Bible

 

Genesis 30

Studie

   

1 achelė matydama, kad ji nevaisinga, pavydėjo savo seseriai Lėjai ir tarė Jokūbui: “Duok man vaikų, kitaip aš mirsiu!”

2 Jokūbas, supykęs ant achelės, tarė: “Ar aš Dievas, kuris tau vaikų neduoda?”

3 Tada ji tarė: “Štai mano tarnaitė Bilha. Įeik pas ją, kad ji pagimdytų ant mano kelių ir aš galėčiau turėti vaikų iš jos”.

4 Ji davė jam už žmoną savo tarnaitę Bilhą, ir Jokūbas įėjo pas ją.

5 Bilha pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui sūnų.

6 Tada achelė tarė: “Dievas teisingai nusprendė dėl manęs, išklausydamas mano balsą ir davė man sūnų”. Todėl ji pavadino jį Danu.

7 achelės tarnaitė Bilha pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui antrą sūnų.

8 Tada achelė tarė: “Didžiose grumtynėse grūmiausi su savo seserimi ir nugalėjau”. Ir ji pavadino jį Neftaliu.

9 Lėja matydama, kad nebegali daugiau gimdyti, davė Jokūbui savo tarnaitę Zilpą už žmoną.

10 Zilpa, Lijos tarnaitė, pagimdė Jokūbui sūnų.

11 Tada Lėja tarė: “Laimingai!” Ir ji pavadino jį Gadu.

12 Vėliau Zilpa pagimdė Jokūbui antrą sūnų.

13 Tada Lėja tarė: “Aš laimingoji! Nes moterys vadins mane palaiminta”. Ir ji pavadino jį Ašeru.

14 Kviečių pjūties metu ubenas išėjęs rado mandragorų ir juos parnešė savo motinai Lėjai. Tada achelė tarė Lėjai: “Duok man savo sūnaus mandragorų”.

15 Bet ji atsakė: “Ar negana tau, kad turi mano vyrą, ar nori atimti ir mano sūnaus mandragorus?” achelė tarė: “Tegul jis šią naktį praleidžia su tavimi už tavo sūnaus mandragorus!”

16 Jokūbui pareinant vakare iš lauko, Lėja išėjo jo pasitikti ir tarė: “Tu eisi pas mane, nes aš tave pasamdžiau už mano sūnaus mandragorus”. Taip jis praleido su ja tą naktį.

17 Dievas išklausė Lėją; ji pagimdė Jokūbui penktąjį sūnų.

18 Tada Lėja tarė: “Dievas man atlygino, nes aš daviau savo tarnaitę savo vyrui”. Ji pavadino jį Isacharu.

19 Lėja vėl pastojo ir pagimdė Jokūbui šeštąjį sūnų.

20 Tada Lėja tarė: “Dievas apdovanojo mane gera dovana; dabar mano vyras gyvens su manimi, nes aš jam pagimdžiau šešis sūnus”. Ir ji praminė jį Zabulonu.

21 Po to ji pagimdė dukterį ir ją pavadino Dina.

22 Dievas atsiminė achelę, išklausė ją ir padarė vaisingą.

23 Ji pagimdė sūnų ir tarė: “Dievas pašalino mano gėdą”.

24 Ji pavadino jį Juozapu, sakydama: “Viešpats duos man dar kitą sūnų!”

25 achelei pagimdžius Juozapą, Jokūbas tarė Labanui: “Paleisk mane, grįšiu į tėvynę, į savo šalį!

26 Duok man mano žmonas ir mano vaikus, už kuriuos tau tarnavau, ir leisk man eiti. Tu juk žinai, kaip aš tau tarnavau!”

27 Labanas jam tarė: “O kad aš rasčiau malonę tavo akyse! Aš patyriau, kad Viešpats laimino mane dėl tavęs.

28 Nustatyk tu pats sau užmokestį, ir aš tau jį duosiu!”

29 Jokūbas atsakė: “Tu pats žinai, kaip tau tarnavau ir kokia tapo tavo banda mano priežiūroje.

30 Tu mažai turėjai prieš man atvykstant, bet dabar tai smarkiai padaugėjo, nes Viešpats tave laimino, kai aš atėjau. O dabar ar ne laikas man pasirūpinti savo namais?”

31 Labanas tarė: “Ką turiu tau duoti?” Jokūbas atsakė: “Nieko man neduok! Jei sutiksi su mano reikalavimu, aš vėl ganysiu ir saugosiu tavo kaimenę:

32 šiandien pereisiu visas avių bandas, išskirdamas iš jų kiekvieną dėmėtą bei lopiniuotą avį ir kiekvieną juodą avį, ir visas lopiniuotas bei dėmėtas ožkas. Tai bus mano atlyginimas.

33 Mano sąžiningumas kalbės už mane, kai ateis laikas man atsiimti užmokestį tavo akivaizdoje. Visa, kas nebus dėmėta bei lopiniuota tarp ožkų ir avių, tebūna kaip mano pavogta!”

34 Labanas atsakė: “Sutinku. Tebūna kaip sakai!”

35 Ir jis atskyrė tą dieną ožkas ir avis, ožius ir avinus­lopiniuotus ir dėmėtus; visus vienos spalvos gyvulius atidavė savo sūnums.

36 Labanas nustatė, kad tarp jo ir Jokūbo būtų trijų dienų atstumas. Jokūbas ganė likusią Labano kaimenę.

37 Jokūbas, paėmęs žalias drebulių, migdolų ir liepų lazdeles, išlupinėjo jose dryžius, kad tose vietose, kur buvo žievė, būtų balta.

38 Jis tas išpjaustytas lazdeles sudėjo į lovius, į kuriuos pilamas vanduo, prie kurių bandos ateidavo gerti, ir atėję gerti imdavo poruotis.

39 Ir avys poruodavosi, žiūrėdamos į lazdeles; ir jos vesdavo dryžuotus, dėmėtus ir lopiniuotus ėriukus.

40 Jokūbas perskyrė savo bandą. Jis sudėjo lazdeles taip, kad jo avys ir Labano avys matytų jas. Jis laikė savo bandas atskirai ir nesuleisdavo jų su Labano bandomis.

41 Kai poravosi stipresnieji gyvuliai, Jokūbas įdėdavo lazdeles į lovius taip, kad gyvuliai matytų jas ir poruotųsi.

42 Silpnesniems gyvuliams poruojantis, jis neįdėdavo tų lazdelių. Taigi silpnesnieji teko Labanui, o stipresnieji Jokūbui.

43 Taip šis žmogus nepaprastai pralobo. Jis turėjo daug tarnų ir tarnaičių, galvijų, avių, kupranugarių ir asilų.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3928

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3928. 'And she called his name Naphtali' means the essential nature of it, that is to say, of the temptation in which one overcomes and also of the resistance offered by the natural man. This is clear from the meaning of 'name' and of 'calling the name' as the essential nature, dealt with in 144, 145, 1754, 1896, 2009, 2724, 3421. The particular nature is that which is meant by 'Naphtali', for the name Naphtali is derived from the word 'wrestlings'. And for the same reason 'Naphtali' represents this second general truth of the Church. Temptation is the means by which the internal man is joined to the external, for they are at variance with each other but are made to agree and to correspond by means of temptations. The external man is indeed such that of itself it does not desire anything except bodily and worldly things; these are the delights of the natural man's life. But the internal man - when opened towards heaven and desiring the things of heaven, as is the case with those who are able to be regenerated - takes delight in heavenly things. And when a person undergoes temptations these two types of delight conflict with each other. The person is not directly aware of the conflict, because he is not aware of what heavenly delight is and of what hellish delight is, let alone that they are so utterly contrary to each other. But celestial angels cannot be present at all with a person in his bodily and worldly delight until this has been made subservient, that is to say, until bodily and worldly delight is no longer regarded as an end in itself but something which is meant to be subservient to heavenly delight, as shown above in 3913. Once this has been achieved the angels are able to reside with that person in both; but in this case his delight becomes blessedness, and at length happiness in the next life.

[2] Anyone who believes that the delight of the natural man prior to regeneration is not hell-like, and that devilish spirits are not in possession there, is much mistaken. He is unaware of what the situation is with man - that prior to regeneration genii and spirits from hell have possession of his natural man, no matter how much he seems to himself to be like any other person, and also that he is able to participate with everybody else in what is holy and to reason about the truths and goods of faith, indeed is able to believe that he has become strong in these. If this person does not feel within himself some measure of affection for what is right and fair in his daily work, and for what is good and true in society and in life, let him recognize that his kind of delight in things is the kind that exists with those in hell, for his delight entails no other love than self-love and love of the world. And when these constitute his delight no charity or any faith is present within it. The only means that will weaken and dispel this delight once it has become predominant is the affirmation and acknowledgement of the holiness of faith and of the good of life, which is the first means meant, as shown above, by Dan, and after this by temptation, which is the second means and is meant by Naphtali; for this second means follows the other. Indeed people who do not affirm and acknowledge the goodness and the truth which constitute faith and charity are unable to enter any conflict brought about by temptation as there is nothing within to oppose the evil and falsity towards which natural delight gravitates.

[3] In other places in the Word where Naphtali is mentioned he means a person's state following temptations, as in the prophecy of Jacob, who by then was Israel,

Naphtali is a hind let loose, giving beautiful words. Genesis 49:21.

'A hind let loose' stands for the affection for natural truth in a state that is free, which arises following temptation. This state is also what is at stake within temptations, which are meant by 'Naphtali', for the battle fought in temptations is a struggle for freedom. Likewise in Moses' prophecy,

To Naphtali he said, Naphtali, satisfied with favour, and full with the blessing of Jehovah, will possess the west and the south. Deuteronomy 33:23.

For the representations of Jacob's sons, and of the tribes, depend on the order in which they are mentioned, 3862. And in the prophecy of Deborah and Barak,

Zebulun is a people that consigned its soul to die, as did Naphtali, on the heights of the field. Judges 5:18.

This too refers in the internal sense to the conflicts brought about by temptations, and to a person's presence among those who do not fear anything evil because they are rooted in forms of truth and good, meant by 'being on the heights of the field'.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3913

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3913. 'She said, Behold, my maidservant Bilhah' means the affirming means, which has its place between natural truth and interior truth. This is clear from the meaning of 'a maidservant', and also of 'a servant-girl' as the affection for the cognitions which belong to the exterior man, dealt with in 1895, 2567, 3835, 3849, and in this particular case since that affection is the means by which interior truths become joined to natural or external truths, 'a maidservant' therefore describes the affirming means that has its place between these; and from the representation of 'Bilhah' as the nature of that means. The two servant-girls which Rachel and Leah gave to Jacob as wives for producing offspring represented and meant in the internal sense nothing else than something which is of service, in this case something serving as the means by which those two things are joined together, namely interior truth with external truth, for 'Rachel' represents interior truth, 'Leah' external, 3793, 3819. Indeed by means of the twelve sons of Jacob twelve general or principal requisites are described here by which a person is introduced into spiritual and celestial things while he is being regenerated or becoming the Church.

[2] Actually when a person is being regenerated or becoming the Church, that is, when from being a dead man he is becoming a living one, or from being a bodily-minded man is becoming a heavenly-minded one, he is led by the Lord through many states. These general states are specified by those twelve sons, and later by the twelve tribes, so that the twelve tribes mean all aspects of faith and love - see what has been shown in 3858. For any general whole includes every particular and individual detail, and each detail exists in relation to the general whole. When a person is being regenerated the internal man is to be joined to the external man, and therefore the goods and truths which belong to the internal man are to be joined to those which belong to the external man, for it is truths and goods that make a person a human being. These cannot be joined together without means. These means consist in such things as take something from one side and something from the other, and act in such a way that insofar as a person moves closer to one the other plays a subordinate role. These means are meant by the servant-girls - Rachel's servant-girls being the means available from the internal man, Leah's the means available from the external man.

[3] The necessity for means by which the joining together is effected may be recognized from the consideration that of himself the natural man does not agree at all with the spiritual but disagrees so much as to be utterly opposed to the spiritual. For the natural man regards and loves self and the world, whereas the spiritual man does not, except insofar as to do so leads to the rendering of services in the spiritual world, and so he regards service to it and loves this service because of the use that is served and the end in view. The natural man seems to himself to have life when he is promoted to high positions and so to pre-eminence over others, but the spiritual man seems to himself to have life in self-abasement and in being the least. Not that he despises high positions, provided they are means by which he is enabled to serve the neighbour, society as a whole, and the Church. Neither does the spiritual man view the important positions to which he is promoted in any selfish way but on account of the services rendered which are his ends in view. Bliss for the natural man consists in his being wealthier than others and in his possessing worldly riches, whereas bliss for the spiritual man consists in his having cognitions of truth and good which are the riches he possesses, and even more so in the practice of good in accordance with truths. Not however that he despises riches, because these enable him to render a service in the world.

[4] These few considerations show that on account of their different ends in view the state of the natural man and the state of the spiritual are the reverse of each other, but that the two can be joined one to the other. That conjunction is effected when things which belong to the external man become subordinate and are subservient to the ends which the internal man has in view. In order that a person may become spiritual therefore it is necessary for the things belonging to the external man to be brought into a position of subservience, and so for ends that have self and the world in view to be cast aside and those that have the neighbour and the Lord's kingdom to be adopted. The former cannot possibly be cast aside or the latter adopted, and so the two cannot be joined, except through means. It is these means that are meant by the servant-girls, and specifically by the four sons born to the servant-girls.

[5] The first means is one that affirms, or is affirmative towards, internal truth; that is to say, it affirms that it really is internal truth. Once this affirmative attitude is present, a person is in the first stage of regeneration, good from within being at work and leading to that spirit of affirmation. That good cannot pass into a negative attitude, nor even into one of doubt, until this becomes affirmative. After this, that good manifests itself in affection; that is to say, it causes the person to feel an affection for, and delight in, truth - first through his coming to know this truth, then through his acting in accordance with it. Take for example the truth that the Lord is the human race's salvation. If the person does not develop an affirmative attitude towards this truth, none of the things which he has learned about the Lord from the Word or in the Church and which are included among the facts in his natural memory can be joined to his internal man, that is, to the truths that are able to be truths of faith there. Nor can affection accordingly enter in, not even into the general aspects of this truth which contribute to the person's salvation. But once he develops an affirmative attitude countless things are added and are filled with the good that is flowing in. For good is flowing in constantly from the Lord, but where no affirmative attitude exists it is not accepted. An affirmative attitude is therefore the first means and so to speak first dwelling-place of the good flowing in from the Lord. And the same is so with all other truths called the truths of faith.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.