Bible

 

2 Mózes 3

Studie

   

1 Mózes pedig õrzi vala az õ ipának, Jethrónak a Midián papjának juhait és hajtá a juhokat a pusztán túl és juta az Isten hegyéhez, Hórebhez.

2 És megjelenék néki az Úr angyala tûznek lángjában egy csipkebokor közepébõl, és látá, hogy ímé a csipkebokor ég vala; de a csipkebokor meg nem emésztetik vala.

3 S monda Mózes: Oda megyek, hogy lássam e nagy csudát, miért nem ég el a csipkebokor.

4 És látá az Úr, hogy oda méne megnézni, és szólítá õt Isten a csipkebokorból, mondván: Mózes, Mózes. Ez pedig monda: Ímhol vagyok.

5 És monda: Ne jõjj ide közel, oldd le a te saruidat lábaidról; mert a hely, a melyen állasz, szent föld.

6 És monda: Én vagyok a te atyádnak Istene, Ábrahámnak Istene, Izsáknak Istene és Jákóbnak Istene. Mózes pedig elrejté az õ orczáját, mert fél vala az Istenre tekinteni.

7 Az Úr pedig monda: Látván láttam az én népemnek nyomorúságát, a mely Égyiptomban vagyon és meghallottam az õ sanyargatóik miatt való kiáltásukat; sõt ismerem szenvedéseit.

8 Le is szállok, hogy megszabadítsam õt az Égyiptombeliek kezébõl és felvigyem õt arról a földrõl, és tágas földre, téjjel és mézzel folyó földre, a Kananeusok, Khitteusok, Emoreusok, Perizeusok, Khivveusok és Jebuzeusok lakóhelyére.

9 Mivel hát ímé feljutott hozzám az Izráel fiainak kiáltása és láttam is a nyomorgatást, a melylyel nyomorgatják õket az Égyiptombeliek:

10 Most azért eredj, elküldelek téged a Faraóhoz és hozd ki az én népemet, az Izráel fiait Égyiptomból.

11 Mózes pedig monda az Istennek: Kicsoda vagyok én, hogy elmenjek a Faraóhoz és kihozzam az Izráel fiait Égyiptomból?

12 És felele: Én veled lészek! és ez lesz a jele, hogy én küldöttelek téged, hogy mikor kihozod a népet Égyiptomból, ezen a hegyen fogtok szolgálni az Istennek.

13 Mózes pedig monda az Istennek: Ímé én elmegyek az Izráel fiaihoz és ezt mondom nékik: A ti atyáitok Istene küldött engem ti hozzátok; ha azt mondják nékem: Mi a neve? mit mondjak nékik?

14 És monda Isten Mózesnek: VAGYOK A KI VAGYOK. És monda: Így szólj az Izráel fiaihoz: A VAGYOK küldött engem ti hozzátok.

15 És ismét monda Isten Mózesnek: Így szólj az Izráel fiaihoz: Az Úr, a ti atyáitoknak Istene, Ábrahámnak Istene, Izsáknak Istene és Jákóbnak Istene küldött engem ti hozzátok. Ez az én nevem mind örökké és ez az én emlékezetem nemzetségrõl nemzetségre.

16 Menj el és gyûjtsd egybe az Izráel véneit és mondd ezt nékik: Az Úr, a ti atyáitok Istene, Ábrahámnak, Izsáknak és Jákóbnak Istene megjelent nékem, mondván: Megemlékeztem rólatok és arról a mit elkövettek rajtatok Égyiptomban.

17 És mondám: Kiviszlek titeket az égyiptomi nyomorúságból a Kananeusok, Khitteusok, Emoreusok, Perizeusok, Khivveusok és Jebuzeusok földére, téjjel és mézzel folyó földre.

18 És ha hallgatnak szavadra, akkor elmégy te és az Izráel vénei Égyiptom királyához, s így szóltok néki: Az Úr, a héberek Istene megjelent nékünk; most azért hadd menjünk három napi útra a pusztába, hogy áldozzunk az Úrnak a mi Istenünknek.

19 Én pedig tudom, hogy az égyiptomi király nem engedi meg néktek, hogy elmenjetek, még erõhatalomra sem.

20 Kinyújtom azért az én kezemet és megverem Égyiptomot mindenféle csudáimmal, melyeket véghez viszek benne; így azután elbocsát titeket.

21 És kedvessé tészem e népet az Égyiptombeliek elõtt, és lészen, hogy mikor kimentek, nem mentek üresen.

22 Kérjen azért minden asszony az õ szomszédasszonyától és háza lakó asszonyától ezüst edényeket és arany edényeket és ruhákat; és rakjátok azokat fiaitokra és leányaitokra, s így foszszátok ki Égyiptomot.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 6859

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

6859. 'And the Amorite and the Perizzite' means occupied by evils and the falsities that arise from them. This is clear from the representation of 'the Amorite' as evil, dealt with in 1857, 6306; and from the representation of 'the Perizzite' as falsity, dealt with in 1573, 1574. There are two sources of evil, and there are also two sources of falsity. One source of evil lies in false teaching or else false religion, the other in desires belonging to self-love and love of the world. Falsity from the first source springs, as stated, from false teaching or else false religion, while falsity from the second source springs from the evil which the desires belonging to self-love and love of the world crave after. Those evils are what 'the Canaanite' and 'the Amorite' mean, and the falsities what 'the Hittite' and 'the Perizzite' mean.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 1573

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1573. 'And the Canaanite and the Perizzite were then dwelling in the land' means evils and falsities in the external man. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'the Canaanite' as hereditary evil from the mother in the external man, dealt with already in 1444, and from the meaning of 'the Perizzite' as derivative falsity, dealt with in what follows below. That hereditary evil from the mother resided with the Lord in His external Man, see what has been stated already in 1414, 1444. The fact that falsity resulted from that hereditary evil follows, for where there is hereditary evil falsity is present also. The one is born from the other, but falsity from evil cannot be born until a person has been endowed with facts and cognitions. Evil has nothing to work on or flow into except facts and cognitions. In this way evil belonging to the will part of the mind is turned into falsity in the understanding part, and therefore this falsity also was hereditary because it was born from what was hereditary, though not the falsity that is based on false principles. But it existed in the external man as that which the internal man could see was falsity.

[2] Because hereditary evil from the mother was present before the Lord had been endowed with facts and cognitions, that is, before 'Abram sojourned in Egypt' it is said in verse 6 of the previous chapter that 'the Canaanite was in the land' but not that the Perizzite was there, whereas in the present verse, now that He had been endowed with facts and cognitions, it is said that 'the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelt in the land'. From these considerations it is clear that 'the Canaanite' means evil and 'the Perizzite' falsity. It is also clear from the consideration that the mention of the Canaanite and the Perizzite does not bear any relation to the historical events among which it occurs, for nothing is said about either of them in what has gone before or in what follows. The same is also true with the mention of the Canaanite in verse 6 of the previous chapter. From this it is evident that some arcanum lies concealed here which one cannot know except from the internal sense.

[3] To some it may come as a surprise to say that hereditary evil from the mother was present with the Lord, but as such evil is spoken of so plainly here, and as in the internal sense the Lord is the subject, there can be no doubt that it was present. For no human being can possibly be born from another human being without deriving evil from him or her. But the hereditary evil that is derived from the father is one thing, that from the mother is another. Hereditary evil from the father is more internal and remains for ever, since it can never be rooted out. Such evil did not exist with the Lord because He was born of Jehovah as His Father, and thus was Divine, or Jehovah, as regards internals. But hereditary evil from the mother belongs to the external man, as it did with the Lord, and it is called 'the Canaanite in the land', and derivative falsity 'the Perizzite'. The Lord was in this sense born as any other, and had weaknesses as any other has them.

[4] That the Lord derived hereditary evil from the mother is quite clear from the fact that He underwent temptations. Nobody can ever be tempted who has no evil, for it is the evil present with man that tempts and by means of which he is tempted. That the Lord was tempted, undergoing temptations so serious that no other could ever endure one ten thousandth part of them, that He suffered all alone, and by His own power overcame evil, or the devil and the whole of hell, is also clear. Those temptations are spoken of in Luke as follows,

Jesus was led by the Spirit into the wilderness. He was tempted for forty days by the devil, so that He ate nothing in those days. But after the devil had ended every temptation he departed from Him for a time. From there He returned in the power of the Spirit into Galilee. Luke 4:1-2, 13-14.

[5] And in Mark,

The Spirit, driving Jesus, made Him go away into the wilderness; and He was in the wilderness forty days, tempted; and He was with the wild beasts. Mark 1:12-13.

Here 'beasts' means hell. In addition to this He is spoken of as being tempted to the point of death, so that His sweat was [like] drops of blood,

And when He was in agony He prayed more earnestly; and His sweat became as great drops of blood falling down upon the ground. Luke 22:44.

[6] No angel can possibly be tempted by the devil, the reason being that as an angel abides in the Lord, evil spirits cannot approach him, even when they are a long way off, but are instantly seized with horror and fright. Much less could hell have approached the Lord if He had been born Divine, that is, without evil from the mother clinging to Him.

[7] That the Lord bore the iniquities and evils of the human race is also a statement commonly made by preachers, yet the diversion of iniquities and evils to Himself can never come about except through a hereditary channel. The Divine cannot take evil upon Itself, and therefore in order that He might overcome evil by His own powers - which no human being has ever been able to do or ever can do - and in so doing might make Himself alone Righteousness, He was willing to be born like any other. Otherwise there would have been no need for Him to be born at all, for the Lord could have assumed Human Essence without going through the process of birth, as He had indeed sometimes done when seen by members of the Most Ancient Church, and also by prophets. Therefore in order that He might be furnished with evil against which He was to fight and over which He was to conquer, and in so doing might join together in Himself the Divine Essence to the Human Essence, He came into the world.

[8] In the Lord however there was no evil of His own, that is, He committed no actual evil, as He Himself also says in John,

Who of you is going to convict Me of sin? John 8:46.

From these considerations it may now be quite evident what is meant by the statement immediately preceding - 'there was strife between Abram's herdsmen and Lot's herdsman'. The reason was that 'the Canaanite and the Perizzite were dwelling in the land'.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.