9156. Upon every word of transgression. That this signifies whatsoever injury and whatsoever loss, is evident from the signification of “transgression,” as being everything that is contrary to the truth of faith, thus that injures or extinguishes it, consequently all injury and loss thereof whatsoever. In the Word, evils are sometimes called “sins,” sometimes “iniquities,” and sometimes “transgressions;” but what is meant specifically by these several terms is not clear except from the internal sense. Those evils are called “transgressions” which are done contrary to the truths of faith; those are called “iniquities,” which are done contrary to the goods of faith; and those are called “sins,” which are done contrary to the goods of charity and of love. The first two proceed from a perverted understanding, but the last from a depraved will. As in David:

Wash me from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin; for I acknowledge my transgressions, and my sin is ever before me (Psalms 51:2-3);

“iniquity” denotes evil contrary to the goods of faith; “sin,” evil contrary to the goods of charity and love; and “transgressions,” evil contrary to the truths of faith. As the latter is evil proceeding from a perverted understanding, and thus is known from the truths of faith, it is said, “I acknowledge my transgressions.”

[2] Again:

Remember, O Jehovah, Thy mercies, and Thy compassions; remember not the sins of my youth, and my transgressions (Psalms 25:6-7);

sins” denote evils from a depraved will; and “transgressions,” evils from a perverted understanding.

In Isaiah:

Behold for iniquities were ye sold, and for transgressions was your mother put away (Isaiah 50:1);

“iniquities” denote evils contrary to goods, and “transgressions,” evils contrary to the truths of faith of the church; the “mother” denotes the church, which is said to be “put away” when it departs from faith.

In Micah:

For the transgression of Jacob is all this, and for the sin of the house of Israel. What is the transgression of Jacob? Is it not Samaria? She was the beginning of sin to the daughter of Zion; for the transgressions of Israel were found in thee (Micah 1:5, 13);

here in like manner “sin” denotes what is contrary to the good of charity and love; and “transgression” what is contrary to the truth of faith; for “Samaria” denotes the church of perverted faith, and so does “Israel” in this passage.

[3] As “transgressions” denote evils that are contrary to the truths of faith, they are also “trespasses” and “revolts,” which moreover, in the original tongue are signified by the same expression, as is evident in David:

For the multitude of their transgressions thrust out those who rebel against Thee (Psalms 5:10);

“to rebel” is said when there are both revolt and trespass. And in Isaiah:

Are ye not children of transgression, the seed of a lie; who have heated yourselves with gods under every green tree; who slay the children in the rivers? (Isaiah 57:4-5).

That “transgression” denotes evil contrary to the truths of faith is very evident from these passages, for the “children of transgression” denote the falsities which destroy the truths of faith; and therefore they are also called “the seed of a lie,” for “a lie” denotes falsity (n. 8908); and therefore it is said of them that they “heat themselves with gods under every green tree,” by which in the internal sense is meant worship from falsities; for “gods” denote falsities (n. 4402, 4544, 7873, 8867); and a “green tree,” the perception of falsity from a perverted understanding (n. 2722, 4552); and therefore it is also said “ye slay the children in the rivers,” by which is meant the extinction of the truths of faith by means of falsities; for “to slay” denotes to extinguish; “children” or “sons” denote the truths of faith (n. 489, 491, 533, 1147, 2623, 2813, 3373); and “rivers” denote falsities (n. 6693).

2586. For closing Jehovah had therefore closed every womb of the house of Abimelech. That this signifies barrenness, namely, of doctrine, is evident from the signification of “closing to close up the womb,” as being to prevent conception itself; and from the signification of “the house of Abimelech,” as being the good of the doctrine of faith, which shows that barrenness is signified. That up to this point in this chapter “God” is mentioned, but here for the first time “Jehovah,” is because “God” is mentioned where the subject is truth, but “Jehovah” where the subject is good. All the conception of doctrine is from good as a father, but its birth is by means of truth as a mother, as occasionally stated before. Here the conception of doctrine is treated of, and as this is from good, “Jehovah” is mentioned; whereas above its birth is treated of, and as this takes place by means of truth, “God” is mentioned, as in the verse preceding: “God healed Abimelech, and his wife, and his maidservants, and they brought forth.”

[2] The case is the same elsewhere in the Word where conception is treated of, as in Isaiah:

Jehovah hath called me from the womb. Thus saith Jehovah that formed me from the womb; then shall I be precious to Jehovah; and my God shall be my strength (Isaiah 49:1, 5);

“strength” is predicated of truth, and therefore “God” is mentioned. In the same:

Thus saith Jehovah thy Maker, and thy Former from the womb (Isaiah 44:2, 24, and elsewhere).

For the same reason it is said “the house of Abimelech,” by which is signified the good of the doctrine of faith (that a “house” denotes good may be seen above, n. 2048, 2233, 2234; and that “Abimelech” denotes the doctrine of faith, n. 2509, 2510). That there is a Divine arcanum in the fact that they brought forth, and that the wombs of the house of Abimelech were shut on account of Sarah, is manifest; and this arcanum cannot possibly be disclosed except by the internal sense.