5247. “他就剃头, 刮胡子” 表就外层属世层的覆盖物而言的抛弃和所作的改变. 这从 “剃头, 刮胡子” 的含义清楚可知, “剃头, 刮胡子” 是指抛弃外层属世层的覆盖物; 因为所剃的 “头发” 表示外层属世层 (参看3301节). 毛发, 无论头上的, 还是胡须上的, 在大人中对应于外层属世层. 这解释了为何在天堂之光中, 感官人, 即那些除了属世之物外什么也不信, 也不想去明白除了他们能用感官觉知的东西外, 更内在或更纯粹的事物如何会存在的人在来世显得多毛. 他们看上去毛烘烘的, 以致他们的脸除了胡须外, 几乎什么都不是. 我经常看见这种满是毛发的脸. 但理性人, 也就是属灵人, 因属世层在他们里面处于恰当的从属地位, 故看似有整洁的头发. 事实上, 在来世, 凭头发就能知道灵人在属世层方面的品质或性质. 灵人头上之所以出现头发, 是因为在来世, 灵人看上去和世人一模一样. 正因如此, 圣言有时也描述人们所看见的天使的头发.

综上所述, 明显可知 “剃头, 刮胡子” 表示什么, 如以西结书:

祭司利未人撒督的子孙当脱下供职的衣服, 放在圣屋内, 穿上别的衣服, 免得因他们的衣服使民成圣. 不可剃头, 也不可留长发, 只可剪头发. (以西结书 44:15, 19-20)

这论及新殿和新祭司职分, 也就是新教会. “穿上别的衣服” 表示神圣真理; “不可剃头, 也不可留长发, 只可剪头发” 表示不抛弃属世层, 只采取措施使它变得和谐一致, 从而使它变得顺从. 凡相信圣言神圣的人都能看出, 先知所提到的描述新地, 新城, 新殿和新祭司职分的这些和其它所有细节都不可照字面来理解. 如祭司利未人撒督的子孙当脱下供职的衣服, 穿上别的衣服, 只可剪头发就不是字面上的意思; 相反, 先知所给出的每一个和一切细节都表示诸如属于一个新教会的那类事物.

在摩西五经中, 关于大祭司, 亚伦的子孙和利未人的条例若不包含神圣之物在里面, 也不会被制定:

在弟兄中作大祭司, 头上倒了膏油, 又承接圣职, 穿了圣衣的, 不可剃头, 也不可撕裂衣服. (利未记 21:10)

亚伦的子孙不可使头光秃, 不可剃除胡须的周围; 要归他们的神为圣, 不可亵渎他们神的名. (利未记 21:5-6)

你洁净利未人当这样行. 用除罪水弹在他们身上, 又叫他们用剃头刀刮全身, 洗衣服, 洁净自己. (民数记 8:7)

这些条例若非含有神圣观念在里面, 永远不会被赋予. 在这些条例中 (即大祭司不可剃头, 也不可撕裂衣服; 亚伦的子孙不可使头光秃, 不可剃除胡须的周围; 洁净利未人要叫他们用剃头刀刮全身) 能有什么神圣之物, 或教会之物呢? 确切地说, 拥有顺从内在人或属灵人的外在人或属世人, 进而拥有顺从神性的这二者, 就是这些条例里面的神圣观念; 也是当世人阅读这些圣言经文时, 天使所觉察到的.

这也适用于归耶和华为圣的拿细耳人:

若在他旁边忽然有人碰巧死了, 以致沾染了他离俗的头, 他要在得洁净的日子剃头, 就是在第七日剃头. 离俗的日子满了, 拿细耳人要在会幕门口剃离俗的头; 把头发放在平安祭下的火上. (民数记 6:9, 13, 18)

至于何为拿细耳人, 他代表哪方面的神圣, 可参看前文 (3301节). 若不藉着对应知道 “头发” 是什么意思, 因而知道拿细耳人的头发对应于哪方面的神圣, 没有人能理解为何神圣之物居于他的头发. 同样, 谁也不明白参孙力气的源头如何在他的头发中; 在以下描述中, 参孙将其告诉了大利拉:

剃头刀向来就没有上过我的头, 因为我自出母胎就归神作拿细耳人; 若我剃了, 我的力气就离开我, 我便软弱像别人一样. 大利拉叫了一个人来剃除他头上的七条发绺, 他的力气就离开他了. 后来他的头发被剃之后, 又开始渐渐长起来了, 力气便又回到他身上. (士师记 16:17, 19, 22)

若没有对应的任何知识, 谁能明白主的神性属世层由拿细耳人代表, 或 “离俗” 没有其它含义, 参孙的力气是由于这种代表?

不知道圣言拥有一个内义, 字义用来代表包含在内义中的真实事物之人, 尤其不相信的人, 几乎不承认这些事物有任何神圣之物; 而事实上, 最神圣之物就在它们里面. 人若不知道, 尤其不相信圣言拥有神圣的内义, 就不可能知道以下经文里面包含什么, 如耶利米书:

真理已经灭绝, 从他们的口中剪除. 要剪掉你离俗的头发, 把它扔掉! (耶利米书 7:28-29)

以赛亚书:

到那日, 主必用大河外赁的剃头刀, 就是亚述王, 剃头和脚上的毛, 并要剃净胡须. (以赛亚书 7:20)

弥迦书:

你使头光秃, 为你所喜爱的儿女剪除你的头发, 你要剃头, 要大大地光秃, 如同秃鹰, 因为他们都必流亡而离开你. (弥迦书 1:16)

他不知道有何神圣包含在有关以利亚的记载中, 因为以利亚是长满毛发的人, 腰束皮带 (列王纪下 1:8); 也不知道为何戏笑以利沙秃头的童子被林中出来的母熊撕裂 (列王纪下 2:23, 24).

以利亚和以利沙都代表圣言方面的主, 因而代表圣言本身, 尤其代表先知部分 (参看创世记 18章序言, 2762节). “长满毛发” 和 “皮带” 表示字义, “长满毛发的人” 表示就真理而言的字义, 腰间的 “皮带” 表示就良善而言的字义. 事实上, 圣言的字义就是它的属世意义, 因为它采用的观念是由世上的事物形成的; 而内义是属灵意义, 因为它采用的观念是由天上的事物形成的. 这两种意义就像人的内在与外在那样彼此关联. 不过, 由于内在离了外在无法存在, 因为外在是内在持续存在所在的次序最后和最低层级, 所以戏笑以利沙 “秃头” 是对圣言的毁谤, 暗示它缺乏外在, 因而圣言没有适合人理解的那层意义.

由此可见, 圣言的一切细节都是神圣的. 然而, 没有人能发现圣言里面的这种神圣, 除非他熟悉内义; 然而, 它的一点迹象会从天堂流入相信圣言为神圣的人. 这种流注通过天使所知的内义实现; 这内义虽然不能被人理解, 却仍在他里面激发一种情感, 因为知道内义的天使所感受到的情感会传给他. 由此也明显可知, 圣言已被赋予世人, 以便他能与天堂交流, 并且天堂里的神性真理能通过流入他而在他里面激发情感.

2015. That 'kings will come out of you' means that all truth comes from Him is clear from the meaning of 'a king' as truth in both the historical and the prophetical sections of the Word, as stated in 1672 but not yet shown to be so. From the meaning of 'nations' as goods, and from the meaning of 'kings' as truths, the nature of the internal sense of the Word becomes clear, and also how remote it is from the sense of the letter. No one reading the Word, especially the historical section, believes anything other than that 'nations' referred to there means nations, or that 'kings' there means kings, and therefore that the nations mentioned there, or the kings, are the real subject of the very Word itself. But when the idea of nations and also of kings reaches angels it perishes altogether, and good and truth take their place instead. This is bound to seem strange and indeed a paradox, but it is nevertheless the truth. The matter may also become clear to anyone from the fact that if nations were meant in the Word by 'nations' and kings by 'kings', the Word of the Lord would hardly embody anything more than some historical or other piece of writing and so would be something of a worldly nature, when in fact everything in the Word is Divine and so is celestial and spiritual.

[2] Take merely the statement in the present verse about Abraham's being made fruitful, nations being made of him, and kings coming out of him. What else is this but something purely worldly and nothing at all heavenly? Indeed these assertions entail no more than the glory of this world, a glory which is absolutely nothing in heaven. But if this is the Word of the Lord then its glory must be that of heaven, not that of the world. This also is why the sense of the letter is completely erased and disappears when it passes into heaven, and is purified in such a way that nothing worldly at all is intermingled. For 'Abraham' is not used to mean Abraham but the Lord; nor is 'being fruitful' used to mean his descendants who would increase more and more but the endless growth of good belonging to the Lord's Human Essence. 'Nations' do not mean nations but goods, and 'kings' do not mean kings but truths. Nevertheless the narrative in the sense of the letter remains historically true, for Abraham was indeed spoken to in this way; and he was indeed made fruitful in this way, with nations as well as kings descending from him.

[3] That 'kings' means truths becomes clear from the following places: In Isaiah,

The sons of the foreigner will build up your walls, and their kings will minister to you. You will suck the milk of nations, and the breast of kings will you suck. Isaiah 60:10, 16.

What 'sucking the milk of nations and the breast of kings' means is not at all evident from the letter but from the internal sense, in which being endowed with goods and instructed in truths is meant. In Jeremiah,

There will enter through the gates of this city kings and princes seated on the throne of David, riding in chariots and on horses. Jeremiah 17:25; 22:4.

'Riding in chariots and on horses' is a prophecy meaning the abundance of things of the understanding, as becomes clear from very many places in the Prophets. Thus the prophecy that 'kings will enter through the gates of the city' means in the internal sense that they were to be endowed with truths of faith. This sense of the Word is the heavenly sense into which the worldly sense of the letter passes.

[4] In the same prophet,

Jehovah has spurned in His fierce indignation king and priest. The gates of Zion have sunk into the ground, He has destroyed and broken in pieces her bars. King and princes are among the nations; the law is no more. Lamentations 2:6, 9.

Here 'king' stands for the truth of faith, 'priest' for the good of charity, 'Zion' for the Church, which is destroyed and its bars broken in pieces. Consequently 'king and princes among the nations', that is, truth and what belongs to truth, will be so completely banished that 'the law is no more', that is, nothing of the doctrine of faith will exist any more. In Isaiah,

Before the boy knows to refuse evil and to choose good, the ground will be abandoned which you loathe in the presence of its two kings. Isaiah 7:16.

This refers to the Lord's Coming. 'The land that will be abandoned' stands for faith which at that time would not exist. 'The kings' are the truths of faith which would be loathed.

[5] In the same prophet,

I will lift up My hand to the nations and raise My ensign to the peoples; and they will bring your sons in their bosom, and your daughters will be carried on their shoulder. Kings will be your foster fathers and their queens your wet-nurses. Isaiah 49:22-23.

'Nations' and 'daughters' stand for goods, 'peoples' and 'sons' for truths, as shown in Volume One. That 'nations' stands for goods, 1259, 1260, 1416, 1849, as does 'daughters', 489-491, while 'peoples' stands for truths, 1259, 1260, as does 'sons', 489, 491, 533, 1147. 'Kings' therefore stands for truths, in general by which they will be nourished, and 'queens' for goods by which they will be suckled. Whether you speak of goods and truths or of those who are governed by goods and truths it amounts to the same.

[6] In the same prophet,

He will spatter many nations, kings will shut their mouths because of him, ¹ for that which has [not] been told them they have seen, and that which they have not heard they have understood. Isaiah 52:15.

This refers to the Lord's Coming. 'Nations' stands for those who are stirred by an affection for goods, 'kings' those who are stirred by an affection for truths. In David,

Now, O kings, be intelligent; be instructed, O judges of the earth. Serve Jehovah with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son lest He perhaps be angry and you perish in the way. Psalms 2:10-12.

'Kings' stands for people who are governed by truths, and who by virtue of truths are also in many places called 'king's sons'. 'The Son' here stands for the Lord, and he is called the Son here because he is Truth itself, and the source of all truth.

[7] In John,

They will sing a new song, You are worthy to take the Book and to open its seals. You have made us kings and priests to our God so that we shall reign on the earth. Revelation 5:9-10.

Here people who are governed by truths are called 'kings'. The Lord also calls them 'the sons of the kingdom' in Matthew,

He who sows the good seed is the Son of Man, the field is the world, the seed are the sons of the kingdom, and the tares are the sons of the evil one. Matthew 13:37-38.

In John,

The sixth angel poured out his bowl over the great river Euphrates and its water was dried up to prepare the way of the kings who were from the east. Revelation 16:12.

'Euphrates' clearly does not mean the Euphrates, nor does 'kings from the east' mean kings from that quarter. What 'Euphrates' does mean may be seen in 120, 1585, 1866, from which it is evident that 'the way of the kings who were from the cast' means truths of faith that derive from goods of love.

[8] In the same book,

The nations that are saved will walk in its light, and the kings of the earth will bring their glory and honour into it. Revelation 21:24.

Here 'nations' stands for people who are governed by goods, 'kings of the earth' for those who are governed by truths, which is also evident from the fact that the details here are prophetical, not historical. In the same book,

With the great harlot seated on many waters the kings of the earth have committed whoredom and have become drunk with the wine of her whoredom. Revelation 17:2.

And elsewhere in the same book,

Babylon has given all nations drink from the wine of the fury of her whoredom; and the kings of the earth have committed whoredom with her. Revelation 18:1, 3, 9.

Here similarly it is clear that 'the kings of the earth' does not mean kings, for the subject is the falsification and adulteration of the doctrine of faith, that is, of truth, which are 'whoredom'. 'Kings of the earth' stands for truths that have been falsified and adulterated.

[9] In the same book,

The ten horns that you saw are ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom but are receiving authority as kings for one hour, together with the beast. These will be of one mind, and they will hand over power and authority to the beast. Revelation 17:12-13.

That 'kings' here does not mean kings may also be evident to anyone. If kings were meant, then 'ten kings receiving authority as kings for one hour' would be quite unintelligible, as similarly with the following words in the same book,

I saw the beast and the kings of the earth, and their armies gathered to make war with Him who was sitting on the horse, and with His army. Revelation 19:19

In verse 13 of the same chapter it is stated explicitly that the One who was sitting on the horse was The Word of God, against which the kings of the earth are said to have been gathered. 'The beast' stands for goods of love that have been profaned, 'kings' for truths of faith that have been adulterated; these are called 'kings of the earth' because they exist within the Church - 'earth' meaning the Church, see 662, 1066, 1067, 1262. 'The white horse' stands for the understanding of truth, 'He who was sitting on the horse' for the Word. This matter is plainer still in Daniel 11, describing the war between the king of the south and the king of the north, by which is meant the conflict of truths with falsities. Here such conflicts are described as a war that took place in history.

[10] Since 'a king' means truth, what is meant in the internal sense when the Lord is called King, and also a Priest, is made clear; and what essential quality of the Lord was represented by kings, and what by priests, is also made clear. 'Kings' represented His Divine Truth, and 'priests' His Divine Good. All the laws of order by which the Lord governs the universe as King are truths, while all the laws by which He governs the universe as Priest and by which He rules even over truths themselves are goods. For government from truths alone condemns everyone to hell, but government from goods lifts them out of that place and raises them up into heaven; see 1728. Because, in the Lord's case, these two - truths and goods - are joined together, they were also represented in ancient times by kingship and priesthood combined, as with Melchizedek who was at one and the same time king of Salem and priest to God Most High, Genesis 14:18. And at a later time among the Jews where the representative Church was established in a form of its own He was represented by judges and priests, and after that by kings.

[11] But because 'kings' represented truths which ought not to be paramount for the reason, already stated, that they condemn, the very idea was so objectionable that the Jews were reproached for it. The nature of truth regarded in itself has been described in 1 Samuel 8:11-18, as the rights of a king; and previous to that, in Moses, in Deuteronomy 17:14-18, they had been commanded through Moses to choose genuine truth deriving from good, not spurious truth, and not to pollute it with reasonings and factual knowledge. These are the considerations which the directive concerning a king given in the place in Moses referred to above embodies within itself. No one can possibly see this from the sense of the letter, but it is nevertheless evident from the details within the internal sense. This shows why 'a king' and 'kingship' represented and meant nothing other than truth.

Poznámky pod čarou: