Bible

 

1 Mose 38

Studie

   

1 Es begab sich um dieselbige Zeit, daß Juda hinabzog von seinen Brüdern und tat sich zu einem Mann von Odollam, der hieß Hira.

2 Und Juda sah daselbst eines Kanaaniter-Mannes Tochter, der hieß Suah; und nahm sie. Und da er sie beschlief,

3 ward sie schwanger und gebar einen Sohn, den hieß er Ger.

4 Und sie ward aber schwanger und gebar einen Sohn, den hieß sie Onan.

5 Sie gebar abermal einen Sohn, den hieß sie Sela; und er war zu Chesib, da sie ihn gebar.

6 Und Juda gab seinem ersten Sohn Ger ein Weib, die hieß Thamar.

7 Aber er war böse vor dem HERRN; darum tötete ihn der HERR.

8 Da sprach Juda zu Onan: Lege dich zu deines Bruders Weib und nimm sie zur Ehe, daß du deinem Bruder Samen erweckest.

9 Aber da Onan wußte, daß der Same nicht sein eigen sein sollte, wenn er sich zu seines Bruders Weib legte, ließ er's auf die Erde fallen und verderbete es, auf daß er seinem Bruder nicht Samen gäbe.

10 Das gefiel dem HERRN übel, das er tat, und tötete ihn auch.

11 Da sprach Juda zu seiner Schnur Thamar: Bleibe eine Witwe in deines Vaters Hause, bis mein Sohn Sela groß wird. Denn er gedachte: Vielleicht möchte er auch sterben wie seine Brüder. Also ging Thamar hin und blieb in ihres Vaters Hause.

12 Da nun viele Tage verlaufen waren, starb des Suah Tochter, Judas Weib. Und nachdem Juda ausgetrauert hatte, ging er hinauf, seine Schafe zu scheren, gen Thimnath mit seinem Hirten Hira von Odollam.

13 Da ward der Thamar angesagt: Siehe, dein Schwäher gehet hinauf gen Thimnath, seine Schafe zu scheren.

14 Da legte sie die Witwenkleider von sich, die sie trug, deckte sich mit einem Mantel und verhüllete sich und setzte sich vor die Tür heraus an dem Wege gen Thimnath; denn sie sah, daß Sela war groß worden, und sie ward ihm nicht zum Weibe gegeben.

15 Da sie nun Juda sah, meinete er, es wäre eine Hure, denn sie hatte ihr Angesicht verdecket.

16 Und machte sich zu ihr am Wege und sprach: Lieber, laß mich bei dir liegen. Denn er wußte nicht, daß sie seine Schnur wäre. Sie antwortete: Was willst du mir geben, daß du bei mir liegest?

17 Er sprach: Ich will dir einen Ziegenbock von der Herde senden. Sie antwortete: So gib mir ein Pfand, bis daß du mir's sendest.

18 Er sprach: Was willst du für ein Pfand, das ich dir gebe? Sie antwortete: Deinen Ring und deine Schnur und deinen Stab, den du in den Händen hast; Da gab er's ihr und lag bei ihr; und sie ward von ihm schwanger.

19 Und sie machte sich auf und ging hin und legte den Mantel ab und zog ihre Witwenkleider an.

20 Juda aber sandte den Ziegenbock durch seinen Hirten von Odollam, daß er das Pfand wieder holete von dem Weibe; und er fand sie nicht.

21 Da fragte er die Leute desselbigen Orts und sprach: Wo ist die Hure, die außen am Wege saß? Sie antworteten: Es ist keine Hure dagewesen.

22 Und er kam wieder zu Juda und sprach: Ich habe sie nicht funden; dazu sagen die Leute desselben Orts, es sei keine Hure dagewesen.

23 Juda sprach: Sie hab's ihr, sie kann uns doch ja nicht Schande nachsagen; denn ich habe den Bock gesandt, so hast du sie nicht funden.

24 Über drei Monden ward Juda angesagt: Deine Schnur Thamar hat gehuret; dazu siehe, sie ist von Hurerei schwanger worden. Juda sprach: Bringet sie hervor, daß sie verbrannt werde.

25 Und da man sie hervorbrachte, schickte sie zu ihrem Schwäher und sprach: Von dem Manne bin ich schwanger, des dies ist. Und sprach: Kennest du auch, wes dieser Ring und diese Schnur und dieser Stab ist?

26 Juda erkannte es und sprach: Sie ist gerechter denn ich; denn ich habe sie nicht gegeben meinem Sohn Sela. Doch beschlief er sie nicht mehr.

27 Und da sie gebären sollte, wurden Zwillinge in ihrem Leibe erfunden.

28 Und als sie jetzt gebar, tat sich eine Hand heraus. Da nahm die Wehmutter und band einen roten Faden darum und sprach: Der wird der erste herauskommen.

29 Da aber der seine Hand wieder hinein zog, kam sein Bruder heraus; und sie sprach: Warum hast du um deinetwillen solchen Riß gerissen? Und man hieß ihn Perez.

30 Danach kam sein Bruder heraus, der den roten Faden um seine Hand hatte. Und man hieß ihn Serah.

   

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4925

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4925. 'That behold, his brother came out' means the truth of good. This is clear from the meaning of 'brother' as that which is kindred, by virtue of good, dealt with in 3815, 4267, and so the truth of good. The truth of good is that truth which is rooted in good, or that faith which is rooted in charity. Dealt with here in the internal sense is the birthright in the case of those who are being born again or regenerated by the Lord, and therefore the birthright within the Church. It has been a matter of argument since most ancient times as to which is the firstborn, whether this is the good of charity or whether it is the truth of faith. Unseen while a person is being born again and becoming a Church, good conceals itself within the interior man and reveals itself solely within some affection which does not pass into the conscious feelings of the external or natural man until he has been born again. But truth reveals itself, for this does enter his conscious feelings and lodges in the memory belonging to the external or natural man. This explains why many have fallen into the error that truth is the firstborn, and at length even thinking that truth is the vital element of the Church, so vital that truth which is called faith can save a person without the good of charity.

[2] From this one error very many others have been derived which have infected not only what is taught but also life, such as the error that no matter what kind of life a person leads he can be saved provided he has faith. A further derivative error is that very wicked people are accepted into heaven provided that in the final hour before they die they declare their belief in those things which are matters of faith; and another such error is that, irrespective of the kind of life one has led, one is accepted into heaven solely by grace. Because people hold to this teaching they fail at length to know what charity is or to have any concern about what it is, till in the end they do not believe in the existence of it, or consequently in the existence of heaven and hell. The reason for this is that faith without charity, or truth without good, teaches a person nothing; and the more it departs from good, the more foolish it makes him. For good is what the Lord flows into and through which He flows, imparting intelligence and wisdom and consequently a superior ability to see, and also perception whether something is really true or not.

[3] From these considerations one may now see the position with regard to the birthright, namely that in actual fact it belongs to good but appears to belong to truth. This is what the birth of Tamar's two sons is used to describe in the internal sense. 'The twice-dyed thread' which the midwife bound on the hand that came out means good, as shown in 4922; 'coming out first' means priority of place, 4923; 'withdrawing the hand' means that good concealed its own power, as stated immediately above [in 4924]; 'his brother came out' means truth; 'you have made a breach upon yourself means this truth's apparent separation from good; 'afterwards his brother came out' means that good is in actual fact first; and 'on whose hand was the twice-dyed thread' means the acknowledgement that good is first. For it is not until after a person has been born again that good is acknowledged to be first, at which point that person's actions spring from good, and his view of truth and what this is like springs from the same.

[4] These are the matters contained within the internal sense, in which teaching is given regarding the good and truth with a person who is being born anew, namely that good in actual fact occupies first place but truth appears to do so, and that good is not seen to occupy the first place while a person is being regenerated but is plainly seen to do so once he has been regenerated. But there is no need to explain these matters any further since they have been explained already - see 3324, 3325, 3494, 3539, 3548, 3556, 3563, 3570, 3576, 3603, 3701, 4243, 4244, 4247, 4337; and the fact that controversy has taken place since ancient times over whether the birthright belonged to good or to truth, that is, to charity or to faith, 2435.

[5] Because in the highest sense the Lord is the firstborn, and therefore love to Him and charity towards the neighbour are the firstborn, the law was for that reason laid down in the representative Church that firstborn things were Jehovah's: in Moses,

Sanctify to Me all the firstborn, that which opens the womb among the children of Israel; with man and with beast let them be Mine. Exodus 13:2.

You shall make over to Jehovah all that opens the worm', and every firstling of a beast; however many males you have they shall be Jehovah's. Exodus 13:12.

All that opens the womb is Mine; therefore among all your cattle, you shall give the male. that among oxen and small cattle which opens [the womb]. Exodus 34:19.

All that opens the womb among all flesh which they bring to Jehovah, from men and from beasts, shall be yours. Nevertheless you shall surely redeem all the firstborn of men. Numbers 18:15.

Behold, I Myself have taken the Levites from the midst of the children of Israel, instead of every firstborn, that which opens the womb, from the children of Israel, so that the Levites may be Mine. Numbers 3:12.

[6] Because the firstborn is the one that opens the womb, the expression 'that which opens the womb' is therefore added, when the firstborn is mentioned in these places, so as to mean good. It is evident that this expression means good from the specific details contained in the internal sense, especially from those which are recorded regarding the sons of Tamar: Zerah is said to have opened the womb with his hand, and 'Zerah' represents good, as is also clear from the twice-dyed thread placed on his hand, dealt with in 4922. In addition to this 'the womb', to which the expression 'opened' is applied, means the place where good and truth, consequently the Church, lie, see 4918, while 'opening the womb' means supplying the power which enables truth to be born.

[7] Because the Lord is the only firstborn - He being Good itself, and His Good being the source of all truth - Jacob, who was not the firstborn, was therefore allowed to purchase the birthright from Esau his brother so that he might represent Him. Also, because this was not sufficient, he was called Israel, so that by this name he might represent the good of truth; for 'Israel' in the representative sense means good which comes through truth, 3654, 4286, 4598.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 3563

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

3563. 'And said, The voice is Jacob's voice, and the hands Esau's hands' means that the understanding consists in this case of truth existing inwardly, while the will consists in this case of good existing outwardly, so that an inversion of order exists with them. This is clear from the use of 'voice' to refer to truth and of 'hand' to refer to good. For 'voice' is used in reference to truth, as is evident from the places introduced in Volume One, in 219, 220, and from the fact that the actual words used are 'the voice is Jacob's voice', Jacob representing natural truth, as shown in various places above. And the reason why 'hand' is used in reference to good is that 'the hand' means power and ability, 878, 3541, the source of which is nothing other than good. All the power and ability that truth possesses comes from good, even though it seems to come from truth. This likewise is evident from the fact that the actual words used are 'the hands are Esau's hands', Esau representing natural good, as also shown above. The consequent existence of an inversion of order with them is evident from the consideration that proper order requires good, which belongs to the will, to exist inwardly, and truth, which belongs to the understanding, to exist outwardly. But these matters, as stated above, are such as can hardly be explained in any intelligible way because few have any knowledge of such things. For even if a perfectly clear explanation of them were given they would still not be understood if knowledge of them is lacking. Nevertheless the matter must be discussed since it is the subject at this point.

[2] The only source of the good of the natural which manifests itself in a person is interior good, that is, the good of the rational. Natural good can have no other source, though that which flows in from the one determines the nature of the good in the other. And since the good of the natural comes from no other source, neither does the truth of the natural, for where good is, so also is truth. Both must be present if they are to be anything at all. And again, that which flows in determines the nature of the truth there. Influx is such that the good of the rational flows into the natural along two different routes - one a very short and thus direct route into the good itself of the natural, and then on through the good of the natural into the truth there, this good and this truth being represented by Esau and his venison. In addition to this, the good of the rational flows into the natural along a second route which is less short, that is to say, through the truth of the rational, by means of which influx it forms something resembling good, but which in fact is truth.

[3] Everything is thus taking place according to order when the good of the rational flows directly into the good of the natural and at the same time into the truth there, and also indirectly by way of the truth of the rational into the good of the natural, and in a similar way both directly and indirectly into the truth of the natural. When all this is taking place the influx is according to order. Such is the influx with those who have been regenerated. But a different influx exists prior to regeneration, as has been stated above. That is to say, the good of the rational does not flow into the good of the natural directly but indirectly, by way of the truth of the rational, and so manifests something resembling good in the natural, which is not genuine good nor consequently genuine truth. Instead it is something such as does indeed possess good inmostly by virtue of influx through the truth of the rational; but there is nothing more. Therefore good too presents itself there under a different form, that is to say, outwardly as good represented by 'Esau' but inwardly as truth represented by 'Jacob'. And as this is not in accordance with order an inversion of order is said to exist with them. Yet insofar as nobody can be regenerated in any other way it is according to order.

[4] I realize that no matter how clearly these matters are stated and as a consequence are able to be perceived clearly by those who have a knowledge of the existence of such things, they still remain obscure to those who do not know what influx is, more so to those who do not know that the rational is distinct and separate from the natural, and more so still to those who do not have any distinct and clear idea of what good is or of what truth is. But the nature of natural good and of natural truth in the state prior to regeneration is plain to see only from the desires present at that time. When a person desires truth not because he has life in view but some other ends, such as to become learned, and to become this because of some desire to outdo others, which amounts to childish envy, and also because of some desire for glory, the order existing with the good of the natural and the truth of the natural is akin to that represented here by Jacob. As these two exist in relation to each other, there is a reversal of order, that is to say, the will, to which good belongs, exists outwardly, while the understanding, to which truth belongs, exists inwardly.

[5] But in the state following regeneration the situation is different. In this case the person desires truth not only because he has life in view but more still because he desires the good itself which constitutes that life. Previous desires, that is to say, those connected with outdoing, with childish envy, and with glory, now break away, so much so that they seem so to speak to have been dispelled. At this point good which belongs to the will exists inwardly, and truth which belongs to the understanding exists outwardly. The result then is that truth acts as one with good since it stems from good. This order is genuine order. The order existing previously also serves to bring this order about, for the will which at that time occupies an external position allows many things to come in which contribute to regeneration, like a sponge which absorbs water, clear or muddy, so that it absorbs such things as would otherwise be rejected. Indeed these things serve as means and also as ideas that have to be formed concerning genuine goods and truths, besides other uses which they serve.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.