Bible

 

1 Mózes 30

Studie

   

1 És látá Rákhel, hogy õ nem szûle Jákóbnak, irigykedni kezde Rákhel az õ nénjére, és monda Jákóbnak: Adj nékem gyermekeket, mert ha nem, meghalok.

2 Felgerjede azért Jákób haragja Rákhel ellen, és monda: Avagy Isten [vagyok-é] én, ki megtagadta tõled a méhnek gyümölcsét.

3 És monda ez: Ímhol az én szolgálóm Bilha, menj be hozzá, hogy szûljön az én térdeimen, és én is megépüljek õ általa.

4 Adá tehát néki az õ szolgálóját Bilhát feleségûl, és beméne ahhoz Jákób.

5 És teherbe esék Bilha és szûle Jákóbnak fiat.

6 És monda Rákhel: Ítélt felõlem az Isten, és meg is hallgatta szavamat, és adott énnékem fiat: azért nevezé nevét Dánnak.

7 Ismét fogada az õ méhében, és szûle Bilha, a Rákhel szolgálója más fiat is Jákóbnak.

8 És monda Rákhel: Nagy tusakodással tusakodtam az én nénémmel, és gyõztem; azért nevezé nevét Nafthalinak.

9 Látván pedig Lea hogy õ megszûnt a szûléstõl, vevé az õ szolgálóját Zilpát, és adá azt Jákóbnak feleségûl.

10 És szûle Zilpa, Lea szolgálója, fiat Jákóbnak.

11 És monda Lea: Szerencsére! és nevezé nevét Gádnak!

12 És szûle Zilpa, Lea szolgálója, más fiat is Jákóbnak.

13 És monda Lea: Oh én boldogságom! bizony boldognak mondanak engem az asszonyok: és nevezé nevét Ásernek.

14 És kiméne Rúben búzaaratáskor, és talála a mezõn mandragóra-bogyókat s vivé azokat az õ anyjának, Leának. És monda Rákhel Leának: Adj nékem kérlek a fiad mandragóra-bogyóiból.

15 Az pedig monda néki: Talán keveselled, hogy elvetted tõlem az én férjemet, s a fiam mandragóra-bogyóit is elvennéd tõlem? És monda Rákhel: Háljon veled hát az éjjel a te fiad mandragóra-bogyóiért.

16 Mikor Jákób este a mezõrõl jöve, eleibe méne Lea, és monda: Én hozzám jõjj be, mert megvettelek a fiam mandragóra-bogyóiért; és nála hála azon éjszaka.

17 És meghallgatá Isten Leát, mert fogada az õ méhében és szûle Jákóbnak ötödik fiat.

18 És monda Lea: Megadta az Isten jutalmamat, a miért szolgálómat férjemnek adtam; azért nevezé nevét Izsakhárnak.

19 És ismét fogada az õ méhében Lea, és szûle hatodik fiat Jákóbnak.

20 És monda Lea: Megajándékozott az Isten engem ajándékkal; most már velem lakik az én férjem, mert hat fiat szûltem néki, és nevezé nevét Zebulonnak.

21 Annakutána szûle leányt, és nevezé nevét Dínának.

22 Megemlékezék pedig az Isten Rákhelrõl; és meghallgatá õt az Isten és megnyitá az õ méhét.

23 És fogada méhében, és szûle fiat, s monda: Elvevé Isten az én gyalázatomat.

24 És nevezé nevét Józsefnek, mondván: Adjon ehhez az Úr nékem más fiat is.

25 És lõn, a mint szûlte vala Rákhel Józsefet, monda Jákób Lábánnak: Bocsáss el engemet, hadd menjek el az én helyembe, az én hazámba.

26 Add meg nékem az én feleségeimet és magzatimat, a kikért szolgáltalak téged, hadd menjek el, mert te tudod az én szolgálatomat, a melylyel szolgáltalak téged.

27 És monda néki Lábán: Vajha kedvet találtam volna szemeid elõtt! Úgy sejtem, hogy te éretted áldott meg engem az Úr.

28 És monda: Szabj bért magadnak és én megadom.

29 Ez pedig monda: Te tudod mimódon szolgáltalak téged, és hogy mivé lett nálam a te jószágod.

30 Mert a mi kevesed vala én elõttem, sokra szaporodott, és megáldott az Úr téged az én lábam nyomán. Immár mikor tehetek valamit a magam házáért is?

31 És monda [Lábán:] Mit adjak néked? Felele Jákób: Ne adj nékem semmit; juhaidat ismét legeltetem és õrizem, ha nekem ezt a dolgot megteszed:

32 Nyájaidat ma mind végig járom, minden pettyegetett és tarka bárányt kiszaggatok közûlök, és minden fekete bárányt a juhok közûl, s a tarkát és pettyegetettet a kecskék közûl, s legyen [ez] az én bérem.

33 S a mikor majd bérem iránt eljövéndesz, mi elõtted lesz, becsületességemrõl ez felel: a mi nem pettyegetett vagy tarka a kecskék, s nem fekete a juhok közt, az mind lopott jószág nálam.

34 És monda Lábán: Ám legyen: Vajha a te beszéded szerint lenne.

35 Külön választá azért azon a napon a pettyegetett és tarka kosokat, és minden csíkos lábú és tarka kecskét, mind a melyikben valami fehérség vala, és minden feketét a juhok közûl, és adá az õ fiainak keze alá.

36 És három napi járó földet vete maga közé és Jákób közé; Jákób pedig legelteti vala Lábán egyéb juhait.

37 És võn Jákób zöld nyár-, mogyoró- és gesztenye-vesszõket, és meghántá azokat fehéresen csíkosra, hogy látható legyen a vesszõk fehére.

38 És a vesszõket, melyeket meghántott vala, felállítá a csatornákba, az itató válúkba, melyekre a juhok inni járnak vala, szembe a juhokkal, hogy foganjanak, mikor inni jönnek.

39 És a juhok a vesszõk elõtt foganának és ellenek vala csíkos lábúakat, pettyegetetteket és tarkákat.

40 Azután külön szakasztá Jákób ezeket a bárányokat, és a Lábán nyáját arczczal fordítja vala a csíkos lábú és fekete bárányokra; így szerze magának külön falkákat, melyeket nem ereszte a Lábán juhai közé.

41 És lõn, hogy mikor a nyáj java részének vala párzási ideje, akkor Jákób a vesszõket oda raká a válúkba a juhok eleibe, hogy a vesszõket látva foganjanak.

42 De mikor satnya vala a nyáj, nem rakja vala oda s ily módon Lábánéi lõnek a satnyák, a java pedig Jákóbé.

43 És felette igen meggazdagodék a férfiú; és vala néki sok juha, szolgálója, szolgája, tevéje és szamara.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3913

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3913. 'She said, Behold, my maidservant Bilhah' means the affirming means, which has its place between natural truth and interior truth. This is clear from the meaning of 'a maidservant', and also of 'a servant-girl' as the affection for the cognitions which belong to the exterior man, dealt with in 1895, 2567, 3835, 3849, and in this particular case since that affection is the means by which interior truths become joined to natural or external truths, 'a maidservant' therefore describes the affirming means that has its place between these; and from the representation of 'Bilhah' as the nature of that means. The two servant-girls which Rachel and Leah gave to Jacob as wives for producing offspring represented and meant in the internal sense nothing else than something which is of service, in this case something serving as the means by which those two things are joined together, namely interior truth with external truth, for 'Rachel' represents interior truth, 'Leah' external, 3793, 3819. Indeed by means of the twelve sons of Jacob twelve general or principal requisites are described here by which a person is introduced into spiritual and celestial things while he is being regenerated or becoming the Church.

[2] Actually when a person is being regenerated or becoming the Church, that is, when from being a dead man he is becoming a living one, or from being a bodily-minded man is becoming a heavenly-minded one, he is led by the Lord through many states. These general states are specified by those twelve sons, and later by the twelve tribes, so that the twelve tribes mean all aspects of faith and love - see what has been shown in 3858. For any general whole includes every particular and individual detail, and each detail exists in relation to the general whole. When a person is being regenerated the internal man is to be joined to the external man, and therefore the goods and truths which belong to the internal man are to be joined to those which belong to the external man, for it is truths and goods that make a person a human being. These cannot be joined together without means. These means consist in such things as take something from one side and something from the other, and act in such a way that insofar as a person moves closer to one the other plays a subordinate role. These means are meant by the servant-girls - Rachel's servant-girls being the means available from the internal man, Leah's the means available from the external man.

[3] The necessity for means by which the joining together is effected may be recognized from the consideration that of himself the natural man does not agree at all with the spiritual but disagrees so much as to be utterly opposed to the spiritual. For the natural man regards and loves self and the world, whereas the spiritual man does not, except insofar as to do so leads to the rendering of services in the spiritual world, and so he regards service to it and loves this service because of the use that is served and the end in view. The natural man seems to himself to have life when he is promoted to high positions and so to pre-eminence over others, but the spiritual man seems to himself to have life in self-abasement and in being the least. Not that he despises high positions, provided they are means by which he is enabled to serve the neighbour, society as a whole, and the Church. Neither does the spiritual man view the important positions to which he is promoted in any selfish way but on account of the services rendered which are his ends in view. Bliss for the natural man consists in his being wealthier than others and in his possessing worldly riches, whereas bliss for the spiritual man consists in his having cognitions of truth and good which are the riches he possesses, and even more so in the practice of good in accordance with truths. Not however that he despises riches, because these enable him to render a service in the world.

[4] These few considerations show that on account of their different ends in view the state of the natural man and the state of the spiritual are the reverse of each other, but that the two can be joined one to the other. That conjunction is effected when things which belong to the external man become subordinate and are subservient to the ends which the internal man has in view. In order that a person may become spiritual therefore it is necessary for the things belonging to the external man to be brought into a position of subservience, and so for ends that have self and the world in view to be cast aside and those that have the neighbour and the Lord's kingdom to be adopted. The former cannot possibly be cast aside or the latter adopted, and so the two cannot be joined, except through means. It is these means that are meant by the servant-girls, and specifically by the four sons born to the servant-girls.

[5] The first means is one that affirms, or is affirmative towards, internal truth; that is to say, it affirms that it really is internal truth. Once this affirmative attitude is present, a person is in the first stage of regeneration, good from within being at work and leading to that spirit of affirmation. That good cannot pass into a negative attitude, nor even into one of doubt, until this becomes affirmative. After this, that good manifests itself in affection; that is to say, it causes the person to feel an affection for, and delight in, truth - first through his coming to know this truth, then through his acting in accordance with it. Take for example the truth that the Lord is the human race's salvation. If the person does not develop an affirmative attitude towards this truth, none of the things which he has learned about the Lord from the Word or in the Church and which are included among the facts in his natural memory can be joined to his internal man, that is, to the truths that are able to be truths of faith there. Nor can affection accordingly enter in, not even into the general aspects of this truth which contribute to the person's salvation. But once he develops an affirmative attitude countless things are added and are filled with the good that is flowing in. For good is flowing in constantly from the Lord, but where no affirmative attitude exists it is not accepted. An affirmative attitude is therefore the first means and so to speak first dwelling-place of the good flowing in from the Lord. And the same is so with all other truths called the truths of faith.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3793

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3793. 'Rachel came with the flock' means the affection for interior truth belonging to the Church and to doctrine. This is clear from the representation of 'Rachel' as the affection for interior truth, and from the meaning of 'the flock' as the Church and also as doctrine, dealt with in 3767, 3768, 3783. To enable it to be known how 'Rachel' represents the affection for interior truth, and 'Leah' the affection for exterior truth, let a brief statement be made about the matter: The natural, which 'Jacob' represents, consists of good and of truth; and within the natural, as within every single part in the human being, and indeed within the whole natural order, there ought to be a marriage of good and truth. Without this marriage nothing is produced, for every act of bringing forth and every effect is from that marriage. When he is born there is no marriage of good and truth within a person's natural because the human being, unlike other creatures, is not born into a condition where Divine order is present. It is true that good which goes with innocence and charity is present, flowing from the Lord in earliest childhood; but no truth is present to which that good may be coupled. As he advances in life this good which has been instilled by the Lord into a person in early childhood is drawn in towards the interior parts and kept there by the Lord so that it may serve to modify the states of life which he experiences subsequently. As a consequence without the good belonging to his infancy and early childhood the human being would be worse and more vicious than any wild animal. When that good belonging to earliest childhood is drawn inwards, evil in that case takes its place and enters the person's natural. Falsity then couples itself to that evil, and a joining together and so to speak a marriage of evil and falsity takes place with him. If a person is to be saved therefore, he has to be regenerated. Evil has to be removed and good instilled by the Lord. And in the measure that he receives good truth is instilled into him so that a coupling, or so to speak marriage, of good and truth takes place.

[2] These are the matters represented by Jacob and his two wives, Rachel and Leah. 'Jacob' now takes on the representation of natural good therefore, and 'Rachel' that of truth. But since all joining of truth to good is effected through affection, it is the affection for truth coupled to good that 'Rachel' represents. Furthermore the natural, like the rational, has an interior and an exterior. 'Rachel' represents the affection for interior truth, and 'Leah' the affection for exterior truth. 'Laban', who is their father, represents a good that springs from a common stock, but is a parallel good, as has been stated. That good is the good which in the parallel line corresponds to the truth of the rational, which is 'Rebekah', 3012, 3013, 3077. Daughters descended from that good therefore represent affections existing within the natural, for these are like daughters fathered by that good. And because those affections are to be coupled to natural good they consequently represent affections for truth - the first representing the affection for interior truth, the second the affection for exterior truth.

[3] The regeneration of a person's natural is altogether like Jacob and Laban's two daughters, Rachel and Leah. Anyone therefore who can see and understand the internal sense of the Word sees this arcanum which has been disclosed to him, but no one else is able to see it except him in whom good and truth are present. No others, no matter how good a perception they may have of the things to do with personal life and life in society and may seem to be highly intelligent, are able to see and then to acknowledge anything at all of that arcanum. Indeed they do not know what good and truth are, for they imagine evil to be good, and falsity to be truth. For this reason the moment good is mentioned the idea of evil presents itself, and the moment truth is mentioned the idea of falsity does so. Consequently they perceive nothing of the things contained in the internal sense, but as soon as they hear anything of it darkness descends which extinguishes the light.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.