Bible

 

創世記 45

Studie

   

1 そこでヨセフはそばに立っているすべての人ので、自分を制しきれなくなったので、「人は皆ここから出てください」と呼ばわった。それゆえヨセフが兄弟たちに自分のことを明かした時、ひとりも彼のそばに立っている者はなかった。

2 ヨセフは声をあげて泣いた。エジプトびとはこれを聞き、パロのもこれを聞いた

3 ヨセフは兄弟たちに言った、「わたしはヨセフです。父はまだ生きながらえていますか」。兄弟たちは答えることができなかった。彼らは驚き恐れたからである。

4 ヨセフは兄弟たちに言った、「わたしに近寄ってください」。彼らが近寄ったので彼は言った、「わたしはあなたがたの弟ヨセフです。あなたがたがエジプト売った者です。

5 しかしわたしをここに売ったのを嘆くことも、悔むこともいりません。は命を救うために、あなたがたよりさきにわたしをつかわされたのです。

6 この二年の間、中にききんがあったが、なお五年の間は耕すことも刈り入れることもないでしょう。

7 は、あなたがたのすえを地に残すため、また大いなる救をもってあなたがたの命を助けるために、わたしをあなたがたよりさきにつかわされたのです。

8 それゆえわたしをここにつかわしたのはあなたがたではなく、です。はわたしをパロの父とし、その全とし、またエジプトのつかさとされました。

9 あなたがたは父のもとに急ぎ上って言いなさい、『あなたのヨセフが、こう言いました。がわたしをエジプト全国のとされたから、ためらわずにわたしの所へ下ってきなさい。

10 あなたはゴセンの地に住み、あなたも、あなたのらも、孫たちも、も牛も、その他のものもみな、わたしの近くにおらせます。

11 ききんはなお五年つづきますから、あなたも、族も、その他のものも、みな困らないように、わたしはそこで養いましょう』。

12 あなたがたと弟ベニヤミンが見るとおり、あなたがたにら語っているのはこのわたしです。

13 あなたがたはエジプトでの、わたしのいっさいの栄えと、あなたがたが見るいっさいの事をわたしの父に告げ、急いでわたしの父をここへ連れ下りなさい」。

14 そしてヨセフは弟ベニヤミンのくびを抱いて泣き、ベニヤミンも彼のくびを抱いて泣いた。

15 またヨセフはすべての兄弟たちに口づけし、彼らを抱いて泣いた。そして兄弟たちは彼と語った。

16 時に、「ヨセフの兄弟たちがきた」と言ううわさがパロのに聞えたので、パロとその来たちとは喜んだ。

17 パロはヨセフに言った、「兄弟たちに言いなさい、『あなたがたは、こうしなさい。獣に荷を負わせてカナンの地へ行き、

18 父と族とを連れてわたしのもとへきなさい。わたしはあなたがたに、エジプトの地の良い物を与えます。あなたがたは、このの最も良いものを食べるでしょう』。

19 また彼らに命じなさい、『あなたがたは、こうしなさい。幼な子たちとたちのためにエジプトの地から車をもって行き、父を連れてきなさい。

20 家財に心を引かれてはなりません。エジプトの良い物は、あなたがたのものだからです』」。

21 イスラエルのらはそのようにした。ヨセフはパロの命に従って彼らに車を与え、また途中の食料をも与えた。

22 まためいめいに晴着を与えたが、ベニヤミンにはシケルと晴着五着とを与えた。

23 また彼は父に次のようなものを贈った。すなわちエジプトの良い物を負わせたろば頭と、穀物、パン及び父の道中の食料を負わせた雌ろば頭。

24 こうしてヨセフは兄弟たちを送り去らせ、彼らに言った、「途中で争ってはなりません」。

25 彼らはエジプトから上ってカナンの地に入り、父ヤコブのもとへ行って、

26 彼に言った、「ヨセフはなお生きていてエジプトのつかさです」。ヤコブは気が遠くなった。彼らの言うことが信じられなかったからである。

27 そこで彼らはヨセフがった言葉を残らず彼に告げた。父ヤコブはヨセフが自分を乗せるために送った車を見て元気づいた。

28 そしてイスラエルは言った、「満足だ。わがヨセフがまだ生きている。わたしは死ぬ前に行って彼を見よう」。

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5946

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5946. For your babes, and for your women. That this signifies for those who do not yet know, namely, the more interior things of the church, is evident from the signification of “babes,” as being those who do not yet know these things; and from the signification of “women” as being affections of truth. For when “men” [viri] signify truths, as here the sons of Jacob, then their “women” signify the affections of truth; and on the other hand when “men” [viri] signify goods, their “women” signify truths, but in this case the men are called “husbands” (see n. 3236, 4510, 4823). Neither do the affections of truth, which here are the “women,” know the more interior things of the church, except by means of truths, which are the “men.” Affections without these are like the will without what is of the understanding. The will, in order to see or know anything, must do it through the understanding: there is its sight or eye.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4823

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4823. And she conceived again, and bare a son. That this signifies evil, is evident from the signification of a “son,” as being truth, and also good (n. 264); thus in the opposite sense falsity and also evil, but the evil which is from falsity. This evil in its essence is falsity, because it is from it; for one who from a false doctrine does what is evil, does also what is false; but because it is done in act, it is called evil. That by the firstborn son is signified falsity, and by this one evil, is evident from its being related of this son that he did evil in act, namely, that “he destroyed the seed to the earth, that he might not give seed to his brother. And the thing which he did was evil in the eyes of Jehovah; and He caused him also to die” (verses 9 and 10). Here also it is evident that this evil was from falsity. Moreover, in the ancient churches by the second son was signified the truth of faith in act; and therefore by this son falsity in act, that is, evil. That evil is what is signified by him, may be seen also from the fact that Er the firstborn was named by his father, or Judah; while this son, or Onan, was named by his mother, the daughter of Shua, as may be seen in the original tongue. For in the Word by a “man” is signified falsity, and by a “woman” the evil thereof (see n. 915, 2517, 4510). That by the daughter of Shua is signified evil, may be seen above (n. 4818, 4819). Wherefore Er, because he was named by his father, signifies falsity, and Onan, because he was named by his mother, signifies evil; for the former was thus as it were the father’s son, but the latter as it were the mother’s.

[2] In the Word “man and wife,” and also “husband and wife,” are often mentioned; and when “man and wife” are mentioned, by “man” is signified truth, and by “wife” good, and in the opposite sense by “man” is signified falsity, and by “wife” evil; but when “husband and wife” are mentioned, good is signified by “husband,” and truth by “wife,” and in the opposite sense evil is signified by “husband,” and falsity by “wife.” The reason of this mystery is this: in the celestial church the husband was in good, and the wife in the truth of this good; but in the spiritual church the man is in truth, and the wife in the good of this truth; such were they in fact then, and such are they now, for the interiors of man have undergone this change. Hence where celestial good and celestial truth from it are treated of in the Word, it is said “husband and wife;” but where spiritual good and spiritual truth from it are treated of, it is said “man and wife,” or rather “man and woman.” From this, as also from the expressions themselves, it is known what good and what truth are treated of in the Word, in its internal sense.

[3] This too is the reason of its having been occasionally stated that marriages represent the conjunction of good and truth, and of truth and good. Moreover, conjugial love has its origin from this conjunction of good with truth; and conjugial love with the spiritual from the conjunction of truth with good. Marriages also actually correspond to these conjunctions. From all this it is evident what is involved in the father’s naming the first son, and the mother’s naming the second, and also the third-as appears from the original tongue-namely, that the father named the first son, because by him was signified falsity, and that the mother named the second, because by him was signified evil.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Foundation for the permission to use this translation.