35 Təlas igi ən tədist, təgraw barar, təṇṇa: «Əmərədda ad əɣbəda Əməli.» Adi da fəl das təg' eṣəm Yuda. Təmməzzay d ara.

   

スウェーデンボルグの著作から

 

Arcana Coelestia#3819

この節の研究

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

3819. 'The name of the elder was Leah' means the nature of the affection for external truth; 'and the name of the younger Rachel' means the nature of the affection for internal truth. This is clear from the representation of 'Leah' as the affection for external truth, and of 'Rachel' as the affection for internal truth, both dealt with in 3793; and from the meaning of 'the name' as the nature of, dealt with in 144, 145, 1754, 1896, 2009, 2724, 3006. Leah is called 'the elder' because external truth is learned first, and Rachel 'the younger' because internal truth is learned from then on after that; or what amounts to the same, a person first of all feels an affection for external truths, and from then on after that an affection for internal truths. external truths provide the basic outline for internal truths, for they are the general outlines into which particular details are added. Unless a person has a general outline of the idea of a thing he does not make sense of any particular aspect of it. This explains why the literal sense of the Word contains general truths but the internal sense particular truths. General truths are called external, but particular truths internal. And because truths devoid of affection are not truths because there is no life to them, the affections for them are therefore meant when external and internal truths are referred to.

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

スウェーデンボルグの著作から

 

Arcana Coelestia#4766

この節の研究

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

4766. 'And I, where do I go?' means, Where now is the Church? This is clear from the representation of 'Reuben' as the Church's faith in general, dealt with in 4731, 4734, 4761. And because Reuben says of himself, 'And I, where do I go?' the meaning is, Where now is the Church's faith? or what amounts to the same, Where now is the Church? For the Church does not exist where no heavenly Joseph - that is, no Lord as regards Divine Truth - does so. In particular it has no existence where the Divine Truth that the Lord's Human is Divine and the Truth that charity, and therefore the works of charity, is the essential element of the Church have no existence, as may be seen from what has been shown in this chapter about these two Truths.

[2] If there is no acceptance of this Divine Truth, that the Lord's Human is Divine, then of necessity it follows that a triad and not a single entity should be worshipped, and only half the Lord, that is, His Divine but not His Human (for is there anyone who worships that which is not Divine?) Is the Church anything when a triad is worshipped, each of the three separately from another, or what amounts to the same, when equal homage is paid to each of them? For although the three are called one, thought still keeps them separate and makes them three, the declaration 'a single entity' being no more than a saying spoken with the lips. Let anyone ask himself, when he says that he acknowledges and believes in one God, whether or not he has thoughts of three. Or when he says that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and that these are distinct and separate both in their persons and as to their functions, whether he can think that there is one God, except in the way that three who are distinct from one another make one through unanimity and also through deference insofar as one goes forth from another. When therefore three gods are worshipped, where then is the Church?

[3] But if the Lord alone is worshipped, in whom the perfect Triad dwells, and in whom is the Father and the Father in Him, as He Himself says in the following places -

Even though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father. John 10:38.

He who has seen Me has seen the Father. Do you not believe, Philip, that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me. John 14:9-11.

He who sees Me sees Him who sent Me. John 12:45.

All Mine are Yours, and Yours are Mine. John 17:10.

- then it is a Christian Church, as it is when it keeps to the following spoken by the Lord,

The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord; therefore you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength. This is the first commandment. The second is like it, You shall love your neighbour as yourself. There Is no other commandment greater than these. Mark 12:29-31.

'The Lord our God' is the Lord, see Matthew 4:7, 10; 22:43-44; Luke 1:16-17; John 20:28, 'Jehovah' in the Old Testament being called 'the Lord' in the New, see 2921.

[4] If this Divine Truth too goes unaccepted both in doctrine and in life - the Truth that love towards the neighbour, that is, charity, and therefore the works of charity, is the essential element of the Church - then of necessity it follows that thinking what is true exists in the Church but not thinking what is good. That being so, the thought of one who belongs to the Church may consist of elements that contradict and stand opposed to each other; that is to say, thinking what is evil and thinking what is true may be present simultaneously. In thinking what is evil he lives with the devil and in thinking what is true he does so with the Lord. But truth and evil cannot possibly be in accord,

No one can serve two masters, either he will hate the one and love the other . . . Luke 16:13.

When faith separated from charity advocates this, and endorses it in life, then no matter how much it talks about the fruits of faith, where indeed is the Church?

  
/ 10837に移動  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.