Bible

 

以西結書 16:49

Studie

       

49 看哪,你妹妹所多瑪的罪孽是這樣:他和他的眾女都心驕氣傲,糧食飽足,大享安逸,並沒有扶助困苦和窮乏人的

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

属天的奥秘 # 1857

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

1857. “因为亚摩利人的罪恶到现在还没有满盈” 表不再有任何良善之时的末期. 这从 “亚摩利人” 和 “满盈” 的含义清楚可知. 在圣言中, “亚摩利人” 表总体上的邪恶, 原因在于, 迦南地被被称为 “亚摩利人之地”, 这清楚可见于以西结书 (16:3, 4) 和阿摩司书 (2:9, 10). 因此, “亚摩利人” 在此表迦南地的所有民族, 就象前面说的, 这些民族尤表恶与假. 所以, “亚摩利人” 表总体上的一切邪恶. “满盈” 表不再有任何良善之时的末期.

不过, “亚摩利人的罪恶到现在还没有满盈” 这句话的内义是一个奥秘. 在来世, 恶者的情况是这样: 在其罪恶尚未达到顶点之前, 他们不会受到惩罚. 这既适用于总体的罪恶, 也适用于具体的罪恶. 因为在来世, 一切事物都处于这样的平衡: 邪恶自我惩罚, 也就是说, 只有当罪恶达到顶点时, 恶者才会面临罪恶的惩罚. 每一种罪恶都有自己的极限, 这极限因人而异, 超过这个极限是不可以的. 恶者一旦越过这个极限, 就会面临惩罚. 具体情况就是如此.

总体上也是这样. 恶者不是立刻, 而是逐渐将自己推入地狱. 这源于主所确立的秩序的普遍法则: 主从不将任何人送入地狱, 而是在罪恶满盈, 没有一丝良善出现时, 罪恶本身, 或这个恶人将自己逐渐扔进地狱. 只要尚有一丝良善, 他就会从地狱被提升上来. 不过, 当只有罪恶时, 他就被自己推入地狱. 善与恶必须首先彼此分离, 因为它们是对立面, 人不可以向这两边倾斜. 这就是 “亚摩利人的罪恶到现在还没有满盈” 的含义. 但善者的情形则不然, 他们不断被主提升向天堂, 而他们的罪恶也会逐渐被抹除.

教会的状态也是这样. 只有等到它的罪恶达到完结, 即仁之善和信之真不复存在之时, 处罚才会到来. 先知书经常提及这种完结 (或结局, 终结, 满了, 满盈等). 如以赛亚书:

我从主万军之耶和华那里听见, 已经决定在全地上施行清算, 终结的事. (以赛亚书 28:22)

耶利米书:

巴比伦啊, 你这住在众水之上多有财宝的, 你的结局到了! 你贪婪之量已满盈! (耶利米书 51:13)

但以理书:

为你本国之民和你圣城, 已经定了七十个七, 要终止罪过, 除净罪恶, 赎尽罪孽, 引进永义, 封住异象和预言, 并膏至圣所. (但以理书 9:24)

最终, 那荒凉必临到可憎的飞鸟身上, 直到所定的结局, 它必倾在那行毁坏的身上. (但以理书 9:27)

主自己也在路加福音中以这些话预言了结局:

他们要倒在刀下, 又被掳到各国去. 耶路撒冷最终要被外邦人践踏, 直到外邦人的日期满了. (路加福音 21:24)

“要倒在刀下” 表虚假, 因为在圣言中, “刀” 是指对虚假的惩罚. “耶路撒冷” 表主的国度和教会 (402节), “外邦人” 表邪恶 (1260节). 因此, 这段经文的意思是, 当教会被恶与假所占据, 从而自行毁灭时, “结局” 就到了.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to our friends at swedenborgwork.com for their permission to use this translation on the New Christian Bible Study site. ( 衷心感谢”史威登堡著作中文网”许可我们使用该中文译文)

Ze Swedenborgových děl

 

Arcana Coelestia # 4462

Prostudujte si tuto pasáž

  
/ 10837  
  

4462. 'To give our sister to a man who has a foreskin' means unless they could identify the truth and the good of the Church with representatives and disregard the spiritual entities meant by these. This is clear from the meaning of 'the foreskin' as an external representative - as the sign that they were members of the Church. It was usual therefore to speak of circumcision and the foreskin when they needed to distinguish between those who belonged to the Church and those who did not. For circumcision meant the departure from filthy loves, namely self-love and love of the world, and the acceptance of heavenly loves, which are love to the Lord and love towards the neighbour, and so an acceptance of the Church. This is why these words mean an acceptance of their semblance of religion and that therefore they identified the truth and the good of the Church with representatives, disregarding the internal things meant by these. For otherwise they would not be like them, as the words that follow show, 'Only on this [condition] will we consent to you: If you will be as we are'. As regards 'circumcision' being the sign of purification from filthy loves, see 2039, 2632, and the expression 'uncircumcised' being used of those who were governed by those loves, 2049, 3412, 3413.

[2] Scarcely anyone at the present day knows what circumcision means specifically, and this therefore must be stated. The genital organs in both sexes mean things associated with the joining together of good and truth. They not only mean them but also in actual fact correspond to them. It has been shown at the ends of chapters that all the organs and members in the human being have a correspondence with spiritual things in heaven, including therefore the organs and members devoted to procreation. These correspond to the marriage of good and truth, from which marriage conjugial love also comes down, see 2618, 2727-2729, 2803, 3132, 4434. Because the foreskin covered the genital organ it corresponded in the Most Ancient Church to the obscuration of good and truth, but in the Ancient Church to the defilement of them. With a person who belonged to the Most Ancient Church, because he was an internal man, good and truth were able to be obscured but not defiled, but with one who belonged to the Ancient Church, because he was in comparison with his predecessor an external man, good and truth were able to be defiled since it is external things, that is to say, external loves, that cause defilement. For this reason those who belonged to the Most Ancient Church had no knowledge of circumcision, only those who belonged to the Ancient Church had it.

[3] In addition circumcision spread from this Church to many nations. It was imposed on Abraham and his descendants not as something new but as the revival of a practice which had been abandoned, it becoming for his descendants the sign that they belonged to the Church. But that nation did not know, and did not wish to know, what it was a sign of, for they identified religion with representatives alone, which are externals. They therefore condemned the uncircumcised as a whole, when yet circumcision was to be merely a sign representative of purification from self-love and love of the world, from which those are purified who have been circumcised spiritually and are called circumcised at heart, as in Moses,

Jehovah God will circumcise your heart, and the heart of your seed, so that you will love Jehovah your God with all your heart and with all your soul. Deuteronomy 30:6.

In the same author,

You shall circumcise the foreskin of your heart, and you shall be stiff-necked no longer. Deuteronomy 10:16, 18.

And in Jeremiah,

Break up your fallow ground, and remove the foreskin of your heart. Jeremiah 4:3-4.

[4] People however who are governed by self-love and love of the world are called 'uncircumcised', in spite of their having been circumcised, as in Jeremiah,

Behold, the days are coming in which I will visit every one circumcised in the foreskin - Egypt, and Judah, and Edom, and the children of Ammon, and Moab, and all that have the corners [of their hair] cut and who dwell in the wilderness, for all these nations are uncircumcised, and all the house of Israel is uncircumcised in heart. Jeremiah 9:25-26.

From this it is also evident that many other nations were circumcised, for it is said 'I will visit every one circumcised in the foreskin', and so, as stated above, that circumcision was not something new, nor was it confined to the descendants of Jacob as a distinguishing feature. The Philistines were not circumcised, and therefore 'the uncircumcised' is generally used to mean the Philistines, 1 Samuel 14:6; 17:26, 36; 31:4; 2 Samuel 1:20; and elsewhere.

  
/ 10837  
  

Thanks to the Swedenborg Society for the permission to use this translation.