3147. “又拿水给他洗脚” 表那里的洁净. 这从 “清洗的水”, 或用水清洗和 “脚” 的含义清楚可知: “清洗的水” 或用水清洗是指洁净, 如下文所述; “脚” 是指属世之物, 或也可说, 属世人中的事物 (参看2162节). 在代表性教会, 用水洗脚是一种礼仪, 由此表示洗去属世人的不洁之物. 属世人的不洁之物全都是那些属于我欲和物欲的事物. 这些不洁之物被洗去后, 良善与真理便流入进来, 因为唯独这些不洁之物阻碍良善与真理从主流入.

良善不断从主流入, 但当经由内在人或属灵人抵达外在人或属世人时, 它在那里要么被败坏, 要么被弹回, 要么被窒息. 不过, 属于我欲和物欲的事物被除去后, 良善便在那里被接受, 并结出果实, 因为此时人实践仁爱的行为. 这一事实从多种考虑可以看出来, 如当人处于不幸, 悲伤和疾病状态时, 属于外在人或属世人的事物只是沉寂下来, 这人随即开始虔诚地思考, 并意愿良善, 也开始尽可能地实践敬虔的行为. 不过, 一旦这种状态改变, 所有这些事也会改变.

在古教会, 各种 “洗” 是表示这些事的符号; 但在犹太教会, 它们则成了代表形式. 在古教会, 各种 “洗” 是有意义的符号; 而在犹太教会, 它们则成了代表形式. 这是因为古教会成员将仪式视为敬拜的某种外在行为, 他们并不认为自己通过这种清洗就能洁净, 而是相信通过洗去属世人的污秽才能洁净. 如前所述, 属世人的污秽就是属于我欲和物欲的事物. 而犹太教会成员则认为自己通过这种洗就能洁净, 既不知道, 也不想知道所指是内在的洁净.

“洗” 表示洗去那污秽, 这清楚可见于以赛亚书:

你们要洗濯, 自洁, 从我眼前除掉你们的恶行, 要止住作恶. (以赛亚书 1:16)

显然, 这里的 “洗濯” 表示使自己洁净, 除掉邪恶. 又:

主以审判之灵和清洗之灵, 将锡安女子的污秽洗去, 又将耶路撒冷的血从城当中涮净. (以赛亚书 4:3)

此处 “将锡安女子的污秽洗去, 又将耶路撒冷的血涮净” 表从恶与假中洁净. 耶利米书:

耶路撒冷啊, 你当洗去心中的恶, 使你可以得救. 恶念存在你里面要到几时呢? (耶利米书 4:14)

以西结书:

我用水洗你, 洗净你身上的血, 又用油抹你. (以西结书 16:9);

这论及耶路撒冷, 耶路撒冷在此表示古教会. “用水洗” 表洁除虚假, “洗净血” 表清除邪恶, “用油抹” 表那时充满良善. 诗篇:

求你洗净我的罪孽, 并洁除我的罪! 求你用牛膝草洁净我, 我就干净; 求你洗涤我, 我就比雪更白. (诗篇 51:2, 7)

此处 “洗涤” 明显表示从恶及其假中洁净.

这些就是代表性教会中 “洗” 所表示的事. 为了作代表, 当他们变得不洁, 并且需要洁净时, 该教会就要求人们洗皮肤, 手, 脚, 以及衣服. 所有这些都表示属于属世人的事. 同样为了作代表, 铜造的洗濯盆, 也就是说列王纪上 (7:23-39) 所提到的 “铜海和十个铜盆” 被安在圣殿的外面; 还有亚伦和他儿子用来洗濯的铜盆被放在会幕和坛的中间, 因而在会幕外面 (出埃及记 30:18, 19, 21); 它们也表示仅外在事物或属世之物需要被洁净. 除非它们被洁净, 也就是说, 属于我欲和物欲的事物被除去, 否则, 属于对主和对邻之爱的内在事物绝无可能流入进来, 如前所述.

为了更好地理解这些事, 也就是说, 外在事物需要被洁净, 以善行, 或也可说如今被称作信的果子的仁之良善为例来说明. 这些都是外在事物, 因为它们是仁爱的行为. 若不除去那些属于我欲和物欲的事物, 善行就是恶行. 在除去这些事物之前所做的行为表面上看似良善, 内里其实是邪恶. 因为所做的这些行为要么为名, 要么为利, 要么为个人的荣耀, 要么为回报. 相应地, 它们或是邀功的, 或是虚伪的, 因为属于我欲和物欲的事物使这些行为变得如此. 不过, 一旦除去这些恶, 这些行为就变成良善, 并且是仁之良善. 也就是说, 它们无关自我, 这个世界, 名声或回报, 因而不是邀功或虚伪的. 在这种情况下, 属天之爱和属灵之爱便从主流入这些行为, 并使它们变成行为上的爱与仁. 与此同时, 主还通过这些爱洁净属世人或外在人, 将其整理成序, 以便人相应地接受所流入的属天和属灵之物.

这从主给门徒洗脚时所教导的话非常清楚地看出来. 如我们在约翰福音中读到:

然后, 祂挨到西门彼得, 彼得对他说, 主啊, 你洗我的脚吗? 耶稣回答他说, 我所做的, 你如今不知道, 后来必明白. 彼得对祂说, 你永不可洗我的脚! 耶稣回答他说, 我若不洗你, 你就与我无分了. 西门彼得对祂说, 主啊, 不单我的脚, 还有手和头呢! 耶稣对他说, 凡洗过澡的人, 只要把脚一洗, 全身就干净了; 你们是乾净的, 然而不都是乾净的. (约翰福音 13:4-17)

“凡洗过澡的人, 只要把脚一洗, 全身就干净了” 表凡已被改造的人只需洁净属世之物, 也就是说, 将恶与假从他们身上除去. 这时, 一切事物就都被来自主的属灵之物的流注整理成序了. 此外, “洗脚” 是一种仁爱行为, 意味着人不应老想着别人的邪恶; “洗脚” 还是一种谦卑行为, 意味着洁除别人身上如同身体污秽那样的邪恶. 这也可从主的话明显看出来 (约翰福音 13:12-17; 路加福音 7:37, 38, 44, 46; 约翰福音 11:2; 撒母耳记上 25:41).

谁都能看出, 洗自己不是洁除人的恶与假, 只是洗去附着在人身上的脏东西. 然而, 由于洗礼是教会所规定的仪式之一, 故可知, 它含有某种特定概念, 即属灵的洗礼, 也就是洁除内在附着于人身上的污秽. 因此, 凡教会中知道这些事, 并思想心的洁净, 也就是从属世人中除去我欲和物欲的邪恶, 竭尽全力去实现的人会按照规定奉行作为外在敬拜的洗礼仪式. 但在那些不知道, 也不想知道这些事, 反以为仅洗衣, 洗皮肤, 手和脚这样的仪式就会洁净他们, 并且只要做了这些事, 他们就可以继续过着贪婪, 仇恨, 报复, 无情, 残忍 (所有这些都是属灵的污秽) 的生活之人当中, 举行仪式就是进行偶像崇拜. 尽管如此, 他们仍能通过这种仪式去作代表, 并通过代表去展现教会的某种事物, 从而在主到来之前, 天堂与人类能有某种结合. 然而, 这种结合具有这样的特点: 天堂对教会中人影响很小, 或根本没有任何影响.

犹太人和以色列人是这样: 他们根本不思想内在人, 也不愿了解有关它的任何情况, 因此对关系到死后生命的属天和属灵之物一无所知. 为防止与天堂, 因而与主的一切联系终止, 他们与表示内在事物的外在仪式牢牢绑在一起. 一般来说, 他们的被掳和灾祸都是为了外在仪式因代表的缘故而被严格执行. 正因如此, 摩西要用水洗亚伦和他儿子, 好让他们成圣 (出埃及记 29:4; 40:12; 利未记 8:6). 亚伦和他儿子在进入会幕, 或就近供职的祭坛之前, 要洗水洗脚, 免得死亡; 并且这要作他们永远的定例 (出埃及记 30:18-21; 40:30-31). 穿圣服之前, 亚伦要洗身 (利未记 16:4, 24). 要用除罪水弹在利未人身上, 以洁净他们; 他们要用剃头刀刮全身, 洗衣, 从而洁净自己 (民数记 8:6-7). 凡吃动物尸体, 哪怕是洁净动物, 或被撕裂的尸体之人, 都要用水洗衣洗澡, 若不洗自己洗澡, 他必担当自己的罪孽 (利未记 17:15-16). 凡摸了患漏症人的床, 或坐那人所坐之物的, 凡摸那人身体的, 要用水洗衣洗澡, 并且必不洁净到晚上 (利未记 15:5-7, 10-12等). 那放羊归与阿撒泻勒的人要洗身 (利未记 16:26). 求洁净的麻风病人要洗衣, 剃去毛发, 用水洗澡, 就洁净了 (利未记 14:8, 9). 甚至不洁之人所摸的器皿本身也变得不洁, 要放在水中, 并且必不洁净到晚上 (利未记 11:32). 从所有这些律法可以看出, 没有人通过洗礼的仪式而洁净内在事物, 这种人只是因上述原因而代表灵性上纯洁或洁净的人. 主在马太福音 (15:1-20) 和马可福音 (7:1-23) 非常明确地教导了这一点.

3518. 'Go now to the flock' means to homeborn natural good that has not been joined to the Divine Rational. This is clear from the meaning of 'the flock' as good, dealt with in 343, 415, 1565, here natural good since the words are addressed to Jacob. Indeed homeborn good is meant since it was homebred, whereas the field from which Esau, who means the good of the natural, 3500, 3508, was to obtain his venison, means good that was not homeborn. In other places in the Word 'the flock' is used to refer to the good of the rational; but in such cases 'the herd' is used to refer to the good of the natural, see 2566. homeborn natural good is the good which a person possesses from his parents or is the good that he is born with, which is quite distinct and separate from the good of the natural which flows in from the Lord. What natural good is, and its essential nature, see 3470, 3471. To distinguish one from the other therefore, the first good is called the good of the natural, but the second natural good. What is more, everyone receives homeborn good both from father and from mother; and these are distinct from each other. Good received from the father is interior, that from the mother exterior. In the Lord's case these two forms of good were quite distinct and separate, for the Good which He had from the Father was Divine, whereas that which He had from the mother was polluted with hereditary evil. That Good within the Natural which the Lord had from the Father was His very own since it was His life itself; and this Good is represented by 'Esau'. But the natural good which the Lord possessed from the mother, being polluted with hereditary evil, was by its very nature evil; and it is this good that is meant by the description 'homeborn good'. Yet in spite of being thus polluted, homeborn good was nevertheless of service in the reformation of the natural. But once it had rendered its service it was cast away.

[2] With everyone who is being regenerated something similar takes place. The good which a person receives from the Lord as a new Father is interior, but the good he possesses from parents is exterior. The good which he receives from the Lord is called spiritual good, whereas that which he possesses from parents is called natural good. The latter good - that which he possesses from parents - is of service first of all in the reformation of him, for it is through that good, serving as joy and delight, that facts, and after that cognitions of truth, are brought in. But once it has served as the means to effect that purpose it is separated, and spiritual good comes to the fore and manifests itself. This becomes clear from much experience, merely for example from the fact that when a child first starts to learn he is moved by a desire for knowing, not initially on account of any end in view that is seen by himself but because of some innate joy and delight and because of other incentives. Later on, as he grows up, he is moved by a desire for knowing on account of some end he has in view - excelling others, that is, his rivals. Later still he is so moved on account of some worldly end. But when about to be regenerated his desire for knowing stems from the delight and pleasantness of truth, and when undergoing regeneration, which takes place in adult years, from a love of truth, and later on from a love of good. The ends in view which had existed previously, and their delights, are now separated little by little, to be replaced by interior good which comes from the Lord and manifests itself in his affection. From this it is evident that previous delights, which seemed in outward appearance to be forms of good, have served as means. Consecutive series of means such as these occur unceasingly.

[3] Such series may be compared to a tree, which at the initial stage or the start of spring decks its branches with leaves, and after that as that stage or spring advances it adorns them with blossom. Then, around summertime, it produces the elementary signs of its fruit, which go on to develop into the fruit itself; and at length within the fruit it produces seeds, in which are contained new trees like itself - potentially a whole garden, which becomes a reality if those seeds are planted. Such are the comparisons existing in the natural world. They are also representatives, for the whole natural order is a theatre representative of the Lord's kingdom in heaven, and therefore of the Lord's kingdom on earth, which is the Church, and consequently of the Lord's kingdom with every regenerate person. From all this it is evident how natural or homeborn good, despite being a merely external and indeed worldly delight, may be of service as the means for producing the good of the natural which may join itself to the good of the rational and so become regenerate or spiritual good, that is, good which comes from the Lord. These are the things which are represented and meant in this chapter by Esau and Jacob.