4744. “那坑是空的, 里头没有水” 表那时根本没有真理. 这从 “坑”, “空” 和 “水” 的含义清楚可知: “坑” 是指虚假 (参看4728节); “空” 是指根本真理的地方, 因为根本没有良善, 如下文所述; “水” 是指真理 (680, 739, 2702, 3058, 3424节). “空” 表示根本没有真理的地方, 这一点从圣言中的其它经文明显看出来, 如耶利米书:

他们的贵胄打发家僮打水, 他们来到池边, 见没有水, 就拿着空器皿, 蒙羞惭愧, 抱头而回. (耶利米书 14:3)

“空器皿” 表示其中没有源于良善的真理之真理. 又:

巴比伦王尼布甲尼撒吞灭我, 使我混乱, 又使我成为空虚的器皿. 他将我吞下. (耶利米书 51:34)

“空虚的器皿” 表示没有真理的地方; “巴比伦” 表示那些损毁, 也就是剥夺他人真理的人 (1327末尾节). 又:

我观看地, 不料, 地是空虚混沌; 我观看天, 天也无光. (耶利米书 4:23)

以赛亚书:

鹈鹕, 箭猪却要得为业; 猫头鹰, 乌鸦要住在其间, 他们必将空虚的准绳, 混沌的线铊拉在其上. (以赛亚书 34:11)

又:

空虚的城破毁了; 各家关门闭户, 使人都不得进去. 街上因无酒而有呼喊之声, 地上的喜乐消逝, 城中只有荒凉. (以赛亚书 24:10-12)

此处原文用另一个词来表示 “空”, 但它具有同样的含义. “空” 是指因没有良善而没有真理之地, 这层含义从此处细节的内义, 也就是说, 从 “城”, “家”, “呼喊”, “酒” 和 “街” 的含义明显看出来. 以西结书:

主耶和华如此说, 祸哉! 这流人血的城, 我也必大堆火柴. 把锅倒空坐在炭火上, 使锅烧热, 使铜烧红, 熔化其中的污秽, 除净其上的锈. (以西结书 24:9, 11)

此处显而易见 “倒空” 表示什么; 经上说 “锅” 被 “倒空”, 是因为它有污秽和锈, 也就是邪恶与虚假在里面.

在马太福音也一样.

污灵从人里面出来, 走遍干旱之地, 寻求安歇, 却寻不着. 于是说, 我要回到我所出来的屋里去. 到了, 就看见里面空闲, 打扫干净, 为他修饰好了, 便去另带了七个比自己更恶的灵来, 都进去住在那里. (马太福音 12:43-45)

“污灵” 表示人所过的不洁生活, 以及与他同居的污灵, 因为污灵就住在人的不洁生活中; “干旱之地” 或无水之地表示没有真理之地; “空屋” 表示人的内层再次充满不洁, 也就是源于邪恶的虚假. 路加福音:

神叫饥饿的得饱美食, 叫富足的空手回去. (路加福音 1:53)

“富足的” 表示那些知道很多的人; 因为 “富足” 在灵义上表示记忆知识, 教义事物和对良善与真理的认知. 那些知道这些事, 却不行出来的人就被称为 “富而空”; 因为对他们来说, 真理并非真理, 因为它们缺乏良善 (参看4736节).

4292. In the internal historical sense 'he said, Your name will no longer be called Jacob, but Israel' means that they could not as [the descendants of] Jacob play the representative part, except by virtue of the new nature that was imparted to them. This becomes clear from the meaning of 'Jacob' in the Word as his descendants, dealt with above in 4281, and from the meaning of 'name' as the essential nature, dealt with immediately above in 4291. The new nature itself is meant by 'Israel' in the internal sense, for 'Israel' is the celestial-spiritual man and consequently the internal man, 4286. And since 'Israel' means the celestial-spiritual man, and so the internal man, 'Israel' also means the internal spiritual Church. For whether you use the expression spiritual man or spiritual Church, it amounts to the same thing because any spiritual person in particular is the Church, even as many are in general. If the individual person in particular were not the Church, no Church in general could exist. The expression Church is used in everyday language to describe a congregation in general; but each member of the congregation must be a Church if that greater Church is to exist. Every general whole incorporates parts that are like that whole.

[2] The implications of this particular matter - the inability of [the descendants on Jacob to play the representative part, except by virtue of the new nature imparted to them, meant by 'Israel' - are as follows: It was specifically Jacob's descendants who were to represent the Church but not specifically Isaac's since Isaac's descended not only through Jacob but also through Esau. Still less was it specifically Abraham's, for Abraham's descended not only through Jacob but also through Esau, and likewise through Ishmael, as well as through his sons by his second wife Keturah, who were Zimran, Jokshan, Medan, Midian, Ishbak, Shuah, and the sons of these, see Genesis 25:1-4. Now because Jacob's descendants insisted that they should be representative, as shown just above in 4290, they could not represent as Jacob, or as Isaac, or as Abraham. The reason why they could not do so as Jacob was that 'Jacob' represented the external aspect of the Church, but not the internal. And they could not do so as Isaac at the same time or as Abraham at the same time for the reason advanced immediately above.

[3] So that they could represent the Church therefore, a new name had inevitably to be given to Jacob, and through that name a new nature, which new nature was to be a sign of the internal spiritual man, or what amounts to the same, of the internal spiritual Church. That new nature is meant by 'Israel'. Every Church of the Lord is internal and external, as has been shown several times already, the internal Church being that which is represented, the external that which represents. The internal Church is also either spiritual or else celestial, the internal spiritual Church being represented by 'Israel', but the internal celestial Church at a later time by 'Judah'. Therefore a division also took place, and the Israelites became a kingdom on their own and the Jews another on their own. But these matters will in the Lord's Divine mercy be discussed later on. From this it is evident that 'Jacob', that is, Jacob's descendants, could not represent the Church as Jacob, for that would have been to represent solely the external aspect of the Church. They had to do so as Israel as well because 'Israel' is the internal aspect.

[4] It has been shown in various places already that it is the internal which is represented and the external which represents, as may also be seen in the human being. A person's speech represents his thought, and a person's action represents his will. Speech and action are the external aspects of the person, thought and will the internal. In addition the various looks seen on a person's face represent both, that is to say, both his thought and his will. It is well known to everyone that the looks on a person's face are representative, for the looks on the faces of people who are sincere enable their interior states to be seen. In short, every part of the body represents some facet of a person's inclination (animus) and mind (mens).

[5] It is similar with the external aspects of the Church, for these are like the body, while its internal aspects are like the soul. There were, for example, the altars and the sacrifices on them, which, as is well known, were external things. There was likewise the bread of the presence, also the lampstand with its lamps, as well as the fire that was kept burning all the time. Anyone can recognize that these external things represented internal ones, as likewise did everything else of a ritual nature. The fact that these external things could not represent anything external, only what was internal, becomes clear from the considerations introduced already. So 'Jacob' could not represent as Jacob, because 'Jacob' means the external aspect of the Church, but he could do so as Israel because 'Israel' means its internal aspect. This is what is meant by a new nature being imparted to enable the descendants of Jacob to play the representative part.