Bible

 

Γένεση 36

Studie

   

1 Αυτη δε ειναι η γενεαλογια του Ησαυ, οστις ειναι ο Εδωμ.

2 Ο Ησαυ ελαβε γυναικας εις εαυτον εκ των θυγατερων Χανααν· την Αδα, θυγατερα Αιλων του Χετταιου, και την Ολιβαμα, θυγατερα του Ανα, εγγονην Σεβεγων του υαιου·

3 και την Βασεμαθ, θυγατερα του Ισμαηλ, αδελφην του Νεβαιωθ.

4 Εγεννησε δε εις τον Ησαυ η Αδα τον Ελιφας· και η Βασεμαθ εγεννησε τον Ραγουηλ·

5 και η Ολιβαμα εγεννησε τον Ιεους και τον Ιεγλομ και τον Κορε. Ουτοι ειναι οι υιοι του Ησαυ, οι γεννηθεντες εις αυτον εν τη γη Χανααν.

6 Ελαβε δε ο Ησαυ τας γυναικας αυτου και τους υιους αυτου και τας θυγατερας αυτου και παντας τους ανθρωπους του οικου αυτου και τα ποιμνια αυτου και παντα τα κτηνη αυτου και παντα τα υπαρχοντα τα οποια απεκτησεν εν γη Χανααν, και υπηγεν εις αλλην γην μακραν απο Ιακωβ του αδελφου αυτου·

7 διοτι τα υπαρχοντα αυτων ησαν τοσον πολλα, ωστε δεν ηδυναντο να κατοικησωσιν ομου· και δεν ηδυνατο η γη της παροικησεως αυτων να χωρεση αυτους, εξ αιτιας των κτηνων αυτων.

8 Κατωκησε δε ο Ησαυ εν τω ορει Σηειρ· ο Ησαυ ειναι ο Εδωμ.

9 Και αυτη ειναι η γενεαλογια του Ησαυ, πατρος των Εδωμιτων, εν τω ορει Σηειρ·

10 ταυτα ειναι τα ονοματα των υιων του Ησαυ· Ελιφας ο υιος της Αδα γυναικος του Ησαυ, Ραγουηλ ο υιος της Βασεμαθ γυναικος του Ησαυ.

11 Και οι υιοι του Ελιφας ησαν Θαιμαν, Ωμαρ, Σωφαρ και Γοθωμ και Κενεζ.

12 Η δε Θαμνα ητο παλλακη του Ελιφας υιου του Ησαυ, και εγεννησεν εις τον Ελιφας τον Αμαληκ· ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι της Αδα γυναικος του Ησαυ.

13 Και ουτοι ειναι οι υιοι του Ραγουηλ· Ναχαθ και Ζερα, Σομε και Μοζε· ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι της Βασεμαθ γυναικος του Ησαυ.

14 Και ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι της Ολιβαμα θυγατρος του Ανα, εγγονης του Σεβεγων, της γυναικος του Ησαυ· και εγεννησεν εις τον Ησαυ τον Ιεους και τον Ιεγλομ και τον Κορε.

15 Ουτοι ησαν οι ηγεμονες των υιων Ησαυ· οι υιοι του Ελιφας πρωτοτοκου του Ησαυ, ηγεμων Θαιμαν, ηγεμων Ωμαρ, ηγεμων Σωφαρ, ηγεμων Κενεζ,

16 ηγεμων Κορε, ηγεμων Γοθωμ, ηγεμων Αμαληκ· ουτοι ειναι οι ηγεμονες του Ελιφας εν τη γη Εδωμ· ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι της Αδα.

17 Και ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι του Ραγουηλ υιου του Ησαυ· ηγεμων Ναχαθ, ηγεμων Ζερα, ηγεμων Σομε, ηγεμων Μοζε· ουτοι ειναι οι ηγεμονες του Ραγουηλ εν τη γη Εδωμ· ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι της Βασεμαθ γυναικος του Ησαυ.

18 Και ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι της Ολιβαμα γυναικος του Ησαυ· ηγεμων Ιεους, ηγεμων Ιεγλομ, ηγεμων Κορε· ουτοι ησαν οι ηγεμονες της Ολιβαμα θυγατρος του Ανα, γυναικος του Ησαυ.

19 Ουτοι ειναι οι υιοι του Ησαυ, οστις ειναι ο Εδωμ· και ουτοι οι ηγεμονες αυτων.

20 Ουτοι ειναι οι υιοι του Σηειρ του Χορραιου, οιτινες κατωκουν την γην· Λωταν και Σωβαλ και Σεβεγων και Ανα,

21 και Δησων και Εσερ και Δισαν· ουτοι ειναι οι ηγεμονες των Χορραιων, των υιων του Σηειρ, εν τη γη Εδωμ.

22 Οι δε υιοι του Λωταν ησαν Χορρι και Αιμαμ· αδελφη δε του Λωταν, η Θαμνα.

23 Ουτοι δε ησαν οι υιοι του Σωβαλ· Αλβαν και Μαναχαθ και Εβαλ, Σεφω και Ωναμ.

24 Ουτοι δε ησαν οι υιοι του Σεβεγων· και Αιε και Ανα· ουτος ειναι ο Ανα οστις ευρηκε τα υδατα εν τη ερημω, οτε εβοσκε τους ονους Σεβεγων του πατρος αυτου.

25 Ουτοι δε ησαν οι υιοι του Ανα· Δησων και Ολιβαμα η θυγατηρ του Ανα.

26 Ουτοι δε ησαν οι υιοι του Δησων· Αμαδαν και Ασβαν και Ιθραμ και Χαρραν.

27 Ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι του Εσερ· Βαλααν και Ζααβαν και Ακαν.

28 Ουτοι ησαν οι υιοι του Δισαν· Ουζ και Αραν.

29 Ουτοι ειναι οι ηγεμονες των Χορραιων· ηγεμων Λωταν, ηγεμων Σωβαλ, ηγεμων Σεβεγων, ηγεμων Ανα,

30 ηγεμων Δησων, ηγεμων Εσερ, ηγεμων Δισαν· ουτοι ειναι οι ηγεμονες των Χορραιων μεταξυ των ηγεμονων αυτων εν τη γη Σηειρ.

31 Και ουτοι ειναι οι βασιλεις οιτινες εβασιλευσαν εν τη γη Εδωμ, πριν βασιλευση βασιλευς επι τους υιους Ισραηλ.

32 Και εβασιλευσεν εν Εδωμ Βελα, ο υιος του Βεωρ· το δε ονομα της πολεως αυτου ητο Δενναβα.

33 Και απεθανεν ο Βελα και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου ο Ιωβαβ, υιος του Ζερα, εκ Βοσορρας·

34 Και απεθανεν ο Ιωβαβ και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου ο Χουσαμ εκ της γης των Θαιμανιτων.

35 Και απεθανεν ο Χουσαμ και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου ο Αδαδ, υιος του Βεραδ, ο παταξας τους Μαδιανιτας εν τη πεδιαδι Μωαβ· το δε ονομα της πολεως αυτου ητο Αβιθ.

36 Και απεθανεν ο Αδαδ, και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου ο Σαμλα εκ Μασρεκας.

37 Και απεθανεν ο Σαμλα και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου ο Σαουλ εκ Ρεχωβωθ της παρα τον ποταμον.

38 Και απεθανεν ο Σαουλ και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου Βααλ-αναν, ο υιος του Αχβωρ.

39 Και απεθανεν ο Βααλ-αναν, υιος του Αχβωρ, και εβασιλευσεν αντ' αυτου ο Χαδδαρ· το δε ονομα της πολεως αυτου ητο Παου· και το ονομα της γυναικος αυτου, Μεεταβεηλ, θυγατηρ του Ματραιδ, εγγονη του Μαιζααβ.

40 Και ταυτα ειναι τα ονοματα των ηγεμονων του Ησαυ, κατα τας οικογενειας αυτων, κατα τους τοπους αυτων, κατα τα ονοματα αυτων. ηγεμων Θαμνα, ηγεμων Αλβα, ηγεμων Ιεθεθ,

41 ηγεμων Ολιβαμα, ηγεμων Ηλα, ηγεμων Φινων,

42 ηγεμων Κενεζ, ηγεμων Θαιμαν, ηγεμων Μιβσαρ,

43 ηγεμων Μαγεδιηλ, ηγεμων Ιραμ· ουτοι ειναι οι ηγεμονες του Εδωμ, κατα τας κατοικιας αυτων εν τη γη της κτησεως αυτων· ουτος ειναι ο Ησαυ, ο πατηρ των Εδωμιτων.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4585

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4585. 'They travelled on from Bethel, and there was still a stretch of land to go to Ephrath' means the spiritual of the celestial at this point. This is clear from the meaning of 'travelling on from Bethel' as a continuation of the progress of the Divine from the Divine Natural - 'travelling on' meaning a continuation, see 4554, and here in the highest sense a continuation of the progress made by the Divine, while 'Bethel' means the Divine Natural, 4559, 4560; from the meaning of 'a stretch of land to go' as that which exists in between, dealt with below; and from the meaning of 'Ephrath' as the spiritual of the celestial within the initial state, dealt with below where Bethlehem is the subject. 1 'Bethlehem' means the spiritual of the celestial within the new state, and this is why the phrase 'Ephrath, that is, Bethlehem' is used in verse 19 below.

[2] In these verses progress made by the Lord's Divine towards aspects more interior is the subject, for when the Lord made His Human Divine His progress involved a similar order to that employed by Him when He makes man new through regeneration. That is to say, it was a progression from external things to more interior ones, and so from truth as this exists in the ultimate degree of order to good which is more interior and is called spiritual good, and from this to celestial good. But ideas about these things do not come within the mental grasp of anyone unless he knows what the external man is and what the internal man is, and that the former is distinct and separate from the latter, though the two seem to be one and the same while a person lives in the body. Nor do those ideas come within his grasp unless he knows that the natural constitutes the external man, and the rational the internal man, and above all unless he knows what the spiritual is, and what the celestial is.

[3] These matters, it is true, have been explained several times already. Even so, those who have not previously had any idea concerning them - for the reason that they have not had any desire to know the things which belong to eternal life - are incapable of having any such idea. These people say, 'What is the internal man? How can it be anything different from the external man?' They also say, 'What is the natural, or the rational? Are these not one and the same thing?' Then they ask, 'What is the spiritual and the celestial? Isn't this some new distinction? We've heard about the spiritual, but not that the celestial is something different'. But the fact of the matter is that these are people who have not previously acquired any idea of these matters. They have failed to do so either because the cares of the world and of the body occupy their whole thought and take away all desire to know anything else, or because they suppose that no one needs to know anything beyond what the common people are taught and that there is nothing to be gained if their thought goes any further. For these say, 'The world we see, but the next life we do not see. Maybe it exists, maybe it doesn't'. People like these push those ideas away from themselves, for at heart they reject them the moment they see them.

[4] All the same, because such ideas are contained in the internal sense of the Word, though they cannot be explained without suitable terms to depict them, and as no terms more suitable exist than 'natural' to express exterior things and 'rational' to express interior, or 'spiritual' to express matters of truth and 'celestial' matters of good, the use of words like these is unavoidable. For without the right words nothing can be described. Therefore so that some idea may be formed by those who have a desire to know what the spiritual of the celestial is, which 'Benjamin' represents and which 'Bethlehem' means, a brief reference to it must be made here. The subject so far in the highest sense has been the glorification of the Lord's Natural, and in the relative sense the regeneration of man's natural. It was shown above, in 4286, that 'Jacob' represented the external man of one who belongs to the Church, and 'Israel' his internal man, thus that 'Jacob' represented the exterior aspect of the natural and 'Israel' the interior aspect; for the spiritual man develops out of the natural, but the celestial man out of the rational. It was also shown that the Lord's glorification advanced, even as the regeneration of man advances, from external things to more interior ones, and that for the sake of such a representation Jacob received the name Israel.

[5] But now the subject is further progress towards aspects more interior still, that is, towards the rational, for as stated immediately above, the rational constitutes the internal man. The part which exists between the internal of the natural and the external of the rational is what the term 'the spiritual of the celestial' - meant by 'Ephrath' and 'Bethlehem', and represented by 'Benjamin' - is used to denote. This intermediate part is derived to some extent from the internal of the natural, meant by 'Israel', and to some extent from the external of the rational, meant by 'Joseph'; for that intermediate part must be derived to some extent from each one, or else it cannot serve as an intermediary. So that anyone who is already spiritual can be made celestial he must of necessity make progress by means of this intermediate part. Without it no advance to higher things is possible.

[6] The nature of the progress made therefore by means of this intermediate part is described here in the internal sense by the statements that Jacob went to Ephrath, and that Rachel gave birth to Benjamin there. From this it is evident that 'they travelled on from Bethel, and there was still a stretch of land to go to Ephrath' means a continuation of the progress of the Lord's Divine from the Divine Natural to the spiritual of the celestial, meant by 'Ephrath' and 'Bethlehem', and represented by 'Benjamin'. The spiritual of the celestial is the intermediate part about which something is said above; it is spiritual insofar as it is derived from the spiritual man, which regarded in itself is the interior natural man, and it is [celestial] insofar as it is derived from the celestial man, which regarded in itself is the rational man. 'Joseph' is the exterior rational man, and therefore he is spoken of as the celestial of the spiritual derived from the rational.

Poznámky pod čarou:

1. i.e. in 4594

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4594

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4594. 'That is, Bethlehem' means a new spiritual of the celestial raised up in place of it. This is clear from the meaning of 'Bethlehem' as the spiritual of the celestial within the new state, for 'Ephrath' is the spiritual of the celestial within the initial state, 4585, while her burial there means the raising up of a new state, 4593. The fact that Bethlehem was the place where Rachel gave birth to her second son, Benjamin, and died in giving birth to him, also the place where David was born and where he was anointed king, and finally the place where the Lord was born, involves an arcanum which has not yet been revealed. Nor could it have been revealed to anyone who did not know what was meant by 'Ephrath' and by 'Bethlehem', and what was represented by 'Benjamin' and also by 'David'. Least of all could it have been revealed to anyone who did not know what the spiritual of the celestial was; for this is what was meant spiritually by those places and what was represented by those personages.

[2] The reason the Lord was born there and nowhere else was that He alone has been born a spiritual-celestial man. Everyone else has been born a natural man with the ability or capacity to become, through regeneration by the Lord, either celestial or spiritual. The Lord was born a spiritual-celestial man to the end that He might make His Human Divine, doing so according to order from the lowest degree to the highest, and so would bring order to everything in the heavens and everything in the hells. For the spiritual of the celestial is an intermediate part between the natural or external man and the rational or internal man, see above in 4585, 4592, so that below it there was the natural or external, and above it the rational or internal.

[3] Until he can grasp these things no one will ever come to understand in the light of any revelation at all why the Lord was born in Bethlehem. From most ancient times 'Ephrath' meant the spiritual of the celestial, as therefore did 'Bethlehem' subsequently. This now explains why the following words occur in David,

He swore to Jehovah, he made a vow to the Mighty One of Jacob, If I enter the tent of my house, if I go up onto the couch of my bed, if I give sleep to my eyes, slumber to my eyelids, until I find a place for Jehovah, dwelling-places for the Mighty One of Jacob. Behold, we heard of Him in Ephrath, we found Him in the fields of the forest; we will enter His dwelling-places, and bow down at His footstool. Psalms 132:2-7.

It is quite evident that these words are used to refer to the Lord. In the original language the pronoun 'Him' in 'we have heard of Him' and in 'we have found Him' is expressed by a letter added to the end of the verb - by the letter H, taken from the name Jehovah.

[4] And in Micah,

You, Bethlehem Ephrath, it is little that you are among the thousands of Judah; from you will come forth for Me one who will be ruler in Israel; and His origins are from of old, from the days of eternity Micah 5:2; Matthew 2:6.

From these prophecies it was well known to the Jewish people that the Messiah or Christ was to be born in Bethlehem, as is clear in Matthew,

Assembling all the chief priests and scribes of the people Herod inquired of them where the Christ (the Messiah) was to be born. They told him, In Bethlehem of Judea. Matthew 2:4-5.

And in John,

The Jews said, Does not the Scripture say that the Christ (the Messiah) is going to come from the seed of David, and from Bethlehem, the city where David was? John 7:42.

His birth did in fact take place there, see Matthew 2:1; Luke 2:4-7. For this reason also, and because He was descended from David, the Lord is called 'a shoot from the stem of Jesse', and 'the root of Jesse', Isaiah 11:1, 10. For Jesse, David's father, was a Bethlehemite, and David was born there and also anointed king there, 1 Samuel 16:1-14; 17:12, for which reason Bethlehem was called the city of David, Luke 2:4, 11; John 7:42. David in particular represents the Lord's kingship or Divine Truth, 1888.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.