Bible

 

2 Mózes 22

Studie

   

1 Ha valaki ökröt vagy bárányt lop, és levágja vagy eladja azt: öt barmot fizessen egy ökörért, és négy juhot egy bárányért.

2 Ha ház-fölverésen kapják a tolvajt, és [úgy] megverik, hogy meghal, nincs vérbûn miatta.

3 Ha reá sütött a nap, vérbûn van miatta: fizessen; ha nincs néki: adassék el tolvajságáért.

4 Ha elevenen kapják kezében a lopott jószágot, akár ökör, akár szamár, akár juh: két annyit fizessen érette.

5 Ha valaki mezõt vagy szõlõt étet le, úgy hogy barmát elereszti, és az a más mezején legel: mezejének javából és szõlõjének javából fizesse meg a kárt.

6 Ha tûz támad, és tövisbe kap, és megég az asztag, vagy a lábon álló gabona, vagy a mezõ: fizesse meg a kárt, a ki a tüzet gyujtotta.

7 Ha valaki pénzt vagy edényeket ád felebarátjának megõrzés végett, és ellopják annak a férfiúnak házából: ha megtalálják a tolvajt, fizessen kétannyit.

8 Ha nem találják meg a tolvajt, a ház urát vigyék a bírák eleibe: hogy nem nyújtotta-é ki kezét az õ felebarátja vagyonára.

9 Akármi bûn dolgában, akár ökör, akár szamár, akár juh, akár ruha, akármi elveszett jószág az, a mirõl azt mondja: ez az; mindkettõjük ügye a bírák eleibe menjen, és a kit a bírák bûnösnek mondanak, fizessen két annyit az õ felebarátjának.

10 Ha valaki szamarat, vagy ökröt, vagy bárányt, vagy akármiféle barmot ád az õ felebarátja gondviselése alá, és az elhull, vagy megsérül, vagy elhajtatik, úgy hogy senki sem látta:

11 Az Úrra való esküvés legyen kettejök közt, hogy nem nyújtotta-é ki kezét felebarátja vagyonára; és ezt fogadja el annak ura, és az semmit se fizessen.

12 Ha pedig ellopták tõle: megfizesse az urának.

13 Ha széttépetett, hozza el azt bizonyságul; a széttépettet nem fizeti meg.

14 Ha pedig valaki kölcsön kér az õ felebarátjától, és az megsérül vagy elhull urának távollétében: fizesse meg a kárt.

15 Ha ura vele van, nem fizet; ha bérbe adatott, bérébe megy.

16 Ha valaki hajadont csábít el, a ki nincs eljegyezve, és vele hál: jegyajándékkal jegyezze azt el magának feleségül.

17 Ha annak atyja nem akarja azt néki adni: annyi pénzt adjon, a mennyi a hajadonok jegyajándéka.

18 Varázsló asszonyt ne hagyj életben.

19 A ki barommal közösül, halállal lakoljon.

20 A ki isteneknek áldozik, nem csupán az Úrnak, megölettessék.

21 A jövevényen ne hatalmaskodjál, és ne nyomorgasd azt, mert jövevények voltatok Égyiptom földén.

22 Egy özvegyet vagy árvát se nyomorítsatok meg.

23 Ha nyomorgatod azt, és hozzám kiált, meghallgatom az õ kiáltását.

24 És felgerjed haragom, és megöllek titeket fegyverrel, és a ti feleségeitek özvegyekké lésznek, a ti fiaitok pedig árvákká.

25 Ha pénzt adsz kölcsön az én népemnek, a szegénynek a ki veled van; ne légy hozzá olyan, mint a hitelezõ; ne vessetek reá uzsorát.

26 Ha zálogba veszed a te felebarátod felsõ ruháját: naplemente elõtt visszaadd azt néki:

27 Mert egyetlen takarója, testének ruhája az: miben háljon? Bizony, ha én hozzám kiált, meghallgatom; mert én irgalmas vagyok.

28 A bírákat ne szidalmazd, és néped fejedelmét ne átkozd.

29 Gabonáddal és boroddal ne késlekedjél; fiaid elsõszülöttét nékem add.

30 Hasonlóképen cselekedjél ökröddel, juhoddal; hét napig legyen az õ anyjával, a nyolczadik napon nékem add azt.

31 És szent emberek legyetek én elõttem; a mezõn széttépett húst meg ne egyétek; az ebnek vessétek azt.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 9207

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

9207. 'And your sons orphans' means that at the same time truths will do so, that is to say, will perish. This is clear from the meaning of 'orphans' as those who possess truth but not as yet good, and still have a desire for good, dealt with in 9199, at this point those who have truth but no desire for good, thus those with whom truths perish; for it is speaking about evil people whose sons will become orphans. The fact that truths perish with those who have no desire for good is evident from what has been stated immediately above in 9206 regarding goodness and truth when joined together. But something further must be stated regarding that joining together. Truths that have been joined to good always hold within them a desire to do good, and at the same time to be joined more closely to good by doing it. Or what amounts to the same thing, those who possess truths always have a desire to do good and to join it thereby to their truths. People therefore who think that they are in possession of truths but who have no desire to do good do not in fact possess truths; that is, they have no belief in them, however much they imagine they do have.

[2] Their condition is portrayed by the Lord when He speaks of 'salt', in Matthew,

You are the salt of the earth; but if the salt is tasteless, by what will it be made salty? It no longer has any use, except to be thrown outdoors and trodden down by people. Matthew 5:13-14.

The Lord says these things to the disciples and to the people. By 'the salt of the earth' He means the Church's truth that has a desire for good, and by 'tasteless salt' He means truth devoid of any desire for good. The fact that such truth is worthless is portrayed by the idea of salt which has become tasteless and no longer has any use, except to be thrown outdoors and trodden down by people. Having a desire for good means having a desire to do good and thereby be joined to good.

[3] In Mark,

Everyone will be salted with fire, and every sacrifice will be salted with salt. Salt is good; but if the salt becomes tasteless, how will you season it? Have salt in yourselves, and seek 1 peace with one another. Mark 9:49-50.

'Being salted with fire' means good that has a desire for truth, and 'being salted with salt' truth that has a desire for good. 'Tasteless salt' is truth devoid of any desire for good; 'having salt in oneself' means possessing that desire.

[4] In Luke,

Any of you who does not renounce all his possessions cannot be My disciple. Salt is good; but if the salt is made tasteless, by what will it be seasoned? It is fit neither for the land nor for the dunghill; people throw it outdoors. Luke 14:33-35.

Here 'salt' in a similar way stands for truth that has a desire for good, and 'tasteless salt' for truth that is devoid of any desire for good, 'unfit for the land or for the dunghill' standing for its total inability to serve any use, good or bad. People possessing such truth are called the lukewarm, as is evident from the words immediately before, stating that a person cannot be the Lord's disciple if he does not renounce all his possessions, that is, if he does not love the Lord above all things. For those loving the Lord and also themselves equally are the ones who are called the lukewarm and who are unfit to serve any use, good or bad.

[5] In Moses,

Every offering of your minchah shall be salted with salt; you shall not leave the salt of the covenant of your God off your minchah. 2 On all your offerings you shall offer salt. Leviticus 2:13.

Salt in every offering was a sign that truth's desire for good and good's desire for truth should be present in all worship. This also explains why this salt is called 'the salt of God's covenant'; for 'a covenant' is a joining together, 665, 666, 1023, 1038, 1864, 1996, 2003, 2021, 2037, 6804, 8767, 8778, and 'salt' is the desire for the joining together.

[6] When each desires to be joined to the other, that is, good to truth and truth to good, they look towards each other. But when truth tears itself away from good, they turn away from each other and look backwards or behind themselves. This is what is meant in Luke by Lot's wife who had become a pillar of salt,

Whoever will be on the housetop with his vessels in the house, let him not come down to take them away; and whoever is in the field likewise, let him not return to the things behind him. Remember Lot's wife. Luke 17:31-32.

This means looking behind oneself or backwards, see 3652, 5895 (end), 5897, 7857, 7923, 8505, 8506, 8510, 8516.

[7] One reason why 'salt' means the desire truth possesses is that salt renders land fertile and makes food tasteful, and another reason is that salt contains a fiery property and at the same time a conjunctive power, even as truth contains a burning desire for good and at the same time a conjunctive power. 'A pillar of salt' is a separation from truth, for 'salt' in the contrary sense means truth that has been destroyed and laid waste, as in Zephaniah 2:9; Ezekiel 47:11; Jeremiah 17:6; Psalms 107:33-34; Deuteronomy 29:23; Judges 9:45; 2 Kings 2:19-22.

These matters have been introduced so that people may know what truth's desire for good is, and what good's desire for truth is, meant by 'orphan' and 'widow'.

Poznámky pod čarou:

1. literally, cultivate

2. literally, you shall not cause to cease the salt of the covenant of your God upon your minchah

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 5895

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

5895. 'In which there will be no ploughing and harvest' means that in the meanwhile no good will be seen nor any truth derived from good. This is clear from the meaning of 'ploughing' as the preparation made by good for the reception of truths, dealt with in what follows below; and from the meaning of 'harvest' as truths derived from good, for a harvest is grain that has ripened by the time it is gathered in, so that 'harvest' means truth derived from good. Before this truth is produced truths are indeed to be seen, but they are truths that lead to good, not truths derived from good. When truth guides a person in his actions his truths are truths leading to good; but when good guides him in them his truths are truths derived from good. The reason why 'ploughing' is said to mean good is that 'the field' which is ploughed means the Church as regards good, 2971, and so the good which constitutes the Church, 3310, 3317, 4982. Consequently 'ploughing' is the preparation made by good for the reception of truths; and 'the oxen' too that were used in ploughing means forms of good within the natural, 2180, 2566, 2781.

[2] Because 'ploughing' had this meaning people in the representative Church were forbidden 'to plough with an ox and an ass together', Deuteronomy 22:10. They would never have been forbidden to do this if there had not been some cause of a more internal nature, thus a cause existing in the spiritual world. Without it what would have been wrong with the two ploughing together? And what value would such a law have in the Word? That cause of a more internal nature, a cause existing in the spiritual world, is that 'ploughing with an ox' means good within the natural, and 'ploughing with an ass' means the truth there, 'an ass' being truth contained in factual knowledge, thus truth within the natural, see 5492, 5741. The more internal or spiritual cause behind the existence of this prohibition was that the angels could not have a separate idea of good and truth. The two must be joined together and make one. For this reason the angels were unwilling to see any kind of ploughing done by an ox and an ass. Celestial angels refuse even to think about truth separate from good, for all truth with them exists within good, so that also for them truth is good. It was for the same reason that people were also forbidden to wear a garment made from a mixture of wool and linen, Deuteronomy 22:11; for 'wool' meant good, and 'linen' truth.

[3] The fact that 'ploughing', also 'harrowing', 'sowing', and 'reaping', mean the kinds of activities that are connected with good and the truth that goes with it is clear in Hosea,

I will make Ephraim ride, Judah will plough, Jacob will harrow for him. Sow for yourselves in keeping with righteousness, reap in keeping with godliness, break up 'your fallow ground; and it is time to seek Jehovah, until He comes and teaches righteousness. Hosea 10:11-12.

'Riding' is used in reference to Ephraim because 'riding' means having the use of an understanding, 'Ephraim' being the Church's gift of understanding. But 'ploughing' is used in reference to Judah because 'Judah' is the good which exists in the Church.

[4] In Amos,

Will horses run upon the rock? Will one plough with oxen? in that you have turned judgement into poison and the fruit of righteousness into wormwood. Amos 6:11-12.

'Will horses run upon the rock?' stands for Will there be any understanding of the truth of faith? For 'rock' in the spiritual sense is faith, Preface to Genesis 22, while 'horses' means the powers of understanding, 2761, 2762, 3217, 5321. 'Will one plough with oxen?' stands for Will there be any doing of good? For 'oxen' means good in the natural, see 2180, 2566, 2781. The fact that no doing of it was possible is meant by the words that follow - 'because you have turned judgement into poison'.

[5] In Luke,

Jesus said, No one putting his hand to the plough, and looking back, is fit for the kingdom of God. Luke 9:62.

These words have the same meaning as those spoken by the Lord in Matthew,

Let him who is on the housetop not go down to take anything out of his house; and let him who is in the field not turn back to take his clothes. Matthew 24:17-18.

The meaning of these words is that a person governed by good should not depart from it and resort to matters of doctrine concerning faith; see 3652, where those words spoken by the Lord have been explained. Thus 'one who puts his hand to the plough' is a person governed by good; but 'looking back' means someone who then looks to matters of doctrine concerning faith and in so doing forsakes good. This explains why Elijah was displeased with Elisha who, ploughing in the field when he received his call, asked whether he might first kiss his father and mother; for Elijah said,

Go away; go back again; for what have I done to you? 1 Kings 19:19-21.

In the contrary sense 'ploughing' means evil that destroys good, and so means a laying waste, as in Jeremiah,

Zion will be ploughed [like] a field, and Jerusalem will be heaps, and the mountain of the house [will be turned] into the heights of the forest. Jeremiah 26:18; Micah 3:12.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.