Bible

 

Nombres 34

Studie

   

1 L'Eternel parla à Moïse, et dit:

2 Donne cet ordre aux enfants d'Israël, et dis-leur: Quand vous serez entrés dans le pays de Canaan, ce pays deviendra votre héritage, le pays de Canaan, dont voici les limites.

3 Le côté du midi commencera au désert de Tsin près d'Edom. Ainsi, votre limite méridionale partira de l'extrémité de la mer Salée, vers l'orient;

4 elle tournera au sud de la montée d'Akrabbim, passera par Tsin, et s'étendra jusqu'au midi de Kadès-Barnéa; elle continuera par Hatsar-Addar, et passera vers Atsmon;

5 depuis Atsmon, elle tournera jusqu'au torrent d'Egypte, pour aboutir à la mer.

6 Votre limite occidentale sera la grande mer: ce sera votre limite à l'occident.

7 Voici quelle sera votre limite septentrionale: à partir de la grande mer, vous la tracerez jusqu'à la montagne de Hor;

8 depuis la montagne de Hor, vous la ferez passer par Hamath, et arriver à Tsedad;

9 elle continuera par Ziphron, pour aboutir à Hatsar-Enan: ce sera votre limite au septentrion.

10 Vous tracerez votre limite orientale de Hatsar-Enan à Schepham;

11 elle descendra de Schepham vers Ribla, à l'orient d'Aïn; elle descendra, et s'étendra le long de la mer de Kinnéreth, à l'orient;

12 elle descendra encore vers le Jourdain, pour aboutir à la mer Salée. Tel sera votre pays avec ses limites tout autour.

13 Moïse transmit cet ordre aux enfants d'Israël, et dit: C'est là le pays que vous partagerez par le sort, et que l'Eternel a résolu de donner aux neuf tribus et à la demi-tribu.

14 Car la tribu des fils de Ruben et la tribu des fils de Gad ont pris leur héritage, selon les maisons de leurs pères; la demi-tribu de Manassé a aussi pris son héritage.

15 Ces deux tribus et la demi-tribu ont pris leur héritage en deçà du Jourdain, vis-à-vis de Jéricho, du côté de l'orient.

16 L'Eternel parla à Moïse, et dit:

17 Voici les noms des hommes qui partageront entre vous le pays: le sacrificateur Eléazar, et Josué, fils de Nun.

18 Vous prendrez encore un prince de chaque tribu, pour faire le partage du pays.

19 Voici les noms de ces hommes. Pour la tribu de Juda: Caleb, fils de Jephunné;

20 pour la tribu des fils de Siméon: Samuel, fils d'Ammihud;

21 pour la tribu de Benjamin: Elidad, fils de Kislon;

22 pour la tribu des fils de Dan: le prince Buki, fils de Jogli;

23 pour les fils de Joseph, -pour la tribu des fils de Manassé: le prince Hanniel, fils d'Ephod; -

24 et pour la tribu des fils d'Ephraïm: le prince Kemuel, fils de Schiphtan;

25 pour la tribu des fils de Zabulon: le prince Elitsaphan, fils de Parnac;

26 pour la tribu des fils d'Issacar: le prince Paltiel, fils d'Azzan;

27 pour la tribu des fils d'Aser: le prince Ahihud, fils de Schelomi;

28 pour la tribu des fils de Nephthali: le prince Pedahel, fils d'Ammihud.

29 Tels sont ceux à qui l'Eternel ordonna de partager le pays de Canaan entre les enfants d'Israël.

   

Komentář

 

Jordanie (le fleuve)

  
Joshua passing the River Jordan with the Ark of the Covenant, by Benjamin West

Le fleuve Jourdain sépare le pays de Canaan des terres situées à l'est. Cette séparation représente la division de l'esprit humain en une partie interne et une partie externe, et c'est l'esprit interne où l'église est formée dans une personne.

Le fleuve est également limité par deux lacs au nord, Merom et Galilée, et par la mer Morte au sud. A l'intérieur de ces limites se trouvent les choses intérieures de l'esprit, et à l'extérieur les choses extérieures.

Les pays extérieurs, tels qu'ils sont mentionnés dans la Bible, peuvent être utiles. Ils représentent les connaissances de base, la capacité de raisonnement, la rationalité, la curiosité et d'autres qualités qui, en tant qu'amis, peuvent soutenir nos croyances religieuses, ou en tant qu'ennemis peuvent argumenter contre elles ou évoquer de faux dieux à adorer.

La terre à l'intérieur représente un état de régénération, ou bien elle peut représenter la fin ultime de cet état, qui est le paradis.

De l'extérieur, donc, le Jourdain est l'entrée vers quelque chose de meilleur, le but du voyage, et ses eaux représentent le lavage mental de la repentance, qui est la première chose de l'église, c'est pourquoi Jean y a baptisé, et Naaman s'y est lavé.

 

De l'intérieur, le Jourdain est le bord de ce qui est à l'extérieur de l'église, et c'est pour cette raison que les enfants d'Israël ont été si souvent troublés par ces nations extérieures : les Madianites, les Ammonites, les Syriens, l'Égypte, et Babylone, et les autres nations dont nous parlons dans les livres des Juges et des Rois, et dans les Prophètes.

Les capacités mentales de nos esprits externes peuvent servir à faire le bien, mais elles peuvent aussi servir à faire le mal.

 

(Odkazy: Arcanes Célestes 1585 [1-3], 4255; L'Apocalypse Expliquée 514 [19], 700 [11-13])

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 2718

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

2718. 'A wife from the land of Egypt' means the affection for knowledge, which the member of the spiritual Church possesses. This is clear from the meaning of 'a wife' as affection or good, dealt with in 915, 2517, and from the meaning of 'Egypt' as knowledge, dealt with in 1164, 1165, 1186, 1462. In this verse the member of the spiritual Church is described so far as the nature of his good, that is, the essence of his life, is concerned - that the good residing with him is obscure, but that it is brightened with light from the Lord's Divine Human. From that brightening of it the affection for truth arises in the rational part of his mind, and the affection for knowledge in the natural part. The reason the affection for good such as resides within the celestial man cannot arise in the spiritual man, but instead the affection for truth, is that the good residing with him is implanted in the understanding part of his mind, and is obscure compared with the celestial man's good, as shown in 2715. From this good no other type of affection can be generated and derived within his rational than the affection for truth, and through this affection for truth the affection for knowledge within the natural. No other truth is meant in this case than that which the person believes to be the truth, even though it may not in itself be the truth. Nor is knowledge used to mean such knowledge as the learned possess but all factual knowledge with which a person can be taught from what he experiences or hears in everyday life, from doctrine, and from the Word. It is the affection for such truth and knowledge that exists within the member of the spiritual Church.

[2] So that it may be known what is meant by the affection for truth existing with someone and what by the affection for good, let a brief statement be made regarding them. Those with the affection for truth think about, question, and discuss whether a thing is true, whether it is so. And when they are convinced it is true, or is so, they think about, question, and discuss what it is. Thus they remain rooted on the doorstep and cannot be admitted into wisdom until they no longer have any doubts. Those however with whom the affection for good exists know and perceive that the thing is so from the good itself governing them. Thus they do not remain on the doorstep but are in a room inside, having been admitted into wisdom.

[3] Take as an example the consideration that it is a celestial gift to think and to act from an affection for good, or from good. Those with whom the affection for truth exists discuss whether this is so, whether such a gift can exist, and what it may be. And so long as they are turning over doubts about it they are unable to be admitted. But those with the affection for good do not discuss or turn doubts over but assert that the thing is true and are for that reason admitted. For those with whom the affection for good exists, that is, those who are celestial, start off where those with the affection for truth, that is, those who are spiritual, come to a halt, so that the furthest point reached by the latter is the starting point for the former. That being so, those who are celestial are given to know, recognize, and perceive that affections for good are countless - as numerous as the communities in heaven - and that they are all joined together by the Lord into a heavenly form so as to constitute one human being so to speak. They are also given to define by perception the genus and species to which each affection belongs.

[4] Or take this example: All delight, blessedness, and happiness belong wholly to love, but the nature of the love determines that of the delight, blessedness, and happiness. The spiritual man fixes his mind on the question whether this is true and whether delight, blessedness, and happiness may not spring from some other source, such as from mixing with others, talking to others, meditation, or learning, and also whether they reside in possessions, position, reputation, and the glory resulting from these. As long as he is asking such questions he does not confirm himself in the truth that none of these accomplishes anything, only the affection born of love which is present within them and making them what they are. The celestial man however does not remain rooted in such preliminary questionings but immediately asserts that the thing is true. Consequently he is interested in the end in view and the realization of this, that is, he is governed by the very affections born of love which are countless, and in each one of which there are things beyond description, involving variations of delight, blessedness, and happiness that have no end.

[5] Take as a further example the consideration that the neighbour is to be loved for the good that resides with him. Those with whom the affection for truth exists think, question, and discuss whether this is true, that is, whether it is so. They ask what the neighbour is, what good is; but they go no further than this, and therefore they shut the door to wisdom against themselves. Those however with the affection for good assert that the thing is so and do not consequently shut the door against themselves but enter in and so come to know, recognize, and perceive from good who is pre-eminently the neighbour, also in what degree he is the neighbour, and that everyone in differing ways is the neighbour. Thus they perceive things beyond description, over and above what is known to those with the affection solely for truth.

[6] Take as yet another example the truth that a person who loves the neighbour for the good within him loves the Lord. Those with the affection for truth question whether this is so. And if they are told that anyone who loves the neighbour for the good within him loves the good, and that - since all good comes from the Lord and the Lord is present in good - when anyone loves good he also loves the Lord from whom that good comes and in which He is present, they then question whether that too is so. They also ask what loving good is, as well as what good is, and whether the Lord is present more so in good than in truth. As long as they remain rooted in such questionings they cannot get even a distant view of wisdom. But those with the affection for good know from perception that the thing is so and immediately behold the whole field of wisdom leading right on to the Lord.

[7] From these examples it may become clear why in comparison with those who have the affection for good, that is, with those who are celestial, obscurity exists with those who have the affection for truth, that is, with those who are spiritual Nevertheless the latter are able to pass from obscurity into light, provided that they are willing to adopt the affirmative attitude that all good belongs to love to the Lord and charity towards the neighbour; also that love and charity constitute spiritual conjunction, and that these are the source of all blessedness and happiness, thus that heavenly life consists in the good belonging to love received from the Lord, but not in the truth of faith separated from it.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.