Bible

 

Genesis 42

Studie

   

2 «Nak əsleɣ as Masar ih'et alkama, ərəsat tat, zanzat ana du daɣ-as a dana wər anɣu laz.»

3 Ərasan ṃaraw məqqaran ən Yusəf sas Masar ad d azzanzin daɣ-as alkama.

4 Yaqub wər dər-san iššedaw Benyamin wa n amaḍray ən Yusəf fəlas iṇṇa iksud a tu təgrəw təkma iyyat əntada.

5 Əglan maddanəs n Israyil əddewan d aytedan wiyyaḍ əntanay da əgmaynen alkama fəlas akal ən Kanan əntada ewad t'in laz.

6 Yusəf ənta azzaran y akal, ənta a innəṭṭafan əd taɣawšay ta n nazzan n alkama y aytedan kul win n akal. Iməqqaran-net as t'in oṣan əssəjadan dat-əs daɣ aṃadal.

7 Inay Yusəf iməqqaran-net ɣas izday tan mišan iṣṣəkn'en as wər tan izday, iharaššat tan iṇṇ'aṣan: «Məni du təfalam?» Əjjəwwaban as, əṇṇan as: «Akal wa n Kanan a du nəfal fəl a du nəzzanzu isudar.»

8 Yusəf izday iməqqaran-net mišan əntanay wər t'əzdayan.

9 Iktad du Yusəf targəten ši ṇad itag sər-san, təzzar iṇṇ'aṣan: «Kawanay inaṣṣasaman a təṃosam, toṣam du fəl ad tənəyam idaggan win ərkamnen daɣ akal.»

10 Əṇṇan as: «Kala kala əmizwar, eklan nak nakkanay, aṣṣa ɣas a du nəga ad nazzanzu isudar.

11 Nakkanay ket nana abba nnana iyyanda, nakkanay aytedan ən təfləst a nəṃos, wər nəṃos inaṣṣasaman.»

12 «Kala, kala, iṇṇ-asan, toṣam du fəl ad tənəyam idaggan win ərkamnen daɣ akal!»

13 Əjjəwwaban as: «Nakkanay eklan nak ṃaraw-ena d əššin eraw ana aləs iyyanda ən Kanan. Amaḍray nnana wa ənḍərran noyyay in ɣur abba nnana, aṃaran wa das waššaran aba tu.»

14 Iṇṇ-assan Yusəf: «Nak adi da a dawan əṇṇe kawanay inaṣṣasaman a təṃosam.

15 Aṃaran a kawan ajjarraba: " Əhadaɣ awan s eṣəm ən Firɣawna kud təfalam da iket wər di d oṣa amaḍray nnawan.

16 Saglat iyyan daɣ wan a t'id'awəy, kawanay aṃaran at takkim kasaw, a kawan ajjarraba har əṣṣəna kud a wa di təgannam tidət wala bahu, as wər iga di əhada s eṣəm ən Firɣawna as kawanay inaṣṣasaman.»

17 Ig'en daɣ kasaw har əgan karad aḍan.

18 As ig'əzəl wa n karad, iṇṇ'asan Yusəf: «Agat a wa dawan z aṇṇa, a kawan ayya təddaram, fəlas Məššina a əksuda.

19 Kud tidət as təṃosam aytedan ən təfləst ayyaq qawan, aqqam du iyyan daɣ wan daɣ kasaw, kawanay taglim tawəyam alkama y aɣaywan nawan iha laz.

20 Təzzar tawəyam i du amaḍray nnawan ad əṣṣənaɣ as tidət a di təgam aṃaran wər za taṃṃatim.» Ərdan s a wen da.

21 Ad ətinəməṇṇin gar-essan, tidət as nətawaddab fəl əddəlil n amaḍray nnana. Tərəmmeq ta iga as daɣ-na igammay a tu nayyu mišan wər das nəṣṣəsam, tərəmmeq tədi da a nəga azal a.

22 Iššewal Ruben iṇṇ-asan: «Wərge əmalaɣ awan as dawan əṇṇeɣ ad wər tagim abakkaḍ iṃosan təkma ən barar di? Mišan wər di təṣṣəsamam. Əmərədda azni-net a daɣ-na itawaran.»

23 Iməqqaran-net wər əṣṣenan as Yusəf igra a wa əgannan, fəlas əməššewəl a illan gar-es dər-san.

24 Igguk kan in ad ihallu. adi iqqal du fəl ad asan iššiwəl, obaz daɣ-san Šimehon issəɣfal tu dat šiṭṭawen nasan.

25 Omar Yusəf y a dasan təwəṭkəran sumad nasan alkama, itəwəssuɣəl tan əzrəf nasan, akk iyyan itəwəgget as əzrəf-net daɣ əsaməd-net. Omar tolas a tan itəwəkfu allaw. Itawagg'asan a wen da.

26 Əṭṭərken isumad nasan fəl əzdan nasan, əglan.

27 As oṣan edag iyyan a daɣ z aṇsin ora iyyan daɣ-san əsaməd wa-net fəl ad d'ikkəs y ajad-net a itša təzzar inay azrəf-net daɣ əmi n əsaməd.

28 Iṇṇa i midawan-net: «Ənəyat azrəf in itawasaɣal i du, ənta da ihan əsaməd in da,» təzzar təggaz tan ṭasa, təṇdaw tan taysəst, ad ətinəməṇṇin gar-essan: «Ma dana itag Məššina da?»

29 As din oṣan abba nnasan Yaqub daɣ Kanan əmalan as arat wa tan igrawan kul, əṇṇan as:

30 «Aləs wa iṃosan əmizwar ən Masar as din noṣa iharaššat ana, iṇṇa:" Kawanay inaṣṣasaman a təṃosam. "

31 Nəṇṇ'as nakkanay aytedan ən təfləst, wər nəṃos inaṣṣasaman.

32 Nakkanay ṃaraw-ena d əššin nədraw abba, iyyan daɣ-na aba tu, wa daɣ-na ənḍarran iqqim in ɣur abba nnana daɣ akal ən Kanan. Təzzar iṇṇ-ana əmizwar ən Masar: " Arat w'as z əṣṣəna kud aytedan ən təfləst a təṃosam,

33 wədi a du tayyim ɣur-i iyyan daɣ-wan tətkəlam alkama tawəyam tu y iɣawnatan nawan a əlluznen.

34 As din toṣam tawəyam i du aṃadray nnawan wa n alallawa ad əṣṣənaɣ as wər təṃosam inaṣṣasaman mišan aytedan ən təfləst, amaran əssuɣəlaq qawan amaḍray nnawan, akfaq qawan turagat ad təssəɣləyam i təɣawšiwen nawan daɣ akal."»

35 As əggazan šin n ikus n alkama akk iyyan oṣ'in daɣ əsaməd-net əsəkməs n əzrəf-net. As ənnayan isəkmas n əzrəf nasan təggaz tan ṭasa əntanay əd ši-ssan.

36 Iṇṇ'asan abba nnaṣan Yaqub: «Bararan in a dər-i təzammazzayam, Yusəf abas t'illa, ilkam as Šimehon, amaran taram ad tawəyam Benyamin. Adi kul nak ad d iqqal.»

37 Iṇṇ'as Ruben: «As dak du wər ewaya Benyamin tanɣa bararan in ann əššin. Əfləs i sər-əs, a dak k'id'əssuɣəla.»

38 Iṇṇ'as Yaqub: «Barar in wər dər-wan iddew, fəlas amaqqar-net aba tu iqqim du ɣas-net. As tu təgraw təkma daɣ əšikəl nawan nak a waššaran a a di tawəyam s alaxirat fəl tayyant-net.»

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5420

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5420. 'And bowed down to him, faces to the earth' means an expression of humility. This is clear from the meaning of 'bowing down' as an expression of humility, dealt with in 2153, and of 'faces to the earth' as a reverent expression of humility, 1999. The phrase 'expression of humility' is not used here to mean that which arises out of acknowledgement or recognition and is therefore an inward humility. Rather, an outward humility is meant, because such a bowing down was the accepted way to behave in front of the governor of the land. No inward, only outward humility is meant because as yet no agreement existed, no agreement leading to a joining together. When such is the state of the natural it can indeed humble itself, doing so to the utmost; yet this is no more than an acquired habit. It is a posture devoid of genuine affection as the producer of it, and so is a bodily action lacking its own true soul. This kind of an expression of humility is meant here.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1999

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1999. That 'Abram fell on his face' 1 means adoration is clear without explanation. Falling on one's face' was the reverent way in which the Most Ancient Church, and as a consequence the ancients, expressed adoration. The reason they expressed it in this way was that 'the face' meant the inward parts, and 'falling on one's face' 1 represented a state of humiliation of those inward parts; and from this it became in the Jewish representative Church an act of reverence. True adoration or humility of heart entails prostration before the Lord face-downwards on the ground as the natural action resulting from it. Indeed humiliation of heart entails the acknowledgement of oneself as being nothing but uncleanness, and at the same time the acknowledgement of the Lord's infinite mercy towards such. When these acknowledgements are fixed in the mind, the mind itself casts itself down towards hell and prostrates the body. Nor does it raise itself until raised up by the Lord, as happens in all true humiliation, accompanied by a perception that such raising up is of the Lord's mercy. Such was the humiliation of members of the Most Ancient Church. It is different however with adoration which does not flow from humiliation of heart, see 1153.

[2] It is well known from the Word, in the Gospels, that the Lord adored and prayed to Jehovah, His Father, and that He did so as though to Someone other than Himself, even though Jehovah was within Him. But the state that the Lord experienced at such times was the state of His humiliation, the nature of which has been discussed in Volume One, namely this, that at such times as these He was in the infirm human derived from the mother. But to the extent He cast this off and took on the Divine His state was different, which state is called the state of His glorification. In the first state He adored Jehovah as Someone other than Himself, even though He was within Him, for, as has been stated, His Internal was Jehovah. In the latter state however, that is to say, the state of glorification, He spoke to Jehovah as to Himself, since He was Jehovah Himself.

[3] The truth of all this however cannot be grasped unless one knows what the internal is and how the internal operates into the external, and furthermore how the internal and external are distinct and separate and yet joined together. The matter may be illustrated however by means of something similar, namely by means of the internal with man and of its influx and operation into the external with him. For the fact that man has an internal, an interior or rational, and an external, see what has appeared already in 1889, 1940. Man's internal is that which makes him human and distinguishes him from animals. It is by means of this internal that man lives on after death and for ever, and by means of it the Lord can raise him up among angels. It is the prior or primary form from which anyone becomes and is a human being, and it is by means of this internal that the Lord is united to man. The heaven itself that is nearest to the Lord consists of these human internals, but being above even the inmost angelic heaven these internals therefore belong to the Lord Himself. In this way the entire human race is directly present beneath the eyes of the Lord. Distance, a visible feature of this sublunary world, does not exist in heaven, still less above heaven - see what has been mentioned from experience in 1275, 1277.

[4] These inward aspects of men possess no life in themselves but are recipient forms of the Lord's life. To the extent then that anyone is under the influence of evil, both that of his own doing and that which is hereditary, he has been so to speak separated from this internal which is the Lord's and resides with the Lord, and so has been separated from the Lord. For although that human internal is joined to the person and cannot be separated from him, yet to the extent he moves away from the Lord he does in a way separate himself from it, see 1594. But such separation is not a complete severance from that human internal - for if it were, man would no longer be able to live after death; but it is a lack of harmony and agreement with it on the part of his capacities which are beneath it, that is, of his rational and external man. Insofar as disharmony and disagreement are present there is no conjunction, but insofar as they are absent man is joined to the Lord by means of the internal, which is achieved in the measure that he is moved by love and charity, for love and charity effect conjunction. Such is the situation with man.

[5] But the Lord's Internal was Jehovah Himself, since He was conceived from Jehovah, who cannot be divided or become the relative of another, like a son who has been conceived from a human father. For unlike the human, the Divine is not capable of being divided but is and remains one and the same. To this Internal the Lord united the Human Essence. Moreover because the Lord's Internal was Jehovah it was not, like man's internal, a recipient form of life, but life itself. Through that union His Human Essence as well became life itself. Hence the Lord's frequent declaration that He is Life, as in John,

As the Father has Life in Himself, so He has granted the Son to have Life in Himself. John 5:26.

And elsewhere besides this in the same gospel, 1:4; 5:21; 6:33, 35, 48; 11:25. 'The Son' is used to mean the Lord's Human Essence. To the extent therefore that the Lord was in the human which He received by heredity from the mother, He appeared to be distinct and separate from Jehovah, and worshipped Jehovah as Someone other than Himself. But to the extent He cast off this human, the Lord was not distinct and separate from Jehovah but one with Him. The first state, as has been mentioned, was the state of the Lord's humiliation, but the second the state of His glorification.

Poznámky pod čarou:

1. lit faces

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.