Bible

 

Genesis 37

Studie

   

2 Ənta da əttarix ən maddanəs ən Yaqub. Yusəf iṃos abi ilan ṃaraw elan d əṣṣa, faw itakku təməḍint ən hərwan nasan iddew əd məqqaran-net maddanəs ən Bilha əd Zilfa, šiḍoden n abba nnet. Faw itaway du i ši-s isalan n arak təṇṇawen šin əgannin.

3 Israyil(eṣəm wahaḍan ən Yaqub) iṣṣof Yusəf bararan-net kul win haḍatnen fəlas tušaray-net a daq q igraw. Ig'as takatkat təknat šihussay.

4 Ənayan məqqaran-net as əntanay iṣṣof tan ši-ssan Yusəf, təzzar əgzaran tu har as abas əfragan dər-əs ələsan takkayt.

5 Iga Yusəf targət, imal asan tat, təzzar əsannahalan tu gezzar.

6 Iṇṇ'asan: «Səsəmat i ad awan əməla targət ta əgeɣ,

7 iṃan nana a nayaɣ nəha šiwəgas nətaqqan šibolasen n alkaman, as din əgreɣ təbolast ta nnu təbdad, əkkanat tat du šin nawan əɣalayɣalaynat tat, əssəjadnat as.»

8 Əṇṇan as məqqaran-net: «Əngəm kay a z iqqəlan əmənokal nana, təxkəmaɣ ana?» Əsannahalan tu məqqaran-net gezzar wəllen fəl tərgət ta sər-san iga da, d amel wa dasan tat iga.

9 Ilas Yusəf igi ən tərgət iyyat imal tat i məqqaran-net. Iṇṇa: «Əgeɣ targət iyyat tolas təṃosat as ənaya təfuk əd təllit d eṭran əṃosnen maraw d iyyan, a di sajadnen.»

10 Targət ta imal i məqqaran-net da, imal tat i ši-s ənta da. Iharaššat tu ši-s iṇṇ'as: «Ma iṃos almaɣna ən tərgət ta? Mərda nnak ad ak nəssəjəd nak, d anna nak əd məqqaran nak?»

11 Təzzar əmmənzaɣan tu məqqaran-net mišan ši-s imməɣras in ikiṭṭəw targət ta.

12 As əzəl iyyan əglan məqqaran-net əḍanan eharay ən ši-ssan daɣ aṃadal ən Šəkem.

13 Iṇṇa Israyil i Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nak wərgeɣ əkkan təməḍint əs Šəkem, ayaw a kay zəmmizəla sər-san.» Ikkəwan as Yusəf, iṇṇ'as: «Nak da.»

14 Iṇṇ'as: «Aglu əṣṣən iməqqaran nak əɣlasan, əntanay d aharay nasan, təqqəla du təməlaɣ i. Təzzar immozal Yusəf, ifal aɣlal wa n Xebron ikka Šəkem.

15 Ijiwankat as t igraw aləs iyyan, ixrak daɣ əṣuf. Iṇṇ'as: «M'as təṣaggada?»

16 Iṇṇ'as Yusəf: «Iməqqaran nin as əṣaggada, təfraga ad i təməla edag wa daɣ əssəḍanan.»

17 Iṇṇ-as aləs: «Əg̣madan edag wa fəlas əsallaɣ asan as əṇṇan:" Əndawatana aṃadal wa n Dotan!"» Iggaz Yusəf ədəriz ən məqqaran-net har tan in oṣa daɣ Dotan.

18 As t ənayan daɣ igəg, izay tan in, əgan eɣaf fəl at t anɣin.

19 Ənamaṇṇan gar-essan: «Əməggi ən tərgəten den ad d izayan den.

20 Anɣiwatanaq qu a tu nəgər daɣ iyyat daɣ təgaziwen a, ad naṇṇu əmudar at t itšan, ad nəṣṣən a wa z'əqqəlnat tərgəten-net.»

21 Isl asan Ruben, igmay d efsan-net iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tagim iṃan-net.»

22 Ilas iṇṇ'asan: «Ad wər tənɣəlam azni nnet, əgərat t in ɣas daɣ tagaza a təhat əṣuf da, da wər das təɣšedam arat.» Ruben ira at t assafsu har t issuɣəl i ši-s.

23 As d ewad Yusəf iməqqaran-net əzzafan tu əkkaṣan daɣ-as takatkat-net ta təknat šihussay izlag.

24 Təzzar ədkalan tu əgaran tu daɣ tagaza wər əhen aṃan.

25 Dəffər adi əqqiman ad əṭattin as d ətkalan aṣawad nasan, ənayan taɣlamt ən Kəl Ismaɣil a du təfalat aṃadal ən Gilad. Olaman nasan əggiggan ilalan əganen daɣ məglan d aḍutan əzodnen, əgan anamod ən Masar.

26 Təzzar iṇṇa Yuda i məqqaran-net: «Ma dana z'aknu ad nanɣu amaḍray nnana nəɣbər azni nnet?

27 Əndawat a t in nazzanzu i Kəl Ismaɣil, da wər das nəɣšed arat, fəlas amaḍray nnana a iṃos, nəṃos dər-əs arat iyyanda.» Təzzar əṭṭafan məqqaran-net batu ta, ənamarḍan dər-əs fall-as.

28 As d okoyan mazanzan wiyyaḍ ən Kəl Midyan, əkkasan du Yusəf daɣ tagaza, əzzənzan t in i Kəl Ismaɣil ṣanatat təmərwen ən tamma n əzrəf. Ewayan tu Kəl Ismaɣil win əs Masar.

29 Iqqal du Ruben tagaza inay as Yusəf wər tat iha. Təzzar irmaɣ ad izazarrat isəlsa nnet.

30 Iqqal iməḍrayan-net, iṇṇ'asan: «Barar wər t'illa! Əmərədda, nak ma z'aga?»

31 Təzzar əgzaman əzolaɣ ədkalan takatkat ən Yusəf, əssəlmaɣan tat daɣ əzni nnet.

32 Əsassawayan takatkat ta təknat šihussay əs ši-ssan, əṇṇan as in: «A wa da a din nog̣az əṣṣən kud takatkat ən barar nak adi wala.»

33 Izday tat iṇṇa: «Takatkat ən barar in a wa! Əmudar n əmətši at t'itšan! Yusəf barar in iqqal idesan immətša!

34 Ad izazarrat Yaqub telassay-net fəl tərəmmeq, iggaz afartay ən rur-es har ig'azzaman aggotnen.

35 Ad gammayan bararan-net əd təbararen-net ket nasan ad t'əsəssikəyan tərəmmeq mišan ugay, iṇṇa: «Kala kala, har faw əheɣ afartay iket wər əlkema i barar in s alaxirat.» Imməɣras in ihallu fall-as.

36 Siga wen Yusəf əzzənzan t'in Kəl Midyan daɣ akal wa n Masar y aləs igan eṣəm Fotifar illan ɣur Firɣawna, iṃos əmuzar ən mag̣azan-net ən nammagaran.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4766

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4766. 'And I, where do I go?' means, Where now is the Church? This is clear from the representation of 'Reuben' as the Church's faith in general, dealt with in 4731, 4734, 4761. And because Reuben says of himself, 'And I, where do I go?' the meaning is, Where now is the Church's faith? or what amounts to the same, Where now is the Church? For the Church does not exist where no heavenly Joseph - that is, no Lord as regards Divine Truth - does so. In particular it has no existence where the Divine Truth that the Lord's Human is Divine and the Truth that charity, and therefore the works of charity, is the essential element of the Church have no existence, as may be seen from what has been shown in this chapter about these two Truths.

[2] If there is no acceptance of this Divine Truth, that the Lord's Human is Divine, then of necessity it follows that a triad and not a single entity should be worshipped, and only half the Lord, that is, His Divine but not His Human (for is there anyone who worships that which is not Divine?) Is the Church anything when a triad is worshipped, each of the three separately from another, or what amounts to the same, when equal homage is paid to each of them? For although the three are called one, thought still keeps them separate and makes them three, the declaration 'a single entity' being no more than a saying spoken with the lips. Let anyone ask himself, when he says that he acknowledges and believes in one God, whether or not he has thoughts of three. Or when he says that the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, and that these are distinct and separate both in their persons and as to their functions, whether he can think that there is one God, except in the way that three who are distinct from one another make one through unanimity and also through deference insofar as one goes forth from another. When therefore three gods are worshipped, where then is the Church?

[3] But if the Lord alone is worshipped, in whom the perfect Triad dwells, and in whom is the Father and the Father in Him, as He Himself says in the following places -

Even though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in the Father. John 10:38.

He who has seen Me has seen the Father. Do you not believe, Philip, that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me. John 14:9-11.

He who sees Me sees Him who sent Me. John 12:45.

All Mine are Yours, and Yours are Mine. John 17:10.

- then it is a Christian Church, as it is when it keeps to the following spoken by the Lord,

The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord; therefore you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind, and with all your strength. This is the first commandment. The second is like it, You shall love your neighbour as yourself. There Is no other commandment greater than these. Mark 12:29-31.

'The Lord our God' is the Lord, see Matthew 4:7, 10; 22:43-44; Luke 1:16-17; John 20:28, 'Jehovah' in the Old Testament being called 'the Lord' in the New, see 2921.

[4] If this Divine Truth too goes unaccepted both in doctrine and in life - the Truth that love towards the neighbour, that is, charity, and therefore the works of charity, is the essential element of the Church - then of necessity it follows that thinking what is true exists in the Church but not thinking what is good. That being so, the thought of one who belongs to the Church may consist of elements that contradict and stand opposed to each other; that is to say, thinking what is evil and thinking what is true may be present simultaneously. In thinking what is evil he lives with the devil and in thinking what is true he does so with the Lord. But truth and evil cannot possibly be in accord,

No one can serve two masters, either he will hate the one and love the other . . . Luke 16:13.

When faith separated from charity advocates this, and endorses it in life, then no matter how much it talks about the fruits of faith, where indeed is the Church?

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 2921

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

2921. 'My lord, you are a prince of God in the midst of us' means the Lord as regards Divine good and truth with them. This is clear from the meaning of 'a lord' and of 'a prince of God', and from the meaning of 'in the midst of us'. The fact that the expression 'lord' is used when good is the subject is clear from the Old Testament Word, for there Jehovah is sometimes called Jehovah, sometimes God, sometimes Lord, sometimes Jehovah God, sometimes Lord Jehovih, sometimes Jehovah Zebaoth, and always for a hidden reason which cannot be known except from the internal sense. In general when the celestial things of love, that is, when good, are dealt with, the name Jehovah is used, but when the spiritual things of faith are dealt with, the name God is used. And when both together are dealt with, the names Jehovah God are used. When however the Divine power of good, that is, when omnipotence is the subject, Jehovah Zebaoth (or Jehovah of Hosts), and also the Lord, are used; so that the names Jehovah Zebaoth and the name the Lord have the same sense and meaning. From this also, that is to say, from the power of good, men and angels are called 'lords', and in the contrary sense those are called servants or slaves who have no power at all or else have a power received from their lords. From these considerations it becomes clear that here 'my lord' in the internal sense means the Lord as regards good, which in what follows below will be illustrated from the Word. 'A prince of God' however means the Lord as regards the power of truth, that is, as regards truth, as becomes clear from the meaning of 'a prince' or 'princes' as first and foremost truths, dealt with in 1482, 2089, and from the fact that the phrase 'a prince of God' is used, for the name God is used when truth is dealt with but the name Jehovah when good is dealt with, 2586, 2769, 2807, 2822. As regards 'in the midst of us' meaning among them or present with them, this is clear without explanation.

[2] That in the Old Testament Word the names Jehovah Zebaoth and the name Lord have the same sense and meaning is clear in Isaiah,

The zeal of Jehovah Zebaoth will do this; the Lord has sent a word into Jacob, and it has fallen on Israel. Isaiah 9:7-8.

Elsewhere in the same prophet,

A mighty king will have dominion over them, said the Lord, Jehovah Zebaoth. Isaiah 19:4.

In Malachi,

Behold, suddenly there will come to His temple the Lord whom you are seeking and the angel of the covenant in whom you delight. Behold, He is coming, says Jehovah Zebaoth. Malachi 3:1.

More plainly, in Isaiah,

I saw the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up. Above Him stood the seraphim; each had six wings. One called to another, Holy, holy, holy is Jehovah Zebaoth. Woe is me! For I am cut off; for my eyes have seen the King, Jehovah Zebaoth. And I heard the voice of the Lord. Isaiah 6:1-3, 5, 8.

From these places it is evident that Jehovah Zebaoth and the Lord have the same meaning.

[3] But 'the Lord Jehovih' is used more particularly when the help of omnipotence is sought and prayed for, as in Isaiah,

Say to the cities of Judah, Behold your God! Behold, the Lord Jehovih will come with might, and His arm will exercise dominion for Him; behold, His reward is with Him, and His work before Him. He will pasture His flock like a shepherd. Isaiah 40:9-11.

For further examples of this use of 'the Lord Jehovih', see Isaiah 25:8; 40:10; 48:16; 50:4-5, 7, 9; 61:1; Jeremiah 2:22; Ezekiel 8:1; 11:13, 17, 21; 12:10, 19, 28; 13:8, 13, 16, 18, 20; 14:4, 6, 11, 18, 20-21; Micah 1:2; Psalms 71:5, 16; and many other places.

[4] What is more, in the Old Testament Word 'the Lord' entails the same as 'Jehovah', that is to say, 'the Lord' is used when good is dealt with, and therefore also the Lord is distinguished from God in the same way as Jehovah is from God; as in Moses,

Jehovah your God, He is God of gods, and Lord of lords. Deuteronomy 10:17.

In David,

Confess the God of gods, for His mercy is for ever; confess the Lord of lords, for His mercy is for ever. Psalms 136:1-3.

[5] But nowhere in the New Testament Word, neither in the Gospels nor in the Book of Revelation, is Jehovah used. Instead of Jehovah the name the Lord occurs - for hidden reasons to be dealt with below. The fact that in the New Testament Word the Lord is used instead of Jehovah is quite clear in Mark,

Jesus said, The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God is one Lord. Therefore you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your thought, and with all your strength. Mark 12:29-30.

The same is expressed in Moses as follows,

Hear, O Israel, Jehovah our God is one Jehovah; and you shall love Jehovah your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength. Deuteronomy 6:4-5.

Here it is evident that the name 'the Lord' is used instead of Jehovah. Likewise in John,

I looked, and behold, a throne had been set in heaven, with one seated upon the throne. Around the throne were four living creatures, full of eyes in front and behind. Each had for himself six wings round about him, and was full of eyes within. They were saying, Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God omnipotent. Revelation 4:2, 6, 8.

This is described in Isaiah as follows,

I saw the Lord seated upon a throne, high and lifted up. Above Him stood the seraphim; each had six wings. One called to another, Holy, holy, holy is Jehovah Zebaoth. Isaiah 6:1-3, 5, 8.

In this case 'the Lord' is used instead of 'Jehovah', that is, 'the Lord God omnipotent' instead of 'Jehovah Zebaoth'. The fact that the four living creatures are the seraphim or cherubs is evident in Ezekiel 1:5, 13-15, 19 and following verses; 10:15. That in the New Testament 'the Lord' is Jehovah is also clear from many other places, as in Luke,

An angel of the Lord appeared to Zechariah. Luke 1:11.

'An angel of the Lord' is used instead of 'an angel of Jehovah'. In the same chapter the angel told Zechariah regarding his son,

He will turn many of the children of Israel to the Lord their God. Luke 1:16.

'To the Lord their God' is used instead of 'to Jehovah their God'. Also in the same chapter, the angel told Mary regarding Jesus,

He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to Him the throne of David. Luke 1:32.

'The Lord God' is used instead of 'Jehovah God'. Still in the same chapter,

Mary said, My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Saviour. Luke 1:46-47.

Here also 'the Lord' is used instead of 'Jehovah'. And again in the same chapter, Zechariah prophesied, saying,

Blessed is the Lord God of Israel. Luke 1:68.

'The Lord God' is used instead of 'Jehovah God'. In the same gospel,

An angel of the Lord stood before the shepherds, and the glory of the Lord shone around them. Luke 2:9.

'An angel of the Lord' and 'the glory of the Lord' are used instead of 'an angel of Jehovah' and 'the glory of Jehovah'. In Matthew,

Blessed is He coming in the name of the Lord. Matthew 21:9; 23:39; Luke 13:35; John 12:13.

'In the name of the Lord' is used instead of 'in the name of Jehovah'. There are many other places besides all these, such as Luke 1:28; 2:15, 22-24, 29, 38-39; 5:17; Mark 12:10-11.

[6] Among the hidden reasons why people called Jehovah the Lord were the following: If when the Lord was in the world they had been told that He was the Jehovah mentioned so many times in the Old Testament, see 1736, they would not have accepted it because they would not have believed it. And there is the further reason that as regards the Human the Lord did not become Jehovah until He had in every respect united the Divine Essence to the Human Essence, and the Human Essence to the Divine Essence, see 1725, 1729, 1733, 1745, 1815, 2156, 2751. These became fully united after the final temptation, which was that of the Cross; and it was for this reason that after the Resurrection the disciples always called Him Lord, John 20:2, 13, 15, 18, 20, 25; 21:7, 12, 15-17, 20; Mark 16:19-20; and Thomas said,

My Lord and my God. John 20:28.

And as the Lord was the Jehovah mentioned so many times in the Old Testament, therefore He also told the disciples,

You call Me Master and Lord, and you are right, for so I am. If therefore I your Lord and Master have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one anothers' feet. John 13:13-14, 16.

These words mean that He was Jehovah God, for in this instance He is called 'Lord' as regards good, but 'Master' as regards truth. That the Lord was Jehovah is also meant by the angel's words to the shepherds,

To you is born this day a Saviour, who is Christ the Lord. Luke 2:11.

'Christ' is used instead of 'Messiah', 'Anointed One', and 'King', 'the Lord, instead of 'Jehovah' - 'Christ' having regard to truth, 'the Lord' to good. Anyone who does not examine the Word carefully cannot know this, for he believes that our Saviour was called Lord because this was an everyday expression that was used to offer respect to Him, as to others, when in reality He was so called by virtue of His being Jehovah.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.