Bible

 

Genesis 27

Studie

   

2 Iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Nak əmərədda waššara, wər əṣṣena da daɣ-i təlla taṃattant.

3 Daɣ adi əmərədda əgmaya daɣ-ak ad tətkəla təganzay nnak əd ṃarran-net təggəzaɣ əṣuf tanɣaɣ i du iṣan ən tawaqqast.

4 Tassaŋŋaɣ i aṃensay izodan s əmmək wa as tareɣ tawəyaɣ i t'id at t'atša fəl a fall- ak ag'albaraka nin dat taṃattant in.»

5 Wa iššewal Isxaq y Esaw təṣṣisam asan Raqqiyetu. Igla Esaw, ikka tagmərt.

6 Təṇṇa i rures Yaqub: «Əmərədda ad əsleɣ y abba nnak iššewal y amaqqar nak Esaw, iṇṇ'as:

7 "Awəy i du iṣan ən tawaqqast tagaɣ i aṃensay izodan az z'atša a fall-ak ag'albaraka nin dat Əməli harwa di wər aba"

8 Daɣ adi əmərədda barar in ṣəsəm i tagaɣ a w'as kay omara.

9 A daɣ-ak areɣ at tagla takka eharay wa ənḍərran tabəza du əššin sagayan fəl a daɣ-san akna ameṇsay izodan y abba nnak s əmmək w'as t'ira.

10 Aṃaran tawəyaɣ as tu atš'ay fəl a fall-ak ag'albaraka-net dat taṃattant-net.»

11 Mišan Yaqub iṇṇa y anna-net Raqqiyetu: «Nak əṣṣanaɣ as amaqqar in Esaw ibəndəlan, nak abo.

12 As di iḍas abba nin, iṣṣan as bahu a das əge, a di abəz daɣ təkaddilt issəwər i allaɣanat daɣ adag n albaraka nnet».

13 «Təwəret i allaɣanat», təṇṇ'as ṃas. «Səsəm i ɣas aglu, ag'awa as dak əṇṇeɣ.»

14 Igla ilway tan du y anna-net təkna daɣ san ameṇsay wa izodan əmmək w'as t'ira abba nnet.

15 Dəffər adi tədkal du Raqqiyetu isəlsa n Esaw win əhossaynen as kala da əhan ehan-net təssəls'en i Yaqub wa n amaḍray nnet.

16 Təssəlsa tawšeten-net d iri-net agašek ən sagayan.

17 Dəffər a wen təkfa Yaqub ameṇsay wa izodan əd təgəlla a du təkna da.

18 Eway tan y abba-net issəslam fall as. Ibaz as tu Isxaq iṇṇ'as: «Ma təṃosa daɣ bararan in?»

19 Iṇṇ'as Yaqub: «nak Esaw, wa n aɣafadday nnak. Əgeɣ aw'as di təṇṇeɣ. Əgmaya daɣ ak a du taqqama, tatša awa d əgrawa daɣ təgmərt in fəl a fall-i tag' albaraka nnak.»

20 Iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Ma təge as du təgrawa awaqqas s ətrub?» Ijjəwwab iṇṇ'as: «Əməli Məššina nnak a di dər əs isaṃṃanayan.»

21 Iṇṇa Iškaq i Yaqub: «Ihaz i du barar in a kay əḍəsa ad əṣṣəna kud tidət as kay Esaw.

22 Ihoz t'idu, isallamamas tu iṇṇa: «əməsli in Yaqub mišan ifassan in Esaw».

23 Ig̣mad as tazdit fəlas ifassan-net əlsan tan aṇzadan šilat ən win Esaw. Isammatag'as, inniyat du a fall-as ag'albaraka nnet

24 mišan ilas tu əṣəstan: «Tidət da as kay Esaw?» Ijjəwwab as Yaqub: «Awalla»

25 Iṇṇ'as aṃaran: «Awəy du sər-i a wa du tənɣe daɣ təgmərt fəl ad tatša aga fall-ak albaraka nin.» Eway as du Yaqub ameṇsay, itš-ay, ikf-ay du esmad išw-ay.

26 Dəffər a di iṇṇ-as Isxaq: «Ihaz i du, təzələmmeɣ i barar in.»

27 Ihoz t id izalammat tu təzzar iwat Isxaq aḍu ən səlsa win izlag, iga fall-as albaraka s as iṇṇa: «Hay aḍu ən barar in ola d aḍu n səgyakan win daɣ igar Əməli albarakatan

28 Akfet kay Məššina ikonakan agu iṃədlan nak kul idəɣran akf ik tilwat n alkamatan d esmad təleq qu w'aynayan

29 Šimattiwen kul dak ikkəwanan Iɣərfan deɣ dak əssəjədan Iməḍrayan nak daw-ək ərəsan Ayt mak kul dak əssəjədan Ilɣan Əməli i kay imənzaɣan Itəwəbərrək i kay ibərrakan.

30 Zama ad iɣrad Isxaq tehakkay ən Yaqub albaraka-net iqqab, oṣa ddu Esaw wa n amaqqar-net ifal du tagmərt.

31 Ikna ddu əntada ameṇsay wa izodan eway tu y abba-net iṇṇ'as: «Qam abba nin tatša awa dd'ig̣madan tagmərt in, fəl a fall-i tag'albaraka nnak».

32 «Ma təṃosa?» iṣəstan t'Isxaq, abba nnet. «Nak Esaw wa n aɣafadday nnak.»

33 Irmaɣ Isxaq har iqqim issiwal əs taysəst, iṇṇa: «Ma iṃos za wa dd'inɣan awaqqas eway i t'id ətšeq qu dat aṣṣa nnak. Əgeɣ fall-as albaraka, əmərədda iwar tu.

34 As isla Esaw y awalan n abba-net ig̣mad tu əməsli labasan iḍnay atkər, ad itigunun abba nnet: «Səwər i albaraka nnak nak da, abba nin.»

35 Mišan iṇṇ'as Isxaq: «Amaḍray nnak a di ikkərrasan təzzar idkal albaraka nnak.»

36 Iṇṇ-as Esaw: «Adi da fəl iga eṣəm Yaqub ṣanatat təkkərrəs a di iga: əstizarat idkal fall-i alxaq wa n təla nin fall-as temsay dəffər adi idkal fall-i albaraka nnak.» Iṇṇ'as harwa: «Wər di təṣsənsa albaraka iyyan?»

37 Iṇṇ'as: «Əmərədda əgeq qu məšš-ik,əgeq qu məššis ən šəqqaɣan-net, əššilwaq qu s alkama d asmad w'aynayan. Daɣ adi mas tareɣ a dak k aga barar in?»

38 Iṇṇ'as Esaw: «Wər təleɣ ar albaraka iyyanda, abba? Səwər i tu nak da, abba nin.» Iḍbaɣ as ətkər.

39 Təzzar iṇṇ'as abba-net Isxaq: «Təməɣsurt nak akal wa n maṇṇa, Ikonakan dər-san təneməggəga.

40 Təməddurt nak takoba əd ṭarna. Əššəɣəl n amaḍray nnak kul tu takna Har taffalaga y a tu tarna Tasaddarfa iṃan-nak tala tat tarza.»

41 Igzar Esaw Yaqub fəl əddəlil n albaraka wa fall-as ig'abba nnet. Iṇṇa daɣ ṃan-net: «Daɣ a ihozan abba nnana ad t iba. Dəffər awen ad əfrəga ad anɣa Yaqub.

42 Təsla Raqqiyetu gezzar n Esaw Yaqub. Təssassaɣr'ay du, təṇṇ'as: «Amaqqar nak Esaw ira a daɣ-ak izzəzəl, s a kay anɣu.

43 Əmərədda barar in ṣəsəm i: «Taggar əs Xaran ɣur amaqqar in Laban.

44 Agu ɣur-əs tamert har tiṣmad taɣašašit n amaqqar nak,

45 har t'ig̣məd alham nak, aṭṭaw in a wa das təɣšada. Əddi a din assagla awedan dər-ək d'iglan. Fəlas wər areɣ a di tagim ag̣amad iyyanda ket-nawan fəl əššin-ewwan.

46 Təṇṇa y Isxaq wər əṃṃəndaya təməddurt fəl əddəlil ən təḍoden šinn aššet Xet. Ma əkkeɣ i təməddurt izlaf Yaqub iyyat daɣ Kəl Xet šilat ən šin, daɣ akal a.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3296

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3296. And the elder shall serve the younger. That this signifies that for a time the good of truth should be inferior, is evident from the signification of the “elder,” as being good; from the signification of “serving,” as being inferior; and from the signification of the “younger,” as being truth. How the case herein is may be seen from what follows, where it is described under the representation of Esau and Jacob; for as before said by Esau is represented good, and by Jacob, truth. That there was struggling or combat concerning priority and dominion, is described in the internal sense by Jacob’s taking away from Esau the birthright, and also his blessing; yet that this was done only for a time is manifest from Isaac’s prophecy concerning Esau.

And upon thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck (Genesis 27:40).

[2] That these things have an internal sense, and that what they signify cannot be known without the internal sense (namely, what is signified by two nations being in the womb, and by two peoples being separated from the bowels, and by one people prevailing over the other, and the elder serving the younger), is evident; and that they signify what has been said, is evident from what follows, where much will be said on this subject. Moreover it can with difficulty be believed that these expressions involve such things unless it is known how the case is with good and truth, and concerning the birth of the one from the other, and the change of state in man when he is being regenerated. In the internal sense indeed the Lord is treated of, and here how He made His natural Divine; nevertheless in the representative sense the regeneration of man is also treated of; for man’s regeneration is an image of the Lord’s glorification (n. 3043, 3138, 3212); that is, in regeneration as in a certain image it appears how the Lord glorified His Human, or what is the same, made it Divine. For as the Lord altogether changed His human state into the Divine, so also in man, when He regenerates him, the Lord utterly changes the man’s state, for He makes his old man new.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3212

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3212. And Isaac was comforted after his mother. That this signifies a new state, is evident from the signification of “receiving comfort,” as being a new state; for a state of consolation is new; and that it succeeded to the foregoing is signified by “after his mother.” This new state is the state of glorification of the rational; as before in respect to good, so now in respect to truth. The rational was glorified when it was made Divine in respect to both.

[2] That the Lord as to the human was made new, that is, glorified (or what is the same, was made Divine), no one can possibly conceive (thus neither believe) who is in worldly and corporeal loves; for he is altogether ignorant what the spiritual and celestial is, nor indeed is he willing to know. But he who is not in worldly and corporeal loves, is capable of perceiving this, for he believes that the Lord is one with the Father, and that from Him proceeds all that is holy; consequently that He is Divine even as to the Human; and whoever believes, perceives in his own way.

[3] The state of the Lord’s glorification may in some manner be conceived from the state of the regeneration of man, for the regeneration of man is an image of the glorification of the the Lord, (n. 3043, 3138). When man is being regenerated, he is then becoming altogether another, and is being made new; therefore also when he has been regenerated, he is called “born again,” and “created anew.” Then, although he has a similar face and a similar speech, yet his mind is not similar; his mind, when he is regenerate, is open toward heaven, and there dwells therein love to the Lord and charity toward his neighbor, together with faith. It is the mind that makes a man another, and a new man. This change of state cannot be perceived in the body of man, but in his spirit, the body being merely the covering of his spirit; and when it is put off, then his spirit appears, and this (provided he has been regenerated) in altogether another form, for it then has the form of love and charity in beauty inexpressible (n. 553), instead of its pristine form, which was that of hatred and cruelty with a deformity also inexpressible. This shows what a regenerate person is, or one who is born again, or created anew; namely, that he is altogether another, and is a new man.

[4] From this image it may in some measure be conceived what the glorification of the Lord is. He was not regenerated as a man is; but became Divine, and this from the very Divine Love itself, for He was made the Divine Love itself. What his form then was, was made apparent to Peter, James, and John when it was given them to see Him, not with the eyes of the body but with the eyes of the spirit, namely-that His countenance shone like the sun (Matthew 17:2); and that this was His Divine Human is evident from the voice which then came out of the cloud, saying, “This is my beloved Son” (verse 5). That the “Son” is the Divine Human, may be seen above (n. 2628).

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.