Bible

 

Бытие 34

Studie

   

1 Нјкогда Дина, дочь Ліи, которую она родила Іакову, вышла посмотрјть дочерей земли той.

2 Увидјлъ ее Сихемъ, сынъ Эммора, Хиввеянина, князя земли той, и взялъ ее, и былъ съ нею, и сдјлалъ ей насиліе.

3 И прилјпилась душа его къ Динј, дочери Іаковлевой, и онъ полюбилъ дјвицу, и говорилъ по сердцу дјвицы.

4 И сказалъ Сихемъ Эммору, отцу своему, говоря: возьми мнј эту дјвицу въ жену.

5 Іаковъ слышалъ, что онъ обезчестилъ Дину, дочь его; но какъ сыновья его были со скотомъ его въ полј, то Іаковъ молчалъ, пока не пришли они.

6 И пришелъ Эмморъ, отецъ Сихемовъ, къ Іакову, поговорить съ нимъ.

7 Сыновъя же Іаковлевы, услышавъ, пришли съ поля, и огорчились, и воспылаъ у нихъ сильный гнјвъ, потому, что безчестіе сдјлалъ онъ Израилю, бывъ съ дочерью Іакова; такъ не надлежало бы дјлать.

8 Эмморъ сталъ говорить имъ, и сказалъ: Сихемъ, сынъ мой, прилјпился душею къ дочери вашей; дайте ее въ жену ему.

9 Породнитесъ съ нами; отдавайте за насъ дочерей вашихъ, и нашихъ дочерей берите себј.

10 Съ нами и живите, земля сія предъ вами, живите на ней, и производите на ней промыслъ, пріобрјтайте ее во владјніе.

11 Сихемъ также сказалъ отцу ея и братьямъ ея: только бы мнј обрјсти благоволеніе въ очахъ вашихъ, я дамъ, что ни скажете мнј.

12 Назначьте самое большое вјно и дары, я дамъ, что ни скажете мнј: только дайте мнј дјвицу въ жену.

13 И отвјчали сыновья Іакова Сихему и Эммору, отцу его, съ лукавствомъ, за то, что онъ обезчестилъ Дину, сестру ихъ, и говорили;

14 и сказали имъ: не можемъ того сдјлать, чтобы выдать сестру нашу за человјка, который не обрјзанъ; ибо это у насъ безчестно.

15 Впрочемъ мы согласимся съ вами на семъ условіи, если вы будете подобны намъ въ томъ, чтобы у васъ весь мужскій полъ былъ обрјзанъ.

16 Тогда будемъ отдавать за васъ дочерей нашихъ, и брать за себя вашихъ дочерей, и будемъ жить съ вами, а составимъ одинъ народъ.

17 А если не послушаетесь насъ въ томъ, чтобы обрјзаться, то мы возьмемъ сестру свою, и удалимся.

18 И былъ Эмморъ доволенъ словами ихъ, и Сихемъ, сынъ Эмморовъ, былъ доволенъ.

19 Юноша не умедлилъ исполнить сіе; потому что любилъ дочь Іаковлеву. Притомъ же онъ болје всјхъ уважаемъ былъ въ дому отца своего.

20 И пришелъ Эмморъ и сынъ его Сихемъ къ воротамъ города своего, и стали говорить жителямъ города своего, и сказали:

21 сіи люди мирно живутъ съ нами; пусть они селятся на землј, и производятъ на ней промыслы; земля же, видите, пространна во всј стороны передъ ними. Станемъ брать дочерей ихъ себј въ жены, и нашихъ дочерей выдавать за нихъ.

22 Только сіи люди соглашаются жить съ нами, и быть однимъ народомъ, на томъ условіи, чтобы и у насъ обрјзанъ былъ весь мужескій полъ, какъ они обрјзаны.

23 Не намъ ли достанутся стада ихъ, и имјніе ихъ, и весь скотъ ихъ? только согласимся съ ними, чтобы они жили у насъ.

24 И послушались Эммора и сына его Сихема всј выходящіе изъ воротъ города его, и всякій выходящій изъ воротъ города его, мужескаго пола, былъ обрјзанъ.

25 Но на третій день, когда они были въ болјзни, два сына Іакова, Симеонъ и Левій, братья Дины, взяли каждый свой мечъ, напали нечаянно на городъ, и перебили весь мужескій полъ;

26 и самаго Эммора и Сихема, сына его, убили остріемъ меча; и взяли Дину изъ дома Сихемова и вышли.

27 Сыновья Іакова пришли къ убитымъ, и разграбили городъ, за то, что они обезчестили сестру ихъ.

28 Они взяли мелкій и крупный скотъ ихъ, и ословъ ихъ, и что ни было въ городј, и что ни было въ полј.

29 И все богатство ихъ, и всјхъ дјтей ихъ, и женъ ихъ взяли въ плјнъ, и разграбили также и все, что было въ домахъ.

30 И сказалъ Іаковъ Симеону и Левію: вы нарушили покой мой, сдјлавъ меня ненавистнымъ между жителями сей земли, между Хананеями и Ферезеями. У меня людей мало, соберутся противъ меня, поразятъ меня, и истребленъ буду я и домъ мой.

31 Но они сказали: надлежало ли поступать съ сестрою нашею, какъ съ блудницею!

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4337

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4337. THE INTERNAL SENSE.

In the foregoing chapters, where “Jacob” is spoken of, the subject treated of in the internal sense was the acquisition of truth in the natural, which acquisition is made in order that this truth may be conjoined with good, for all truth is for the sake of this end. “Jacob,” in the internal sense, is this truth, and “Esau” is the good with which the truth is to be conjoined. Before the conjunction is effected, truth appears to be in the first place; but after the conjunction, good is actually in the first place (see n. 3539, 3548, 3556, 3563, 3570, 3576, 3603, 3701, 3995). This is also what is signified by the prophecy of Isaac to Esau: “Upon thy sword shalt thou live, and thou shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shall break his yoke from off thy neck” (Genesis 27:40). And this state is what is described in the present chapter. For this reason Jacob calls Esau his “lord,” and himself his “servant” (verses 5, 8, 13, 14).

[2] Be it known that Jacob here represents the good of truth. But regarded in itself the good of truth is only truth; for so long as truth is in the memory only, it is called truth; but when in the will and thence in act, it is called the good of truth; for to do truth is nothing else. Whatever proceeds from the will is called good, for the essential of the will is love and the derivative affection; and everything that is done from love and its affection is named good. Neither can truth be conjoined with the good that flows in through the internal man and is in its origin Divine (which is here represented by Esau), until the truth is truth in will and act; that is, the good of truth. For the good that flows in through the internal man and is in its origin Divine, flows into the will, and there meets the good of truth that has been instilled through the external man.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3563

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3563. And said, The voice is Jacob’s voice, but the hands are the hands of Esau. That this signifies that in this case the intellectual part is of truth which is within, but that the will part is of good which is without, thus that they are of inverted order, is evident from the predication of “voice” as being of truth, and from the predication of “hand” as being of good (that “voice” is predicated of truth is evident from what was adduced in Part First,n. 219-220); and from its being said, “the voice is Jacob’s voice,” by whom is represented natural truth, as has been repeatedly shown above. And the reason why “hand” is predicated of good is that by “hand” is signified power and faculty (n. 878, 3541), which is derived from no other source than good, all the power and faculty of truth being therefrom, although it appears to be from truth; the same is evident also from its being said, “the hands are the hands of Esau,” by whom good is represented, as also has been shown above. That these things are of inverted order is evident from the fact that it is according to order for good which is of the will to be within, and for truth which is of the understanding to be without. However, as before said, these things are such that they cannot be so well set forth to the apprehension, because few are in any knowledge concerning such things; for even if they should be most clearly set forth, yet when knowledge is wanting they are not apprehended and yet it is necessary to state how the case is, because this is the subject here treated of.

[2] The good of the natural comes forth from no other source in man than interior good, that is, from the good of the rational; that the natural has good from no other source is evident; but the influx causes the good in the natural to be such as the natural is; and as this is the only source of the good of the natural, the truth of the natural is from the same source; for where good is, there is truth, both being necessary in order that there may be anything; but the influx causes the truth therein to be such as is that into which it flows. The influx takes place in this way: The good of the rational flows into the natural in two ways; through the shortest way, into the good itself of the natural, thus immediately; and through the good of the natural into the truth there; this good and this truth are what is represented by Esau and his hunting. The good of the rational also flows into the natural by a way less short, namely, through the truth of the rational, and by this influx forms something like good, but it is truth.

[3] It is according to order that the good of the rational should inflow into the good of the natural and at the same time into its truth, immediately; and also through the truth, of the rational into the good of the natural, thus mediately; and in like manner into the truth of the natural both immediately and mediately; and when this is the case, then the influx is according to order. Such influx exists with those who have been regenerated; but as before said there is another influx before they have been regenerated, namely, that the good of the rational does not flow immediately into the good of the natural, but mediately through the truth of the rational, and thus presents something like good in the natural, but which is not genuine good, and consequently not genuine truth; yet it is such that inmostly it really has good from the influx through the truth of the rational; but no further. Therefore also good comes forth there under another form, namely, outwardly like the good which is represented by Esau, but inwardly like the truth which is represented by Jacob; and as this is not according to order, it is said to be of inverted order; but yet in respect to the fact that man can be regenerated in no other way, it is according to order.

[4] I am aware that these things, even though clearly stated, and consequently possible of clear perception on the part of those who are in the knowledge of such things, are yet obscure to those who do not know what influx is; and still more so to those who do not know that the rational is distinct from the natural; and still more so to those who have not any distinct idea about good and truth. But what the quality of natural good is, and of natural truth, in the state previous to regeneration, can appear solely from the affections at that time. When man is affected with truth, not for the sake of ends of life, but for the sake of other ends, such as that he may become learned, and this from a certain affection of emulation, or from a certain affection of childish envy, and also from a certain affection of glory; then are the good of the natural and the truth of the natural in such an order as is here represented by Jacob, consequently relatively to each other they are in inverted order; that is, the will part which is of good is without, and the intellectual part which is of truth is within.

[5] But in the state after regeneration it is otherwise; for then man is not only affected with truth for the sake of ends of life, but still more is he affected with the good itself of life; and the former affections, namely those of emulation, of childish envy, and of glory, separate themselves, and this until it appears as if they were dissipated; for then the good which is of the will is within, and the truth which is of the understanding is without; yet still in such a manner that truth acts as a one with good, because from good. This order is genuine; and the former order tends to the forming of this order, inasmuch as the will part, which is then without, admits many things that are serviceable to regeneration, and is like a sponge that absorbs both clear and muddy waters; thus also it admits things that would otherwise be rejected, which yet serve as means, and also for forming ideas about goods and truths, and for other uses.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.