Bible

 

2 Samuelis 1

Studie

1 Atsitiko, kad Sauliui mirus, Dovydas, nugalėjęs amalekiečius, sugrįžo ir praleido dvi dienas Ciklage.

2 Trečią dieną iš Sauliaus stovyklos atėjo vyras su perplėštais drabužiais ir žemėmis apibarstyta galva. Atėjęs pas Dovydą, jis puolė ant žemės ir išreiškė jam pagarbą.

3 Dovydas jį paklausė: “Iš kur ateini?” Tas jam atsakė: “Pabėgau iš Izraelio stovyklos”.

4 Dovydas tarė: “Papasakok man, kas ten atsitiko”. Tas atsakė: “Žmonės pabėgo iš mūšio, daugelis žuvo, taip pat ir Saulius su sūnumi Jehonatanu mirė”.

5 Tuomet Dovydas klausė jaunuolį, kuris jam pranešė: “Iš kur žinai, kad Saulius ir jo sūnus Jehonatanas mirė?”

6 Jaunuolis, kuris jam tai pranešė, atsakė: “Visai atsitiktinai užėjau ant Gilbojos kalno, žiūriu, Saulius pasirėmęs ant ieties, o karo vežimai ir raiteliai skuba prie jo.

7 Atsigręžęs ir mane pamatęs, jis pašaukė mane. Aš atsiliepiau: ‘Aš čia!’

8 Jis klausė: ‘Kas tu esi?’ Aš atsakiau jam: ‘Aš esu amalekietis’.

9 Tada jis man tarė: ‘Ateik ir nužudyk mane; aš kankinuosi, bet gyvybė dar yra manyje’.

10 Priėjau prie jo ir nužudžiau, nes buvau tikras, kad jis neišgyvens po savo kritimo. Nuėmiau karūną nuo jo galvos ir apyrankę nuo jo rankos ir atnešiau juos čia savo valdovui”.

11 Tuomet Dovydas, nutvėręs savo drabužius, perplėšė juos, taip padarė ir visi vyrai, buvę su juo.

12 Jie iki vakaro verkė, pasninkavo ir liūdėjo Sauliaus, jo sūnaus Jehonatano ir Viešpaties tautos, Izraelio namų, nes jie žuvo nuo kardo.

13 Dovydas tarė jaunuoliui, kuris jam tai pranešė: “Iš kur esi?” Tas atsakė: “Aš esu ateivio amalekiečio sūnus”.

14 Dovydas jam tarė: “Kaip išdrįsai pakelti savo ranką, kad nužudytum Viešpaties pateptąjį?”

15 Tada jis, pasišaukęs vieną iš savo jaunuolių, tarė: “Ateik ir užmušk jį”. Tas smogė jam, ir jis mirė.

16 Dovydas pasakė jam: “Tavo kraujas kris ant tavo galvos, nes tavo paties žodžiai paliudijo prieš tave, kai pasakei: ‘Aš nužudžiau Viešpaties pateptąjį’ ”.

17 Dovydas giedojo šitą raudą apie Saulių ir jo sūnų Jehonataną,

18 norėdamas, kad Judo vaikai mokytųsi Lanko giesmės, kaip parašyta Josaro knygoje.

19 “Tavo šlovė, o Izraeli, žuvo tavo aukštumose, krito galingieji!

20 Nepasakokite Gate, neskelbkite Aškelono gatvėse, kad nesilinksmintų filistinų dukterys, nedžiūgautų neapipjaustytųjų dukterys.

21 Jūs, Gilbojos kalnai, tenekrinta ant jūsų nei rasa, nei lietus, kad nebūtų ant jūsų derlingų laukų.Ten buvo pamestas galingųjų skydas, skydas Sauliaus, lyg jis nebūtų buvęs pateptas.

22 Be nukautųjų kraujo, be galingųjų taukų, Jehonatano lankas nesugrįždavo, ir Sauliaus kardas negrįždavo tuščias.

23 Saulius ir Jehonatanas, mieli ir brangūs, kartu gyveno ir mirtyje jie nebuvo perskirti. Jie buvo greitesni negu ereliai, stipresni negu liūtai.

24 Izraelio dukterys, raudokite Sauliaus, kuris jus aprengdavo purpuru su papuošalais, apsagstydavo auksiniais pagražinimais jūsų drabužius.

25 Krito galingieji kovos įkarštyje. Jehonatanas nukautas ant kalno.

26 Aš gailiuosi tavęs, mano broli Jehonatanai! Labai brangus tu man buvai. Tavo meilė man buvo nuostabesnė už moterų meilę.

27 Krito galingieji, sulaužyti jų ginklai”.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4462

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4462. 'To give our sister to a man who has a foreskin' means unless they could identify the truth and the good of the Church with representatives and disregard the spiritual entities meant by these. This is clear from the meaning of 'the foreskin' as an external representative - as the sign that they were members of the Church. It was usual therefore to speak of circumcision and the foreskin when they needed to distinguish between those who belonged to the Church and those who did not. For circumcision meant the departure from filthy loves, namely self-love and love of the world, and the acceptance of heavenly loves, which are love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour, and so an acceptance of the Church. This is why these words mean an acceptance of their semblance of religion and that therefore they identified the truth and the good of the Church with representatives, disregarding the internal things meant by these. For otherwise they would not be like them, as the words that follow show, 'Only on this [condition] will we consent to you: If you will be as we are'. As regards 'circumcision' being the sign of purification from filthy loves, see 2039, 2632, and the expression 'uncircumcised' being used of those who were governed by those loves, 2049, 3412, 3413.

[2] Scarcely anyone at the present day knows what circumcision means specifically, and this therefore must be stated. The genital organs in both sexes mean things associated with the joining together of good and truth. They not only mean them but also in actual fact correspond to them. It has been shown at the ends of chapters that all the organs and members in the human being have a correspondence with spiritual things in heaven, including therefore the organs and members devoted to procreation. These correspond to the marriage of good and truth, from which marriage conjugial love also comes down, see 2618, 2727-2729, 2803, 3132, 4434. Because the foreskin covered the genital organ it corresponded in the Most Ancient Church to the obscuration of good and truth, but in the Ancient Church to the defilement of them. With a person who belonged to the Most Ancient Church, because he was an internal man, good and truth were able to be obscured but not defiled, but with one who belonged to the Ancient Church, because he was in comparison with his predecessor an external man, good and truth were able to be defiled since it is external things, that is to say, external loves, that cause defilement. For this reason those who belonged to the Most Ancient Church had no knowledge of circumcision, only those who belonged to the Ancient Church had it.

[3] In addition circumcision spread from this Church to many nations. It was imposed on Abraham and his descendants not as something new but as the revival of a practice which had been abandoned, it becoming for his descendants the sign that they belonged to the Church. But that nation did not know, and did not wish to know, what it was a sign of, for they identified religion with representatives alone, which are externals. They therefore condemned the uncircumcised as a whole, when yet circumcision was to be merely a sign representative of purification from self-love and love of the world, from which those are purified who have been circumcised spiritually and are called circumcised at heart, as in Moses,

Jehovah God will circumcise your heart, and the heart of your seed, so that you will love Jehovah your God with all your heart and with all your soul. Deuteronomy 30:6.

In the same author,

You shall circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and you shall be stiff-necked no longer. Deuteronomy 10:16, 18.

And in Jeremiah,

Break up your fallow ground, and remove the foreskin of your heart. Jeremiah 4:3-4.

[4] People however who are governed by self-love and love of the world are called 'uncircumcised', in spite of their having been circumcised, as in Jeremiah,

Behold, the days are coming in which I will visit every one circumcised in the foreskin - Egypt, and Judah, and Edom, and the children of Ammon, and Moab, and all that have the corners [of their hair] cut and who dwell in the wilderness, for all these nations are uncircumcised, and all the house of Israel is uncircumcised in heart. Jeremiah 9:25-26.

From this it is also evident that many other nations were circumcised, for it is said 'I will visit every one circumcised in the foreskin', and so, as stated above, that circumcision was not something new, nor was it confined to the descendants of Jacob as a distinguishing feature. The Philistines were not circumcised, and therefore 'the uncircumcised' is generally used to mean the Philistines, 1 Samuel 14:6; 17:26, 36; 31:4; 2 Samuel 1:20; and elsewhere.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 2049

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

2049. 'From every son who is a foreigner and not of your seed' means those outside the Church. This is clear from the meaning of 'son who is a foreigner' as those who are not born inside the Church and so are not governed by goods and truths of faith because they have no knowledge of them. 'Sons who are foreigners' also means people whose worship is external, dealt with in 1097, though in that context people inside the Church are the subject. Here however, the subject being the Lord's Church in its widest extent, 'sons who are foreigners' means those who, like gentiles, are not born inside the Church. Gentiles outside the Church can possess truths, but not the truths of faith. Their truths, like the Ten Commandments, are that parents should be honoured; that people should not murder, steal, commit adultery, or covet the things that belong to others; and also that they should worship God. Truths of faith consist however of all doctrinal teachings concerning eternal life, the Lord's kingdom, and the Lord. Such teachings cannot be known by gentiles because they do not possess the Word.

[2] These are the people who are meant by 'sons who are foreigners and not of your seed' but who are to be circumcised, that is to be purified. From this it is evident that they are just as much capable of being purified as those inside the Church, which purification was represented by being circumcised. They are purified when they cast aside filthy loves and live among one another in charity, for in their case truths have a part to play in their lives because charity and all truths go together, though such truths belong to the first of the two types mentioned above. When these truths play a part in their lives they then absorb the truths of faith with ease, if not during this life then in the next, because truths of faith are the interior truths of charity. Indeed at that point there is nothing they desire more than to be introduced into the interior truths of charity. Interior truths of charity are what constitute the Lord's kingdom. Regarding these, see 932, 1032, 1059, 1327, 1328, 1366.

[3] In the next life mere knowledge of the cognitions of faith is of no value at all, for the worst people, even those in hell, can have such knowledge, sometimes a better knowledge than others have. Leading a life in accordance with those cognitions is what matters, for all cognitions have life as their end in view. If life was not the reason for learning them they would have no use, apart from enabling people to discuss them and as a result to be considered learned in the world, to be raised to positions of importance, and to enhance reputation and wealth. From this it is clear that a life in keeping with the cognitions of faith is nothing other than the life of charity. Indeed love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour constitute the Law and the Prophets, that is, the doctrine of faith in its entirety together with all the cognitions of it, as is plain to anyone from the Lord's words in Matthew 22:35-40, and Mark 12:28-35.

[4] Matters of doctrine, or cognitions of faith, are nevertheless absolutely vital for the formation of the life of charity; it cannot be formed without them. This is the life which saves a person after death. The life of faith never exists without the life of charity, for without charity the life of faith is impossible. People in whom the life of love and charity dwells have the Lord's life within them. Nobody can be joined to Him by means of any other life. From this it is also clear that the truths of faith cannot possibly be acknowledged as truths - that is, no acknowledgement of what they are saying is possible - other than outwardly or with the lips, if they are not implanted within charity, since inwardly or at heart they are denied. For as has been stated, all truths of faith have charity as their end in view, and if charity is not present within them then inwardly they are rejected. The nature of the things that are interior is plain to see when those that are exterior are taken away, as is done in the next life, namely that they are utterly contrary to all the truths of faith. No people can possibly receive the life of charity, or mutual love, in the next life, when they have had none in this life; but their life as it has been with them in the world remains with them after death. Indeed they are averse to and hate mutual love. When merely approaching a community where the life that belongs to mutual love exists they quiver and shake, and experience torment.

[5] Although people such as these are born inside the Church, they are called 'sons who are foreigners, uncircumcised in heart and uncircumcised in the flesh' who are not to be allowed into the sanctuary, that is, into the Lord's kingdom. They are also meant in Ezekiel,

No son who is a foreigner, uncircumcised in heart and uncircumcised in flesh, shall enter the sanctuary. Ezekiel 44:7, 9.

And in the same prophet,

Whom have you thus become like in glory and in greatness among the trees of Eden? You will be made to go down with the trees of Eden into the nether world; you will lie in the midst of the uncircumcised with those slain by the sword. Ezekiel 31:18.

This refers to Pharaoh who means types of knowledge in general, 1164, 1165, 1186, 1462. 'The trees of Eden' with which they were to go down into the nether world also means types of knowledge, but knowledge of the cognitions of faith. From this it is now evident what 'one uncircumcised' means in the internal sense, namely one in whom filthy loves and the life belonging to these are present.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.