Bible

 

Genesi 40

Studie

   

1 OR, dopo queste cose, avvenne che il coppiere del re di Egitto, e il panattiere, peccarono contro al re di Egitto, lor signore.

2 E Faraone si crucciò gravemente contro a que’ suoi due Eunuchi, cioè: contro al coppier maggiore, e contro al panattier maggiore.

3 E li fece mettere in prigione in casa del Capitan delle guardie, nel Torrione, nello stesso luogo ove Giuseppe era incarcerato.

4 E il Capitan delle guardie commise a Giuseppe d’esser con loro; ed egli li serviva. Ed essi furono un anno in prigione.

5 Ed amendue, il coppiere ed il panattiere del re di Egitto, ch’erano incarcerati nel Torrione, sognarono ciascuno un sogno in una stessa notte, conveniente alla interpretazione che ne fu data a ciascun d’essi.

6 E Giuseppe, venuto la mattina a loro, li riguardò; ed ecco, erano conturbati.

7 Ed egli domandò quegli Eunuchi di Faraone, ch’erano seco in prigione, in casa del suo signore, dicendo: Perchè sono oggi le vostre facce meste?

8 Ed essi gli dissero: Noi abbiam sognato ciascuno un sogno, e non vi è alcuno che ce lo interpreti. E Giuseppe disse loro: Le interpretazioni non appartengono esse a Dio? deh! raccontatemeli.

9 E il coppier maggiore raccontò a Giuseppe il suo sogno, e gli disse: E’ mi pareva nel mio sogno di veder davanti a me una vite.

10 E in quella vite erano tre tralci; e parve ch’ella germogliasse, poi che fiorisse, ed in fine che i suoi grappoli maturassero le uve.

11 Ed io avea la coppa di Faraone in mano; e prendeva quelle uve, e le spremeva nella coppa di Faraone, e dava la coppa in mano a Faraone.

12 E Giuseppe gli disse: Quest’è l’interpretazione di cotesto sogno: I tre tralci son tre giorni.

13 Fra qui e tre giorni, Faraone, rivedendo la sua famiglia, ti rassegnerà, e ti rimetterà nel tuo stato; e tu porgerai in mano a Faraone la sua coppa, secondo il tuo primiero ufficio, quando eri suo coppiere.

14 Ma abbi appo te memoria di me, quando avrai del bene; ed usa, ti prego, benignità inverso me, e fa’ menzion di me a Faraone, e fa’ che io esca fuor di questa casa.

15 Perciocchè in verità io sono stato rubato dal paese degli Ebrei; ed anche qui non ho fatto nulla, perchè io dovessi esser messo in questa fossa.

16 E il panattier maggiore, veggendo che Giuseppe avea interpretato il sogno di colui in bene, disse a Giuseppe: A me ancora pareva nel mio sogno di aver tre panieri bianchi in su la testa.

17 E nel più alto paniere vi erano di tutte le vivande di Faraone, di lavoro di fornaio; e gli uccelli le mangiavano di dentro quel paniere d’in sul mio capo.

18 E Giuseppe rispose, e disse: Questa è l’interpretazione di cotesto sogno: I tre panieri son tre giorni.

19 Fra qui e tre giorni, Faraone, rivedendo la sua famiglia, ti casserà e ti torrà il tuo ufficio, e ti farà appiccare ad un legno, e gli uccelli ti mangeranno la carne d’addosso.

20 Ed egli avvenne il terzo giorno appresso, ch’era il giorno della natività di Faraone, ch’egli fece un convito a tutti i suoi servitori; e trovò fra’ suoi servitori rassegnati, il coppier maggiore, e il panattier maggiore.

21 Ed egli rimise il coppier maggiore nel suo ufficio di coppiere; ed egli porse la coppa in mano a Faraone.

22 Ma fece appiccare il panattier maggiore, secondo l’interpretazione che Giuseppe avea lor data.

23 E il coppier maggiore non si ricordò di Giuseppe; anzi lo dimenticò.

   


To many Protestant and Evangelical Italians, the Bibles translated by Giovanni Diodati are an important part of their history. Diodati’s first Italian Bible edition was printed in 1607, and his second in 1641. He died in 1649. Throughout the 1800s two editions of Diodati’s text were printed by the British Foreign Bible Society. This is the more recent 1894 edition, translated by Claudiana.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5095

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5095. 'To the king of Egypt' means which were subordinate to the interior natural. This is clear from the representation of Pharaoh or 'the king of Egypt' in this chapter as a new state of the natural man, dealt with in 5079, 5080, consequently as the interior natural since this had been made new. As to what the interior natural is, and the exterior natural, see immediately above in 5094. The nature of the internal sense of the Word in the historical sections and in the prophetical parts must be stated briefly. When the historical sense mentions a number of persons - as when Joseph, Pharaoh, the chief of the attendants, the cupbearer, and the baker are mentioned here - various things are indeed meant by them in the internal sense, yet only as all these exist in one person. The reason for this is that names mean different spiritual things, as they do here: 'Joseph' represents the Lord as regards the celestial-spiritual from the rational and also within the natural, 'Pharaoh' represents Him as regards the new state of the natural man, that is, as regards the interior natural, 'the cupbearer and the baker' as regards the things that belong to the external natural. Such is the nature of the internal sense. The same is so in other places, for example when Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob are mentioned; in the sense of the letter they are three different persons, but in the highest sense all three represent the Lord - 'Abraham' the Divine itself, 'Isaac' His Divine Intellectual, 1 and 'Jacob' His Divine Natural. The same may be seen in the Prophets where sometimes the text consists of mere names, either of persons or of kingdoms or of cities; yet all of them together present and describe a single entity in the internal sense. Anyone unaware of this may be easily misled by the sense of the letter into visualizing a variety of things, with the result that the idea of a single entity disappears.

Poznámky pod čarou:

1. previously the expression Divine Rational has been used to describe Isaac's representation; cp 5998.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5094

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5094. 'The cupbearer and the baker' means regarding both kinds of sensory powers. This is clear from the meaning of 'the cupbearer' as the sensory powers subordinate to the understanding part of the mind, dealt with in 5077, and from the meaning of 'the baker' as the sensory powers subordinate to the will part, dealt with in 5078, which, as stated above in 5083, 5089, were cast aside by the interior natural. But it should be realized that the actual powers of the senses were not cast aside - that is to say, sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch, for the life of the body is dependent on these - but the insights or thoughts, as well as the affections and desires, that are dependent on them. Objects belonging to the world enter a person's external or natural memory by way of his senses on the one hand and by way of his rational thought on the other. These objects then divide themselves off from one another in that memory; those entering through rational thought place themselves in a more internal position, whereas those entering through the senses do so in a more external one, as a consequence of which the natural comes to have two parts - the interior part and the exterior - as has also been stated above.

[2] The interior natural is what 'Pharaoh king of Egypt' represents, while the exterior natural is what 'the cupbearer and the baker' represents. The nature of the difference between the two becomes clear from the different ways they look at things, that is, from their thoughts and their conclusions based on those thoughts. The person who uses the interior natural to think with and to form conclusions is rational, and is so insofar as he has absorbed what comes to him through rational thought; but the person who uses the exterior natural to think with and form conclusions is governed by his senses, and is so insofar as he has absorbed what comes to him from sensory evidence. Such a person is called one governed by his senses, whereas the other is called one who is rational-natural. When a person dies he has the entire natural with him; and its form remains the same as that which it took in the world. He is also rational-minded to the extent he has absorbed ideas from rational thought, but sensory-minded to the extent he has absorbed ideas from his senses. The difference between the two is that, to the extent it has absorbed ideas from rational thought and made them its own, the natural looks down on the senses belonging to the exterior natural and controls them by disparaging and casting aside illusions formed by the senses. But to the extent that it has absorbed ideas formed by the bodily senses and made them its own the natural looks down on rational thought by disparaging this and casting it aside.

[3] An example of the difference between the two may be seen in the ability of the rational-natural man to comprehend that no one's life is self-existent but that it comes to him through an influx of life from the Lord by way of heaven, and the inability of one governed by the senses to comprehend the same. For the latter says his senses tell him and he can plainly see that his life is self-existent and that it is pointless to contradict the evidence of the senses. Let another example be given. The rational-natural man comprehends the existence of a heaven and a hell; but one governed by his senses denies the existence of these because he has no conception of another world purer than the one he sees with his eyes. The rational-natural man comprehends the existence of spirits and angels who are not visible to him; but one governed by the senses cannot comprehend the same, for he imagines that what he cannot see or touch has no existence.

[4] Here is another example. The rational-natural man comprehends that it is the mark of an intelligent being to have ends in view, and with foresight to be directing means towards some final end. When he looks at the natural creation from the point of view of the order of everything, he sees the natural creation as a complex system of means and realizes that an intelligent Supreme Being has given them direction, though to what final end he cannot see unless he becomes spiritual. But a person governed by his senses does not comprehend how anything distinct and separate from the natural creation can exist or how some Being superior to the natural order can do so. He has no notion of what exercising intelligence, exercising wisdom, having ends in view, or giving direction to means may be unless all these activities are being spoken of as natural ones; and when they are spoken of as such, his idea of them is like that of one who is designing a machine. These few examples show what is meant by the interior natural and the exterior natural, and by the powers of the senses being cast aside - not sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch in the body, but the conclusions reached by these about interior matters.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.