2463. 'And he dwelt in a cave - he' means good enveloped in falsity. This is clear from the meaning of 'a cave'. A cave is a kind of dwelling-place in a mountain, but an obscure one. And because all dwelling-places whatever, like houses, mean goods, 2231, 2233 - though the nature of the goods is such as are those dwelling-places - 'the cave' mentioned here, being an obscure dwelling-place, therefore means an obscure good. Mountain-caves are mentioned in various places in the Word, where in the internal sense they have a similar meaning, such as in Isaiah 2:19; 32:14. They also have a similar meaning in historical descriptions, as for example in the incident describing when Elijah, fleeing from Jezebel, came to a cave in Mount Horeb where he spent the night and where the word of Jehovah came to him. He went out and stood on the mount before Jehovah, when he wrapped his face in his mantle and went out and stood at the entrance to the cave, 1 Kings 19:9, 13. Here in the internal sense 'a cave' means an obscure good, but like that which exists in times of temptation. Because he could not bear to see the Divine he wrapped his face in his mantle. Similar examples occur elsewhere in historical descriptions, such as in Judges 6:2 where it is said that the children of Israel made caves for themselves in the mountains, because of Midian, and also in 1 Samuel 13:6, because of the Philistines. These historical descriptions are similar to those in Moses, in that they mean something different in the internal sense.

2231. 'That he will command his sons, and his house after him, and they will keep the way of Jehovah to do righteousness and judgement' means that from Him comes the entire doctrine of charity and of faith. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'son', 'house', 'way', 'righteousness', and 'judgement', which in short, or when their several meanings are converted into one, mean the entire doctrine of charity and of faith. For 'sons' means all who are governed by truths, 'house' all who are governed by goods, 'way' means the doctrine of faith which they are taught, 'righteousness' that doctrine in regard to good, 'judgement', in regard to truth. Doctrine regarding good is the doctrine of charity, while doctrine regarding truth is the doctrine of faith.

[2] In general there is only one doctrine, that is to say, the doctrine of charity, for, as stated in 2228, all things of faith have charity in view. No other difference exists between charity and faith than that which exists between willing what is good and thinking what is good - for one who wills what is good also thinks what is good - thus than that which exists between will and understanding. People who reflect on the matter know that the will is one thing and the understanding another. The same is also well recognized in the learned world, and it is plain to see in the case of those who will what is evil and yet from thought utter what is good. From such persons it is evident to anyone that the will is one thing and the understanding another, and thus that the human mind is divided into two parts which do not then make a single whole. Yet man was created in such a way that those two parts should constitute one single mind, and no other difference should exist between them than, to use a comparison, between that of a flame and the light shining from it. Love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour were to be like the flame, and all perception and thought like the light shining from it. Thus love and charity were to constitute the whole of perception and thought, that is, to exist in every single part. Perception or thought regarding the essential nature of love and charity is that which is called faith.

[3] But because the human race started to will what was evil, to hate the neighbour, and to practice revenge and cruelty, with the result that the part of the mind called the will was completely corrupted, men started to make a distinction between charity and faith, and to attribute to faith all those matters of doctrine which belonged to their religion and to refer to them by the single term faith. At length they went so far as to say that people could be saved by faith alone, by which they meant their doctrine. They said that provided they believed that doctrine people could be saved no matter how they lived. Charity was accordingly separated from faith, and when that happens it is nothing else, to use a comparison, than some kind of light that has no flame, like sunlight in winter-time which is so cold and icy that the earth's vegetation languishes and dies. But faith that is derived from charity is like the light of spring-time and summer-time which causes all things to sprout and come into flower.

[4] The same may also be recognized from the fact that love and charity are celestial flame, while faith is the spiritual light that shines from it. This is also how faith and charity make a perceptible and visual presentation of themselves in the next life, for in that life the Lord's celestial manifests itself before the angels by means of a flaming radiance like that of the sun, while the Lord's spiritual manifests itself by means of the light shining from this; and that radiance and light act upon the angels and spirits interiorly according to the life of love and charity existing with them. This is the source of the joy and happiness in the next life with all their variations. These considerations show the implications of the assertion that faith alone saves.